Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 52:23:34 |
Calls: | 583 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
176 files (26,758K bytes) |
Messages: | 111,542 |
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns: legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to percolate up through the
system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-for- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns: legal
expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, 'I
hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns. We're
collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and we interpret >> the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, we're only talking >> about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, >> your AR-15 is now going to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go to a >> district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now what does
this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney general or Solicitor >> General John Sauer said, for these cases to percolate up through the
system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-for-
the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says,
'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.
We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and
we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well,
we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the
National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by
our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go
to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now
what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney
general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to
percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-f
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:f
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says,
'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.
We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and
we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well,
we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the
National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by
our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go
to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now
what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney
general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to
percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds and
blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@ 0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted somef
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says,
'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.
We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and
we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well,
we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the
National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by
our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go
to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now
what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney
general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to
percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds and
blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid? First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take the
guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams, with masks,
... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters. You've yapped decades about
guns being defense against fascism, yet you stare it right in the face
and do nothing.
Baxter wrote:
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@
0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted somef
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says, >>>>> 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.
We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and
we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well, >>>>> we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the
National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by >>>>> our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go >>>>> to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now >>>>> what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney
general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to
percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there!-a Despite other philosophical differences, reds and
blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid?-a First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take the
guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams, with masks,
... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters.-a You've yapped decades about
guns being defense against fascism, yet you stare it right in the face
and do nothing.
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example, says,
'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the guns.
We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to house, and
we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is saying, well,
we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I don't know, the
National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going to be collected by
our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately go
to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so now
what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the attorney
general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these cases to
percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door-f
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds and
blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
Baxter wrote:
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@ 0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted somef
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab
guns: legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example,
says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the
guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to
house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is
saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I
don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going
to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately
go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and
so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the
attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these
cases to percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-doo
r-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds
and blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid? First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take
the guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams,
with masks, ... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters. You've
yapped decades about guns being defense against fascism, yet you
stare it right in the face and do nothing.
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
Anonymous wrote:
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
Unwashed subhumans.
Mexicans are pro-cockroach. Sympathy for the Devil etc.
"Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> wrote in news:mdomjlFhr21U1@mid.individual.net:
Anonymous wrote:
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
Unwashed subhumans.
Mexicans are pro-cockroach. Sympathy for the Devil etc.
you two go crawl back into the sewer.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:105777f$i9t$1@news.tcpreset.net:
Baxter wrote:
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@ 0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted somef
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab
guns: legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example,
says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the >>>>>> guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to
house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is
saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I
don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going >>>>>> to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately >>>>>> go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and
so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the
attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these
cases to percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-doo >>>>>> r-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds
and blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid? First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take
the guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams,
with masks, ... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters. You've
yapped decades about guns being defense against fascism, yet you
stare it right in the face and do nothing.
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
So you have zero understanding of the word "tyranny"!!! And you see
anyone a little different from your own glorious self as "subhuman"!!
You're just a POS.
Baxter wrote:to
"Lane \"Stonehowler\" Waldby" <wichitajayhawks@msn.com> wrote in
news:mdomjlFhr21U1@mid.individual.net:
Anonymous wrote:
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans
weird.I'm not joking. The Mexican expressed his sorrow that I had eradicateduse against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
Unwashed subhumans.
Mexicans are pro-cockroach. Sympathy for the Devil etc.
you two go crawl back into the sewer.
my cockroach menace. To me, cockroaches are nithings. To him,
cockroaches are mosquitoes or spiders. I've seen girls under the
Spanish influence wince when I reach out and smash one. It's just
Baxter wrote:@news.tcpreset.net:
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:105777f$i9t$1
the
Baxter wrote:
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@ 0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab
guns: legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example,
says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all
goingguns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to
house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is >>>>>>> saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I >>>>>>> don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now
immediatelyto be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would
doogo to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and >>>>>>> so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the
attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these >>>>>>> cases to percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-
ocid=EMMXfr-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?
If what he says is true, it sounds tyrannical to me. You have ultimate exaggeration of the word "zero", Baxteria.
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds
and blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid? First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take
the guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams,
with masks, ... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters. You've
yapped decades about guns being defense against fascism, yet you
stare it right in the face and do nothing.
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
So you have zero understanding of the word "tyranny"!!! And you see
anyone a little different from your own glorious self as "subhuman"!!
You're just a POS.
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@0.0.0.1...
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted some
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab guns:
legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example,
says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the
guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to
house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is
saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I
don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going
to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately
go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and so
now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the
attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these
cases to percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-door
-f or-
the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds
and blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
Just remember every fall on a specific day, the largest armed force
ever seen by the world descends on the woods of America.. they are the American deer hunter.
Anonymous <anon@anon.net> wrote in news:105777f$i9t$1@news.tcpreset.net:You've demonstrated that you have zero understanding of ANYTHING.
Baxter wrote:
"P. Coonan" <nospam@ix.netcom.com> wrote in
news:XnsB31DA51FEDB4A002CE8@ 0.0.0.1:
On 07 Jul 2025, a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> posted somef
news:bZXaQ.182822$W5Jb.120947@fx09.iad:
On 7/6/25 08:43, Baxter wrote:
Supreme Court just opened the door for the government to grab
guns: legal expert>
"What if the next president, a Democrat president, for example,
says, 'I hereby issue an executive order: we're collecting all the >>>>>> guns. We're collecting them all tomorrow, we're going house to
house, and we interpret the Constitution. The Second Amendment is
saying, well, we're only talking about militia. And that's, oh, I
don't know, the National Guard. Therefore, your AR-15 is now going >>>>>> to be collected by our authorities.'"
"Imagine the same thing," he suggested. "Someone would immediately >>>>>> go to a district court to challenge that as unconstitutional and
so now what does this mean that we now need to wait for as the
attorney general or Solicitor General John Sauer said, for these
cases to percolate up through the system?"
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/supreme-court-just-opened-the-doo >>>>>> r-
or- the-government-to-grab-guns-legal-expert/ar-AA1HytUf?ocid=EMMX
Baxter is so ignorant and delusional.
At worst, they might get to about 10 houses, in Blue states,
before they were stopped in their tracks and had to accept
reality.
In agreement there! Despite other philosophical differences, reds
and blues tend to agree on the right to bear arms.
You think they're stupid? First they'll enlist YOU jerkwads to take
the guns of the violent criminals. They'll send you out in teams,
with masks, ... oh! just like those ICE bounty hunters. You've
yapped decades about guns being defense against fascism, yet you
stare it right in the face and do nothing.
They said "tyrannical government". Importing millions of subhumans to
use against Heritage Americans sure sounds tyrannical to me.
So you have zero understanding of the word "tyranny"!!!