• **2025 Pool** Race 18, Singapore GP - Final Results

    From Mark@mpconmy@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 9 10:16:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1


    The top 5 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 214
    1 Mark Jackson 214
    3 durian 212
    4 JohnM 210
    4 Sir Tim 210

    The people who scored points are:

    10 EB5AGV 14
    1 Hornplayer9599 12
    18 Mark 12
    14 Martin Harran 12
    16 ceg 10
    12 Hugh 10
    17 mairsz 10
    8 Phil Carmody 10
    6 a425couple 8
    3 durian 8
    6 Eric 8
    4 JohnM 8
    12 Yazoo 8
    22 Carl Keehn 6
    10 Darryl Johnson 6
    1 Mark Jackson 6
    4 Sir Tim 6
    18 Sreekumar A 6
    23 User8270 6
    9 Alan Baker 4
    21 Ar 4
    14 scole 4
    20 Shaun 4

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    ;-)

    Mark

    The overall table looks like:

    1 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190
    2 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208
    3 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 198
    4 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 202
    5 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    7 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200
    8 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154
    9 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168
    10 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210
    11 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198
    12 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 214
    13 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 178
    14 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200
    15 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 130
    16 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186
    17 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214
    18 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 210
    19 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 206
    20 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194
    21 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 190
    22 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202
    23 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 212
    24 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 204
    25 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 196

    Ordered by points:

    1 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 214
    1 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214
    3 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 212
    4 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 210
    4 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210
    6 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    8 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 206
    9 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 204
    10 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 202
    10 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202
    12 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200
    12 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200
    14 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 198
    14 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198
    16 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 196
    17 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194
    18 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190
    18 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 190
    20 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186
    21 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 178
    22 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168
    23 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154
    24 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 130
    25 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    DUPLICATOR RANKER1 RANKER2 RESULTS
    1. BAH HAM VER HAM NOR
    HAM VER LEC HAM RIC VET HAM RIC VET NOR VER RUS
    8 8 15/20 0 0 18/20 0 0 18/20
    2. EMI NOR VER VER PIA
    NOR VER RUS VER STR HUL VER STR HUL PIA NOR RUS
    12 20 17/20 0 0 19/20 0 0 19/20
    3. POR PIA VER VER VER
    PIA NOR RUS VER OCO STR VER OCO STR VER NOR PIA
    10 30 17/20 2 2 19/20 2 2 19/20
    4. SPA VER VER VER PIA
    VER NOR PIA VER OCO STR VER OCO STR PIA RUS NOR
    6 36 18/20 0 2 19/20 0 2 19/20
    5. MON PIA VER VER VER
    PIA RUS NOR VER HAM OCO VER HAM OCO PIA VER LEC
    10 46 17/20 8 10 19/20 8 10 19/20
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 9 18:06:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:
    Ahhh, errrrr

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    Efye >
    Mark

    I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,
    But bearing in mind
    #1 https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073

    and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly
    correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,

    But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points
    after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed
    new total of 208 seems inconsistent.

    Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"?


    The top 5 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 214
    1 Mark Jackson 214
    3 durian 212
    4 JohnM 210
    4 Sir Tim 210

    The people who scored points are:

    10 EB5AGV 14
    1 Hornplayer9599 12
    18 Mark 12
    14 Martin Harran 12
    16 ceg 10
    12 Hugh 10
    17 mairsz 10
    8 Phil Carmody 10
    6 a425couple 8
    3 durian 8
    6 Eric 8
    4 JohnM 8
    12 Yazoo 8
    22 Carl Keehn 6
    10 Darryl Johnson 6
    1 Mark Jackson 6
    4 Sir Tim 6
    18 Sreekumar A 6
    23 User8270 6
    9 Alan Baker 4
    21 Ar 4
    14 scole 4
    20 Shaun 4

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    ;-)

    Mark

    The overall table looks like:

    1 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190
    2 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208
    3 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 198
    4 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 202
    5 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    7 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200
    8 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154
    9 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168 10 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210 11 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198 12 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 214 13 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 178 14 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200 15 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 130 16 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186 17 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214 18 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 210 19 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 206 20 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194 21 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 190 22 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202 23 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 212 24 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 204 25 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 196

    Ordered by points:

