• Jim Snow 2.0!

    From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 20:27:04 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of yourself. You
    need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population from even being able to shovel snow for him.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 15:45:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-02-22 3:27 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be able to participate because they're
    too thick to figure out how to get ID, so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population from even being able to shovel snow for him.


    What is the city's liability if a volunteer gets hurt or killed
    shovelling, say from a heart attack or mugging?

    Also, how is the union reacting to their employees being deprived of
    extra hours? I'll bet they're NOT happy!

    FWIW, I once spoke to a woman who grew up in a small European village
    where they didn't get much snow and there were no snow plows. On at
    least one occasion, the village had a significant snow fall and the
    whole village turned out with shovels to clear the main drag. Of course
    that would have been back in 1930s; perhaps the same happened here in
    small towns that didn't normally get snow.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From danny burstein@dannyb@panix.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 21:30:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    In <10nfoqo$2dsin$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes:

    [snip]
    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department >specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >yourself because they ran out of money.

    umm, you might try some magnesium. It's often a good treatment
    for kneejerks.

    a: these are NOT "volunteers" [1] but are paid positions to
    help augment in areas such as sidewalk curb cuts and bus stops.
    Oh, and fire hydrants.

    b: this has been a standard NYC deal for years. More likely decades.

    (that whole ID required deal is another story, all togerher, Shirley)

    [1] well, yes, he's also put out the standard request
    that people look out for and clear the hydrants, etc., just
    like they ask for help clearing leaves off storm sewer drains
    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From danny burstein@dannyb@panix.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 21:37:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    In <10nfpss$2be1i$1@dont-email.me> Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> writes:

    Also, how is the union reacting to their employees being deprived of
    extra hours? I'll bet they're NOT happy!

    actually, in this case they're quite happy. Doing 18 hours/day for
    three or four days is pretty much the limit...

    FWIW, I once spoke to a woman who grew up in a small European village
    where they didn't get much snow and there were no snow plows. On at
    acleast one occasion, the village had a significant snow fall and the
    whole village turned out with shovels to clear the main drag. Of course
    that would have been back in 1930s; perhaps the same happened here in
    small towns that didn't normally get snow.

    I forget which city it was in New Mexico but I remember
    Gov Bill Richardson (D, 2003-2011) describing how that
    area had just one dedicated snow plow vehicle which was
    at the airport due to FAA regulations..

    (I'd love to see a solid biogrphy of him. He seemed to
    show up at plenty of international critical events, includinf
    hostage negotiaions. From my limited point of view he seemed
    to be pretty impressive, but friends of mine from New Mexico
    curse him out. Oh, and Univ of New Mexico just now removed
    his name from its hospital building 'cuz Epstein connections...)
    --
    _____________________________________________________
    Knowledge may be power, but communications is the key
    dannyb@panix.com
    [to foil spammers, my address has been double rot-13 encoded]
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 22:05:48 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 1:30:26 PM PST, "danny burstein" <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:

    In <10nfoqo$2dsin$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes:

    [snip]
    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm
    clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it
    yourself because they ran out of money.

    umm, you might try some magnesium. It's often a good treatment
    for kneejerks.

    a: these are NOT "volunteers" [1] but are paid positions to
    help augment in areas such as sidewalk curb cuts and bus stops.
    Oh, and fire hydrants.

    b: this has been a standard NYC deal for years. More likely decades.

    The fact that it's been going on a long time isn't the flex you think it is. People in NYC pay some of the highest taxes in the nation and one of the
    things they're supposed to get for all that state-sanctioned robbery is an efficient snow-removal department. Asking the citizens who have already *paid* for snow removal to do it themselves, either as volunteers or temporary employees, would be fucked up even if this was the first time it happened. For it to have been going on for years just makes it all the more appalling.

    Here's an idea: instead of spending billions of tax dollars on illegal aliens and vagrants, how about fully fund the sanitation department (or whatever department snow removal falls under)?

