| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 27 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 46:25:58 |
| Calls: | 632 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 1,187 |
| D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
| Messages: | 176,483 |
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360850060/chloe-swarbrick-how-should-we-define-her-contribution-politics
He has got it.
On 12/10/25 07:45, Tony wrote:
He has got it.https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360850060/chloe-swarbrick-how-should-we-define-her-contribution-politics
Total crap. An attempt to redefine the term "genocide", then claiming
the term is too difficult for average Joe to understand.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard and so the average Joe has a valid legal basis for using
'genocide' in describing the events in Gaza. And so does Swarbrick.
The MAGA Zionists; PM Lux, Deputy PM Seymour, Foreign Minister Winston, >Defence Minister Crusher are all giving Trump a b_job.
NZ is a signatory to ICJ and they have duty to uphold and respect it.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/507667/south-african-president-hails-ruling-against-israel-as-step-toward-justiceYes, another person unable to understand that there are two sides to this tragedy.
"The World Court ordered Israel on Friday to prevent acts of genocide >against the Palestinians and do more to help civilians,
although it stopped short of ordering a ceasefire as requested by the >plaintiff South Africa.
While the ruling denied Palestinian hopes of a binding order to halt the
war in Gaza, it also represented a legal setback
for Israel, which had hoped to throw out a case brought under the
genocide convention established in the ashes of the Holocaust.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard about whether Palestinian rights were being
denied in a war it said was causing grievous humanitarian harm."
greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
On 12/10/25 07:45, Tony wrote:Yes, another person unable to understand that there are two sides to this tragedy.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360850060/chloe-swarbrick-how-should-we-define-her-contribution-politics
He has got it.
Total crap. An attempt to redefine the term "genocide", then claiming
the term is too difficult for average Joe to understand.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard and so the average Joe has a valid legal basis for using
'genocide' in describing the events in Gaza. And so does Swarbrick.
The MAGA Zionists; PM Lux, Deputy PM Seymour, Foreign Minister Winston,
Defence Minister Crusher are all giving Trump a b_job.
NZ is a signatory to ICJ and they have duty to uphold and respect it.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/507667/south-african-president-hails-ruling-against-israel-as-step-toward-justice
"The World Court ordered Israel on Friday to prevent acts of genocide
against the Palestinians and do more to help civilians,
although it stopped short of ordering a ceasefire as requested by the
plaintiff South Africa.
While the ruling denied Palestinian hopes of a binding order to halt the
war in Gaza, it also represented a legal setback
for Israel, which had hoped to throw out a case brought under the
genocide convention established in the ashes of the Holocaust.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard about whether Palestinian rights were being
denied in a war it said was causing grievous humanitarian harm."
Sad really.
On 13/10/25 10:10, Tony wrote:I was referring to the core of this issue which is the conflict in Gaza and surrounding countries, not the ICJ.
greybeard <nobody@nowhere.invalid> wrote:
On 12/10/25 07:45, Tony wrote:Yes, another person unable to understand that there are two sides to this
He has got it.https://www.stuff.co.nz/politics/360850060/chloe-swarbrick-how-should-we-define-her-contribution-politics
Total crap. An attempt to redefine the term "genocide", then claiming
the term is too difficult for average Joe to understand.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard and so the average Joe has a valid legal basis for using
'genocide' in describing the events in Gaza. And so does Swarbrick.
The MAGA Zionists; PM Lux, Deputy PM Seymour, Foreign Minister Winston,
Defence Minister Crusher are all giving Trump a b_job.
NZ is a signatory to ICJ and they have duty to uphold and respect it.
https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/world/507667/south-african-president-hails-ruling-against-israel-as-step-toward-justice
"The World Court ordered Israel on Friday to prevent acts of genocide
against the Palestinians and do more to help civilians,
although it stopped short of ordering a ceasefire as requested by the
plaintiff South Africa.
While the ruling denied Palestinian hopes of a binding order to halt the >>> war in Gaza, it also represented a legal setback
for Israel, which had hoped to throw out a case brought under the
genocide convention established in the ashes of the Holocaust.
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that there was a case to
be heard about whether Palestinian rights were being
denied in a war it said was causing grievous humanitarian harm."
tragedy.
Sad really.
Please explain. What 'side' am I missing? What did the ICJ fail to
consider in it's determination?
Please explain. What 'side' am I missing? What did the ICJ fail to
consider in it's determination?