    1 Hornplayer9599 10 8 8 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 214
    1 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214
    3 durian 20 8 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 212
    4 JohnM 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 210
    4 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210
    6 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    8 Phil Carmody 14 12 10 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 206
    9 Alan Baker 10 20 10 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 204 10 Darryl Johnson 10 8 10 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 202 10 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202 12 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200 12 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200 14 Martin Harran 14 12 6 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 198 14 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198 16 ceg 14 8 10 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 196 17 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194 18 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190 18 Sreekumar A 12 8 12 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 190 20 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186 21 Ar 6 10 6 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 178 22 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168 23 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154 24 D Munz 10 14 6 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 130 25 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    DUPLICATOR RANKER1 RANKER2 RESULTS
    1. BAH HAM VER HAM NOR
    HAM VER LEC HAM RIC VET HAM RIC VET NOR VER RUS
    8 8 15/20 0 0 18/20 0 0 18/20
    2. EMI NOR VER VER PIA
    NOR VER RUS VER STR HUL VER STR HUL PIA NOR RUS
    12 20 17/20 0 0 19/20 0 0 19/20
    3. POR PIA VER VER VER
    PIA NOR RUS VER OCO STR VER OCO STR VER NOR PIA
    10 30 17/20 2 2 19/20 2 2 19/20
    4. SPA VER VER VER PIA
    VER NOR PIA VER OCO STR VER OCO STR PIA RUS NOR
    6 36 18/20 0 2 19/20 0 2 19/20
    5. MON PIA VER VER VER
    PIA RUS NOR VER HAM OCO VER HAM OCO PIA VER LEC
    10 46 17/20 8 10 19/20 8 10 19/20

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Jackson@mjackson@alumni.caltech.edu to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Fri Oct 10 07:09:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 10/9/2025 9:06 PM, a425couple wrote:
    I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly
    correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    If my notes are correct:

    Pole: 2

    Predicted: 1 2 3
    Actual:
    1 10 6 2
    2 6 8 4
    3 2 4 6
    --
    Mark Jackson - https://mark-jackson.online/
    Against the assault of laughter nothing can stand.
    - Mark Twain
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@mpconmy@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 15 10:45:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:
    Ahhh, errrrr

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    Efye >
    Mark

    I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,
    But bearing in mind
    #1 https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073

    I have no idea what this is about. Am I missing something?

    and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,

    But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points
    after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed
    new total of 208 seems inconsistent.

    Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"?

    Right...I'm back from my holidays so here goes.

    I didn't notice anything, but it's all (pretty much) automated so unless someone challenges it, I don't go back and recompute.

    I have _no_ idea what went wrong here. I've just rerun the script and
    there are a number of numbers that didn't match up including yours. Is
    this any better?

    The top 6 are currently:

    1 Hornplayer9599 220
    2 durian 214
    2 Mark Jackson 214
    4 JohnM 212
    5 a425couple 210
    5 Sir Tim 210

    The people who scored points are:

    12 EB5AGV 14
    1 Hornplayer9599 12
    19 Mark 12
    10 Martin Harran 12
    15 ceg 10
    13 Hugh 10
    18 mairsz 10
    7 Phil Carmody 10
    5 a425couple 8
    2 durian 8
    7 Eric 8
    4 JohnM 8
    13 Yazoo 8
    22 Carl Keehn 6
    10 Darryl Johnson 6
    2 Mark Jackson 6
    5 Sir Tim 6
    17 Sreekumar A 6
    23 User8270 6
    9 Alan Baker 4
    21 Ar 4
    15 scole 4
    20 Shaun 4

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    ;-)

    Mark

    The overall table looks like:

    1 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190
    2 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 210
    3 Martin Harran 14 12 12 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 204
    4 Darryl Johnson 10 8 12 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 204
    5 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    6 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    7 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200
    8 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154
    9 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168
    10 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210
    11 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198
    12 Hornplayer9599 10 8 14 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 220
    13 Ar 6 10 8 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 180
    14 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200
    15 D Munz 10 14 16 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 140
    16 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186
    17 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214
    18 JohnM 16 12 12 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 212
    19 Phil Carmody 14 12 12 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 208
    20 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194
    21 Sreekumar A 12 8 18 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 196
    22 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202
    23 durian 20 8 12 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 214
    24 Alan Baker 10 20 12 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 206
    25 ceg 14 8 12 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 198

    Ordered by points:

