| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 26 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 57:01:40 |
| Calls: | 632 |
| Files: | 1,188 |
| D/L today: |
28 files (19,987K bytes) |
| Messages: | 179,886 |
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same >><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it >>appears, that concept no longer exists.
"-oWe hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,-o he said in a monologue."
If that's all he said, I don't see the problem. Sure, it's a lie, but
so what? Free speech doesn't include lying anymore?
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same >>><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it >>>appears, that concept no longer exists.
"?We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,? he said in a monologue."
If that's all he said, I don't see the problem. Sure, it's a lie, but
so what? Free speech doesn't include lying anymore?
Where's the lie?
Anyway, the capper was the clip of Trump being asked how he was
holding up in the last day-and-a-half (after Kirk's death). He
said okay, and immediately pivoted to the building of his White
House ballroom. He doesn't *really* care about Kirk.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:10:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show, >>>>that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same >>>><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it >>>>appears, that concept no longer exists.
"?We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,? he said in a monologue."
If that's all he said, I don't see the problem. Sure, it's a lie, but
so what? Free speech doesn't include lying anymore?
Where's the lie?
That Kirk's killer was MAGA.
His family was Republican but Robinson
himself was noted by family members as rebellious and was known to be
dating a trans.
On this point the left is starting to sound like the rightists blaming Democrats for the KKK.
--Anyway, the capper was the clip of Trump being asked how he was
holding up in the last day-and-a-half (after Kirk's death). He
said okay, and immediately pivoted to the building of his White
House ballroom. He doesn't *really* care about Kirk.
Exactly. Trump must be the center of attention. So what if he had to
ride a martyr's ass onto the stage?
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:10:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
...
Where's the lie?
That Kirk's killer was MAGA.
That not what he said. To repeat:
"We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,"
Both points seem true to me, based on my own observations of
the reactions from "the right".
That Kirk's killer was MAGA. His family was Republican but Robinson
himself was noted by family members as rebellious and was known to be
dating a trans.
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:<snip>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:10:00 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"?We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,? he said in a monologue."
If that's all he said, I don't see the problem. Sure, it's a lie, but >>>> so what? Free speech doesn't include lying anymore?
Where's the lie?
That Kirk's killer was MAGA.
That not what he said. To repeat:
"We hit some new lows over the weekend, with the MAGA gang
desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk
as anything other than one of them and doing everything they can to
score political points from it,"
Both points seem true to me, based on my own observations of
the reactions from "the right".
His family was Republican but Robinson
himself was noted by family members as rebellious and was known to be
dating a trans.
On this point the left is starting to sound like the rightists blaming
Democrats for the KKK.
"The left" :-D
Anyway, the capper was the clip of Trump being asked how he was
holding up in the last day-and-a-half (after Kirk's death). He
said okay, and immediately pivoted to the building of his White
House ballroom. He doesn't *really* care about Kirk.
Exactly. Trump must be the center of attention. So what if he had to
ride a martyr's ass onto the stage?
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same <https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, LeftistsAreFools said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D-|Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, LeftistsAreFools said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D-|Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, LeftistsAreFools said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, LeftistsAreFools said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, LeftistsAreFools said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same
<https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-abo
ut-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about >-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air> ><https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
We re-elected a preening, narcissistic, grievance-soaked, vengeful
tabloid tallywhacker, and the Supreme Court removed all
constraints from him.
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
<snip>
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
<snip>
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
Jesus, does this guy even watch any kind of news?
And "the leftists", as if "the leftists" are the only ones who
care about adherence to the Constitution.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in
violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent
President.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" should find ways to "take
action" on Kimmel. FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" vv FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same <https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:10:38 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D-|Oliveiro >>>>>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>>
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" vv FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
Nexstar made the decision to drop Kimmel before Carr suggested anyone
should find ways to "take action" on Kimmel.
[Nazi filth newsgroup alt.politics.trump removed from followups]
On 9/19/2025 1:23 PM, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:10:38 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said: >>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro >>>>>>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK. >>>>>>>>>>>We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>>>
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are >>>>>> behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" vv FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
Nexstar made the decision to drop Kimmel before Carr suggested anyone
should find ways to "take action" on Kimmel.
That's a lie, fascist filth.
Nexstar, the nationAs largest station owner, denied on Thursday that it
pulled oJimmy Kimmel Live!o off the air due to pressure from FCC Chairman
Brendan Carr.
