• Montreal Worldcon code of conduct

    From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 07:10:21 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    I've posted another analysis of a convention's code of conduct, this
    time for the 2027 Montreal Worldcon.

    https://garymcgath.com/montreal-worldcon-code-of-conduct/

    Here's the text of my post:


    //////////////////////
    I've registered as an attending member for the 2027 Worldcon in
    Montreal. Even though it's in another country, it's an easy day's drive
    from my home. I hope that crossing the border won't be too dangerous to consider by then, but today I'm here to talk about its code of conduct.
    There have been better ones and worse ones. I have concerns, but they
    weren't enough to scare me out of registering. Let's take a look, as I
    have with other conventions.

    You can be expelled based on "the sole judgement of a convention chair
    or designated person." This puts a lot of power in one person's hands.
    Don't get the con chair mad at you! However, most conventions are
    unclear on who has this authority, so it's hard to say this is worse.

    "Costumes, cosplays and clothing must provide the same level of body
    coverage expected at an all-ages public beach." But in the next
    paragraph, we're told that nipples must be covered "regardless of gender presentation." It doesn't bother me that shirts are required, but the inconsistency is interesting. Maybe they figured this is the safest way
    to deal with trans edge cases? Anyway, wear a shirt. Most fans don't
    look very good without one anyway.

    "Masks shall not include balaclavas, ski masks, and other styles of
    masks commonly associated with bank robberies." ICE shouldn't be in
    Canada, but this is reassuring. :)

    Now we come to the speech rules. Montreal's aren't as bad as some; they
    don't say that anything that anyone takes offense at violates the rules. Still, they could make people wary of what they're allowed to say, and
    could in principle lead to unwarranted warnings or expulsions.

    "Costumes and clothing may not include racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or otherwise prejudiced or bigoted messages or sentiments, obscene or offensive language, or images including uncensored
    profanities and pornographic content." This rule is vague and could
    easily be abused. The boundary lines of unconventional opinions,
    prejudiced messages, and humor are often vague. Profanities are often
    part of ordinary language and can appear on shirts without causing
    alarm. Don't wear your "Shit Happens" or "To Hell with [whatever]" shirt
    to the con. Some people will consider a slogan supporting Israel
    bigoted; others will think that one supporting Palestine is. The rule's broadness could scare off legitimate expression or provide an excuse for banning it.

    "Speech or actions that show prejudicial discrimination, including those relating to race, colour, culture, national origin, disabilities,
    gender, gender identity, gender presentation, sexual orientation,
    religion, age, body size, choice to wear a mask, and appearance, shall
    be considered harassment." How does the convention decide if a statement
    shows "prejudicial discrimination"? Worse, any such statement is
    automatically escalated to "harassment," even if it isn't directed or persistent. This could lead to unwarranted charges. Suppose, for
    example, someone says, "I can't take a religion seriously that claims
    its priests can turn bread into Jesus." Someone might claim that shows prejudicial discrimination against Christianity, and therefore is
    harassment. Maybe the comment I made above about shirtless fans is too. Getting kicked out of a convention for "harassment" is a serious black
    mark on a fan or pro.

    The best way to deal with people saying annoying things is to tell them
    to leave you alone. Some conventions have a rule that if someone tells
    you not to bother them, you have to stop bothering them. It can defuse a
    lot of problems. Montreal doesn't have such a rule, though.

    "Montreal 2027 Worldcon members must ask permission before taking
    photographs of other members. If a person wishes for a photograph in
    which they appear to be deleted, they may ask the photographer to do so
    and the photographer must comply." Taken as stated, that means panelists
    and speakers can't be photographed unless they give permission. They
    can't just say "It's OK to take pictures"; each person who wants to take
    a picture must ask individually. I don't expect that to be enforced,
    though, unless a speaker is really averse to photography.

    "All policies regarding photography also apply to all audio and visual recording technologies." This means people have to ask permission of
    each singer if they want to record a filk circle. The rule could be
    improved by allowing events and individuals to grant general permission
    where the people being recorded or photographed are comfortable with it.

    "Dogs in training, emotional support animals and therapy animals are not allowed in convention spaces." (Properly vetted service animals are.)
    Someday I should look into the rise and fall of "emotional support
    animals." It was obvious from the beginning that the idea was an excuse
    to bring pets in where they otherwise wouldn't be allowed, and a lot of
    places are now explicitly rejecting those claims.

