From Newsgroup: rec.arts.sf.fandom
On 6/6/2025 12:07 AM, Theory11 wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 16:36:06 +0000, Ubiquitous wrote:
In article <xn0p6outf79jm86001@post.eweka.nl>, blueshirt@indigo.news
wrote:
Ubiquitous wrote:
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
Hopefully Rose is a placeholder.
From what I heard, it was a stunt to convince Disney to pay
for another season ("Look at the ratings! People want to see
another season!").
Well... if the alternative is "Doctor Who" being cancelled, I
want to see another season, regardless of the ratings.
I'd rather have no Doctor Who than bad Doctor Who.
The simplest alternative is to avoid watching a television program that
has deteriorated in quality to the stage where it is deemed "bad" by
parts of its fandom.
I agree, those people who think it's bad, should stop watching it. I,
for one, will continue watching, and mostly enjoying, it, assuming these grumps haven't gotten it canceled.
--
Qualified immunity = virtual impunity.
Tim Merrigan
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2