Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition private property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and make it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC might have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea Weaver will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently has.
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition private >> property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just toIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC might >> have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea Weaver >> will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently >> has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a >>> different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently >>> has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its
former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:Here's hoping!
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a >>>> different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as >> well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element >> to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:36:54 -0500, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>> wrote:Here's hoping!
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to >>>>> commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the >>>>> Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather >>>> poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families >>>> became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two >>>> and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned >>>> times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie >>>> blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
That's because it would never happen. What might, but probably won't,
happen is to use the places that are unoccupied as temporary housing.
Imagine empty office buildings or other places that may have set empty
for years being re purposed.
On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:36:54 -0500, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >>> wrote:Here's hoping!
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition >>>>> privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon >>>> found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather >>>> poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families >>>> became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to >>>>> commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you >>>>> and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC >>>>> might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the >>>>> Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea >>>>> Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two >>>> and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with >>>> everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned >>>> times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie >>>> blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the >>> true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
That's because it would never happen. What might, but probably won't,
happen is to use the places that are unoccupied as temporary housing.
Imagine empty office buildings or other places that may have set empty
for years being re purposed.
On 2026-01-05 7:37 p.m., shawn wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 17:36:54 -0500, Rhino
<no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>Here's hoping!
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition >>>>>> privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon >>>>> found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather >>>>> poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families >>>>> became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families >>>>> assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two >>>>> and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with >>>>> everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned >>>>> times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>>>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to >>>>>> commercial
residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you >>>>>> and make
it a public resource.
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/2008031252692025344/vid/avc1/1896x1080/e4HvOku0n8aLV3qR.mp4
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. >>>>>> NYC might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the >>>>>> Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea >>>>>> Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked. >>>>> These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>>>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie >>>>> blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the >>>> true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
That's because it would never happen. What might, but probably won't,
happen is to use the places that are unoccupied as temporary housing.
Imagine empty office buildings or other places that may have set empty
for years being re purposed.
That sounds more plausible to me although even here he would face legal challenges. Even if a given building has stood vacant for years and
could be renovated into decent housing, somebody owns those buildings
and I feel sure they will object to their property being expropriated.
They should have the full backing of the Constitution and laws of your country. Now, obviously, expropriations of private property are legal
under limited circumstances but the owner still has recourse to the
courts as I understand it.
. . .
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a >period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my* >house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for >free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a
period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my* >> house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for >> free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say.
The government completely intrudes on your life. Socialism never goes
away.
Your typical homeowner, not in a homeowners' association, owns the land
as fee simple. This includes a bundle of rights, but not all rights. You don't own your air space, which is a good thing with respect to flights thousands of feet above but a bad thing when it comes to drone
surveillance. You don't own mineral rights, so you can't dig for
petroleum nor rare earth elements.
Let's say you want to use your own land to its highest and best use. Say there's a major transportation facility nearby and your land might be desireable for commercial/industrial use or multi-family housing. But
your land is zoned single family preventing you from redeveloping it.
No court ever ruled that deliberate downzoning by the municipality or
county is a taking. It should be.
Mamdani or not, you are not free to do what you wish with your own land.
On Jan 5, 2026 at 10:05:01 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a >>> period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my* >>> house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for >>> free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say.
The government completely intrudes on your life. Socialism never goes
away.
Your typical homeowner, not in a homeowners' association, owns the land
as fee simple. This includes a bundle of rights, but not all rights. You
don't own your air space, which is a good thing with respect to flights
thousands of feet above but a bad thing when it comes to drone
surveillance. You don't own mineral rights, so you can't dig for
petroleum nor rare earth elements.
Let's say you want to use your own land to its highest and best use. Say
there's a major transportation facility nearby and your land might be
desireable for commercial/industrial use or multi-family housing. But
your land is zoned single family preventing you from redeveloping it.
No court ever ruled that deliberate downzoning by the municipality or
county is a taking. It should be.
Mamdani or not, you are not free to do what you wish with your own land.
I said house, not land.
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 10:05:01 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:I said house, not land.
. . .
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a >>>> period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my*The government completely intrudes on your life. Socialism never goes
house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for
free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say. >>>
away.
Your typical homeowner, not in a homeowners' association, owns the land >>> as fee simple. This includes a bundle of rights, but not all rights. You >>> don't own your air space, which is a good thing with respect to flights >>> thousands of feet above but a bad thing when it comes to drone
surveillance. You don't own mineral rights, so you can't dig for
petroleum nor rare earth elements.