The company announced the decision hours after Carr threatened to take action
against ABC affiliates over KimmelAs comments about Charlie KirkAs killer.
Carr also urged affiliates to preempt the show.
Asked whether NexstarAs decision was in any way influenced by CarrAs remarks,
Gary Weitman, the companyAs chief communications officer, said oNo.o
https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/nexstar-jimmy-kimmel-suspension-fcc-pressure-1236523812/
Weitman was lying, of course.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
<snip>
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
Jesus, does this guy even watch any kind of news?
And "the leftists", as if "the leftists" are the only ones who
care about adherence to the Constitution.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is
well within FCC's purview. Telling an outright lie is not in the
public's interest. Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The
fool thought he had a right to lie.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" should find ways to "take
action" on Kimmel. FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:<snip>
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is
well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The
fool thought he had a right to lie.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:13:40 -0400, LeftistsAreFools ><IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" should find ways to "take
action" on Kimmel. FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
However he did suggest license loss for or other penalties on
Disney/ABC or at the very least, intense scrutiny. (additional work
for the FCC head)
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:<snip>
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is
well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about
the 2020 election?
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The
fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to
lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 02:06:51 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
SCORE!
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|OliveiroKimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel >>>>>>>
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" should find ways to "take
action" on Kimmel. FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:10:38 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro >>>>>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>>
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" vv FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
Nexstar made the decision to drop Kimmel before Carr suggested anyone
should find ways to "take action" on Kimmel.
[Nazi filth newsgroup alt.politics.trump removed from followups]
On 9/19/2025 1:23 PM, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:10:38 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 19:13:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said: >>>>>>>>>
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|Oliveiro >>>>>>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK. >>>>>>>>>>>We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>>>
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are >>>>>> behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do
this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to
take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" vv FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
Heh, there's no weaseling out of this one.
In a few days we'll see if polls show a solid majority of Americans
think Kimmel's firing was due to Trump regime pressure and if they
approve of it.
You won't like the results.
Nexstar made the decision to drop Kimmel before Carr suggested anyone
should find ways to "take action" on Kimmel.
That's a lie, fascist filth.
Nexstar, the nationAs largest station owner, denied on Thursday that it
pulled oJimmy Kimmel Live!o off the air due to pressure from FCC Chairman
Brendan Carr.
The company announced the decision hours after Carr threatened to take action
against ABC affiliates over KimmelAs comments about Charlie KirkAs killer.
Carr also urged affiliates to preempt the show.
Asked whether NexstarAs decision was in any way influenced by CarrAs remarks,
Gary Weitman, the companyAs chief communications officer, said oNo.o
https://variety.com/2025/tv/news/nexstar-jimmy-kimmel-suspension-fcc-pressure-1236523812/
Weitman was lying, of course.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:42:49 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 02:06:51 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro >><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
SCORE!
Trump is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:30:25 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:13:40 -0400, LeftistsAreFools >><IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 12:36:59 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 11:58:40 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 06:12:55 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:34:35 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:32:45 -0500, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2025-09-19 08:29:32 +0000, TrumpersAreProudFascists said:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 05:35:44 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D-|Oliveiro >>>>>>>>> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 23:57:51 -0400, Anonymous wrote:Depending upon how your boss takes that statement. Same as with Kimmel
There is no free speech in either New Zealand or the UK.
We can repeat what Jimmy Kimmel said without anybody getting fired. >>>>>>>>>
Kimmel's boss isn't Donald Trump and/or Brendan Carr.
...and neither one of them fired him.
...and John Gotti didn't actually rub out all those wiseguy rats personally.
The leftists have no evidence that Donald Trump or Brendan Carr are
behind Kimmel's firing.
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Carr did suggest that "these companies" should find ways to "take
action" on Kimmel. FWIW, he didn't suggest the action should be to
fire him.
However he did suggest license loss for or other penalties on
Disney/ABC or at the very least, intense scrutiny. (additional work
for the FCC head)
It was a mistake for him to to that, but he did it after Nextar and
Sinclair had already shut Kimmel off on their own volition.
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:35:14 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:<snip>
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>> this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>> take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is
well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about
the 2020 election?
<chuckle> Fox News is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The
fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to
lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
Not laws, but FCC standards.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
"Ding" goes the irony bell.....
