Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >convenient.
Mon, 23 Feb 2026 11:40:58 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
Probably want to do their best to get rid of early voting because a
certain powerful politician does not like it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>convenient.
I don't think that will happen until after they start losing elections >because of it. Until that happens nothing will change.
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more convenient.
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more convenient.
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more convenient.
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not thatBut they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in
person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
Feb 23, 2026 at 8:18:27 AM PST, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>>of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>convenient.
But they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will
actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in
person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
And the Democrats don't?
California just disenfranchised 40% of the electorate by gerrymandering them >out of existence.
Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in >California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into >Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting >fucking ridiculous.
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more convenient.
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting fucking ridiculous.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Feb 23, 2026 at 8:18:27 AM PST, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>>concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>>office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>>>of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>>that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>>voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>>Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>>using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>>county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>>are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>>own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>>convenient.
But they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will >>>actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in >>>person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
And the Democrats don't?
California just disenfranchised 40% of the electorate by gerrymandering them >>out of existence.
Were you going to comment on "in reaction to Trump ordering Texas to do
it" or simply ignore that this bad idea is entirely the fault of
Republicans, esecially John Roberts? Republicans gave Democrats cover to
go with their worst instincts. It's a bad day in America; John Roberts
made it so.
If the two pro gerrymandering decisions are ever to be reveresed, does
the Equal Protection clause provide any hope of protecting minorities,
in this case, voters who don't want to be represented by assholes?
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in >California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into >Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting >fucking ridiculous.
On Mon, 23 Feb 2026 20:09:53 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
Feb 23, 2026 at 8:18:27 AM PST, suzeeq <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>>> convenient.
But they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will
actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in
person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
And the Democrats don't?
California just disenfranchised 40% of the electorate by gerrymandering them
out of existence.
Were you going to comment on "in reaction to Trump ordering Texas to do
it" or simply ignore that this bad idea is entirely the fault of
Republicans, esecially John Roberts? Republicans gave Democrats cover to
go with their worst instincts. It's a bad day in America; John Roberts
made it so.
Agreed. California would never have done what they did without Texas
making the first move and Texas would never had done what it did
without Trump and the Supreme Court giving them cover to do so.
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in
California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into >> Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting >> fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting?
On Feb 23, 2026 at 12:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >>>> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in
California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into >>> Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting >>> fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting?
Well, for one thing, if you vote in September, a whole lot of shit can happen around the world between then and November which could/would influence your vote. If you've already voted for a candidate and you find out afterward that she's actually guilty of a homicide, you can't that vote back.
On Feb 23, 2026 at 12:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>> convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in >>> California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into
Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting
fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting?
Well, for one thing, if you vote in September, a whole lot of shit can happen around the world between then and November which could/would influence your vote. If you've already voted for a candidate and you find out afterward that she's actually guilty of a homicide, you can't [take] that vote back.
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful >> of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting fucking ridiculous.
On Feb 23, 2026 at 12:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>> convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in >>> California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into
Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's getting
fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting?
Well, for one thing, if you vote in September, a whole lot of shit can happen around the world between then and November which could/would influence your vote. If you've already voted for a candidate and you find out afterward that she's actually guilty of a homicide, you can't that vote back.
On 2/23/2026 5:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 12:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Well, for one thing, if you vote in September, a whole lot of shit can
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> >>>> wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>>> convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in >>>> California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into
Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's >>>> getting
fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting? >>
happen
around the world between then and November which could/would influence your >> vote. If you've already voted for a candidate and you find out afterward
that
she's actually guilty of a homicide, you can't [take] that vote back.
But that'd be your choice, i.e., to forgo your chance to waffle.
Thinking further on it, an election with a running tally of votes cast
so far sounds potentially interesting...
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:26:37 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 5:42 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 12:43:15 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 1:50 PM, BTR1701 wrote:Well, for one thing, if you vote in September, a whole lot of shit can >>> happen
On Feb 23, 2026 at 3:40:58 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each
county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there
are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
If we're making early voting extend outward 40 days before and now (in
California) 20 days after Election Day, we've now turned Election Day into
Election Quarter. Fully 25% of the year is now "Election Day". It's >>>>> getting
fucking ridiculous.
Rhetorical question: What's the inherent virtue of synchronized voting? >>>
around the world between then and November which could/would influence your
vote. If you've already voted for a candidate and you find out afterward >>> that
she's actually guilty of a homicide, you can't [take] that vote back.
But that'd be your choice, i.e., to forgo your chance to waffle.
Thinking further on it, an election with a running tally of votes cast
so far sounds potentially interesting...
So why don't we just have continuous elections? As soon as a new president is sworn in, the next election starts and runs until November 7 four years later?
On Feb 23, 2026 at 8:18:27 AM PST, "suzeeq" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not that >>> concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the postBut they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will
office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew
that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of >>> voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily
Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters
using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their >>> own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more
convenient.
actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in
person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
And the Democrats don't?
California just disenfranchised 40% of the electorate by gerrymandering them out of existence.
On 2/23/2026 10:52 AM, BTR1701 wrote:
On Feb 23, 2026 at 8:18:27 AM PST, "suzeeq" <suzeeq@imbris.com> wrote:Texas Rs tried it first, under Trump's wishes.
On 2/23/2026 3:40 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Today's rant is about in person early voting. March 17 primary. Not thatBut they're trying to make it harder to vote so less people will
concerned as two years ago, I already voted by mail, giving the post >>>> office enough time.
Indiana just cut early voting in half. It is a Republican state. A handful
of Republican legislators were familiar with the statistics and knew >>>> that this is popular with their own voter and in a few counties, half of
voters vote early. But the idiot Republican legislators in a heavily >>>> Republican state still want to eliminate it despite their own voters >>>> using it and liking it.
My state has 40 days since COVID. However, it is not full time and each >>>> county sets its own hours with 1 location. For the last 15 days, there >>>> are an expanded number of locations and weekend hours.
Some day, Republicans will come to understand they are pissing off their
own voters with their false claims and fears about making voting more >>>> convenient.
actually vote. And they believe only the Rs will acutally vote in
person, ensuring that they'll get to stay in office.
And the Democrats don't?
California just disenfranchised 40% of the electorate by gerrymandering them
out of existence.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:29:32 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (21,017K bytes) |
| Messages: | 194,231 |