Let's say you want to use your own land to its highest and best use. Say >>> there's a major transportation facility nearby and your land might be
desireable for commercial/industrial use or multi-family housing. But
your land is zoned single family preventing you from redeveloping it.
No court ever ruled that deliberate downzoning by the municipality or
county is a taking. It should be.
Mamdani or not, you are not free to do what you wish with your own land. >>
Let's say the house isn't building code compliant. You may be denied permission to live there during renovation. They can slow walk building permits and raise irrelevancies during inspection or even shut the work
down. They can add so many unnecessary expenses to the project that it's
too costly to perform the work.
There are communities with appearance review codes.
Rent? You may need a permit, and short-term rentals may be denied since
the onus is on you to prove that the short term traveller isn't there to
have a very loud party or harm the neighborhood.
Demolition? No permit; your house is historic.
On Jan 6, 2026 at 10:00:06 AM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:in it for
On Jan 5, 2026 at 10:05:01 PM PST, ""Adam H. Kerman"" <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
BTR1701 <atropos@mac.com> wrote:
. . .
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a
period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my*
house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay
I said house, not land.free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say. >>>>The government completely intrudes on your life. Socialism never goes >>>> away.
Your typical homeowner, not in a homeowners' association, owns the land >>>> as fee simple. This includes a bundle of rights, but not all rights. You >>>> don't own your air space, which is a good thing with respect to flights >>>> thousands of feet above but a bad thing when it comes to drone
surveillance. You don't own mineral rights, so you can't dig for
petroleum nor rare earth elements.
Let's say you want to use your own land to its highest and best use. Say >>>> there's a major transportation facility nearby and your land might be >>>> desireable for commercial/industrial use or multi-family housing. But >>>> your land is zoned single family preventing you from redeveloping it. >>>>
No court ever ruled that deliberate downzoning by the municipality or >>>> county is a taking. It should be.
Mamdani or not, you are not free to do what you wish with your own land. >>>
Let's say the house isn't building code compliant. You may be denied
permission to live there during renovation. They can slow walk building
permits and raise irrelevancies during inspection or even shut the work
down. They can add so many unnecessary expenses to the project that it's
too costly to perform the work.
There are communities with appearance review codes.
Rent? You may need a permit, and short-term rentals may be denied since
the onus is on you to prove that the short term traveller isn't there to
have a very loud party or harm the neighborhood.
Demolition? No permit; your house is historic.
Which is exactly the kind of fuckery that shouldn't be legal under the >Constitution. You're making my point for me.
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:Here's hoping!
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition >>>> privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a >>>> different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and >>>> make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC >>>> might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea >>>> Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather >>> poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two >>> and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned >>> times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the >> true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
On Jan 5, 2026 at 2:36:54 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>Here's hoping!
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition >>>>> privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon >>>> found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather >>>> poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families >>>> became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families >>>> assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two >>>> and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with >>>> everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned >>>> times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just >>>> a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to >>>>> commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and
make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC >>>>> might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the >>>>> Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea >>>>> Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she currently
has.
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked. >>>> These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its >>>> former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie >>>> blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the >>> true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
Ahead of her appointment, Comrade Weaver deleted her Twitter account in an attempt to hide her outright communist and racist beliefs, but unfortunately for her, acting on a hunch, an independent media organization archived her entire account just in case. So let's look at some of Comrade Weaver's greatest hits:
@ceaweaver:
Private property, including (and kind of especially) home ownership,
is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as "wealth building"
public policy.
Now you might notice that living in the United States is better in almost every respect *because* we recognize private property rights and that there's never been a country in the history of mankind that doesn't recognize them that you would actually want to live in.
You might also notice that in this country, white people aren't the only ones with homes. How does a black family owning their own home further the cause of
white supremacy, you might ask. That would be a good question, one which might
have been asked of Comrade Weaver if there was still a legitimate and functioning news media left in this country.
@ceaweaver:
Impoverish the *white* middle class. Home ownership is a racist
failed public policy.
Remember the woman who wrote that was just given a position of power in the administration of the mayor of the nation's largest city. And this isn't a one-off. Another of Mamdani's appointees was quoted as saying, "It's important
that white people feel defeated." So this entire administration is blatantly and virulently racist from its inception.
@ceaweaver:
I think passing strong rent control is an effective way to shrink
the value of real estate.