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 07:16:05 -0400, LeftistsAreFools ><IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:42:49 -0400, Governor Swill >><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 02:06:51 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro >>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
SCORE!
Trump is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Don't forget that the vast majority of what's at that wiki site
contain author half-truths and out of context statements.
On 2025-09-20, LeftistsAreFools <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:35:14 -0400, Governor Swill >><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:<snip>
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>>> this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>>> take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even
in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is >>>>well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about
the 2020 election?
<chuckle> Fox News is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The >>>>fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to
lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
Not laws, but FCC standards.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
"Ding" goes the irony bell.....
<https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fcc-and-speech>
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:56 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-09-20, LeftistsAreFools <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote: >>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:35:14 -0400, Governor Swill >>><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:<snip>
super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>>>> this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>>>> take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the >>>>>>> FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>>>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even >>>>>>in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>>>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is >>>>>well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about >>>>the 2020 election?
<chuckle> Fox News is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The >>>>>fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to >>>>lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
Not laws, but FCC standards.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
"Ding" goes the irony bell.....
<https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fcc-and-speech>
Hoisted by your own petards again. You never learn, do you?
---
What is the FCC's responsibility?
The limitations on the FCC's power to restrict or ban speech begin
with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which decrees that
the federal government "shall make no law -a abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press." Accordingly, Congress through Section 326 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. -o 326, explicitly declared that
nothing in the statute
shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the [broadcast] communications or signals transmitted
by any [broadcast] station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the
right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast
communication.
---
Further, from
<https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing
on First Amendment rights of
the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally
distort the news, and the FCC may act
on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from
persons with direct personal
knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide,
Complaints About Broadcast
Journalism (www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
---
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 09:16:01 -0400, NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 07:16:05 -0400, LeftistsAreFools >><IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:42:49 -0400, Governor Swill >>><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 02:06:51 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro >>>><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really??
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump>
SCORE!
Trump is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
So? Doesn't make him any less a liar.
Don't forget that the vast majority of what's at that wiki site
contain author half-truths and out of context statements.
You just can't stop lying either, can you?
On 2025-09-21, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:56 -0000 (UTC), potheadYawn.
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-09-20, LeftistsAreFools <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote: >>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:35:14 -0400, Governor Swill >>>><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>>super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:<snip>
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>>>>> this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>>>>> take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>>>>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even >>>>>>>in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>>>>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is >>>>>>well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about >>>>>the 2020 election?
<chuckle> Fox News is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The >>>>>>fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to >>>>>lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
Not laws, but FCC standards.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
"Ding" goes the irony bell.....
<https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fcc-and-speech>
Hoisted by your own petards again. You never learn, do you?
---
What is the FCC's responsibility?
The limitations on the FCC's power to restrict or ban speech begin
with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which decrees that
the federal government "shall make no law ? abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press." Accordingly, Congress through Section 326 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. o 326, explicitly declared that
nothing in the statute
shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of
censorship over the [broadcast] communications or signals transmitted
by any [broadcast] station, and no regulation or condition shall be
promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the
right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast
communication.
---
Further, from >><https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf> >>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing
on First Amendment rights of
the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally
distort the news, and the FCC may act
on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from
persons with direct personal
knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide,
Complaints About Broadcast
Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
---
Everything that disagees with your ideaology is autmatically from a conservative
site.
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing
on First Amendment rights of
the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally
distort the news, and the FCC may act
on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from
persons with direct personal
Make my point as do other hotlinks.
Then why did the FCC do nothing about the 2020 election lies Fox and
other broadcasters were telling?
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Here we have NZ and the UK reporting on same ><https://www.stuff.co.nz/world-news/360827879/what-jimmy-kimmel-said-about >-charlie-kirk-got-him-taken-air> ><https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c203n52x1y9o>.
To normal people, that is just freedom of speech. But in the USA, it
appears, that concept no longer exists.
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 04:54:21 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
Then why did the FCC do nothing about the 2020 election lies Fox and
other broadcasters were telling?
Fox news is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy. Neither is CNN and
MSNBC.
<potsnip>
Further, from <https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming The FCC is
prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on
First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for
broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may
act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such
behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more
information, please see our consumer guide, Complaints About
Broadcast Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<potsnip>
Further, from
<https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf> >>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming The FCC is
prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on
First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for
broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may
act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such
behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more
information, please see our consumer guide, Complaints About
Broadcast Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
Has the FCC acted on Fox News' transgressions yet?