    This is also happening in L.A., except it's trash rather than snow. We have an entire Bureau of Sanitation that has more than 3000 employees, yet the city looks like a giant trash heap. Of course, the city is in a budget crisis, having spent literally billions on the homeless (only for homelessness to increase) and giving illegal aliens free hotel rooms, meals, health care, and debit cards full of taxpayer money, so the city council has all but completely defunded the Bureau of Sanitation (along with the fire department, police department, and a bunch of other city departments) to pay for all that. As a result, trash now blows through the streets like tumbleweeds in Tombstone. And it doesn't help that we have 80,000 vagrants who are continually making more
    of it and throwing it into the street.

    So what does Mayor Karen Bass do (who I wouldn't trust to manage a Starbucks, let alone the nation's second largest city)? She goes on TV and announces a
    new citizen initiative where we're supposed to organize trash collecting
    groups in our neighborhoods and go out and pick up the trash ourselves. Yes, a service we've already paid for with the highest taxes in the nation, now we're supposed to do it ourselves-- and *keep* paying those taxes at the same time.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 22:17:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems >for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department >specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of >yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed
    that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID,
    so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population
    from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific
    government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved
    with voter ID.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 22:22:10 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems >> for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm
    clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it
    yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed
    that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, >> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population
    from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved
    with voter ID.

    Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide your driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be cross-checked before the ballot is counted.

    A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely to also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill them out under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 17:38:37 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-02-22 5:05 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Feb 22, 2026 at 1:30:26 PM PST, "danny burstein" <dannyb@panix.com> wrote:

    In <10nfoqo$2dsin$1@dont-email.me> BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> writes:

    [snip]
    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >>> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >>> yourself because they ran out of money.

    umm, you might try some magnesium. It's often a good treatment
    for kneejerks.

    a: these are NOT "volunteers" [1] but are paid positions to
    help augment in areas such as sidewalk curb cuts and bus stops.
    Oh, and fire hydrants.

    b: this has been a standard NYC deal for years. More likely decades.

    The fact that it's been going on a long time isn't the flex you think it is. People in NYC pay some of the highest taxes in the nation and one of the things they're supposed to get for all that state-sanctioned robbery is an efficient snow-removal department. Asking the citizens who have already *paid*
    for snow removal to do it themselves, either as volunteers or temporary employees, would be fucked up even if this was the first time it happened. For
    it to have been going on for years just makes it all the more appalling.

    Here's an idea: instead of spending billions of tax dollars on illegal aliens and vagrants, how about fully fund the sanitation department (or whatever department snow removal falls under)?

    This is also happening in L.A., except it's trash rather than snow. We have an
    entire Bureau of Sanitation that has more than 3000 employees, yet the city looks like a giant trash heap. Of course, the city is in a budget crisis, having spent literally billions on the homeless (only for homelessness to increase) and giving illegal aliens free hotel rooms, meals, health care, and debit cards full of taxpayer money, so the city council has all but completely
    defunded the Bureau of Sanitation (along with the fire department, police department, and a bunch of other city departments) to pay for all that. As a result, trash now blows through the streets like tumbleweeds in Tombstone. And
    it doesn't help that we have 80,000 vagrants who are continually making more of it and throwing it into the street.

    So what does Mayor Karen Bass do (who I wouldn't trust to manage a Starbucks, let alone the nation's second largest city)? She goes on TV and announces a new citizen initiative where we're supposed to organize trash collecting groups in our neighborhoods and go out and pick up the trash ourselves. Yes, a
    service we've already paid for with the highest taxes in the nation, now we're
    supposed to do it ourselves-- and *keep* paying those taxes at the same time.


    That sounds like the very definition of chutzpah....

    I'd tell her to pound sand. Or maybe refuse to pay whatever taxes go to
    trash collection.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 17:46:38 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-02-22 5:17 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems >> for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm
    clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it
    yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed
    that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, >> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population >>from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    It's a boy's job if it is just shovelling a couple of driveways. I
    suspect they are looking for a lot more than that out of these
    "volunters" (or temporary employees).