So here we have bright-line evidence that Mamdani has appointed a woman whose stated goal is to torpedo property values for the city's residence. Imagine being a potential homeowner or commercial real estate investor and hearing something like this coming out of the mayor's office. Why would you invest a single dollar in property anywhere in New York City? The government is coming right out and saying that it wants you to lose money on your investment. Bankrupting you is the quickest way for them to realize their dream of nothing
but slums from one end of Manhattan to the other.
@ceaweaver
The KKK is a violent Christian group. To keep us all safe on this
busy travel day, Delta Airlines should kick all white people in
Christmas outfits off planes.
I mean, that one's just batshit crazy in addition to being (again) overtly racist. And why just Delta Airlines? So many questions...
@ceaweaver
Really needing to repress the desire for revenge right now.
I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take
credit for women's work and all white men who take credit for
the work of women of color would one day burn in agony.
More racism along with strong indications of mental instability and violent impulses.
On 2026-01-06 11:01 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 2:36:54 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:In Starmer's Britain, she could go to jail for such sentiments - or be granted British citizenship despite them. Oh wait, she's AGAINST white people so no prison for her! If she'd said that about non-whites though, she'd be looking at a stretch in one of His Majesty's Prisons.
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>Here's hoping!
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transition >>>>>> privateIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon >>>>> found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to >>>>>> commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well. >>>>>>
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have." >>>>>>
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and
make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC
might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the >>>>>> Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea
Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she >>>>>> currently
has.
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families >>>>> became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families >>>>> assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with >>>>> everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the
authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after
Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment >>>>> blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked. >>>>> These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its
former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie >>>>> blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the >>>> 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial >>>> element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the
true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
Ahead of her appointment, Comrade Weaver deleted her Twitter account in an >> attempt to hide her outright communist and racist beliefs, but unfortunately
for her, acting on a hunch, an independent media organization archived her >> entire account just in case. So let's look at some of Comrade Weaver's
greatest hits:
@ceaweaver:
Private property, including (and kind of especially) home ownership, >> is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as "wealth building"
public policy.
Now you might notice that living in the United States is better in almost >> every respect *because* we recognize private property rights and that
there's
never been a country in the history of mankind that doesn't recognize them >> that you would actually want to live in.
You might also notice that in this country, white people aren't the only
ones
with homes. How does a black family owning their own home further the cause >> of
white supremacy, you might ask. That would be a good question, one which
might
have been asked of Comrade Weaver if there was still a legitimate and
functioning news media left in this country.
@ceaweaver:
Impoverish the *white* middle class. Home ownership is a racist
failed public policy.
Remember the woman who wrote that was just given a position of power in the >> administration of the mayor of the nation's largest city. And this isn't a >> one-off. Another of Mamdani's appointees was quoted as saying, "It's
important
that white people feel defeated." So this entire administration is blatantly
and virulently racist from its inception.
@ceaweaver:
I think passing strong rent control is an effective way to shrink
the value of real estate.
So here we have bright-line evidence that Mamdani has appointed a woman
whose
stated goal is to torpedo property values for the city's residence. Imagine >> being a potential homeowner or commercial real estate investor and hearing >> something like this coming out of the mayor's office. Why would you invest a
single dollar in property anywhere in New York City? The government is
coming
right out and saying that it wants you to lose money on your investment.
Bankrupting you is the quickest way for them to realize their dream of
nothing
but slums from one end of Manhattan to the other.
@ceaweaver
The KKK is a violent Christian group. To keep us all safe on this
busy travel day, Delta Airlines should kick all white people in
Christmas outfits off planes.
I mean, that one's just batshit crazy in addition to being (again) overtly >> racist. And why just Delta Airlines? So many questions...
@ceaweaver
Really needing to repress the desire for revenge right now.
I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take
credit for women's work and all white men who take credit for
the work of women of color would one day burn in agony.
More racism along with strong indications of mental instability and violent >> impulses.
On Jan 6, 2026 at 8:39:11 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 11:01 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 2:36:54 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>In Starmer's Britain, she could go to jail for such sentiments - or be
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>Here's hoping!
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transitionIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
private
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well. >>>>>>>
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from you and
make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC
might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea
Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she >>>>>>> currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families >>>>>> assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the >>>>>> authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after >>>>>> Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment >>>>>> blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked. >>>>>> These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its
former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians.
