1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. nz.politics

  • Netanyahu surrendered to Hamas, hid the truth

    From NefeshBarYochai@void@invalid.noy to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,rec.food.cooking,soc.culture.jewish,nz.politics,alt.atheism on Mon Oct 13 23:09:40 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.politics

    The Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth has revealed alarming details
    about the Gaza peace agreement, saying that Prime Minister Benjamin
    Netanyahu set key conditions but made major concessions and hid the
    truth from the public.

    According to the paper, the basic conditions set by Netanyahu to end
    the war ensured what it described as oa complete surrender to Hamaso.
    However, Yedioth Ahronoth reported, oHamas was not disarmed, Gaza was
    not demilitarised, and the territory was not cleared,o based on
    documents that were reviewed.

    The paper asked, oIf these conditions were essential, why did
    Netanyahu give them up?o An intelligence source said, oThe agreement
    is considered successful, but the concessions are extremely deep.o

    The same source, who has close contact with the intelligence
    community, the defence establishment, and the political level, added:
    oThe public deserves honest answers to the key remaining questions,
    which the government and NetanyahuAs campaign seem to be struggling to
    answer.o

    https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/20251013-yedioth-ahronoth-netanyahu-surrendered-to-hamas-hid-the-truth/


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,soc.culture.israel,nz.politics,alt.politics.trump on Tue Oct 14 03:50:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: nz.politics

    On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 23:09:40 -0400, NefeshBarYochai wrote:

    According to the paper, the basic conditions set by Netanyahu to end
    the war ensured what it described as rCLa complete surrender to
    HamasrCY. However, Yedioth Ahronoth reported, rCLHamas was not disarmed,
    Gaza was not demilitarised, and the territory was not cleared,rCY
    based on documents that were reviewed.

    The paper asked, rCLIf these conditions were essential, why did
    Netanyahu give them up?rCY

    Because they were impossible goals to achieve, anyway. It was clear
    fairly early on that such proclamations from Butcher Bibi and his partners-in-war-crimes, both in Efc<Efc# and Efc|Efc+, were more about macho chest-beating than an actual military strategy. Remember all the talk
    about flooding the tunnels with seawater? That would have been an act
    of sheer desperation, an act of futility if the aim was to defeat
    Hamas. Thankfully, the idea was abandoned, so cooler heads were able
    to prevail, at least to some extent.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2