    By the way, I had a guy come up to me a couple of weeks ago offering to
    do my shovelling and he was way past being a kid; he was at least in his
    30s. I think he said $40 but I took a pass. One time, when I had a major accumulation on the end of my driveway and was overwhelmed, I actually
    went to Yelp and looked for shovelling services. I only got one offer
    and he wanted $200 (!!!). I told him he was out of his mind; he claimed
    it was a typo and he meant $100. That was still too much in my opinion
    so I did it myself by hand. It was a LOT of work but I got through it
    with "elephant tactics" (how do you eat an elephant? One bite at a
    time!). My driveway is just the standard one car-width wide and I was
    only talking about the bit from the sidewalk to the road which is your
    normal suburban distance but the ploughs had pushed a LOT of snow in there!


    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved
    with voter ID.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 17:53:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-02-22 5:22 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems
    for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >>> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >>> yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed
    that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, >>> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population
    from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific
    government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in
    California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved
    with voter ID.

    Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide your driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be cross-checked
    before the ballot is counted.

    A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely to also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill them out under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.


    I remember hearing a British commentator saying that he was pretty sure
    that mail-in ballots from Muslim households were mostly being filled in
    by the man of the house; he strongly suspected that the voting-age women
    were either told who to vote for or the man simply filled in all their
    forms on their behalf, probably without even asking them. That should
    outrage at least all the feminists. It seems like a good argument for minimizing mail-in voting so that women have to vote in person and can
    then vote for whoever they like. (Of course hubby could still tell them
    but if he can be kept a distance away, she can vote for whoever she
    likes and tell him he voted for whoever he instructed her to choose.
    Mind you, he'd probably take advantage of the rules to say he HAS to go
    with her to interpret and even fill out the ballot because she's
    illiterate.)
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 22:58:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of >>>yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and >>>vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. . . .

    . . .

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific >>government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in >>California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved >>with voter ID.

    Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide
    your driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be >cross-checked before the ballot is counted.

    "provide your driver license number on your mail-in ballot"

    No. Ballots MUST NOT have distinguing marks to mitigate against vote buying
    and for privacy.

    In my state, we put the DL number or the SSN's four most significant
    digits on the application for a mail-in ballot. This is then matched
    against the voter registration database that had been matched against the
    state database of these name/number combinations required under federal
    law, Motor Voter. The voted ballot must be returned in an envelope
    that effectively serves as a second application and affidavit which is
    required under specific circumstances. The ballot remains unvoted till
    after polls close to make sure the voter didn't vote in person. Only then
    is the envelope opened and the vote cast.

    This is far more secure than other states that cast mail-in ballots
    before polls close to appease the news media that gets hysterical when
    all close elections cannot be called shortly after polls close.

    A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely
    to also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill
    them out under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.

    There's 100% chance of success in preventing fraud of this nature by
    amending your election code to end distribution of ballots blanks unless applied for. You're the one who convinced me how bad this law was when
    you first brought it to my attention.

    Why are you arguing that this law invitiing fraud can be salvaged? The
    only solution here is repeal.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:06:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    . . .

    I remember hearing a British commentator saying that he was pretty sure
    that mail-in ballots from Muslim households were mostly being filled in
    by the man of the house; he strongly suspected that the voting-age women >were either told who to vote for or the man simply filled in all their
    forms on their behalf, probably without even asking them.

    That was always the argument about giving women the franchise. But the
    law cannot prevent illegal activity, only punish after the fact. It's
    like making marriage illegal to prevent domestic violence in marriage.

    That should
    outrage at least all the feminists. It seems like a good argument for >minimizing mail-in voting so that women have to vote in person and can
    then vote for whoever they like. (Of course hubby could still tell them
    but if he can be kept a distance away, she can vote for whoever she
    likes and tell him he voted for whoever he instructed her to choose.
    Mind you, he'd probably take advantage of the rules to say he HAS to go
    with her to interpret and even fill out the ballot because she's >illiterate.)

    As an election judge, we were supposed to prevent voter assistance
    without an affidavit and from assistance in which the assistant was
    influencing the voter.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:11:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2026-02-22 5:17 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems
    for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >>> people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >>> yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed
    that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, >>> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population >>>from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    It's a boy's job if it is just shovelling a couple of driveways. I
    suspect they are looking for a lot more than that out of these
    "volunters" (or temporary employees).

