On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a >'Paedophile'!!^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
--
Daniel70
On 3/01/2026 11:41 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0pkb5ub1gwt27006@post.eweka.nl>,I just did, Binky .... and it seems someone might have been spoofing
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/2/2026 06:15, Blueshirt wrote:
Any regular visitor to RADW knows there are not 113
people posting here... a lot of the additions over
the year are people that have been brought into RADW
by cross-posting... but they have not stuck around.
In an average month there are no more than 25 regular
contributors here.
It just demonstrates that Dave didn't do well when it came
to statistics and analysis in school.
He's not... as he censors out people (like Idlehands) so his
statistics aren't even correct. But he still persists with
his juvenile games... and then gets offended when people say
#fakestats
I don't blame Dave though. I blame his parents for not making
sure he went to school every day.
horn is out of it. And so are you.
Look at the original post.
YOU, Binky, because the OP Spoofer was using MesNews/1.08.06.00-gb ....^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
rather than your usual trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
WOW!! Fancy someone wanting to Spoof Binky!!
----
Daniel70
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a 'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:'banned' words
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a 'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:'banned' words
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' words
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' wordsIt isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one, and is on some
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
----
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile talkers.
In article <10jc6pc$2nkil$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss|e-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' words
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
Please clarify what you meant about useless posts.
In article <10jc6pc$2nkil$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss|e-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' words
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
Please clarify what you meant about useless posts.
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
Daniel70
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile
On 4/01/2026 2:35 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,He could have been, Binky, but he used the term "useless posts"
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile talkers.
----
Daniel70
On 4/01/2026 2:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jc6pc$2nkil$1@solani.org>,^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss|e-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' words
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
Please clarify what you meant about useless posts.
WHAT?? You, Binky, have determined that Stan is using BANNED words ....
and NOW you want him to explain those words!!^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Sort of like shutting the gates after the Horse has bolted, Binky!!
----
Daniel70
The Binky Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
Daniel70
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile
https://postimg.cc/xJ1FNsgg^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Stay away from the kiddies, stinky binky.
The Binky Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jc6pc$2nkil$1@solani.org>,^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/3/2026 5:44 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss|e-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
<Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
Not really! If we remove all of the useless
|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a|e-a
The useless drivel you post, Binky, you brain^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
Define useless.
Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedfor some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
'banned' words
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
Stan
Please clarify what you meant about useless posts.
dead f*kwit.--
In article <10jdo6a$20kdb$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 4/01/2026 2:35 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,He could have been, Binky, but he used the term "useless posts"
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:Define useless.
Not really! If we remove all of the useless<Snip><Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile talkers.
--
Daniel70
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern
and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
On 1/4/2026 2:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jdo6a$20kdb$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 4/01/2026 2:35 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>,He could have been, Binky, but he used the term "useless posts"
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>,Oh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' words, yet, >>>> ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:Define useless.
Not really! If we remove all of the useless<Snip><Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
posts what does that do to those numbers?
Stan
for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan in talking like a
'Paedophile'!!
Are we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the paedophile talkers. >>>>
--
Daniel70
Since you asked. This is an example of a useless post.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern
and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern
and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
----
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as
one, and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A
modern and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
one, and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A
modern and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it doesn't
count!
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
StanWeiss said:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
From the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
----
solar penguin
StanWeiss said:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:From the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
% wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs >>>> all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used
useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
You're an even bigger asshole than he is.
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:From the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
The Binky Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us
Do you have a mouse in your pocket, Binky?^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
% wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs >>>> all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless >>>>> posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
You're an even bigger a*le than he is.
Pete Tuttle wrote:
% wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:You're an even bigger a*le than he is.
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs >>>>> all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used
useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>>> your posting stats.
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
all the more room for your head to fit up
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
one, and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A
modern and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it doesn't
count!
On 1/5/2026 09:26, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
For Dave, anything that inflates his posting stats has value.
----
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
one, and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A
modern and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it doesn't
count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
----
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <10jfjso$2psr8$1@solani.org>, StanWeiss
<srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/4/2026 2:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jdo6a$20kdb$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 4/01/2026 2:35 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>, StanWeissOh!! Come on, Binky, Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned'
<srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:Define useless.
Not really! If we remove all of the useless posts what<Snip><Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
does that do to those numbers?
Stan
words, yet, for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan
in talking like a 'Paedophile'!!
He could have been, Binky, but he used the term "uselessAre we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the
paedophile talkers.
posts"
Since you asked. This is an example of a useless post.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is
inflate your posting stats.
Stan
I was correct. You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
In article <IqO6R.42433$Mn92.5527@fx18.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern
and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
In article <10jgr04$32f70$1@nntp.eternal-september.org>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
StanWeiss said:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
From the idiot|ore4raos POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, it|ore4raos
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
TimelessChild will never be Doctor Who fans!
% wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:You're an even bigger asshole than he is.
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs >>>> all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used
useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
In article <xn0pkf4cl5es6pu006@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one, and is on
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern and
trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and fundamentalist
Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
All I can say is Welcome Stan Weiss.
On 6/01/2026 1:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Sorry!! What?? Are YOU, Binky, now picking on DoctorPeter,
too?? (Didn't 'Bad Wolf' also produce 'Doctor Who' back
then??
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
I was correct.-a You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky, now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar
Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky??
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jfjso$2psr8$1@solani.org>, StanWeiss
<srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/4/2026 2:52 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jdo6a$20kdb$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 4/01/2026 2:35 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jarui$160ip$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 3/01/2026 2:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10j8p6n$2lchn$1@solani.org>, StanWeissOh!! Come on, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy >>>>>>> in child Sexual Molestation), Stan hasn't used any of your 'banned' >>>>>>> words, yet, for some illusory reason, you still claim Stan
<srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/2/2026 4:59 AM, Daniel70 wrote:Define useless.
Not really! If we remove all of the useless posts what<Snip><Re-insert>
The numbers prove that usenet is not dying
does that do to those numbers?
Stan
in talking like a 'Paedophile'!!
And who would care (apart from Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy in child Sexual Molestation)) if anyone used one of Binky(Word used >by paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s
'banned' words.
He could have been, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>>>> joy in child Sexual Molestation), but he used the term "uselessAre we now not allowed to use "If we"??
Just how stupid are you, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >>>>>>> their joy in child Sexual Molestation)??
StanWeiss could be talking about filtering out the
paedophile talkers.
posts"
Since you asked. This is an example of a useless post.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is
inflate your posting stats.
Stan
I was correct. You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
in child Sexual Molestation), now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar
Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky(Word used by
paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 1:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <IqO6R.42433$Mn92.5527@fx18.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 05:30, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one,
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
and is on some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern
and trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and
fundamentalist Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Sorry!! What?? Are YOU, Binky,(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy in child Sexual Molestation)now picking on DoctorPeter, too?? (Didn't >'Bad Wolf' also produce 'Doctor Who' back then??_
--
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 2:26 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:But isn't that what life's all about, Stan?? Inflating Binky(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s Precious >Post Count??
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
--
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy in child >Sexual Molesta tion)!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
--
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 4:08 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgr04$32f70$1@nntp.eternal-september.org>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
StanWeiss said:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
From the idiot|ore4raos POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, >it|ore4raos
all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
takes second place after that.
TimelessChild will never be Doctor Who fans!
Sorry! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy in child Sexual Molestation), now thinking that 'The Timeless Child' is >a REAL Person, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
in child Sexual Molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 6:20 am, Pete Tuttle wrote:
% wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:You're an even bigger a%ole than he is.
On 1/5/2026 12:05 PM, solar penguin wrote:i have requested every post he makes ,
StanWeiss said:He feels / believe it is his job to reply to almost ever post. The
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:-aFrom the idiotrCOs POV, that makes it a useful post. For him, itrCOs >>>>> all about increasing his precious post count. Everything else
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used
useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>>> your posting stats.
takes second place after that.
problem is he lacks anything useful to post so he fulls back on
standards. I see he has pulled is 3rd most useless post sack RTD.
Stan
he's a service and carries info i need ,
and you ...
But at least '%' spreads himself around the UseNet more, so not
bothering us as much as he used to!!
----
Daniel70
On 6/01/2026 1:16 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <xn0pkf4cl5es6pu006@post.eweka.nl>, BlueshirtSorry!! WHAT?? Who are you and what have YOU done with our beloved Binky (Word >used by paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)??
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/3/2026 16:55, StanWeiss wrote:
It isn't....but Dave has self-appointed himself as one, and is on
I don't know that is a moderated news group.
some sort of Virtue Signal Crusade.
Dave virtue signalling??? Are there two Dave's here? - A modern and
trendy Dave for 2026, plus the old fashioned and fundamentalist
Dave that we all know and love?
I must have missed the former...
All I can say is Welcome Stan Weiss.
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 1:20 am, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Sorry!! What?? Are YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophile to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation), now picking on DoctorPeter,
too?? (Didn't 'Bad Wolf' also produce 'Doctor Who' back
then??
No.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
walking contradictions to begin with.
On 1/6/2026 3:47 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
For him it comes to quantity of posts over quality of posts.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
In article <10jj3om$2p98o$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/6/2026 3:47 AM, Daniel70 wrote:So what is your favourite Doctor Who Stan?
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:For him it comes to quantity of posts over quality of posts.
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless >>>>> posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
Stan
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
New Year, Binky!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
Stan
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**, **what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar**
* Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted)
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting.
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
On 1/6/2026 10:25 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jj3om$2p98o$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
So what is your favourite Doctor Who Stan?