    There you have it. There are causes for concern in the area of
    expression, but nothing that will keep me away. It might make me leave
    some of my shirts at home, just to be safe.

    //////////////////////
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 10:13:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 7:10 AM, Gary McGath wrote:

    Now we come to the speech rules. Montreal's aren't as bad as some; they don't say that anything that anyone takes offense at violates the rules. Still, they could make people wary of what they're allowed to say, and
    could in principle lead to unwarranted warnings or expulsions.

    "Costumes and clothing may not include racist, sexist, homophobic, transphobic, or otherwise prejudiced or bigoted messages or sentiments, obscene or offensive language, or images including uncensored
    profanities and pornographic content." This rule is vague and could
    easily be abused. The boundary lines of unconventional opinions,
    prejudiced messages, and humor are often vague. Profanities are often
    part of ordinary language and can appear on shirts without causing
    alarm. Don't wear your "Shit Happens" or "To Hell with [whatever]" shirt
    to the con. Some people will consider a slogan supporting Israel
    bigoted; others will think that one supporting Palestine is. The rule's broadness could scare off legitimate expression or provide an excuse for banning it.

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    In the words of Cato, "Fasciculi de Epstein emitti debent."
    In my words, "Invoke the 25th in 25."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jdnicoll@jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 16:02:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of >Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From prd@prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 17:07:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10f4veg$pio$1@reader2.panix.com>, jdnicoll@panix.com (James
    Nicoll) wrote:


    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    I remember at the last Montreal Worldcon, we were told to say, "Bonjour
    hi".
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 12:09:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 11:02 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    Vraiment amusant.
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    In the words of Cato, "Fasciculi de Epstein emitti debent."
    In my words, "Invoke the 25th in 25."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 12:18:56 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 12:09 PM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:
    On 11/13/25 11:02 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    Vraiment amusant.


    Actually, the important phrase is "J'ai vote pour Kamala." :-)

    (And many of us are neither Qu|-b|-cois nor Anglais.)
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    In the words of Cato, "Fasciculi de Epstein emitti debent." pour Harris.
    In my words, "Invoke the 25th in 25."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cryptoengineer@petertrei@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 12:49:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/2025 12:18 PM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:
    On 11/13/25 12:09 PM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:
    On 11/13/25 11:02 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    Vraiment amusant.


    Actually, the important phrase is "J'ai vote pour Kamala." :-)

    This may well be true. Many Canadians are *very* upset with the
    toddler in the White House, and his tariff tantrums. This extends
    to his supporters.

    If we're lucky, SCOTUS will read the Constitution for once, and
    rule that tariffing is the job of Congress, not the Executive
    branch.

    I remember that back when the US was invading Iraq, on a false
    pretect of 'weapons of mass destruction', Americans abroad
    sometimes wore shirts saying 'I apologize for my President.
    I did not vote for him' in about 30 languages.

    Maybe we need a new edition.

    pt
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith F. Lynch@kfl@KeithLynch.net to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 22:24:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    The best way to deal with people saying annoying things is to tell
    them to leave you alone. Some conventions have a rule that if
    someone tells you not to bother them, you have to stop bothering
    them. It can defuse a lot of problems.

    At Balticon, asking someone to leave you alone constitutes harassment.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 17:40:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 10:13 AM, Evelyn C. Leeper wrote:
    On 11/13/25 7:10 AM, Gary McGath wrote:

    Now we come to the speech rules. Montreal's aren't as bad as some;
    they don't say that anything that anyone takes offense at violates the
    rules. Still, they could make people wary of what they're allowed to
    say, and could in principle lead to unwarranted warnings or expulsions.

    "Costumes and clothing may not include racist, sexist, homophobic,
    transphobic, or otherwise prejudiced or bigoted messages or
    sentiments, obscene or offensive language, or images including
    uncensored profanities and pornographic content." This rule is vague
    and could easily be abused. The boundary lines of unconventional
    opinions, prejudiced messages, and humor are often vague. Profanities
    are often part of ordinary language and can appear on shirts without
    causing alarm. Don't wear your "Shit Happens" or "To Hell with
    [whatever]" shirt to the con. Some people will consider a slogan
    supporting Israel bigoted; others will think that one supporting
    Palestine is. The rule's broadness could scare off legitimate
    expression or provide an excuse for banning it.

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of Conduct.