    Plenty of boys perform physical labor as chores and do so on behalf of
    others as part time work. There's no school so they can work for hours.
    This isn't the kind of work child labor law prohibit.

    . . .
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:12:56 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:53:09 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-02-22 5:22 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com>
    wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems
    for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking
    people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >>>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >>>> yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have >>>> to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and >>>> vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed >>>> that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be >>>> able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID,
    so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population >>>> from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees >>> which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific
    government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in
    California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved >>> with voter ID.

    Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide your
    driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be
    cross-checked
    before the ballot is counted.

    A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely >> to
    also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill them >> out
    under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.


    I remember hearing a British commentator saying that he was pretty sure
    that mail-in ballots from Muslim households were mostly being filled in
    by the man of the house; he strongly suspected that the voting-age women were either told who to vote for or the man simply filled in all their
    forms on their behalf, probably without even asking them. That should outrage at least all the feminists. It seems like a good argument for minimizing mail-in voting so that women have to vote in person and can
    then vote for whoever they like.

    This was brought up in California when they proposed making mail voting permanent after the Wuhan Flu. Not only did the Democrat politicians not care about abused women being disenfranchised by their husbands and boyfriends, the women's rights groups were also strangely silent about it. When it comes to Democrats winning elections, apparently all other concerns go by the wayside.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:14:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:58:28 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Feb 22, 2026 at 2:17:27 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. . . .

    . . .

    You need specific ID to register to vote and to be found on specific
    government databases. The rest of the United States doesn't engage in
    California's potential ballot fraud problem which still cannot be solved >>> with voter ID.

    Sure it can. Under a voter ID requirement, you'd be required to provide
    your driver license number on your mail-in ballot, which will then be
    cross-checked before the ballot is counted.

    "provide your driver license number on your mail-in ballot"

    No. Ballots MUST NOT have distinguing marks to mitigate against vote buying and for privacy.

    In my state, we put the DL number or the SSN's four most significant
    digits on the application for a mail-in ballot. This is then matched
    against the voter registration database that had been matched against the state database of these name/number combinations required under federal
    law, Motor Voter. The voted ballot must be returned in an envelope
    that effectively serves as a second application and affidavit which is required under specific circumstances. The ballot remains unvoted till
    after polls close to make sure the voter didn't vote in person. Only then
    is the envelope opened and the vote cast.

    This is far more secure than other states that cast mail-in ballots
    before polls close to appease the news media that gets hysterical when
    all close elections cannot be called shortly after polls close.

    A ballot harvester who's filling out blank ballots will be highly unlikely >> to also have a list of dozens or hundreds of people whose names to fill
    them out under *and* their DL numbers to go with it.

    There's 100% chance of success in preventing fraud of this nature by
    amending your election code to end distribution of ballots blanks unless applied for. You're the one who convinced me how bad this law was when
    you first brought it to my attention.

    Why are you arguing that this law invitiing fraud can be salvaged?

    I'm not. I'm just accepting it as a status quo that's unlikely to change since it cements the Democrat super-majority here.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:16:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 2:46:38 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-02-22 5:17 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems
    for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking
    people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >>> clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department
    specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >>> yourself because they ran out of money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have
    to show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of
    yourself. You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and
    vote? Nope, you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed >>> that requiring ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be
    able to participate because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, >>> so not only is Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population
    from even being able to shovel snow for him.

    Where do you get that these are volunteers? They are per diem employees
    which means New York must ask them to comply with both federal tax law
    and immigration law. They aren't paying illegal aliens to shovel.

    The stupid crap is minimum age 18. This is a boy's job.

    It's a boy's job if it is just shovelling a couple of driveways. I
    suspect they are looking for a lot more than that out of these
    "volunters" (or temporary employees).