On Sun, 21 Sep 2025 02:17:59 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
On 2025-09-21, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 15:28:56 -0000 (UTC), pothead >>><pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:Yawn.
On 2025-09-20, LeftistsAreFools <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote: >>>>> On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 05:35:14 -0400, Governor Swill >>>>><governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:32:35 -0400, LeftistsAreFools wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2025 15:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: >>>>>>>>super70s wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:<snip>
"This is a very, very serious issue right now for Disney. We can do >>>>>>>>> this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to >>>>>>>>> take action on Kimmel, or there is going to be additional work for the
FCC ahead." - Brendan Carr
Imagine going after a talk show plus comedic opening monologue, in >>>>>>>>violation of the First Amendment, taking an action that's not even >>>>>>>>in the FCC's purview, in the service of a lawless and incompetent >>>>>>>>President.
Nonsense. Insuring that the broadcasts are in the public interest is >>>>>>>well within FCC's purview.
Telling an outright lie is not in the public's interest.
Really? Then why didn't the FCC do something to Fox for lying about >>>>>>the 2020 election?
<chuckle> Fox News is not under FCC jurisdiction, Dummy.
Had Kimmel or ABC appologised and corrected it
might have gone away, but Kimmel is a moron who wouldn't do it. The >>>>>>>fool thought he had a right to lie.
According to the SCOTUS, news and information outlets ARE allowed to >>>>>>lie. There is no LAW that says they can't.
Not laws, but FCC standards.
If there was, Fox would
have been shut down thirty years ago.
Do you just not bother to think before you post?
"Ding" goes the irony bell.....
<https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/fcc-and-speech>
Hoisted by your own petards again. You never learn, do you?
---
What is the FCC's responsibility?
The limitations on the FCC's power to restrict or ban speech begin
with the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which decrees that
the federal government "shall make no law ? abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press." Accordingly, Congress through Section 326 of
the Communications Act, 47 U.S.C. -o 326, explicitly declared that
nothing in the statute
shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of
censorship over the [broadcast] communications or signals transmitted
by any [broadcast] station, and no regulation or condition shall be
promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the
right of free speech by means of [over-the-air] broadcast
communication.
---
Further, from >>><https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf> >>>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing
on First Amendment rights of
the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally
distort the news, and the FCC may act
on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from
persons with direct personal
knowledge. For more information, please see our consumer guide,
Complaints About Broadcast
Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
---
Everything that disagees with your ideaology is autmatically from a conservative
site.
The FCC is prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing
on First Amendment rights of
the press. It is, however, illegal for broadcasters to intentionally >>distort the news, and the FCC may act
on complaints if there is documented evidence of such behavior from
persons with direct personal
Make my point as do other hotlinks.
Then why did the FCC do nothing about the 2020 election lies Fox and
other broadcasters were telling?
A: Because the FCC doesn't do anything about media lies even though
that apparently falls within their purview.
Then why did the FCC do nothing about the 2020 election lies Fox and
other broadcasters were telling?
A: Because the FCC doesn't do anything about media lies even though
that apparently falls within their purview.
That's a reasonable question.
Why weren't the democrats in an uproar over the censoring of the Hunter >laptop, the Russia collusion lie, conservative media and others?
All of a sudden when the tables get turned the democrats start whining
1st amendment rights which do NOT apply to Kimmel in his capacity as
an employee of the company who pays him. Those rights apply to the COMPANY. >Not Kimmel directly.
That's the way I understand it.
Either way, there is more to this story. Follow the money.
That's a reasonable question.For the same reason Trump is silent on Epstein and Republicans refuse
Why weren't the democrats in an uproar over the censoring of the Hunter
laptop, the Russia collusion lie, conservative media and others?
to pass the immigration legislation we need.
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<potsnip>
Further, from
<https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf> >>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming The FCC is
prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on
First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for
broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may
act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such
behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more
information, please see our consumer guide, Complaints About
Broadcast Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
Has the FCC acted on Fox News' transgressions yet?
