• [OT] Khamenei deploys military against protesters; Trump deploying forces against the regime

    From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 19:52:45 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Protests in Iran have gone into a 12th day with Reza Pahlavi, the Crown
    Prince (son of the last Shah of Iran) is calling for his supporters -
    which appears to be nearly everyone - to go to the streets to take back
    their country. Ayatollah Khamenei has recalled his usual forces, the
    volunteer Basiji and police, since they are getting their butts handed
    to them, and replaced them with IRGC (Revolutionary Guard) units. The
    next few days - and even hours - look critical. If the protesters hold,
    they will almost certainly win but if they crack and go home, they may
    be looking at more years of oppression. There are already reports of
    IRGC members seeking asylum in France and soldiers joining the
    protesters rather than shooting them.

    Trump, who has said he will NOT tolerate mass slaughter of the
    protesters, is apparently moving forces in the Middle East to "deliver a
    very hard blow" to the Iranian regime. It's not remotely clear yet if
    he's planning to put "boots on the ground" or limit himself to air
    raids. Netanyahu is apparently also scrambling forces to aid the Iranian protesters.

    Just about the entirety of the Iranian population appears to have had
    enough of the Islamist regime. They are rallying to the words of the
    Crown Prince who has promised he will abide by whatever they choose
    after the Islamists are gone, whether a republic or a constitutional
    monarchy.

    If the protesters win - which I want VERY MUCH - Americans will be
    seeing a complete change in the official line of Iran. They'll go from
    being the Great Satan to the Great Saviour!

    This YouTube channel, Tousi TV, is doing a MUCH better job of covering
    events in Iran than the Western media. Here is the latest report, just
    an hour old:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kLd-kTxHAyo
    --
    Rhino

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From super70s@super70s@super70s.invalid to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 20:16:32 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 21:31:36 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 02:48:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore the law with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're
    willing to take those demands.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From moviePig@nobody@nowhere.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 22:30:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately. >>>
    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore the law with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 03:35:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    Protests in Iran have gone into a 12th day with Reza Pahlavi, the Crown >Prince (son of the last Shah of Iran) is calling for his supporters -
    which appears to be nearly everyone - to go to the streets to take back >their country. . . .

    Oh. Will restoration lead to liberty? I suspect not. Can they put
    Mosaddegh back into the government?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 03:57:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately. >>>>
    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers >> for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and
    constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're
    willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.

    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 23:13:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-01-08 10:35 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    Protests in Iran have gone into a 12th day with Reza Pahlavi, the Crown
    Prince (son of the last Shah of Iran) is calling for his supporters -
    which appears to be nearly everyone - to go to the streets to take back
    their country. . . .

    Oh. Will restoration lead to liberty? I suspect not.

    The Crown Prince has promised that he will let them have a monarchy or republic and be involved as much or as little as they want him. His name
    and instructions to the protesters seem to have a LOT of impact with
    them. The two primary themes of the protesters chants are "Death to
    Khamenei" (or overthrowing the Islamist regime) and "Bring back the
    King" (meaning the Crown Prince). They see the pre-1979 period in a very positive way and want to go back to that.

    Is support for the Shah universal? Probably not but apparently it is
    very strong right now and they're seeing him as a symbol of the
    direction they want to go in.

    Some pundits have said that the fall of the Islamists will lead to the balkanization of Iran with each of the many ethnic groups splitting off
    into separate countries but the host of Tousi TV, an Iranian expat
    living in the UK who has strong contacts in Iran (via Skylink), says the various groups are pulling together against the regime, not jockeying
    for position to have their own separate areas. He knows a lot more about
    this than I do so I have to defer to his assessment until I know better.

    Whatever follows this regime probably won't be perfect; that's the
    nature of government. How free will people be? I just don't know. It's
    hard to imagine things being worse but maybe my imagination just isn't
    trying hard enough.

    Can they put
    Mosaddegh back into the government?

    Unless they have the power of resurrection, I don't see how. He died in
    1967.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From shawn@nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com to rec.arts.tv on Thu Jan 8 23:48:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 02:48:06 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and >threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers >for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and >constitutionally tested immigration law.

    That's the message of the far right but it's not what is happening as
    the National Guard gets called up in cases where there's a potential
    for large scale protests. Protests where some people will turn
    violent.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore the law >with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're >willing to take those demands.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 04:53:06 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2026-01-08 10:35 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    Protests in Iran have gone into a 12th day with Reza Pahlavi, the Crown >>>Prince (son of the last Shah of Iran) is calling for his supporters - >>>which appears to be nearly everyone - to go to the streets to take back >>>their country. . . .