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the >>>>> 14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial >>>>> element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack into the
true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary >>>> family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the
chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean >>>> the lawyers for the city!
Ahead of her appointment, Comrade Weaver deleted her Twitter account in an
attempt to hide her outright communist and racist beliefs, but unfortunately
for her, acting on a hunch, an independent media organization archived her
entire account just in case. So let's look at some of Comrade Weaver's >>> greatest hits:
@ceaweaver:
Private property, including (and kind of especially) home ownership, >>> is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as "wealth building"
public policy.
Now you might notice that living in the United States is better in almost >>> every respect *because* we recognize private property rights and that
there's
never been a country in the history of mankind that doesn't recognize them
that you would actually want to live in.
You might also notice that in this country, white people aren't the only >>> ones
with homes. How does a black family owning their own home further the cause
of
white supremacy, you might ask. That would be a good question, one which >>> might
have been asked of Comrade Weaver if there was still a legitimate and
functioning news media left in this country.
@ceaweaver:
Impoverish the *white* middle class. Home ownership is a racist
failed public policy.
Remember the woman who wrote that was just given a position of power in the
administration of the mayor of the nation's largest city. And this isn't a
one-off. Another of Mamdani's appointees was quoted as saying, "It's
important
that white people feel defeated." So this entire administration is blatantly
and virulently racist from its inception.
@ceaweaver:
I think passing strong rent control is an effective way to shrink >>> the value of real estate.
So here we have bright-line evidence that Mamdani has appointed a woman >>> whose
stated goal is to torpedo property values for the city's residence. Imagine
being a potential homeowner or commercial real estate investor and hearing
something like this coming out of the mayor's office. Why would you invest a
single dollar in property anywhere in New York City? The government is >>> coming
right out and saying that it wants you to lose money on your investment. >>> Bankrupting you is the quickest way for them to realize their dream of >>> nothing
but slums from one end of Manhattan to the other.
@ceaweaver
The KKK is a violent Christian group. To keep us all safe on this >>> busy travel day, Delta Airlines should kick all white people in
Christmas outfits off planes.
I mean, that one's just batshit crazy in addition to being (again) overtly
racist. And why just Delta Airlines? So many questions...
@ceaweaver
Really needing to repress the desire for revenge right now.
I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take >>> credit for women's work and all white men who take credit for
the work of women of color would one day burn in agony.
More racism along with strong indications of mental instability and violent
impulses.
granted British citizenship despite them. Oh wait, she's AGAINST white
people so no prison for her! If she'd said that about non-whites though,
she'd be looking at a stretch in one of His Majesty's Prisons.
Yes, imagine for a moment that a hard-right conservative won the mayorship of a major American city (against all odds) and he immediately started a campaign
of explicitly making life difficult and financially fraught for black people. How long do you think it would be before that mayor was not only removed but arrested and charged with criminal civil rights violations?
But when it's white people, all bets are off!
On 2026-01-07 12:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 6, 2026 at 8:39:11 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> >> wrote:For the "progressives" ALL white people have targets on their backs and deserve to. It's always bizarre to me to hear that kind of thinking from WHITE "progressives" who never seem to realize that they are painting targets on THEIR OWN BACKS.
On 2026-01-06 11:01 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 2:36:54 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>In Starmer's Britain, she could go to jail for such sentiments - or be
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino"Here's hoping!
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transitionIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
private
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well. >>>>>>>>
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are >>>>>>>> going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from >>>>>>>> you and
make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC
might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea
Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she >>>>>>>> currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the >>>>>>> authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after >>>>>>> Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment >>>>>>> blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its
former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians. >>>>>>>
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC.
Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the
14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial
element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack >>>>>> into the
true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary >>>>> family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think
Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the >>>>> chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean >>>>> the lawyers for the city!
Ahead of her appointment, Comrade Weaver deleted her Twitter account in an
attempt to hide her outright communist and racist beliefs, but
unfortunately
for her, acting on a hunch, an independent media organization archived her
entire account just in case. So let's look at some of Comrade Weaver's >>>> greatest hits:
@ceaweaver:
Private property, including (and kind of especially) home ownership,
is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as "wealth building" >>>> public policy.
Now you might notice that living in the United States is better in almost
every respect *because* we recognize private property rights and that >>>> there's
never been a country in the history of mankind that doesn't recognize them
that you would actually want to live in.