Tom Baker
On 1/6/2026 10:24 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely >> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many
centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological >> storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this
context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the >> modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**,
**what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent >> historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar** >> * Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted) >>
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic
tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting. >>
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
Council of Nicaea
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can "hallucinate"...
i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person that has knowledge
of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT 'expert' should also
know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a group
of books written hundreds of years ago contain absolute facts
to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
On 2026-01-06 1:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
I was correct.-a You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky, now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar
Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky??
Poor binky, struggling to find someone, anyone to join his paedophile "crusade".-a It's been over 10 years since he was christened "binky" in edm.general, his current tantrum over it is somewhat puzzling.
However I won't lose any sleep over binky acting like a binky.
On 1/6/2026 3:47 AM, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless
posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
For him it comes to quantity of posts over quality of posts.
Stan
In article <10jjaie$2pf1d$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/6/2026 10:25 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jj3om$2p98o$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
So what is your favourite Doctor Who Stan?
Tom Baker
For me, the Best Tom Baker was Warriors' Gate
followed by Genesis of the Daleks.
In article <10jii6r$3kls2$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy in child
Sexual Molesta tion)!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
So Are you a doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
In article <10jii0s$3kj9j$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 2:26 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:But isn't that what life's all about, Stan?? Inflating Binky(Word used by
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts. >>>
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s Precious
Post Count??
So are you a Doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
Xor as in exclusive or?
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as intelligent as those that programmed it.
On 7/01/2026 12:47 am, Idlehands wrote:
On 2026-01-06 1:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
I was correct.-a You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky, (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>> joy of child sexual molestation)now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar
Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky (Word used by
paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual molestation) ??
Poor binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual >> molestation) , struggling to find someone, anyone to join his paedophile
"crusade".-a It's been over 10 years since he was christened
"binky" (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual
molestation) in edm.general, his current tantrum over it is
somewhat puzzling.
However I won't lose any sleep over binky (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) acting like
a binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation).
Yeap! Yeap! Yeap.--
--
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 12:47 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/6/2026 3:47 AM, Daniel70 wrote:So you know Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss-a <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless >>>>> posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >>> sexual molestation)!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
For him it comes to quantity of posts over quality of posts.
Stan
of child sexual molestation) well, then, Stan.
--
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 2:55 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jjaie$2pf1d$1@solani.org>,So what, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/6/2026 10:25 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jj3om$2p98o$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
So what is your favourite Doctor Who Stan?
Tom Baker
For me, the Best Tom Baker was Warriors' Gate
followed by Genesis of the Daleks.
sexual molestation)?? You didn't ask Stan which of Tom Bakers Eps were Stan's
Best, YOU, Binky, merely asked him which was his favourite Doctor Who, >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) .
But still, it's another posts so adds to Your Precious Post Count!!!
----
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 2:11 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jii6r$3kls2$1@dont-email.me>,No, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 3:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jgl7c$2qiqa$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
Stan
Exacuse us, but the AntiDoctorWho tiemless child is so toxic to
Doctor Who that retconning it out is the only way to go.
And Defendender of the The Timless Child and Chris Chibnall
deserve all the disdain they earn.
"Exacuse"?? I see YOUR spell-checker is working fantastically in this
New Year, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy in child
Sexual Molestation)!
And I almost missed "tiemless", too.
So Are you a doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
sexual molestation)!!
--
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 2:10 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jii0s$3kj9j$2@dont-email.me>,No, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 2:26 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:But isn't that what life's all about, Stan?? Inflating Binky(Word used by >>> paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s Precious >>> Post Count??
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate
your posting stats.
Stan
So are you a Doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
Xor as in exclusive or?
sexual molestation) .
--
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as >intelligent as those that programmed it.
----
Daniel70
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can "hallucinate"...
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV thenDoes that include the parts that contradict themselves?
it doesn't count!
are walking contradictions to begin with.
i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person that has knowledge
of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT 'expert' should also
know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a group
of books written hundreds of years ago contain absolute facts
to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
In article <10jldsv$iqhk$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
intelligent as those that programmed it.
So what do You make of
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**, **what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar**
* Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted)
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting.
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
--
Daniel70
On 1/6/2026 12:53 PM, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can "hallucinate"...
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV thenDoes that include the parts that contradict themselves?
it doesn't count!
are walking contradictions to begin with.
i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person that has knowledge
of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT 'expert' should also
know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a group
of books written hundreds of years ago contain absolute facts
to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
Over the years different versions on the same "stores" have been found.
Some may even be older that the accepted version.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
On 1/7/2026 9:59 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jldsv$iqhk$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
intelligent as those that programmed it.
So what do You make of
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely >> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many
centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological >> storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this
context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the >> modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**,
**what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent >> historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar** >> * Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted) >>
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic
tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting. >>
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
--
Daniel70
The Council of Nicaea not only decided what "story" could be keep, but
also which version of that story meet their needs.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
In article <10jm15q$2r67c$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/7/2026 9:59 AM, The Doctor wrote:I have heard of the Book of Enoch. Have you?
In article <10jldsv$iqhk$1@dont-email.me>,The Council of Nicaea not only decided what "story" could be keep, but
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:So what do You make of
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
intelligent as those that programmed it.
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely >>> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many
centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological
storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this
context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the
modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**, >>> **what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent >>> historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar** >>> * Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted) >>>
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic
tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting. >>>
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
--
Daniel70
also which version of that story meet their needs.
Stan
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
You have to wonder if athists like BS and YN would
accept the collaberation evidence from sciences independent
of the Holy Bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
On 1/7/2026 12:00 PM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jm15q$2r67c$2@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/7/2026 9:59 AM, The Doctor wrote:I have heard of the Book of Enoch. Have you?
In article <10jldsv$iqhk$1@dont-email.me>,The Council of Nicaea not only decided what "story" could be keep, but
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:24 am, The Doctor wrote:So what do You make of
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,If AI IS "contradictionry", it is because it is DUMB .... only as
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types are
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
The old fashion part is the virtue Dave is signaling.You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then it
doesn't count!
walking contradictions to begin with.
intelligent as those that programmed it.
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and >definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely >>>> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and, >>>> for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many >>>> centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological
storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this >>>> context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather >>>> than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the
modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**, >>>> **what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent
historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar**
* Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas** >>>> * The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted) >>>>
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic
tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting.
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a >textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
--
Daniel70
also which version of that story meet their needs.
Stan
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
Yes, I have.
Stan--
The Doctor wrote:
You have to wonder if athists like BS and YN would
accept the collaberation evidence from sciences independent
of the Holy Bible.
What person with a reasonable level of intelligence believes
in something that they can't see, hear, smell or touch?
Reality is what can be measured and demonstrated to be actual,
regardless of belief.
God is as real as the fairies at the end of the garden - and no
sensible person believes in them do they?
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to babysit
the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In article <10jlcmd$ib5k$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 12:47 am, Idlehands wrote:
On 2026-01-06 1:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
I was correct.|e-a You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF,
solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky, (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >>>> joy of child sexual molestation)now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar
Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky (Word used by
paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual molestation) ??
Poor binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual >>> molestation) , struggling to find someone, anyone to join his paedophile >>> "crusade".|e-a It's been over 10 years since he was christened
"binky" (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual
molestation) in edm.general, his current tantrum over it is
somewhat puzzling.
However I won't lose any sleep over binky (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) acting like
a binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation).
Lying Idlehands lies again.
--Yeap! Yeap! Yeap.
In article <10jldjj$il5b$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:10 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jii0s$3kj9j$2@dont-email.me>,No, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 2:26 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:But isn't that what life's all about, Stan?? Inflating Binky(Word used by >>>> paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s Precious >>>> Post Count??
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used useless posts.
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>> your posting stats.
Stan
So are you a Doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
Xor as in exclusive or?
sexual molestation) .
So what bring you her PaedoDan?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
The Doctor wrote:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Bogus!
On 8/01/2026 1:53 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10jlcmd$ib5k$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 12:47 am, Idlehands wrote:
On 2026-01-06 1:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/01/2026 1:12 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
I was correct.|e-a You want the paeodphile like Idlehands, Dr.WTF, >>>>>> solar Penguin, Dannyboy andRudy C filtiered out!
Sorry!! WHAT?? Are YOU, Binky, (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation)now claiming Idlehands, Dr.WTF, solar >>>>> Penguin, Dannyboy and Rudy C are all Paedophiles, Binky (Word used by >>>>> paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual molestation) ??
Poor binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual >>>> molestation) , struggling to find someone, anyone to join his paedophile >>>> "crusade".|e-a It's been over 10 years since he was christened
"binky" (Word used by paedophiles to indicate tehir joy of child sexual >>>> molestation) in edm.general, his current tantrum over it is
somewhat puzzling.
However I won't lose any sleep over binky (Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) acting like
a binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation).
Lying Idlehands lies again.
Yet YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) , supply absolutely ZERO evidence!!
--Yeap! Yeap! Yeap.
Daniel70
On 8/01/2026 1:58 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10jldjj$il5b$3@dont-email.me>,useless posts.
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 2:10 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jii0s$3kj9j$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 6/01/2026 2:26 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/5/2026 9:20 AM, The Doctor wrote:
Retcon the Timeless Child! RTD out! Bad Wolf out!