On 9/21/25 08:40, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
<potsnip>
Further, from
<https://www.fcc.gov/sites/default/files/broadcasting_false_information.pdf>
---
Broadcasting false content during news programming The FCC is
prohibited by law from engaging in censorship or infringing on
First Amendment rights of the press. It is, however, illegal for
broadcasters to intentionally distort the news, and the FCC may
act on complaints if there is documented evidence of such
behavior from persons with direct personal knowledge. For more
information, please see our consumer guide, Complaints About
Broadcast Journalism
(www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/complaints-about-broadcast-journalism).
Has the FCC acted on Fox News' transgressions yet?
Fox's use of "well actually, its entertainment, not a news channel" as a >legal defense should really have opened them up to fraud lawsuits for >customer deception and misrepresentation of their product.
-hh
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right-
wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for rCLlow ratingsrCY for Kimmel!
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right-However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >> >lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for rCLlow ratingsrCY for >> >Kimmel!
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right-
wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for olow ratingso for >Kimmel!
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for "low ratings" for >>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for olow ratingso for >>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for -olow ratings-o for >>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight
in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV
show, that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business >>>decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
LeftistsAreMorons Is A Moron wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>> repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for ?low ratings? for >>>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Nah, that's like 20% of ABC stations at most, I believe.
LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote in >news:s888dk1v1ub07h03a8nef9a4elvv8hdnr1@4ax.com:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight
in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV
show, that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business >>>>decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Show us these "poor ratings".
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for -olow ratings-o for >>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
On 2025-09-24, LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>> repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>> wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>> lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for -olow ratings-o for >>>> Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Once again my opinion is Kimmel is a pawn in all of this.
Both networks are in the middle of negotiating merger deals for big money. Kimmel's ratings have been tanking and let's face it the guy isn't funny.
So Trump enters this mess, wrongly IMHO, and has pull with the FCC who will in
part
determine the outcome of the mergers and bingo Kimmel is put on hold to please
the FCC
who want to please Trump.
Kimmel is a POS however in this case it's not censorship but follow the money.
And I do not believe that Trump or the FCC trying to please Trump should be involved in any
of this.
I also did not feel that Biden should have been pressuring tech media to censor COVID posts
conservatives, Hunter laptop etc.
So where were you "free speech" left wing lunatics when that was going on? Those incidents surely affected far more people than a single, 3rd rate stand up
comedian.
Mitchell Holman <noemail@aol.com> wrote:
LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote: >>>>> ...
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for rCLlow ratingsrCY for Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Show us these "poor ratings".
Look them up yourself, Dumbass. Compare them to the Gutfeld show.
Contribution. I think werCOre going to test ABC out on this.
LetrCOs see how we do. Last time I went after them, they gave me
$16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative. A
true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad
Ratings,rCY
Let's repeat those last "thoughts":
Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 Million Dollars.
This one sounds even more lucrative.
LeftistsAreMorons Is A Moron wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>> repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>> wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>> lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for -olow ratings-o for >>>> Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Nah, that's like 20% of ABC stations at most, I believe.
Governor Swill wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in
repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for "low ratings" for >>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
Jimmy showed some real emotion over the shooting and over the
support he got from many people.
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Jimmy certainly got Lawsuit Larry's attention:
oI canAt believe ABC Fake News gave Jimmy Kimmel his job back.
The White House was told by ABC that his Show was cancelled!
Something happened between then and now because his audience
is GONE, and his atalentA was never there. Why would they want
someone back who does so poorly, whoAs not funny, and who puts
the Network in jeopardy by playing 99% positive Democrat
GARBAGE. He is yet another arm of the DNC and, to the best of
my knowledge, that would be a major Illegal Campaign
Contribution. I think weAre going to test ABC out on this.
LetAs see how we do. Last time I went after them, they gave me
$16 Million Dollars. This one sounds even more lucrative. A
true bunch of losers! Let Jimmy Kimmel rot in his bad
Ratings,o
Let's repeat those last "thoughts":
Last time I went after them, they gave me $16 Million Dollars.
This one sounds even more lucrative.
LeftistsAreMorons Is A Moron wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>> repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show,
that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney >>>>lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for ?low ratings? for >>>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Nah, that's like 20% of ABC stations at most, I believe.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
LeftistsAreMorons Is A Moron wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 12:14:05 -0400, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight in >>>>>> repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV show, >>>>>> that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him.
Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the right- >>>>>wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business decision: Disney
lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much for ?low ratings? for >>>>>Kimmel!
His return monologue was a gem!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
spiral due to poor ratings.