You might also notice that in this country, white people aren't the only
ones
with homes. How does a black family owning their own home further the >>>> cause
of
white supremacy, you might ask. That would be a good question, one which
might
have been asked of Comrade Weaver if there was still a legitimate and >>>> functioning news media left in this country.
@ceaweaver:
Impoverish the *white* middle class. Home ownership is a racist >>>> failed public policy.
Remember the woman who wrote that was just given a position of power in >>>> the
administration of the mayor of the nation's largest city. And this isn't a
one-off. Another of Mamdani's appointees was quoted as saying, "It's >>>> important
that white people feel defeated." So this entire administration is
blatantly
and virulently racist from its inception.
@ceaweaver:
I think passing strong rent control is an effective way to shrink >>>> the value of real estate.
So here we have bright-line evidence that Mamdani has appointed a woman >>>> whose
stated goal is to torpedo property values for the city's residence. >>>> Imagine
being a potential homeowner or commercial real estate investor and hearing
something like this coming out of the mayor's office. Why would you >>>> invest a
single dollar in property anywhere in New York City? The government is >>>> coming
right out and saying that it wants you to lose money on your investment.
Bankrupting you is the quickest way for them to realize their dream of >>>> nothing
but slums from one end of Manhattan to the other.
@ceaweaver
The KKK is a violent Christian group. To keep us all safe on this >>>> busy travel day, Delta Airlines should kick all white people in >>>> Christmas outfits off planes.
I mean, that one's just batshit crazy in addition to being (again) overtly
racist. And why just Delta Airlines? So many questions...
@ceaweaver
Really needing to repress the desire for revenge right now.
I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take >>>> credit for women's work and all white men who take credit for >>>> the work of women of color would one day burn in agony.
More racism along with strong indications of mental instability and >>>> violent
impulses.
granted British citizenship despite them. Oh wait, she's AGAINST white
people so no prison for her! If she'd said that about non-whites though, >>> she'd be looking at a stretch in one of His Majesty's Prisons.
Yes, imagine for a moment that a hard-right conservative won the mayorship >> of
a major American city (against all odds) and he immediately started a
campaign
of explicitly making life difficult and financially fraught for black
people.
How long do you think it would be before that mayor was not only removed but
arrested and charged with criminal civil rights violations?
But when it's white people, all bets are off!
On Jan 7, 2026 at 10:19:56 AM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
On 2026-01-07 12:16 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 6, 2026 at 8:39:11 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>For the "progressives" ALL white people have targets on their backs and
wrote:
On 2026-01-06 11:01 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 2:36:54 PM PST, "Rhino" <no_offline_contact@example.com>In Starmer's Britain, she could go to jail for such sentiments - or be >>>> granted British citizenship despite them. Oh wait, she's AGAINST white >>>> people so no prison for her! If she'd said that about non-whites though, >>>> she'd be looking at a stretch in one of His Majesty's Prisons.
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 4:30 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:
On Jan 5, 2026 at 1:25:13 PM PST, "Rhino"Here's hoping!
<no_offline_contact@example.com>
wrote:
On 2026-01-05 2:04 p.m., BTR1701 wrote:Not only will all of this violate the 4th and 5th Amendments but the
Mamdani's Director of Tenancy, Cea Weaver, says NYC will transitionIn the days after Lenin seized power in 1917, people with houses soon
private
property to being a "collective good". This will apply not just to
commercial residential buildings but individual homes as well.
She says, "It will mean that especially white families are >>>>>>>>> going have a
different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In other words, she's going to try to take your house away from
you and
make
it a public resource.
The 5th Amendment will have something to say about that, comrade. NYC
might
have elected a communist, but its government still has to obey the
Constitution. And after the Justice Department is done with her, Cea
Weaver
will likely have a different relationship with her job than she
currently
has.
found themselves sharing them with people who had previously had rather
poorer housing. It wasn't a voluntary thing. Homes for single families
became improvised apartment buildings, typically with whole families
assigned to a single small room, with just enough room for a bed or two
and not much more. Kitchens and bathrooms became shared property with
everyone getting assigned times to cook. (I'm not sure if they assigned
times for bathroom breaks.) This pattern persisted for DECADES, not just
a year or two. It was only in the 50s with Stalin dead that the >>>>>>>> authorities finally started building "Krushchovkas" (named after >>>>>>>> Stalin's successor Krushchev), standard-pattern 5 storey apartment
blocks with paper-thin walls and elevators that almost never worked.