Since you asked. This is an example of your second most used
No-one brings me 'her', Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate theirNo, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of childBut isn't that what life's all about, Stan?? Inflating Binky(Word used by >>>>> paedophiles to indicate their joy in child Sexual Molestation)'s Precious >>>>> Post Count??
It adds nothing of any value to the newsgroup. All it does is inflate >>>>>> your posting stats.
Stan
So are you a Doctor Who Fan xor a Timeless Child Fan?
Xor as in exclusive or?
sexual molestation) .
So what bring you her PaedoDan?
joy of child sexual molestation) ..... unfortunately!!
--
Daniel70
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation) is suggesting that you are CORRECT, Blueshirt.--
--
Daniel70
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
molestation) bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
----
solar penguin
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
In article <xn0pkj9e344bwdj001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Bogus!
Wrongo!
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
molestation) bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
On 8/01/2026 10:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
Say WHAT, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)?? "In Your Informed Opinion" is the opposite to "In My
Humble Opinion"!!
Really??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I
IMHO rCo (i) In My Humble/Honest Opinion
Sorry, that page doesn't have a listing for 'IYIO' ... Is that something >YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), made up??
--
Daniel70
On 8/01/2026 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <xn0pkj9e344bwdj001@post.eweka.nl>,What's the Book, Chapter and Verse discussing WATER (H20), Binky(Word used
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Bogus!
Wrongo!
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 8/01/2026 10:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
molestation) bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
2 Peter 3:10
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
earth and everything done in it will be laid bare."
Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."
How do either of those explain "Newton's third law of motion", Binky(Word
used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
--
Daniel70
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or >acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
----
solar penguin
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkghhl1b39pv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 1/5/2026 09:12, Blueshirt wrote:
You know how it goes... if it's not in his KJV then
it doesn't count!
Does that include the parts that contradict themselves?
I assume so, after all, most of those bible-basher types
are walking contradictions to begin with.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every
person that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this.
You as an IT 'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
Sorry. WHAT?? Binky replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your Informed
Opinion, so Binky is suggesting that you are CORRECT,
Blueshirt.
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newtonrn?s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or >acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Letrn?s try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
Binky bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matter
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let's
try biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the
double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The
heavens will # disappear with a roar; the elements will be
destroyed by fire, and the # earth and everything done in it
will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double
helix structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
In article
<MPG.43c973f8c1b9fbc49899e3@news.eternal-september.org>, The
True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
IYIO as opposite to IMHO is In My Important Opinion - Similar
to Says You!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every
person that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this.
You as an IT 'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your Informed
Opinion, so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) is suggesting that you are CORRECT,
Blueshirt.
No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O
stands for - opinion. But what I posted was an actual fact. SO
it's more than just an opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is
shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newtonrn?s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Letrn?s try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
# disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
# earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no mater what
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
science found, if it went against the bible your reward could be being
burnt at the stack.
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual enjoyment)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
It doesnrCOt. It describes what the author thinks will happen when
the Day of the Lord arrives. But that hasnrCOt happened yet.
And it doesnrCOt mention force, mass or acceleration in the description.
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
----
solar penguin
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matter
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
Science is based on the Holy bible.
law of motion based on?
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Unfortunately it seems that some people still like to live--
in those dark ages...
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let's
try biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the
double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
There is no "new" version of the bible in some people's world...
it's the KJV or nothing.... that is the version of choice for
antiquated fundamentalists like our Dave. The NIV is way too
modern for those types.
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The
heavens will # disappear with a roar; the elements will be
destroyed by fire, and the # earth and everything done in it
will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Unfortunately, most of what Dogmatic Dave seems to think is in
the bible isn't actually in it... and often he just doesn't
understand the meaning behind the words... he comes across as
the most confused religious person I have ever debated with.
solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double
helix structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is based
on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots that. Without
being able to provide any evidence to back-up his claim. Which
is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and he is a GREAT advert for his
religion and the Christian church in general. With people like
him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole charade is
crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.43c973f8c1b9fbc49899e3@news.eternal-september.org>, The
True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
IYIO as opposite to IMHO is In My Important Opinion - Similar
to Says You!
That doesn't actually make any sense Dave!
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
It doesnrCOt. It describes what the author thinks will happen when
the Day of the Lord arrives. But that hasnrCOt happened yet.
And it doesnrCOt mention force, mass or acceleration in the description.
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA? >>>>
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no
matter what science found, if it went against the bible
your reward could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
Becuse your worldview is confused, BS.
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it
for my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
In article <MPG.43c98932d0e5e8919899e4@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newtonr??s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Letr??s try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
# disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
# earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Try the KJv.
And note destruction by fire.
In article <xn0pkjqis8sglc5002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and he is a GREAT advert for his
religion and the Christian church in general. With people
like him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole charade
is crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
Despite if your LLM is hallucinating.
In article <10jo74u$1f9ha$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
No Dave, it's actually a fact.Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
Say WHAT, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)?? "In Your Informed Opinion" is the opposite to "In My >> Humble Opinion"!!
Really??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I
IMHO |ore4rCL (i) In My Humble/Honest Opinion
Sorry, that page doesn't have a listing for 'IYIO' ... Is that something
YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), made up??
Yes AGA, PaedoDan is brain dead.
In article <MPG.43c973f8c1b9fbc49899e3@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate theirSo your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
IYIO as opposite to IMHO is In My Important Opinion - Similar to
Says You!
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your Informed Opinion,
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a group
of books written hundreds of years ago contain absolute facts
to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
so Binky is suggesting that you are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O stands
for - opinion.
But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's more than just an
opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is shocking
for somebody who supposedly went to school...
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your
Informed Opinion, so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) is suggesting that you
are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O
stands for - opinion. But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's
more than just an opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is
shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
Is the Bible Fiction?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes over
your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
If you don't have a dictionary handy why don't you ask Google--
Gemini what that word actually means.
Here's a clue... it's not a flexible word that means whatever
YOU want it to mean to suit your world view.
In article <10jo78o$1f9ha$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkj9e344bwdj001@post.eweka.nl>,What's the Book, Chapter and Verse discussing WATER (H20), Binky??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Bogus!
Wrongo!
In article <10jo7kq$1fein$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
molestation) bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
2 Peter 3:10
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
earth and everything done in it will be laid bare."
Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."
How do either of those explain "Newton's third law of motion", Binky(Word
used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
Which version are you quoting from?
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
child sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force,
mass or acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|ore4raos try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix
structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let's try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix
structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10 New International Version
There is no "new" version of the bible in some people's world... it's
the KJV or nothing.... that is the version of choice for antiquated fundamentalists like our Dave. The NIV is way too modern for those
types.
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens
will # disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by
fire, and the # earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Unfortunately, most of what Dogmatic Dave
seems to think is in the bible isn't actually in it... and often he
just doesn't understand the meaning behind the words... he comes
across as the most confused religious person I have ever debated
with.
In article <MPG.43c98932d0e5e8919899e4@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,molestation) bleated:
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|o-n?s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|o-n?s try biology. >>>> Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
# disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
# earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Try the KJv.
And note destruction by fire.
solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double helix
structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is based on
the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots that. Without being
able to provide any evidence to back-up his claim. Which is par for
the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for his
religion and the Christian church in general.
With people like him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole
charade is crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
In article <xn0pkjqis8sglc5002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|ore4raos try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double
helix structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is based
on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots that. Without
being able to provide any evidence to back-up his claim. Which
is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and he is a GREAT advert for his
religion and the Christian church in general. With people like
him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole charade is
crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
Despite if your LLM is hallucinating.
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no mater what
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
science found, if it went against the bible your reward could be being
burnt at the stack.
Stan
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matter
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
Science is based on the Holy bible.
law of motion based on?
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
In article <10johe0$2vrpf$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no mater what
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
science found, if it went against the bible your reward could be being
burnt at the stack.
Stan
And then we had Galileo.
On 9/01/2026 9:44 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes
over your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
Oh! Settle, Blueshirt. No need to criticise Binky's Parents
for their trying to educate Binky!! I mean ... They tried!! ;-P
On 9/01/2026 7:40 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for
his religion and the Christian church in general.
Hey, Settle there, Blueshirt or I might have to take offence,
bundling Binky with me!!
s/he is a GREAT advert/he isn't a GREAT advert
Now, I must go and look up the First and Second Readings that
I'm reading at Mass tonight!! (being just after midnight, my
time)
With people like him being "believers" it's no wonder the
whole charade is crumbling and church attendances are
dwindling.
Yeap!! Yeap! Yeap, unfortunately!!
Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual enjoyment)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or >>>>> acceleration!
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
It doesnrCOt. It describes what the author thinks will happen when
the Day of the Lord arrives. But that hasnrCOt happened yet.
And it doesnrCOt mention force, mass or acceleration in the description. >>>
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try biology. >>>>> Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA? >>>>>
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
Nothing useful, but feel free to try it anyway.
----
solar penguin
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes over
your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
If you don't have a dictionary handy why don't you ask Google
Gemini what that word actually means.
Here's a clue... it's not a flexible word that means whatever
YOU want it to mean to suit your world view.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
Why would you need to do an AI search, I thought this was your
specialist subject?
You are the one stating that science was based on the holy
bible, but you can't seem to explain how.
So why make a claim you can't back up without using an AI
search.
