[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:Apparently, you missed the fact that "the boy" was paired with "the
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
"The boy"? I am assuming that you're referring to the roughly twenty-year
gap between _Second Stage Lensman_ and _Children of the Lens_. If so, Kinnison >was probably 22 when he graduated from Wentworth Hall. The events of _Galactic >Patrol_, _Gray Lensman_, and _Second Stage Lensman_ took about nine years by >my reckoning, so he would have been roughly thirty-one when he and MacDougall >married. Not, in my mind, a "boy" any more.
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
"The boy"? I am assuming that you're referring to the roughly twenty-year
gap between _Second Stage Lensman_ and _Children of the Lens_. If so, Kinnison >was probably 22 when he graduated from Wentworth Hall. The events of _Galactic >Patrol_, _Gray Lensman_, and _Second Stage Lensman_ took about nine years by >my reckoning, so he would have been roughly thirty-one when he and MacDougall >married. Not, in my mind, a "boy" any more.
And the "senior" wasn't another, higher-up officer, but Mentor of Arisia.
I think that most people, even in the 1950s, already knew where babies came >from. Even an exceptionally naive twelve-year-old boy would at least be aware, >from observation, that babies often followed marriage, even if he wasn't aware >of all of the fluid dynamics and simple harmonic motion involved.
Smith didn't portray Kimball and "Red" having sex, it's true. He didn't portray
the happy couple moving to the Second Galaxy, either. He also didn't portray >Kimball taking a dump.
And your recollection that the Children of the Lens were not infants is
quite correct. The youngest -- the twins Camilla and Constance -- were >roughly sixteen when _Children of the Lens_ opens. Old enough that one
of them had to fend off a wolf when (IIRC) checking into some hotel.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
And your recollection that the Children of the Lens were not infants is >quite correct. The youngest -- the twins Camilla and Constance -- were >roughly sixteen when _Children of the Lens_ opens. Old enough that one
of them had to fend off a wolf when (IIRC) checking into some hotel.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow. Remember all the naked people in both the Skylark & Lensman universes?
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
In article <n099u9F6c9qU1@mid.individual.net>,
ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) wrote:
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
(Snip, re: the Lensman series
And your recollection that the Children of the Lens were not infants is
quite correct. The youngest -- the twins Camilla and Constance -- were
roughly sixteen when _Children of the Lens_ opens. Old enough that one
of them had to fend off a wolf when (IIRC) checking into some hotel.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I remember a prediction from Mentor that implied future brother-sisters
(all 4 of them) incest
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow. Remember >> all the naked people in both the Skylark & Lensman universes?
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
?? ... looks through the ISFDB ... _Have Trenchcoat -- Will Travel_, I >wonder when it was written.
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow.
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
On 25/02/2026 16.03, Ted Nolan <tednolan> wrote:
In article <10nnqe6$1430i$1@dont-email.me>,
Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/01/2026 11.41, Paul S Person wrote:
[1] Did anyone else notice that, at the end of one of the Lensmen
books, the boy is advised by a senior to marry the girl and the next
book starts with them being married long enough to have children (and
not, IIRC, infants either) with /no clue whatsoever where the babies
came from being provided/? This is the sort of thing that the later
sex-laded stories were reacting against.
There were plenty of allusions to sex in _Children of the Lens_, mostly
Kit noticing that his sisters were pretty hot and his mother was in
MILF territory herself. Serious implied incest -- enough to make RAH
proud -- even if the acts themselves were not portrayed.
I think Smith got away with about as much as Campbell would allow.
You seem to have misspelled "F. Orlin Tremaine". Hope this helps.
Reading his detective novel is instructive.
I'd definitely like to, but haven't ever seen it on a shelf.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:57:16 |
| Calls: | 812 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
20 files (23,248K bytes) |
| Messages: | 210,076 |