These buildings still form the bulk of housing throughout Russia and its
former republics and satellites, where they are usually called "Commie
blocks" by English-speakers - and English-speaking Russians. >>>>>>>>
It sounds to me like Mamdani plans to do the same in NYC. >>>>>>>
14th as
well, since his exciting new collectivist plans have an overt racial
element
to them.
And if he's not careful, he and his minions might also run smack >>>>>>> into the
true
purpose of the 2nd Amendment.
I'm having trouble imagining him moving homeless people into ordinary
family homes, let alone the mansions of the rich. I don't think >>>>>> Americans will stand for that. The lawyers will be drooling for the >>>>>> chance to take this to court to get some easy wins - and I don't mean
the lawyers for the city!
Ahead of her appointment, Comrade Weaver deleted her Twitter account in an
attempt to hide her outright communist and racist beliefs, but
unfortunately
for her, acting on a hunch, an independent media organization archived her
entire account just in case. So let's look at some of Comrade Weaver's
greatest hits:
@ceaweaver:
Private property, including (and kind of especially) home ownership,
is a weapon of white supremacy masquerading as "wealth building" >>>>> public policy.
Now you might notice that living in the United States is better in almost
every respect *because* we recognize private property rights and that >>>>> there's
never been a country in the history of mankind that doesn't recognize them
that you would actually want to live in.
You might also notice that in this country, white people aren't the only
ones
with homes. How does a black family owning their own home further the >>>>> cause
of
white supremacy, you might ask. That would be a good question, one which
might
have been asked of Comrade Weaver if there was still a legitimate and >>>>> functioning news media left in this country.
@ceaweaver:
Impoverish the *white* middle class. Home ownership is a racist >>>>> failed public policy.
Remember the woman who wrote that was just given a position of power in
the
administration of the mayor of the nation's largest city. And this isn't a
one-off. Another of Mamdani's appointees was quoted as saying, "It's >>>>> important
that white people feel defeated." So this entire administration is >>>>> blatantly
and virulently racist from its inception.
@ceaweaver:
I think passing strong rent control is an effective way to shrink
the value of real estate.
So here we have bright-line evidence that Mamdani has appointed a woman
whose
stated goal is to torpedo property values for the city's residence. >>>>> Imagine
being a potential homeowner or commercial real estate investor and hearing
something like this coming out of the mayor's office. Why would you >>>>> invest a
single dollar in property anywhere in New York City? The government is
coming
right out and saying that it wants you to lose money on your investment.
Bankrupting you is the quickest way for them to realize their dream of
nothing
but slums from one end of Manhattan to the other.
@ceaweaver
The KKK is a violent Christian group. To keep us all safe on this
busy travel day, Delta Airlines should kick all white people in >>>>> Christmas outfits off planes.
I mean, that one's just batshit crazy in addition to being (again) overtly
racist. And why just Delta Airlines? So many questions...
@ceaweaver
Really needing to repress the desire for revenge right now. >>>>> I wish I believed in god so I could believe that all men who take
credit for women's work and all white men who take credit for >>>>> the work of women of color would one day burn in agony.
More racism along with strong indications of mental instability and >>>>> violent
impulses.
Yes, imagine for a moment that a hard-right conservative won the mayorship
of
a major American city (against all odds) and he immediately started a
campaign
of explicitly making life difficult and financially fraught for black
people.
How long do you think it would be before that mayor was not only removed but
arrested and charged with criminal civil rights violations?
But when it's white people, all bets are off!
deserve to. It's always bizarre to me to hear that kind of thinking from
WHITE "progressives" who never seem to realize that they are painting
targets on THEIR OWN BACKS.
There's always the ones who think "I'm one of the good ones, so I'm safe", when in reality, when the revolution comes, it's usually the 'allies' who are first against the wall.
Robespierre was one of the first necks in the guillotine, after all. He and his allies were screaming as they were hauled off to the blade, "But wait, we're on *your* side!"
Not only that, even if the owner loses the eminent domain case, the government >still is required under the 5th Amendment to pay fair market value for what it >takes. Not sure where Comrade Mamdani thinks he's going to find the billions >(or even trillions) it would take to reimburse everyone he plans on stealing >from.
If I own a house and I want, for whatever reason, to leave it empty for a >period of time, that's none of the government's goddam business. It's *my* >house. I can rent it, live in it, leave it empty, let my kid stay in it for >free, or bulldoze it to the ground. Mam-fuckin'-dani doesn't get a say.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:45:15 |
| Calls: | 743 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| Messages: | 187,735 |