    Oh. Will restoration lead to liberty? I suspect not.

    The Crown Prince has promised that he will let them have a monarchy or >republic and be involved as much or as little as they want him. His name
    and instructions to the protesters seem to have a LOT of impact with
    them. The two primary themes of the protesters chants are "Death to >Khamenei" (or overthrowing the Islamist regime) and "Bring back the
    King" (meaning the Crown Prince). They see the pre-1979 period in a very >positive way and want to go back to that.

    He has the advantage of not having done anything evil in the last 4 and
    a 1/2 decades.

    Is support for the Shah universal? Probably not but apparently it is
    very strong right now and they're seeing him as a symbol of the
    direction they want to go in.

    Some pundits have said that the fall of the Islamists will lead to the >balkanization of Iran with each of the many ethnic groups splitting off
    into separate countries but the host of Tousi TV, an Iranian expat
    living in the UK who has strong contacts in Iran (via Skylink), says the >various groups are pulling together against the regime, not jockeying
    for position to have their own separate areas. He knows a lot more about >this than I do so I have to defer to his assessment until I know better.

    Whatever follows this regime probably won't be perfect; that's the
    nature of government. How free will people be? I just don't know. It's
    hard to imagine things being worse but maybe my imagination just isn't >trying hard enough.

    They can't overthrow the Islamic regime soon enough. But I don't see the Revolutionary Guard going quietly.

    Can they put Mosaddegh back into the government?

    Unless they have the power of resurrection, I don't see how. He died in >1967.

    Just thinking how long it's been since they had a government that was
    popularly elected.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 05:04:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 8:48:07 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 02:48:06 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately. >>>>
    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers >> for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and
    constitutionally tested immigration law.

    That's the message of the far right but it's not what is happening as
    the National Guard gets called up in cases where there's a potential
    for large scale protests.

    That's not what Walz said.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rhino@no_offline_contact@example.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 10:08:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 2026-01-08 11:53 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2026-01-08 10:35 p.m., Adam H. Kerman wrote:
    Rhino <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:

    Protests in Iran have gone into a 12th day with Reza Pahlavi, the Crown >>>> Prince (son of the last Shah of Iran) is calling for his supporters -
    which appears to be nearly everyone - to go to the streets to take back >>>> their country. . . .

    Oh. Will restoration lead to liberty? I suspect not.

    The Crown Prince has promised that he will let them have a monarchy or
    republic and be involved as much or as little as they want him. His name
    and instructions to the protesters seem to have a LOT of impact with
    them. The two primary themes of the protesters chants are "Death to
    Khamenei" (or overthrowing the Islamist regime) and "Bring back the
    King" (meaning the Crown Prince). They see the pre-1979 period in a very
    positive way and want to go back to that.

    He has the advantage of not having done anything evil in the last 4 and
    a 1/2 decades.

    Is support for the Shah universal? Probably not but apparently it is
    very strong right now and they're seeing him as a symbol of the
    direction they want to go in.

    Some pundits have said that the fall of the Islamists will lead to the
    balkanization of Iran with each of the many ethnic groups splitting off
    into separate countries but the host of Tousi TV, an Iranian expat
    living in the UK who has strong contacts in Iran (via Skylink), says the
    various groups are pulling together against the regime, not jockeying
    for position to have their own separate areas. He knows a lot more about
    this than I do so I have to defer to his assessment until I know better.

    Whatever follows this regime probably won't be perfect; that's the
    nature of government. How free will people be? I just don't know. It's
    hard to imagine things being worse but maybe my imagination just isn't
    trying hard enough.

    They can't overthrow the Islamic regime soon enough. But I don't see the Revolutionary Guard going quietly.

    Agreed! They've already been sent against the protesters but there are
    reports that they're being supplemented - or even replaced by -
    foreigners like Iraqi Shiites who are deemed less likely to go over to
    the side of the protesters.

    There's already been bloodshed and there looks like there will be more
    but, so far, the unrest is very widespread and the protesters don't seem
    to be backing down. They seem to have finally hit a point where they
    know they have to keep going to get rid of the Islamists. They've been
    very clear that they are enormously grateful to Trump for publicly
    supporting them and their desire to rid themselves of the current
    regime. (They are also aware that most of the media and the Europeans
    are utterly ignoring what's going on or trying to downplay it, which
    makes Trump's support that much more meaningful.)

    I'm eagerly awaiting signs that the regime has utterly collapsed and
    Khamenei and his inner circle have fled to Russia or, failing that, that
    Trump is making good on his promise to help topple the regime.

    Can they put Mosaddegh back into the government?