    By the way, I had a guy come up to me a couple of weeks ago offering to
    do my shovelling and he was way past being a kid; he was at least in his 30s. I think he said $40 but I took a pass. One time, when I had a major accumulation on the end of my driveway and was overwhelmed, I actually
    went to Yelp and looked for shovelling services. I only got one offer
    and he wanted $200 (!!!). I told him he was out of his mind; he claimed
    it was a typo and he meant $100. That was still too much in my opinion
    so I did it myself by hand. It was a LOT of work but I got through it
    with "elephant tactics" (how do you eat an elephant? One bite at a
    time!). My driveway is just the standard one car-width wide and I was
    only talking about the bit from the sidewalk to the road which is your normal suburban distance but the ploughs had pushed a LOT of snow in there!

    One time, I walked outside every day during the winter and it was 75 degrees and sunny. Then I got in my car and drove away without having to shovel anything.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:17:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    Feb 22, 2026 at 2:53:09 PM PST, Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com>:

    . . .

    I remember hearing a British commentator saying that he was pretty sure >>that mail-in ballots from Muslim households were mostly being filled in
    by the man of the house; he strongly suspected that the voting-age women >>were either told who to vote for or the man simply filled in all their >>forms on their behalf, probably without even asking them. That should >>outrage at least all the feminists. It seems like a good argument for >>minimizing mail-in voting so that women have to vote in person and can >>then vote for whoever they like.

    This was brought up in California when they proposed making mail voting >permanent after the Wuhan Flu. Not only did the Democrat politicians
    not care about abused women being disenfranchised by their husbands and >boyfriends, the women's rights groups were also strangely silent about
    it. When it comes to Democrats winning elections, apparently all other >concerns go by the wayside.

    I love your concern that if it's a criminal or a domestic abuser, he's
    always registered to vote and always votes Democratic.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Sun Feb 22 23:25:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    One time, I walked outside every day during the winter and it was 75 degrees >and sunny. Then I got in my car and drove away without having to shovel >anything.

    It's amusing when you try to convince us that California has its good
    points. I think there are two of you, a la "The Enemy Within".
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Mon Feb 23 00:32:47 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Feb 22, 2026 at 3:25:32 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    One time, I walked outside every day during the winter and it was 75 degrees >> and sunny. Then I got in my car and drove away without having to shovel
    anything.

    It's amusing when you try to convince us that California has its good
    points. I think there are two of you, a la "The Enemy Within".

    The natural environment of California is beautiful. It's the most pleasant and aesthetically pleasing place I've ever lived. It's just that the people who
    run it are certifiably insane that's the problem.


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Mon Feb 23 01:52:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Feb 22, 2026 at 3:25:32 PM PST, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:

    . . .

    One time, I walked outside every day during the winter and it was 75 degrees >>>and sunny. Then I got in my car and drove away without having to shovel >>>anything.

    It's amusing when you try to convince us that California has its good >>points. I think there are two of you, a la "The Enemy Within".

    The natural environment of California is beautiful. It's the most
    pleasant and aesthetically pleasing place I've ever lived. It's just
    that the people who run it are certifiably insane that's the problem.

    Fine. "This Side of Paradise" and other episodes of humans being unable
    to live in paradise without ruining or rejecting it. Star Trek explains everything.
    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv on Tue Feb 24 15:12:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    In article <10nfoqo$2dsin$1@dont-email.me>, atropos@mac.com wrote:

    Seems as though Comrade Mamdani is taking a lot of crap from his fellow Dems >for requiring five forms of ID to become a city snow shoveler.

    He did so poorly clearing the snow from the last storm that he's now asking >people to sign up and volunteer do the shoveling after the upcoming storm >clears. Imagine that. Paying all those taxes for a city department >specifically to clear snow, only to have the government beg you to do it >yourself because they ran out of money.

    He's not calling for volunteers. He's going to pay them $30/hour.

    And guess what? These "volunteers" take the shoevel provided to them, go
    home, and collect their money.

    And to participate in this volunteer snow shoveling program, you have to >show two forms of ID, a Social Security card, and two pictures of yourself. >You need all that to shovel snow in NYC, but to walk in and vote? Nope,
    you don't need any of that. And I've been reliably informed that requiring >ID is racist and that blacks and married women won't be able to participate >because they're too thick to figure out how to get ID, so not only is >Mamdani a racist, he's shutting out half the population from even being
    able to shovel snow for him.

    I love when things like this happen to leftists!
    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2