The REALITY is though... whatever your AI of choice is (Gemini /
Perplexity / ChatGPT/ Grok /Co-Pilot, etc..) I would wager none
of them would agree with your claim or provide details to back
it up. So either educate yourself on these issues or keep your
dark-ages religious nonsense to religious newsgroups.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no
matter what science found, if it went against the bible
your reward could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
We know religion isn't your strong point, clearly history isn't
either. (Hint to make it easier for you: Elizabeth I.)
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad things
to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving and caring
god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot of us
on RADW have a better grasp of the source material than you do.
All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant of your religion and
what is it supposed to mean.
The Doctor wrote:
Becuse your worldview is confused, BS.
No Dave, it's not confused at all. Far from it!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it
for my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
Sez You!
Verily, in article <10jpmc8$2tus$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.43c98932d0e5e8919899e4@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newtonr??s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >> >> >sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Letr??s try biology.
Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA? >> >> >
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
# disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
# earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Try the KJv.
Okay.
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the
# which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements
# shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are
# therein shall be burned up.
As usual, the meaning isn't significantly different.
And note destruction by fire.
This still isn't relevant.
If you're thinking of the general principle of entropy, that's not how
it works. That's more of a gradual winding down, not a dramatic burning
up.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqis8sglc5002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and he is a GREAT advert for his
religion and the Christian church in general. With people
like him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole charade
is crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
Despite if your LLM is hallucinating.
Nice comeback! <rolls eyes>
Unlike you I don't use LLM's to back up my opinions... my son
does use AI to code his websites and other work stuff, so I
might piggy-back on his ChatGPT Pro subscription to compose the
odd poem or too for our entertainment from time to time.
Generally I don't use AI as a research tool... if I am
discussing anything with you - especially religion - I don't
need to!!!
I would however recommend you do a bit more research on your
specialist subject though, and don't just blindly follow the
nonsense you have been told. As an advert for the Christian
religion you let your faith down every time you attempt to
promote it here... use a good search AI, like Perplexity and
dive deeper into what you are supposed to believe in... and what
your favourite parts of the bible actually do mean! (Here's a
clue, being nice to people is one of them. - I don't think
calling people paedophiles all day, every day, fits into that
description.)
On 9/01/2026 12:15 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10jo74u$1f9ha$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Yes, AGA, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joyNo Dave, it's actually a fact.Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
Say WHAT, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)?? "In Your Informed Opinion" is the opposite to "In My >>> Humble Opinion"!!
Really??
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I
IMHO |ore4rCL (i) In My Humble/Honest Opinion
Sorry, that page doesn't have a listing for 'IYIO' ... Is that something >>> YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), made up??
Yes AGA, PaedoDan is brain dead.
of child sexual molestation) NEVER EVER provides ANY EVIDENCE to support his >outlandish claims!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:20 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <MPG.43c973f8c1b9fbc49899e3@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jnvgn$1ctah$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate theirSo your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO"
i.e. In Your *Informed* Opinion, so
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
IYIO as opposite to IMHO is In My Important Opinion - Similar to
Says You!
Gobble-de-Gook, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation)!!
How does IMHO (notice the 'H') possibly stand for "In My Important
Opinion" (notice the 'I' for 'Importance'), Binky(Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,Pigs Arse, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
their joy of child sexual molestation).
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II .... but, in your >usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >joy of child sexual molestation), are suggesting 'IYIO' stands for "In
Your *Informed* Opinion".
In one case YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy--
of child sexual molestation), are suggesting the words are "Informed" whereas,
in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the person has said
SOME words .... which may or may-not be FACTUAL!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:41 am, Blueshirt wrote:--
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a group
of books written hundreds of years ago contain absolute facts
to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your Informed Opinion, >>> so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) is suggesting that you are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O stands
for - opinion.
What do you think the second 'I' stands for in 'IYIO', Blueshirt??
(The Spell-Checker knows .... it thinks the 'IYIO' is a mis-spelt "IDIOCY".)
At least Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation) thinks you base your Opinions on Information!!
But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's more than just an
opinion.
Correct.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is shocking.... and, I seem to remember, Tertiary school, at that.
for somebody who supposedly went to school...
So he should have at least half a clue!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?
It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
IYIO.
No Dave, it's actually a fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your
Informed Opinion, so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) is suggesting that you
are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O
stands for - opinion. But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's
more than just an opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is
shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
Is the Bible Fiction?
HOW did this 'discussion' suddenly become about "The Bible"??
Oh! Sorry, I forgot that Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) (tries to) switch the discussion From >'Doctor Who' to All Things Religious .... more stuff the Binky(Word used
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) knows >BUGGER ALL about!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 9:44 pm, Blueshirt wrote:--
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes over
your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
Oh! Settle, Blueshirt. No need to criticise Binky(Word used by paedophiles
to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s Parents for their >trying to educate Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation)!! I mean ... They tried!! ;-P
If you don't have a dictionary handy why don't you ask Google--
Gemini what that word actually means.
Here's a clue... it's not a flexible word that means whatever
YOU want it to mean to suit your world view.
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:16 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10jo78o$1f9ha$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkj9e344bwdj001@post.eweka.nl>,What's the Book, Chapter and Verse discussing WATER (H20), Binky(Word >>>used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Bogus!
Wrongo!
Daniel stop asking Questions that are too difficult for Binky(Word used
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) to answer!! >--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:17 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jo7kq$1fein$1@dont-email.me>,Oh!! Sorry, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >sexual molestation). Do you mean to suggest that different versions of The >Bible tell completely different stories about Christ's life, Binky(Word
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 8/01/2026 10:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >>>>> molestation) bleated:
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?
Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
2 Peter 3:10
"But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the
earth and everything done in it will be laid bare."
Genesis 1:1
"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth."
How do either of those explain "Newton's third law of motion", Binky(Word >>> used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
Which version are you quoting from?
used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
Who would have thought Christ's words/actions would be different
depending on which (Man-Made) version of The Bible we use!!
I think it might have been from Bible.com ... Ah!! There you go, Binky(Word >used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation),
New International Version (NIV)
Have at it, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation) .... even choose which ever version
YOU like, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation).
I'm flexible!!
Oh! No!! The KJV 2 Peter 3:10 IS different ... in Words Used but not >Sentiment Expressed .... and so is the AKJV!!
----
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:18 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
child sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force,
mass or acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|ore4raos try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix
structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
You, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), were the person who suggested it was the Answer, >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation).
See, just above, where YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation), stated "Science is based on the Holy >bible." and then Solar Penguin asked "In that case, which specific bible >verse is Newton's third law of motion based on?" and YOU, Binky(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation), replied
"2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1"
So YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation), seemingly suggested 2 Peter 3:10 was one of the answers
to Solar penguin's Question, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation)!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 7:32 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let's try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix
structure of DNA?
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?
2 Peter 3:10 New International Version
There is no "new" version of the bible in some people's world... it's
the KJV or nothing.... that is the version of choice for antiquated
fundamentalists like our Dave. The NIV is way too modern for those
types.
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens
will # disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by
fire, and the # earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Unfortunately, most of what Dogmatic Dave
When I first read that, it read 'Demonic Dave' ... quite appropriate for
this discussion. ;-P
--seems to think is in the bible isn't actually in it... and often heHe MUST be a great disappearance to both his Mother AND His Minister!!
just doesn't understand the meaning behind the words... he comes
across as the most confused religious person I have ever debated
with.
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43c98932d0e5e8919899e4@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10joarg$2s36$9@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,molestation) bleated:
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
Then how does 2 Peter 3:10 describes what happens?In article <10jo467$1ebok$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Binky bleated:
Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|o-n?s third
law of motion based on?
2 Peter 3:10, Genesis 1:1
Lying asswipe(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child >>>>> sexual molestation)! Neither of those even mention force, mass or
acceleration!
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|o-n?s try biology. >>>>> Which specific bible verse mentions the double-helix structure of DNA? >>>>
2 Peter 3:10
New International Version
# 10 But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will
# disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the >>> # earth and everything done in it will be laid bare.
What does that have to do with Newton's Third Law?
Try the KJv.
And note destruction by fire.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion#Newton's_third_law
Quote
Third law
Actioni contrariam semper & |aqualem esse reactionem: sive corporum
duorum actiones in se mutuo semper esse |aquales & in partes contrarias >dirigi.
To every action, there is always opposed an equal reaction; or, the
mutual actions of two bodies upon each other are always equal, and
directed to contrary parts.End Quote
Nope! No destruction by fire there!
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 7:40 am, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>, solar penguin
<solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. LetrCOs try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double helix
structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is based on
the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots that. Without being
able to provide any evidence to back-up his claim. Which is par for
the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for his
religion and the Christian church in general.
Hey, Settle there, Blueshirt or I might have to take offence, bundling >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual >molestation) with me!!
s/he is a GREAT advert/he *isn't* a GREAT advert
Now, I must go and look up the First and Second Readings that I'm
reading at Mass tonight!! (being just after midnight, my time)
With people like him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole
charade is crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Yeap!! Yeap! Yeap, unfortunately!!
Keep it up Dave.
Oh, must he?? He could surprise us all one day, by acting Intelligent.
One Day!!
----
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:44 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqis8sglc5002@post.eweka.nl>,Gobble-de-gook!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:
In article <10jo7v8$1fhmd$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Maybe physics is a bit too complicated for you. Let|ore4raos try
biology. Which specific bible verse mentions the double
helix structure of DNA?
Well? Are you going to answer this?
We both know he won't... because he can't!
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is based
on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots that. Without
being able to provide any evidence to back-up his claim. Which
is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and he is a GREAT advert for his
religion and the Christian church in general. With people like
him being "believers" it's no wonder the whole charade is
crumbling and church attendances are dwindling.