    Unless they have the power of resurrection, I don't see how. He died in
    1967.

    Just thinking how long it's been since they had a government that was popularly elected.

    It's certainly been a while; that is very clear. The Crown Prince has apparently lived in the US for most of the past 45 years. I have to
    imagine he's seen the benefits of democracy in all that time and does everything within his power to help them get a form of government they
    can live with.
    --
    Rhino
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From moviePig@nobody@nowhere.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 10:52:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist >>>> occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this >>>> will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to >>>> score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and >>> threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and
    constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're >>> willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.

    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In
    such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 18:58:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:52:01 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist >>>>> occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this >>>>> will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to >>>>> score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement
    officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and >>>> constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore >>>> the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're >>>> willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new. >>
    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.

    So we're only concerned about the victims of crime if the happen to be within shouting distance?


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From moviePig@nobody@nowhere.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 14:59:29 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 1/9/2026 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:52:01 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters. >>>>>>>
    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this >>>>>> will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to >>>>>> score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement >>>>> officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and >>>>> constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore >>>>> the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're
    willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new. >>>
    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In
    such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but
    individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.

    So we're only concerned about the victims of crime if the happen to be within shouting distance?

    https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/1600x900/359853-Joseph-Stalin-Quote-A-single-death-is-a-tragedy-a-million-deaths.jpg


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Adam H. Kerman@ahk@chinet.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 20:22:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:52:01 AM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:
    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>>On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:

    . . .

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National
    Guard and threatening to deploy the military against federal law >>>>>enforcement officers for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, >>>>>democratically passed and constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore >>>>>the law with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how >>>>>far they're willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.

    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In >>such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but >>individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.

    So we're only concerned about the victims of crime if the happen to be within >shouting distance?

    You are being so mean to moviePig! You are asking him a bunch of
    softball questions that he should be able to answer, but he simply
    cannot hide his illiberal attitude. Really not sure he's trying to.

    Dear sweet illiberal moviePig:

    We have laws that criminalize individual conduct in which no victim has
    been harmed. Examples are laws restricting vices, such as use of
    unlawful drugs, alchohol use, and prostitution. An individual who
    knowingly takes drugs or alchohol is criminally liable for bad acts
    against other persons or property, so laws against drug and alchohol use
    have nothing to do with that.

    Such laws infringe upon liberty. Let's pretend you know what the word
    means and can use it properly in a sentence.

    There are other laws that regulate drug and alchohol use in which there
    is a high likelihood that others may be harmed. While intoxicated, there
    may be laws restricting use of heavy machinery, performing surgery, or
    driving in the public way. Similarly, laws that prohibit firing a weapon
    when not aiming at a target exist to lower the risk of uninvolved third
    parties from getting shot or killed. Laws that attempt to mitigate harm
    to others while in the public way or in locations one does not fully
    control are not infringements upon individual liberty. There is no
    liberty to potentially harm another person.

    It's never about an "impersonal government statute" nor "ignore the law
    to favor the individual". When considering whether a law regulating
    conduct serves a public purpose or not, one considers the extent to
    which individual harm has been mitigated in the least intrusive way.

    Because you cannot understand liberalism, you did not distinguish in your
    own mind that there is more than one individual, the one who committed
    the act and the one who might be harmed by the act. The law may indeed
    serve a valid public purpose if restriction is imposed upon the former in consideration of the latter. But if there is no third party to protect,
    then there can be a valid argument that the legal restriction serves no
    public purpose.

    If you ever learn something about liberalism, there may indeed be a
    liberal argument to be made on how the Immigration and Nationality Act
    might be amended to take into account whether there are victims of
    immigration versus immigration does not harm society. If you actually
    put some effort into framing an argument, BTR1701 might respect you for
    it. He's a fair guy.

    Here are some hints. That someone coming from a shithole country needs
    help and the United States should support him for the rest of his life
    because we are a rich, prosperous society, is an argument about charity,
    not liberalism.

    That someone coming from a shithole country will work hard to make a
    better life for himself because America is the land of opportunity is a
    liberal argument.

    That someone who grew up without Western values then continues to reject
    them as an adult should be able to impos speech, religion, and
    appearance restrictions on others once he's in the United States is an
    argument about appeasement, not liberalism.

    That someone who grew up in a society with widespread corruption who
    then commits massive fraud in the United States should be excused from enforcement of fraud statutes is a paternalism argument, not a
    liberalism argument.

    I'm sure everything I just wrote went in one ear and out the other.
    You'll never understand.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 20:28:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 9, 2026 at 11:59:29 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/2026 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:52:01 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters. >>>>>>>>
    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement >>>>>> officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and >>>>>> constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore
    the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're
    willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.