    I don't know much about Canada's speech laws, but what I can find
    doesn't suggest that the country has outlawed profanities or merely
    prejudiced statements. The criminal code includes three areas of "hatred-related" speech offenses: advocating genocide, publicly inciting hatred likely to lead to a breach of the peace, and wilfully promoting
    hatred. The first two don't apply here. It would be a big stretch for "prejudiced or bigoted" statements in private conversation to be counted
    as "promoting hatred."

    I just don't think the concom was forced to include this by their
    lawyers. The language doesn't appear to reflect national or provincial
    laws, but it is similar to language in other convention codes of
    conduct, including many in the US.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 17:46:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 5:24 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    The best way to deal with people saying annoying things is to tell
    them to leave you alone. Some conventions have a rule that if
    someone tells you not to bother them, you have to stop bothering
    them. It can defuse a lot of problems.

    At Balticon, asking someone to leave you alone constitutes harassment.

    Balticon is worse than most cons, though not unique. It prohibits saying anything derogatory about anybody.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Tim Merrigan@tppm@rr.ca.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 15:06:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/2025 8:02 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    :) Did you learn that from a Qu|-becois? It actually translates to "I am cursed English."
    --

    Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.

    Tim Merrigan

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Thu Nov 13 18:25:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 6:06 PM, Tim Merrigan wrote:
    On 11/13/2025 8:02 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <10f4sia$26gpu$1@dont-email.me>,
    Evelyn C. Leeper <evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com> wrote:

    Do not forget that Montreal is in Canada, and their free speech laws
    differ from those of the US. In specific, Canada has laws restricting
    hate speech, obscenity, and defamation. Montreal is, so far as I can
    tell, merely trying to incorporate this information in their Code of
    Conduct.

    Montreal is also in Quebec so it may be an idea to learn one or
    two phrases in French, such as Bonjour (Hello), Merci (thank you),
    and Je suis maudit Anglais (I am not from Quebec).

    :) Did you learn that from a Qu|-becois?-a It actually translates to "I am cursed English."


    Some people don't recognize a joke when they see it. James is Canadian;
    I'm sure he knew what it meant. :-)

    (It reminded me of the Monty Python skit "Dirty Hungarian Phrasebook".)
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    In the words of Cato, "Fasciculi de Epstein emitti debent."
    In my words, "Invoke the 25th in 25."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From djheydt@djheydt@kithrup.com (Dorothy J Heydt) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 00:17:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10f5n4f$2ftt1$3@dont-email.me>,
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    On 11/13/25 5:24 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    The best way to deal with people saying annoying things is to tell
    them to leave you alone. Some conventions have a rule that if
    someone tells you not to bother them, you have to stop bothering
    them. It can defuse a lot of problems.

    At Balticon, asking someone to leave you alone constitutes harassment.

    Balticon is worse than most cons, though not unique. It prohibits saying >anything derogatory about anybody.

    [Hal Heydt]
    Even the ConComm? Or should that be, especially the ConComm?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith F. Lynch@kfl@KeithLynch.net to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 01:19:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Balticon is worse than most cons, though not unique. It prohibits
    saying anything derogatory about anybody.

    [Hal Heydt]
    Even the ConComm? Or should that be, especially the ConComm?

    According to https://www.bsfs.org/code-conduct.htm:

    UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT:
    * Slurs and derogatory comments about a person, group, or category
    of people.

    Anyone who thinks they don't take that literally, ask Stephanie Burke.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 06:03:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 8:19 PM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Dorothy J Heydt <djheydt@kithrup.com> wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    Balticon is worse than most cons, though not unique. It prohibits
    saying anything derogatory about anybody.

    [Hal Heydt]
    Even the ConComm? Or should that be, especially the ConComm?

    According to https://www.bsfs.org/code-conduct.htm:

    UNACCEPTABLE CONDUCT:
    * Slurs and derogatory comments about a person, group, or category
    of people.

    Anyone who thinks they don't take that literally, ask Stephanie Burke.

    I think the point was that if the rule were applied to the concom, it
    would negate itself. After all, saying someone has made a derogatory
    comment is a derogatory comment.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith F. Lynch@kfl@KeithLynch.net to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 14:37:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    I think the point was that if the rule were applied to the concom,
    it would negate itself. After all, saying someone has made a
    derogatory comment is a derogatory comment.

    Good point. I've wondered the same about rules such as, "You're not
    allowed to weaponize any of these rules."

    Unfortunately for Balticon's concom, lots of fans have long since
    concluded that the only way to win the Balticon game is not to play.