Keep it up Dave.
Despite if your LLM is hallucinating.
----
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 2:11 am, StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:But, if people were being burned at the stake, wouldn't that light the
Binky bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no mater what
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is NewtonrCOs third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
science found, if it went against the bible your reward could be being
burnt at the stack.
Stan
place up?? ;-P
----
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:43 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,sexual molestation) bleated:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matterIn that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
Science is based on the Holy bible.
law of motion based on?
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
WHAT?? So the CoE did it as well, did they, Binky(Word used by paedophiles >to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 9/01/2026 12:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <10johe0$2vrpf$1@solani.org>,
StanWeiss <srweiss1@comcast.net> wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky bleated:For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no mater what
In article <xn0pkibsm7csi5n001@news.eternal-september.org>,In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|ore4raos third
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Nope! Science is based on the Holy bible.
Also do you know how to enrage an atheist?Yeah, tell them the local clergyman is coming around to
babysit the grandchildren.
law of motion based on?
science found, if it went against the bible your reward could be being
burnt at the stack.
Stan
And then we had Galileo.
Maybe YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation), had Galileo but I certainly didn't!!
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/01/2026 9:44 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean
is shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes
over your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
Oh! Settle, Blueshirt. No need to criticise Binky's Parents
for their trying to educate Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation)!! I mean ... They tried!! ;-P
It's not even his parents, he is surrounded here on RADW by a
lot of people with a reasonable level of intelligence who have
all contributed to the various discussions here over the years,
and contributed plenty of accurate information for him to learn
from... but he just refuses to pay attention, ignores good
information and sticks to his dogma. So we have also tried!
If people don't want to learn, what can you do? <shrugs>
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/01/2026 7:40 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for
his religion and the Christian church in general.
Hey, Settle there, Blueshirt or I might have to take offence,
bundling Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation) with me!!
Sometimes good people get caught in the cross-fire!
s/he is a GREAT advert/he isn't a GREAT advert
Nah, from my POV he IS a great advert!
Now, I must go and look up the First and Second Readings that
I'm reading at Mass tonight!! (being just after midnight, my
time)
I will also do some readings later tonight... on my Kindle.
With people like him being "believers" it's no wonder the
whole charade is crumbling and church attendances are
dwindling.
Yeap!! Yeap! Yeap, unfortunately!!
The world has become too modern... people grow up with so much
knowledge at their fingertips now they can see through the smoke
and mirrors... or they are just too busy on TikTok and posting
selfies on Instagram to be bothered by it all.
In a way, I find old fashioned people that believe in old
fashioned things quaint, but sadly they are like the dinosaurs
just before the meteor* hit!
[* We can substitute 'space freighter' for meteor to keep it--
on-topic!]
In article <xn0pkkpe89mmj5q003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes
over your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
If you don't have a dictionary handy why don't you ask Google
Gemini what that word actually means.
Here's a clue... it's not a flexible word that means
whatever YOU want it to mean to suit your world view.
Hence the heated debate.
In article <xn0pkkpm29mxt31004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The REALITY is though... whatever your AI of choice is
(Gemini / Perplexity / ChatGPT/ Grok /Co-Pilot, etc..) I
would wager none of them would agree with your claim or
provide details to back it up. So either educate yourself
on these issues or keep your dark-ages religious nonsense
to religious newsgroups.
Co-Pilot is M$ junk .
Grok is Musk Junk .
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad
things to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving
and caring god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot
of us on RADW have a better grasp of the source material
than you do. All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant
of your religion and what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
In article <xn0pkkqjf9o50cm000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I would however recommend you do a bit more research on your
specialist subject though, and don't just blindly follow the
nonsense you have been told. As an advert for the Christian
religion you let your faith down every time you attempt to
promote it here... use a good search AI, like Perplexity and
dive deeper into what you are supposed to believe in... and
what your favourite parts of the bible actually do mean!
(Here's a clue, being nice to people is one of them. - I
don't think calling people paedophiles all day, every day,
fits into that description.)
Being dishonest gets you no points.
In article <10jqrk8$2bpo1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>, BlueshirtHOW did this 'discussion' suddenly become about "The Bible"??
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, BlueshirtNo Dave, it's actually a fact.
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:IYIO.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your
Informed Opinion, so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) is suggesting that you
are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
stands for - opinion. But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's
more than just an opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is
shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Is the Bible Fiction?
Oh! Sorry, I forgot that Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) (tries to) switch the discussion From >> 'Doctor Who' to All Things Religious .... more stuff the Binky(Word used
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) knows
BUGGER ALL about!!
--
Daniel70
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**, **what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar**
* Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted)
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting.
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkpe89mmj5q003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
See, clearly the actual meaning of the word 'reality' goes
over your head. Did you skip English classes or were you home
schooled by ignorant people?
If you don't have a dictionary handy why don't you ask Google
Gemini what that word actually means.
Here's a clue... it's not a flexible word that means
whatever YOU want it to mean to suit your world view.
Hence the heated debate.
It's not heated Dave, it's just a discussion on Usenet. Nobody
is getting worked up over it... and neither should they!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkpm29mxt31004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The REALITY is though... whatever your AI of choice is
(Gemini / Perplexity / ChatGPT/ Grok /Co-Pilot, etc..) I
would wager none of them would agree with your claim or
provide details to back it up. So either educate yourself
on these issues or keep your dark-ages religious nonsense
to religious newsgroups.
Co-Pilot is M$ junk .
Grok is Musk Junk .
I'm not a specialist in AI/LLM's, I only have Perplexity on my
iPhone, for searching the internet and stuff like that. (Instead
of using Google.)
My son uses ChatGpt for his business so I can log-in to his
account on my laptop and use it if I want to, or use their free
service even. But I have encountered hallucinations with some
ChatGPT results, so AI is not something I would want to rely on
100%. A few poems here and there are fine though... :-)
I have no experience of Grok, or Co-Pilot... beyond Microsoft
wanting to shove it down my throat every time I open my work
laptop to do anything.
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI becoming
everywhere... I won't be around to worry about it.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad
things to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving
and caring god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot
of us on RADW have a better grasp of the source material
than you do. All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant
of your religion and what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
I don't believe in any god Dave... have you not been paying
attention?
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided northern
cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily in their
national affiliations! But we have been taught to love our
neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some time to ponder
their status before we bring them back into the fold... as
Dorothy once said, "there's no place like home".
BUT, I think it's safe to assume that there are - and have been
- plenty of Presbyterian/Methodist/Pentecostal/Calvinist and
Anglican paedo ministers preaching morality from their pulpits
whilst molesting children. So ChristInsanity is the same
whatever the flavour.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkqjf9o50cm000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
I would however recommend you do a bit more research on your
specialist subject though, and don't just blindly follow the
nonsense you have been told. As an advert for the Christian
religion you let your faith down every time you attempt to
promote it here... use a good search AI, like Perplexity and
dive deeper into what you are supposed to believe in... and
what your favourite parts of the bible actually do mean!
(Here's a clue, being nice to people is one of them. - I
don't think calling people paedophiles all day, every day,
fits into that description.)
Being dishonest gets you no points.
I don't need to tell lies dave... if you don't want to educate
yourself, that's on you. You don't have to become an Atheist but
you could at least try and understand your faith correctly and
understand the bible writings that you read studiously. Most of
the time what you spout here is uneducated nonsense... It might
also explain why you reside in so many people's killfiles, as
it's like talking to an imbecile at times.
You can lead a horse to water...
On 1/9/2026 10:21 AM, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jqrk8$2bpo1$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:40 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjfh54ckakp004@news.eternal-september.org>, BlueshirtHOW did this 'discussion' suddenly become about "The Bible"??
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Too bad you cannot question reality correctly BS
On 7/01/2026 11:38 pm, Blueshirt wrote:No, he is suggesting it's my opinion... as that is what the O
The Doctor wrote:Sorry. WHAT?? Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
In article <xn0pkgsmy1q7zqt000@post.eweka.nl>, BlueshirtNo Dave, it's actually a fact.
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:IYIO.
Will you then say AI is contradictiry?It is a proven fact that multi-model LLM's can
"hallucinate"... i.e. give the wrong answer. Every person
that has knowledge of AI or LLM's knows this. You as an IT
'expert' should also know this.
So your post is pointless... as no LLM can prove that a
group of books written hundreds of years ago contain
absolute facts to a 100% level of certainty. THIS is a
fact.
joy of child sexual molestation) replied "IYIO" i.e. In Your
Informed Opinion, so Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) is suggesting that you
are CORRECT, Blueshirt.
stands for - opinion. But what I posted was an actual fact. SO it's
more than just an opinion.
Dave's lack of understanding of what words actually mean is
shocking for somebody who supposedly went to school...
Is the Bible Fiction?
Oh! Sorry, I forgot that Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
their joy of child sexual molestation) (tries to) switch the discussion From
'Doctor Who' to All Things Religious .... more stuff the Binky(Word used >>> by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) knows
BUGGER ALL about!!
--
Daniel70
Is the Bible Fiction?
Google Gemini
The Bible is not a single book, but a library containing many
different genres. It is rarely classified as "fiction" in the
modern sense, though its contents vary in historical accuracy.
LITERARY GENRES
The Bible includes poetry (Psalms), wisdom literature (Proverbs),
apocalyptic visions (Revelation), and legal codes (Leviticus).
These are distinct from both "history" and "fiction."