    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In >>> such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but
    individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.

    So we're only concerned about the victims of crime if they happen to be
    within
    shouting distance?


    https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/1600x900/359853-Joseph-Stalin-Quote-A-single-death-is-a-tragedy-a-million-deaths.jpg

    Most people see that quote as an example of moral bankruptcy, not a philosophy on which to base a law enforcement system.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From moviePig@nobody@nowhere.com to rec.arts.tv on Fri Jan 9 16:36:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On 1/9/2026 3:28 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 9, 2026 at 11:59:29 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/9/2026 1:58 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 9, 2026 at 7:52:01 AM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote: >>>
    On 1/8/2026 10:57 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 7:30:33 PM PST, "moviePig" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 1/8/2026 9:48 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino"
    <no_offline_contact@example.com>
    wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters. >>>>>>>>>
    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately.

    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement
    officers
    for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and
    constitutionally tested immigration law.

    For years the Left has demanded that the government literally ignore
    the law
    with regard to illegal immigration and now we're seeing how far they're
    willing to take those demands.

    We're biased to "ignore the law" to favor the individual. It's not new.

    Then why do we arrest people for DUI?

    For the same reason(ing) we arrest drunks firing pistols at the moon. In >>>> such instances, we're favoring not impersonal government statute, but >>>> individuals who happen to be in the immediate vicinity.

    So we're only concerned about the victims of crime if they happen to be >>> within
    shouting distance?


    https://quotefancy.com/media/wallpaper/1600x900/359853-Joseph-Stalin-Quote-A-single-death-is-a-tragedy-a-million-deaths.jpg

    Most people see that quote as an example of moral bankruptcy, not a philosophy
    on which to base a law enforcement system.

    I guess I'm not "most people", as I've always seen the quote as a
    paradoxical fact about human nature. Morality doesn't apply.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BTR1701@atropos@mac.com to rec.arts.tv on Sat Jan 10 06:02:35 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 8:48:07 PM PST, "shawn" <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:

    On Fri, 9 Jan 2026 02:48:06 -0000 (UTC), BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com>
    wrote:

    On Jan 8, 2026 at 6:31:36 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:

    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:
    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.

    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately. >>>>
    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and
    threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers >> for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and
    constitutionally tested immigration law.

    That's the message of the far right but it's not what is happening as
    the National Guard gets called up in cases where there's a potential
    for large scale protests. Protests where some people will turn
    violent.

    https://ibb.co/21sw4jRz


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv on Sat Jan 10 16:00:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    Rhino wrote:

    If the protesters win - which I want VERY MUCH - Americans will be
    seeing a complete change in the official line of Iran. They'll go from
    being the Great Satan to the Great Saviour!

    I, for one, cannot wait to see Dems supporting the Islamonazis if Trump
    helps the protesters.
    --
    Democrats and the liberal media hate President Trump more than they
    love this country.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv on Sat Jan 10 16:07:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    nanoflower@gmail.com wrote:
    BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
    "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
    On 2026-01-08 9:16 p.m., super70s wrote:

    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.
    Looks like things are tough all over for authoritarian leaders lately. >>>
    Incredible. Iran is literally shaking off nearly 50 years of Islamist
    occupation and you are seeing close parallels with
    democratically-elected Trump. If the protesters are successful, this
    will be as big as the fall of the Berlin Wall and you have to try to
    score partisan points.... <smh>

    Not only that, he's not even getting the points right.

    It's Tampon Tim Walz that's spinning up the Minnesota National Guard and >>threatening to deploy the military against federal law enforcement officers >>for the egregious sin of enforcing valid, democratically passed and >>constitutionally tested immigration law.

    That's the message of the far right but it's not what is happening


    TROLL-O-METER

    5* 6* *7
    4* *8
    3* *9
    2* *10
    1* | *stuporous
    0* -*- *catatonic
    * |\ *comatose
    * \ *clinical death
    * \ *biological death
    * _\/ *demonic apparition
    * * *damned for all eternity

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ubiquitous@weberm@polaris.net to rec.arts.tv on Sat Jan 10 16:04:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.tv

    super70s@super70s.invalid wrote:

    Trump is also deploying forces against his own protesters.


    TROLL-O-METER

    5* 6* *7
    4* *8
    3* *9
    2* *10
    1* | *stuporous
    0* -*- *catatonic
    * |\ *comatose
    * \ *clinical death
    * \ *biological death
    * _\/ *demonic apparition
    * * *damned for all eternity

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2