    And with the current economy, I think it's unlikely that the vacuum
    left by Balticon's demise will be filled with another con.
    --
    Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
    Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 10:21:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/14/25 9:37 AM, Keith F. Lynch wrote:
    Gary McGath <garym@mcgath.com> wrote:
    I think the point was that if the rule were applied to the concom,
    it would negate itself. After all, saying someone has made a
    derogatory comment is a derogatory comment.

    Good point. I've wondered the same about rules such as, "You're not
    allowed to weaponize any of these rules."

    Unfortunately for Balticon's concom, lots of fans have long since
    concluded that the only way to win the Balticon game is not to play.

    I've stayed away from Balticon for years, even though it has a good filk program and I used to go there pretty regularly.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From prd@prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 16:24:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10f5o8s$2g6kg$1@dont-email.me>, tppm@rr.ca.com (Tim Merrigan) wrote:


    :) Did you learn that from a Quobecois? It actually translates to "I
    am cursed English."

    Canadians are as much into irony as the English.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From prd@prd@pauldormer.cix.co.uk (Paul Dormer) to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 16:24:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    In article <10f5pdq$2gj02$1@dont-email.me>,
    evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com (Evelyn C. Leeper) wrote:


    (It reminded me of the Monty Python skit "Dirty Hungarian
    Phrasebook".)

    Amusing fact. There is a tradition at British universities called Rag
    Week, where various events are held for charity. This often includes a
    student revue. There was a Rag Week at Leeds just after I started there
    in 1970 and the team organising the revue wrote to the Monty Python team
    asking for a sketch they could used. The Hungarian phrase book was what
    they got, some weeks before it was broadcast by the BBC. (I had not
    watched Monty Python before I saw this sketch.)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gary McGath@garym@mcgath.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 19:33:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/13/25 5:40 PM, Gary McGath wrote:

    I don't know much about Canada's speech laws, but what I can find
    doesn't suggest that the country has outlawed profanities or merely prejudiced statements. The criminal code includes three areas of "hatred-related" speech offenses: advocating genocide, publicly inciting hatred likely to lead to a breach of the peace, and wilfully promoting hatred. The first two don't apply here. It would be a big stretch for "prejudiced or bigoted" statements in private conversation to be counted
    as "promoting hatred."

    I just don't think the concom was forced to include this by their
    lawyers. The language doesn't appear to reflect national or provincial
    laws, but it is similar to language in other convention codes of
    conduct, including many in the US.


    Quebec's government is considering a law banning prayer in public. (Yes, really.) Perhaps the code of conduct should add praying to the list of prohibited speech, just to make sure they don't run afoul of the law.
    --
    Gary McGath http://www.mcgath.com
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Evelyn C. Leeper@evelynchimelisleeper@gmail.com to rec.arts.sf.fandom on Fri Nov 14 21:27:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom

    On 11/14/25 19:33, Gary McGath wrote:
    On 11/13/25 5:40 PM, Gary McGath wrote:

    I don't know much about Canada's speech laws, but what I can find
    doesn't suggest that the country has outlawed profanities or merely
    prejudiced statements. The criminal code includes three areas of
    "hatred-related" speech offenses: advocating genocide, publicly
    inciting hatred likely to lead to a breach of the peace, and wilfully
    promoting hatred. The first two don't apply here. It would be a big
    stretch for "prejudiced or bigoted" statements in private conversation
    to be counted as "promoting hatred."

    I just don't think the concom was forced to include this by their
    lawyers. The language doesn't appear to reflect national or provincial
    laws, but it is similar to language in other convention codes of
    conduct, including many in the US.


    Quebec's government is considering a law banning prayer in public. (Yes, really.) Perhaps the code of conduct should add praying to the list of prohibited speech, just to make sure they don't run afoul of the law.

    They'll have to define prayer first. I mean, if I'm rolling craps and
    say, "Please, God, give me a seven," is that praying?

    Or if someone suggests some future event, and I say, "From your lips to
    God's ears," does that count?

    Or is silently using a hand-held prayer wheel praying? What about sign language? For that matter, what about silent prayer? (As Frank Bunker Gilbreth, Jr., said regarding prayer in public schools in the US, "...
    as long as there are final examinations in school, there will be prayers.")
    --
    Evelyn C. Leeper, http://leepers.us/evelyn
    In the words of Cato, "Fasciculi de Epstein emitti debent."
    In my words, "Invoke the 25th in 25."
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2