HISTORICAL NARRATIVE
Many parts of the Bible, such as the Books of Kings or the
Gospels, are intended as historical accounts. Archeology has
confirmed various figures, locations, and events mentioned in
these texts, such as the existence of King David or the
Babylonian Exile.
MYTH AND ALLEGORY
Scholars often describe the early chapters of Genesis (Creation,
Noah's Ark) as "mythopoeic." This doesn't necessarily mean
"false" to a believer, but suggests the stories are intended
to convey theological truths rather than scientific data.
PARABLES
The New Testament contains "parables" told by Jesus. These are
explicitly fictional stories (like the Prodigal Son) used to
illustrate moral or spiritual lessons.
FAITH VS. HISTORICITY
For many, the Bible is "Inspired Word," a category that
transcends the fiction/non-fiction binary. For secular
historians, it is a foundational cultural text that mixes
genuine oral tradition, historical record, and folklore.
In summary, calling the Bible "fiction" is generally seen as
reductive, as it ignores the text's role as a historical
document and its intent to record the heritage of a people.
ChatGPT
Whether the Bible is rCLfictionrCY depends on **perspective and definition**.
**From a religious perspective:**
Believers generally hold that the Bible is **sacred scripture** - divinely >> inspired or revealed - containing spiritual truth, moral teaching, and,
for many, real historical events.
**From an academic / literary perspective:**
Scholars view the Bible as a **collection of texts** written over many
centuries, containing **multiple genres**:
* History and historiography
* Poetry and wisdom literature
* Law codes
* Prophecy
* Letters
* Parable and allegory
Some parts are studied as **historical narratives**, others as **theological >> storytelling**, and some as **symbolic or mythic literature**. In this
context, certain passages are treated as non-literal or symbolic rather
than factual reportage.
**From a historical-critical perspective:**
Historians assess individual books case by case. Some events, people,
and places are supported by external evidence; others are debated
or considered theological constructions.
**Short answer:**
The Bible is **not simply fiction**, but neither is it a single,
modern history book. It is a **complex religious library** whose
interpretation depends on faith, scholarship, and purpose.
If you want, I can explain how specific books (Genesis, Gospels,
Revelation) are usually classified.
Is the Holy Bible Historically factual?
Google Gemini
The historicity of the Bible varies significantly between the
Old and New Testaments and across different time periods.
AREAS OF HISTORICAL CORROBORATION
Archeology has confirmed the existence of many biblical figures
and events, particularly from the later periods:
The House of David: The Tel Dan Stele (9th century BCE)
mentions the "House of David," supporting his existence.
The Babylonian Exile: Records from Babylon and the Cyrus
Cylinder confirm the conquest of Jerusalem and the return
of the Jewish people.
New Testament Figures: Secular Roman and Jewish historians
like Tacitus and Josephus confirm the existence of Jesus
of Nazareth, John the Baptist, and James.
THE "LACK OF EVIDENCE" CHALLENGE
Certain foundational events lack contemporary archeological or
extrabiblical evidence:
The Exodus: There is currently no Egyptian record or
archeological evidence in the Sinai Peninsula of a mass
migration of millions of people as described in Exodus.
The United Monarchy: While David existed, the scale of
his empire and the splendor of Solomon's Jerusalem are
debated; archeology suggests a more modest highland chiefdom.
SCIENTIFIC VS. HISTORICAL FACT
Events such as the Great Flood or the six-day creation are
generally viewed by scientists and modern historians as
theological narratives or adaptations of earlier Near Eastern
myths (like the Epic of Gilgamesh) rather than literal
geological history.
THE GOSPELS AND ORAL TRADITION
The Gospels were written 40 to 70 years after Jesus' death.
While they reflect the geography and politics of 1st-century
Judea accurately, they are written as "testimony" to inspire
faith, meaning they prioritize spiritual meaning over
the detached objectivity expected of modern history.
CONCLUSION
Historians generally view the Bible as a "foundational
history"rCoit captures the real cultural memory and political
shifts of the Levant, but it frames those events through
a specific religious lens that may exaggerate or
reinterpret details for spiritual purposes.
ChatGPT
The Holy Bible is **partly historically factual**, but **not entirely in the >> modern historical sense**. How factual it is depends on **which parts**,
**what standard of history you use**, and **who is evaluating it**.
### What historians generally agree on
Many people, places, and events in the Bible are supported by **independent >> historical or archaeological evidence**, for example:
* Ancient Israel, Judah, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, and Rome
* Kings like **David** (limited evidence), **Hezekiah**, **Nebuchadnezzar** >> * Figures such as **Pontius Pilate**, **Herod the Great**, **Caiaphas**
* The existence and crucifixion of **Jesus of Nazareth** (widely accepted) >>
These show the Bible is **rooted in real historical settings**.
### Where history becomes uncertain or disputed
Other sections lack independent confirmation
or conflict with archaeology or each other:
* Creation accounts (Genesis 1rCo2)
* The global Flood
* The Exodus as described in the Bible
* Large population numbers and timelines
* Miracles (by definition not verifiable historically)
Historians generally view these as **theological narratives**, **epic
tradition**, or **symbolic history**, rather than strict factual reporting. >>
### Differences in historical standards
The Bible was not written using **modern historical methods**.
Ancient authors:
* Prioritised meaning, theology, and identity over precision
* Used symbolism, exaggeration, and oral tradition
* Were not trying to write neutral history
This does not mean rCLfalse,rCY but **different in purpose**.
### Faith vs academic history
* **Faith traditions** often hold the Bible
to be fully true (literally or spiritually)
* **Academic scholarship** treats it as a mixed
source: history + theology + literature
### Bottom line
* **Yes**, the Bible contains real historical material
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards
* It is best understood as a **religious-historical library**, not a textbook
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
* **No**, it is not fully historically factual by modern standards or
even by standards from back in the day.
And just how would you know historians think about each book? Because no
one here cares about what your opinion is!
Stan
----
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >www.avast.com
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,Pigs Arse, Binky.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You-a are interchangable.
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II .... but, in your usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky, are suggesting 'IYIO' stands for "In Your *Informed* Opinion".
In one case YOU, Binky, are suggesting the words are "Informed" whereas,
in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the person has said
SOME words .... which may or may-not be FACTUAL!!
In article <10jqqne$2bgk6$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,Pigs Arse, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
their joy of child sexual molestation).
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II .... but, in your
usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their >> joy of child sexual molestation), are suggesting 'IYIO' stands for "In
Your *Informed* Opinion".
Antonyms in this case.
Daniel70In one case YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation), are suggesting the words are "Informed" whereas,
in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the person has said
SOME words .... which may or may-not be FACTUAL!!!--
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)
and explain what historians think about each.
In article <xn0pkkvh89uutms001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/01/2026 7:40 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for
his religion and the Christian church in general.
Hey, Settle there, Blueshirt or I might have to take offence,
bundling Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation) with me!!
Sometimes good people get caught in the cross-fire!
AGA is correct on his analysis.
In article <xn0pkkpm29mxt31004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
Why would you need to do an AI search, I thought this was your
specialist subject?
You are the one stating that science was based on the holy
bible, but you can't seem to explain how.
So why make a claim you can't back up without using an AI
search.
The REALITY is though... whatever your AI of choice is (Gemini /
Perplexity / ChatGPT/ Grok /Co-Pilot, etc..) I would wager none
of them would agree with your claim or provide details to back
it up. So either educate yourself on these issues or keep your
dark-ages religious nonsense to religious newsgroups.
Co-Pilot is M$ junk .
Grok is Musk Junk .
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad
things to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving
and caring god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot
of us on RADW have a better grasp of the source material
than you do. All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant
of your religion and what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
I don't believe in any god Dave... have you not been paying
attention?
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided northern
cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily in their
national affiliations! But we have been taught to love our
neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some time to ponder
their status before we bring them back into the fold... as
Dorothy once said, "there's no place like home".
BUT, I think it's safe to assume that there are - and have been--
- plenty of Presbyterian/Methodist/Pentecostal/Calvinist and
Anglican paedo ministers preaching morality from their pulpits
whilst molesting children. So ChristInsanity is the same
whatever the flavour.
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no
matter what science found, if it went against the bible
your reward could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
We know religion isn't your strong point, clearly history isn't
either. (Hint to make it easier for you: Elizabeth I.)
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad things
to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving and caring
god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot of us
on RADW have a better grasp of the source material than you do.
All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant of your religion and
what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
In article <10jqvcl$2cu37$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:43 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of childFor 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matter
sexual molestation) bleated:
In that case, which specific bible verse is Newton|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os third
Science is based on the Holy bible.
law of motion based on?
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
WHAT?? So the CoE did it as well, did they, Binky(Word used by paedophiles >> to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
So what are the 3 differences between CoE and RC, PAedoDan?
On 10/01/2026 2:19 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jqqne$2bgk6$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>,Pigs Arse, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A (humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many many
times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it for
my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
their joy of child sexual molestation).
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II .... but, in your >>> usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation), are suggesting 'IYIO' stands for "In
Your *Informed* Opinion".
Antonyms in this case.
Sorry, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), but what are 'Antonyms' in THIS case, Binky(Word used >by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
Daniel70In one case YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation), are suggesting the words are "Informed" >whereas,
in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the person has said
SOME words .... which may or may-not be FACTUAL!!!--
On 10/01/2026 2:21 am, The Doctor wrote:--
<Snip>
If you want, I can go book-by-book (Genesis, Exodus, Gospels, Acts)As the saying goes .... "I'd like to see THAT!!" .... but, as this is, >supposedly, a "Doctor Who" newsgroup, that might not be appropriate, Binky(Word>used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)!!
and explain what historians think about each.