    1 Hornplayer9599 10 8 14 18 10 20 18 6 20 4
    8 18 18 8 10 12 6 12 220
    2 durian 20 8 12 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    6 18 18 12 14 10 8 8 214
    2 Mark Jackson 18 12 10 12 10 24 10 8 18 2
    8 12 18 12 12 10 12 6 214
    4 JohnM 16 12 12 8 10 18 12 8 20 4
    8 18 18 12 14 12 2 8 212
    5 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 210
    5 Sir Tim 16 12 10 8 10 18 12 8 12 0
    6 18 26 12 16 10 10 6 210
    7 Eric 8 18 10 10 16 12 10 4 14 8
    10 18 24 18 6 10 4 8 208
    7 Phil Carmody 14 12 12 6 6 18 12 6 16 2
    10 18 24 12 12 12 6 10 208
    9 Alan Baker 10 20 12 4 6 18 12 10 20 2
    20 18 10 18 10 12 0 4 206
    10 Darryl Johnson 10 8 12 6 18 14 16 8 14 6
    12 8 12 10 12 20 12 6 204
    10 Martin Harran 14 12 12 6 10 14 12 4 10 4
    6 18 20 12 14 12 12 12 204
    12 EB5AGV 20 12 10 4 10 14 14 6 12 2
    6 18 14 24 10 10 2 14 202
    13 Hugh 12 6 10 12 10 18 14 6 12 2
    6 18 18 18 14 12 2 10 200
    13 Yazoo 12 20 10 12 6 18 10 6 20 4
    4 12 18 12 14 12 2 8 200
    15 ceg 14 8 12 8 10 12 14 16 12 4
    10 18 10 14 12 12 2 10 198
    15 scole 12 12 10 4 16 16 10 6 20 4
    6 18 18 18 12 12 0 4 198
    17 Sreekumar A 12 8 18 4 10 16 14 6 12 2
    6 18 20 18 14 10 2 6 196
    18 mairsz 12 12 10 16 6 18 12 6 18 2
    6 18 6 12 16 12 2 10 194
    19 Mark 10 12 10 6 18 10 14 6 10 4
    8 18 18 8 12 12 2 12 190
    20 Shaun 0 0 10 12 6 18 10 16 12 2
    20 18 14 24 6 10 4 4 186
    21 Ar 6 10 8 6 14 18 12 14 14 6
    16 6 10 10 8 18 0 4 180
    22 Carl Keehn 6 8 10 0 6 12 12 6 20 0
    14 6 20 18 14 10 0 6 168
    23 User8270 10 4 10 6 14 12 10 4 10 8
    10 6 14 12 10 4 4 6 154
    24 D Munz 10 14 16 12 4 12 6 6 4 8
    8 6 2 12 12 6 2 0 140
    25 Geoff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

    DUPLICATOR RANKER1 RANKER2 RESULTS
    1. BAH HAM VER HAM NOR
    HAM VER LEC HAM RIC VET HAM RIC VET NOR VER RUS
    8 8 15/20 0 0 18/20 0 0 18/20
    2. EMI NOR VER VER PIA
    NOR VER RUS VER STR HUL VER STR HUL PIA NOR RUS
    12 20 17/20 0 0 19/20 0 0 19/20
    3. POR PIA VER VER VER
    PIA NOR RUS VER OCO STR VER OCO STR VER NOR PIA
    10 30 17/20 2 2 19/20 2 2 19/20
    4. SPA VER VER VER PIA
    VER NOR PIA VER OCO STR VER OCO STR PIA RUS NOR
    6 36 18/20 0 2 19/20 0 2 19/20
    5. MON PIA VER VER VER
    PIA RUS NOR VER HAM OCO VER HAM OCO PIA VER LEC
    10 46 17/20 8 10 19/20 8 10 19/20
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 15 08:26:26 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 10/15/25 03:45, Mark wrote:
    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:
    Ahhh, errrrr

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    Efye >
    Mark

    I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,
    But bearing in mind
    #1
    https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073

    I have no idea what this is about. Am I missing something?

    and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly
    correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,

    But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points
    after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed
    new total of 208 seems inconsistent.

    Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"?

    Right...I'm back from my holidays so here goes.

    I didn't notice anything, but it's all (pretty much) automated so unless someone challenges it, I don't go back and recompute.

    I have _no_ idea what went wrong here. I've just rerun the script and
    there are a number of numbers that didn't match up including yours. Is
    this any better?

    Yes. "Some math I saw,,, did not math!"
    (totals did not add up correctly)
    (202 plus 8 does not equal 208!)
    So yes, this is better.

    I hope you had a great vacation.
    I truly hope my post did not add stress or distraction.

    Thank you very much for your work on this that helps
    add a considerable amount of interest for us.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark@mpconmy@gmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Wed Oct 15 16:51:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/15/25 03:45, Mark wrote:
    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:
    Ahhh, errrrr

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    Efye >
    Mark

    I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,
    But bearing in mind
    #1
    https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073

    I have no idea what this is about. Am I missing something?

    and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly
    correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,

    But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points
    after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed
    new total of 208 seems inconsistent.

    Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"?

    Right...I'm back from my holidays so here goes.

    I didn't notice anything, but it's all (pretty much) automated so unless
    someone challenges it, I don't go back and recompute.

    I have _no_ idea what went wrong here. I've just rerun the script and
    there are a number of numbers that didn't match up including yours. Is
    this any better?

    Yes. "Some math I saw,,, did not math!"
    (totals did not add up correctly)
    (202 plus 8 does not equal 208!)
    So yes, this is better.

    I can't tell you _what_ happened - or why it happened - but I can tell
    you what the impact was.

    Something affected the results for race 3. It's like the system got
    confused about the results for just that one race. I could probably work
    out which results were different...but I can't see an issue with the
    table, and the results page is autogenerated from a scrape of the web.

    This is where it gets *weird*. It doesn't just affect you, and it has
    happened before to those affected just for race 3. No-one has noticed. Appended, though, are your results since race 3...and you can see race 3 sometimes loses 2 points for no obvious reason. Everything else is
    right.

    This is going to irritate me until I can explain it...

    I hope you had a great vacation.
    I truly hope my post did not add stress or distraction.

    Thank you very much for your work on this that helps
    add a considerable amount of interest for us.

    Not a problem...other than finding a bug!

    3 a425couple 16 12 12
    40
    4 a425couple 16 12 10 8
    46
    5 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6
    54
    6 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18
    70
    7 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12
    84
    8 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8
    90
    9 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20
    110
    10 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    116
    11 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 128
    12 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 140
    13 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 158
    14 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 174
    15 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 188
    16 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 198
    17 a425couple 16 12 12 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 202
    18 a425couple 16 12 10 8 6 18 12 8 20 4
    12 12 18 18 12 10 4 8 208
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From a425couple@a425couple@hotmail.com to rec.autos.sport.f1 on Thu Oct 16 08:05:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.autos.sport.f1

    On 10/15/25 09:51, Mark wrote:
    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/15/25 03:45, Mark wrote:
    a425couple <a425couple@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 10/9/25 03:16, Mark wrote:
    Ahhh, errrrr

    Let me know about the inevitable mistakes!
    Efye >
    Mark

    I hate to disrupt a perfect situation,,,, ahhh, err,
    But bearing in mind
    #1
    https://replica.seattletimes.com/html5/reader/production/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=84d463e0-c035-4c49-902d-95c722bfe073

    I have no idea what this is about. Am I missing something?

    and #2, I think I understand the scoring if the 4 picks are perfectly >>>> correct, But I am really murky on the 'near miss' points.

    I did something unusual for me and looked back at prior numbers,,,,

    But, still, it seems that if it is correct, that I had 202 points
    after Azer, and if I scored 8 at Sing, then the listed
    new total of 208 seems inconsistent.

    Or, is that the whole purpose of "Super secret double blind probation"? >>>
    Right...I'm back from my holidays so here goes.

    I didn't notice anything, but it's all (pretty much) automated so unless >>> someone challenges it, I don't go back and recompute.

    I have _no_ idea what went wrong here. I've just rerun the script and
    there are a number of numbers that didn't match up including yours. Is
    this any better?

    Yes. "Some math I saw,,, did not math!"
    (totals did not add up correctly)
    (202 plus 8 does not equal 208!)
    So yes, this is better.

    I can't tell you _what_ happened - or why it happened - but I can tell
    you what the impact was.

    Something affected the results for race 3. It's like the system got
    confused about the results for just that one race. I could probably work
    out which results were different...but I can't see an issue with the
    table, and the results page is autogenerated from a scrape of the web.

    This is where it gets *weird*. It doesn't just affect you, and it has happened before to those affected just for race 3. No-one has noticed. Appended, though, are your results since race 3...and you can see race 3 sometimes loses 2 points for no obvious reason. Everything else is
    right.

    This is going to irritate me until I can explain it...

    I hope you had a great vacation.
    I truly hope my post did not add stress or distraction.

    Thank you very much for your work on this that helps
    add a considerable amount of interest for us.

    Not a problem...other than finding a bug!


    Bummer!
    So, it kind'a looks like a ghost mystery computer bug has the
    prankster alter-ego of Gerhard Berger and will randomly
    reduce the count by 2, pause a couple of beats, then re-add
    those 2 back in, pause a bit longer, then subtract 2 again.
    Yeah, quite the bug.
    Good luck.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2