--
Daniel70
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkvh89uutms001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/01/2026 7:40 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Dogmatic Dave has been told by some pastor that science is
based on the writings in the bible, so he simply parrots
that. Without being able to provide any evidence to back-up
his claim. Which is par for the course with our Dave.
He is one ignorant Christian and *he is a GREAT advert* for
his religion and the Christian church in general.
Hey, Settle there, Blueshirt or I might have to take offence,
bundling Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy
of child sexual molestation) with me!!
Sometimes good people get caught in the cross-fire!
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's 'analysis' ....
maybe, one day, Aggy will.
----
Daniel70
On 10/01/2026 2:13 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <xn0pkkpm29mxt31004@post.eweka.nl>,Yes, of course .... and neither of them measures up to Binky(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s ISP Server. >--
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jp01o$1pahb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Well? Are you going to answer this?
I wonder if an AI search would turn something up?
Why would you need to do an AI search, I thought this was your
specialist subject?
You are the one stating that science was based on the holy
bible, but you can't seem to explain how.
So why make a claim you can't back up without using an AI
search.
The REALITY is though... whatever your AI of choice is (Gemini /
Perplexity / ChatGPT/ Grok /Co-Pilot, etc..) I would wager none
of them would agree with your claim or provide details to back
it up. So either educate yourself on these issues or keep your
dark-ages religious nonsense to religious newsgroups.
Co-Pilot is M$ junk .
Grok is Musk Junk .
Daniel70
On 10/01/2026 3:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad
things to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving
and caring god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot
of us on RADW have a better grasp of the source material
than you do. All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant
of your religion and what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
I don't believe in any god Dave... have you not been paying
attention?
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided northern
cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily in their
national affiliations! But we have been taught to love our
neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some time to ponder
their status before we bring them back into the fold... as
Dorothy once said, "there's no place like home".
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in the
Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Would Northern Ireland be worth more to the Ireland populas than--
Greenland would be to Trump!!
BUT, I think it's safe to assume that there are - and have been--
- plenty of Presbyterian/Methodist/Pentecostal/Calvinist and
Anglican paedo ministers preaching morality from their pulpits
whilst molesting children. So ChristInsanity is the same
whatever the flavour.
Daniel70
On 10/01/2026 2:14 am, The Doctor wrote:--
In article <xn0pkkpxz9n9z2t005@post.eweka.nl>,Why does that matter to YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation)?? I mean YOU, Binky(Word used
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no
matter what science found, if it went against the bible
your reward could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
We know religion isn't your strong point, clearly history isn't
either. (Hint to make it easier for you: Elizabeth I.)
For Christianity read ChristInsanity... they all did bad things
to people in the name of their [supposedly] loving and caring
god. Often, very bad things!
My advice to you is to give up bible-bashing here as a lot of us
on RADW have a better grasp of the source material than you do.
All you do is prove yourself to be ignorant of your religion and
what is it supposed to mean.
So your view on Protestents?
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation),
are SOOOOO proud
of whatever splinter sect YOU, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation), perport to belong to that YOU, >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation), will never even name what Sect YOU, Binky(Word used
by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation), belong to!! >--
Daniel70
On 10/01/2026 2:30 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jqvcl$2cu37$2@dont-email.me>,Newton|a-o|orCU-4|orCR-os third
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:43 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjq2s8rtg1v000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
StanWeiss wrote:
On 1/8/2026 6:24 AM, solar penguin wrote:
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation) bleated:
In that case, which specific bible verse is
Science is based on the Holy bible.
I'm guessing (and it is a Guess, mind you) the 'o', the 'E', and thelaw of motion based on?For 100's of years there were the bad ages. Because no matter
what science found, if it went against the bible your reward
could be being burnt at the stack.
Your reward WOULD be being burnt at the stake. It was the
Christian way!
Catholic yes. Christian, I doubt it.
WHAT?? So the CoE did it as well, did they, Binky(Word used by paedophiles >>> to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
So what are the 3 differences between CoE and RC, PAedoDan?
'R', Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
joy of child sexual molestation)!
--
Daniel70
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Daniel declared:
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Not that many Dutch people in Denmark.
----
solar penguin
On 10/01/2026 3:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided
northern cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily
in their national affiliations! But we have been taught to
love our neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some
time to ponder their status before we bring them back into
the fold... as Dorothy once said, "there's no place like
home".
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Would Northern Ireland be worth more to the Ireland populas
than Greenland would be to Trump!!
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 3:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided
northern cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily
in their national affiliations! But we have been taught to
love our neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some
time to ponder their status before we bring them back into
the fold... as Dorothy once said, "there's no place like
home".
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Er... if that's what your news channels are reporting then they
are seriously mistaken!
Would Northern Ireland be worth more to the Ireland populas
than Greenland would be to Trump!!
You don't offer to purchase something that is naturally yours.
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the paedophilic Idlehands influence.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
In fairness, Agamemnon is minding his own business... Dave
likes to try and get back-up by drawing Aggy into threads
when he's under pressure here after making ludicrous claims.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Wow! That's BREAKING NEWS to everyone.
Thanks for bringing us all up to speed with this modern
world we are living in Dave. Your important contributions
to this newsgroup are the reason why we're all here.
Verily, in article <10jttu9$2hun$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the paedophilic
Idlehands influence.
I can't take it any more. Dave, I just looked at my scorefile, and
*every* *single* *entry* is about you. "PAedophile talker" and "AI/LLM"
get the most business, and "PAedo Dan is a new entry.
I would like to continue reading the on-topic stuff you do post, but
wading through the latest variation of this crap is just a waste of
time.
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10jtaga$332jt$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:19 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jqqne$2bgk6$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>, BlueshirtPigs Arse, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A
(humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many
many times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it
for my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
joy of child sexual molestation).
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those
words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II ....
but, in your usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky, are suggesting
'IYIO' stands for "In Your *Informed* Opinion".
Antonyms in this case.
Sorry, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
child sexual molestation), but what are 'Antonyms' in THIS case,
Binky??
In one case YOU, Binky, are suggesting the words are "Informed"
whereas, in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the
person has said SOME words .... which may or may-not be
FACTUAL!!!
Yes AGA, PAedoDan suffers from Idlehands mindrot.
In article <xn0pkmc5v7canq9001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
In fairness, Agamemnon is minding his own business... Dave
likes to try and get back-up by drawing Aggy into threads
when he's under pressure here after making ludicrous claims.
We know AGA taunts Dan to no end.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Wow! That's BREAKING NEWS to everyone.
In article <xn0pkmch17clmxp000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Wow! That's BREAKING NEWS to everyone.
Thanks for bringing us all up to speed with this modern
world we are living in Dave. Your important contributions
to this newsgroup are the reason why we're all here.
The ironic BS in action.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
In fairness, Agamemnon is minding his own business... Dave
likes to try and get back-up by drawing Aggy into threads
when he's under pressure here after making ludicrous claims.
Daniel declared:
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Not that many Dutch people in Denmark.
In article <xn0pkmbx97by7q8000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 3:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided
northern cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily
in their national affiliations! But we have been taught to
love our neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some
time to ponder their status before we bring them back into
the fold... as Dorothy once said, "there's no place like
home".
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Er... if that's what your news channels are reporting then they
are seriously mistaken!
PaedoDan cannot tell the differnce between the Danes and the Dutch.
Verily, in article <10jttu9$2hun$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the paedophilic
Idlehands influence.
I can't take it any more. Dave, I just looked at my scorefile, and
*every* *single* *entry* is about you. "PAedophile talker" and "AI/LLM"
get the most business, and "PAedo Dan is a new entry.
I would like to continue reading the on-topic stuff you do post, but
wading through the latest variation of this crap is just a waste of
time.
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jttu9$2hun$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the
paedophilic Idlehands influence.
I can't take it any more. Dave, I just looked at my scorefile, and
*every* *single* *entry* is about you. "PAedophile talker" and
"AI/LLM" get the most business, and "PAedo Dan is a new entry.
I would like to continue reading the on-topic stuff you do post,
but wading through the latest variation of this crap is just a
waste of time.
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything
will change, though.
On 11/01/2026 1:33 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jtaga$332jt$3@dont-email.me>, Daniel70Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:19 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jqqne$2bgk6$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 9/01/2026 12:45 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkjqlm8skpvs003@post.eweka.nl>, BlueshirtPigs Arse, Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jo4lk$mml$7@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Wrongo! IYIO is the opposite to IMHO
It really isn't. The opposite of H is A
(humble/arrogant).
You're wasting your time. We have all told him this many
many times over the years...
Maybe what you really want is a simple "Sez you!"
That IS what Dave means... but he seems to prefer IYIO.
But I like "Sez You!" so much I am going to appropriate it
for my own use. (Thanks!)
IYIO/Says You are interchangable.
joy of child sexual molestation).
"Says You" merely means something like 'You have said those
words'
"IYIO" isn't listed AT ALL at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_acronyms%3A_I#II ....
but, in your usage, it seems to me, YOU, Binky, are suggesting
'IYIO' stands for "In Your *Informed* Opinion".
Antonyms in this case.
Sorry, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
child sexual molestation), but what are 'Antonyms' in THIS case,
Binky??
In one case YOU, Binky, are suggesting the words are "Informed"
whereas, in the other case, all you are suggesting is that the
person has said SOME words .... which may or may-not be
FACTUAL!!!
Yes AGA, PAedoDan suffers from Idlehands mindrot.
molestation)'s inability to answer Questions asked of him .... Noted.
Aggy, can you please Educate Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation) about a few things??
--
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 2:56 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
I might suggest Aggy has NEVER provided Aggy's 'analysis' .... but Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)
lives in the hope that, one day, Aggy does ... and that IT will support >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s thoughts.
(I was going to post "Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s Theories" there, but something stopped me
... so I posted "Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s thoughts" instead.)
In fairness, Agamemnon is minding his own business... DaveYEAP!! Yeap!! Yeap!
likes to try and get back-up by drawing Aggy into threads
when he's under pressure here after making ludicrous claims.
----
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 3:15 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkmc5v7canq9001@post.eweka.nl>,PIG'S ARSE, he does, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation).
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:
AGA is correct on his analysis.
Has anybody ever seen Aggy's 'analysis' .... EVER??
I'm pretty sure Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) has NEVER EVER provided Aggy's
'analysis' .... maybe, one day, Aggy will.
In fairness, Agamemnon is minding his own business... Dave
likes to try and get back-up by drawing Aggy into threads
when he's under pressure here after making ludicrous claims.
We know AGA taunts Dan to no end.
Sure, he often disagrees with what I post, but .... SO WHAT, Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)??
--
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 3:06 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Wow! That's BREAKING NEWS to everyone.
But it's a Post so contributes to Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate >their joy of child sexual molestation)'s Precious Post Count!!
--
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 3:15 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkmch17clmxp000@post.eweka.nl>,Better than "The idiotic Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkkxja9xoqnv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The younger ones can worry about the future and AI
becoming everywhere... I won't be around to worry
about it.
LLMs is just a subset of AI.
Wow! That's BREAKING NEWS to everyone.
Thanks for bringing us all up to speed with this modern
world we are living in Dave. Your important contributions
to this newsgroup are the reason why we're all here.
The ironic BS in action.
joy of child sexual molestation) in action"!!
Although 'WE' get waaaayyyy to much of that ... but what else is new??
--
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 1:41 am, solar penguin wrote:
Oh!! Picky! Picky!
Daniel declared:
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Not that many Dutch people in Denmark.
Danes!!
----
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 3:15 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0pkmbx97by7q8000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/01/2026 3:09 am, Blueshirt wrote:
IF however you are trying to goad me re our misguided
northern cousins, then I'd say they are misguided primarily
in their national affiliations! But we have been taught to
love our neighbours, haven't we? So we'll give them some
time to ponder their status before we bring them back into
the fold... as Dorothy once said, "there's no place like
home".
Hmm!! Now there's a thought! Big Bozo Trump is, apparently, in
the Market to purchase Greenland from The Dutch.
Er... if that's what your news channels are reporting then they
are seriously mistaken!
PaedoDan cannot tell the differnce between the Danes and the Dutch.
Never knowingly meet any of either nationality, Binky(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation).
--
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 3:39 am, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jttu9$2hun$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, didWell TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the paedophilic
Idlehands influence.
I can't take it any more. Dave, I just looked at my scorefile, and
*every* *single* *entry* is about you. "PAedophile talker" and "AI/LLM"
get the most business, and "PAedo Dan is a new entry.
I would like to continue reading the on-topic stuff you do post, but
wading through the latest variation of this crap is just a waste of
time.
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
----
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <10jttu9$2hun$3@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
PaedoDan must submit to extreme treatment to purge himself of the
paedophilic Idlehands influence.
I can't take it any more. Dave, I just looked at my scorefile, and
*every* *single* *entry* is about you. "PAedophile talker" and
"AI/LLM" get the most business, and "PAedo Dan is a new entry.
I would like to continue reading the on-topic stuff you do post,
but wading through the latest variation of this crap is just a
waste of time.
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc, >Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child
sexual molestation)?? WELL BEFORE.
--
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will change, though.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything
will change, though.
It won't. We've all tried, and failed. That's why people
disappear from RADW after a while... it just gets too much
for them.
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc,
Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will change, though.
On 11/01/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will
change, though.
Sorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and Aggy
listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong one this
time.
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc,
Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
----
Daniel70
On 11/01/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, did daniel47Sorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and Aggy listed as "The >True" .... so I went for the wrong one this time.
@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will change, though.
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/01/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, didSorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and Aggy
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will
change, though.
listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong one this
time.
You should always pay attention!
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc,
Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 11/01/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, didSorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and Aggy
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will
change, though.
listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong one this
time.
You should always pay attention!
On 12/01/2026 11:20 pm, The True Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Sorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and
Aggy listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong
one this time.
You should always pay attention!
.... either that or increase the width of the 'From:' column.
'The True Blueshirt'?? REALLY!! Is this a case of 'When you're
on a good thing, stick to it!!
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might
stand for??
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might
stand for??
Don't know, don't care... he's back in my killfile.
I hope my laptop doesn't blow up!
Daniel70 wrote:
'The True Blueshirt'?? REALLY!! Is this a case of 'When you're
on a good thing, stick to it!!
If you can't beat 'em...
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc, >>>> Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
"YIYO"??
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
Daniel declared:
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
Yodelling induced yesterday?s orgasms?
Young Italians yeet ocelots?
You impregnate your offspring?
Yaks invariably yawn outdoors?
Yellow ibises yammer often?
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc, >>>>> Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky(Word used by >paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation).
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
--
Daniel70
On 12/01/2026 11:20 pm, The True Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... either that or increase the width of the 'From:' column. ;-P
On 11/01/2026 9:45 pm, The True Melissa wrote:
Verily, in article <10jvprj$3po93$3@dont-email.me>, didSorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and Aggy
daniel47 @nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
Well TYPED, Aggy. Thank you.
I'm not Aggy, but you're welcome. I doubt anything will
change, though.
listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong one this
time.
You should always pay attention!
'The True Blueshirt'?? REALLY!! Is this a case of 'When you're on a good >thing, stick to it!!'
----
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 12/01/2026 11:20 pm, The True Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... either that or increase the width of the 'From:' column.
Sorry, Melissa. In my Mail Agent, I see both you and
Aggy listed as "The True" .... so I went for the wrong
one this time.
You should always pay attention!
Only a bad workman blames his tools!
But you have been here long enough so you should be able to
know who posted something based on the actual message content.
Most people on RADW have a unique style about them... very few
people here would mix-up Melissa with Agamemnon!
Well... unless Melissa starts calling everything "woke garbage"
that is! ;-)
'The True Blueshirt'?? REALLY!! Is this a case of 'When you're
on a good thing, stick to it!!
If you can't beat 'em...
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might
stand for??
Don't know, don't care... he's back in my killfile.
I hope my laptop doesn't blow up!
On 13/01/2026 8:48 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Maybe it's just Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation).
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might
stand for??
Don't know, don't care... he's back in my killfile.
I hope my laptop doesn't blow up!
child sexual molestation)'s (extra special) computer that does that!
--
Daniel70
On 13/01/2026 8:44 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
<Snip>
.... help confusing the hell out of me!! ;-P'The True Blueshirt'?? REALLY!! Is this a case of 'When you're
on a good thing, stick to it!!
If you can't beat 'em...
--
Daniel70
Verily, in article <10k501t$308qt$1@dont-email.me>, did daniel47 >@nomail.afraid.org deliver unto us this message:
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>,
The True Melissa <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc, >> >>>> Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
All I got was "you are your opinion," which didn't mean much.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
Daniel declared:
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
"YIYO"??
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
Yodelling induced yesterdayrCOs orgasms?
Young Italians yeet ocelots?
You impregnate your offspring?
Yaks invariably yawn outdoors?
Yellow ibises yammer often?
----
solar penguin
Verily, in article <10k5ace$33b76$1@dont-email.me>, did >solar.penguin@gmail.com deliver unto us this message:
Daniel declared:
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
Yodelling induced yesterday?s orgasms?
Young Italians yeet ocelots?
You impregnate your offspring?
Yaks invariably yawn outdoors?
Yellow ibises yammer often?
You input your output?
That would at least qualify as an insult.
----
The True Melissa - Canal Winchester - Ohio
United States of America - North America - Earth
Solar System - Milky Way - Local Group
Virgo Cluster - Laniakea Supercluster - Cosmos
In article <10k5517$31krh$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Maybe it's just Binky's (extra special) computer that does that!
Every programmed Open Source PaedoDan?
On 13/01/2026 2:01 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10k2hd4$28n3u$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70-a <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 11:54 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <10jvts6$3qor8$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70-a <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
On 11/01/2026 1:16 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43cc4ae3617794b29899e9@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>> The True Melissa-a <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
<Snip>
"YIYO"??It's like you *want* RADW to die. Do you secretly hate the show?
No. Just retcon the TimeLess Child.
How come YOUR gibberish started WELL before "the TimeLess Child" arc, >>>>> Binky?? WELL BEFORE.
YIYO Dan.
Says You PaedoDan.
I should have expected a response like that from Binky.
Does anyone else here have half a clue what "YIYO" might stand for??
Binky (Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation) bleated:
In article <10k5517$31krh$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
Maybe it's just Binky(Word used by paedophiles to indicate their joy of child sexual molestation)'s (extra special) computer that does that!
Every programmed Open Source PaedoDan?
How many programmed Open Source PaedoDans are there?
(And what about the unprogrammed ones?)
----
solar penguin
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 12:23:04 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
2 files (2,024K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,176 |
| Posted today: | 1 |