Nah, that's like 20% of ABC stations at most, I believe.
More like 30%, but his ratings are already poor.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:03:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>LeftistsAreMorons wrote
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 Governor Swill wrote:Show us these "poor ratings".
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:His return monologue was a gem!
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delightSo, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the >>>>>right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business >>>>>decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much >>>>>for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV
show, that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him. >>>>Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
spiral due to poor ratings.
Look them up yourself, Dumbass. Compare them to the Gutfeld show.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 14:58:28 -0400, LeftistsAreMorons <IronWhite@Systemic_Patriotism.org> wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 13:25:20 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
LeftistsAreMorons Is A Moron wrote ...
More like 30%, but his ratings are already poor.
Can either of you cite any stats?
AI overview: "National household reach: The combined blackout by--
Sinclair and Nexstar affects viewers in about 23-u25% of U.S.
households, effectively blocking millions of viewers from watching
Kimmel's return."
Second place out of four networks isn't poor. Especially since that
third place network was #1 for forty years.
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 15:03:59 -0400, LeftistsAreMorons wrote:
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:03:15 +0000, Mitchell Holman wrote: >>>LeftistsAreMorons wrote
On Wed, 24 Sep 2025 Governor Swill wrote:Show us these "poor ratings".
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:Not without Nexstar and Sinclair. I suspect the show is in a death
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 06:49:11 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:His return monologue was a gem!
Every news network in the Free World must be taking great delight >>>>>>> in repeating the exact words that Jimmy Kimmel uttered on his TV >>>>>>> show, that got the Trump faction to force his network to sack him. >>>>>Kimmel was never sacked. He was temporarily suspended.So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the >>>>>>right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business >>>>>>decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much >>>>>>for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
His ratings will probably be up for a while over this!
spiral due to poor ratings.
Look them up yourself, Dumbass. Compare them to the Gutfeld show.
Gutfeld isn't on late night, dumbass. He's on in prime time.
Moron right wing loons STILL think they have any credibility!
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for rCLlow ratingsrCY for Kimmel!
However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
Their customers can do their own boycott if it matters to them.
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:19:30 -0700, chine.bleu wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for rCLlow ratingsrCY for Kimmel!
However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
Their customers can do their own boycott if it matters to them.
And now one of those right-wing affiliate networks has folded and
returned Kimmel to its feed
<https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/sinclair-gets-nothing-it-asked-for-puts-jimmy-kimmel-back-on-anyway/>.
No, reading further down, actually *both* of those affiliates have put
Kimmel back on!
One fun bit:
Sinclair also announced it would air a special in remembrance of
Kirk in Kimmel's time slot, but then decided to put it on YouTube
instead.
Money talks louder than religious or political ideology. Or at least
it does to sensible people ...
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:19:30 -0700, chine.bleu wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DAOliveiro wrote:
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
Their customers can do their own boycott if it matters to them.
And now one of those right-wing affiliate networks has folded and
returned Kimmel to its feed ><https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/sinclair-gets-nothing-it-asked-for-puts-jimmy-kimmel-back-on-anyway/>.
No, reading further down, actually *both* of those affiliates have put
Kimmel back on!
One fun bit:
Sinclair also announced it would air a special in remembrance of
Kirk in Kimmel's time slot, but then decided to put it on YouTube
instead.
Money talks louder than religious or political ideology. Or at least
it does to sensible people ...
On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:58:20 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro ><ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:19:30 -0700, chine.bleu wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DAOliveiro wrote:
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for olow ratingso for Kimmel!
However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
Their customers can do their own boycott if it matters to them.
And now one of those right-wing affiliate networks has folded and
returned Kimmel to its feed >><https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/sinclair-gets-nothing-it-asked-for-puts-jimmy-kimmel-back-on-anyway/>.
No, reading further down, actually *both* of those affiliates have put >>Kimmel back on!
One fun bit:
Sinclair also announced it would air a special in remembrance of
Kirk in Kimmel's time slot, but then decided to put it on YouTube
instead.
Money talks louder than religious or political ideology. Or at least
it does to sensible people ...
As I wrote a couple of days ago, when they find that Kimmel gets
better ratings than re-runs of Andy Griffith, they'll be putting him
back on the air.
Kimmel noted the big boost in his viewership a couple days ago,
and, like the grateful and appreciative liberal he is, thanked
President Trump.
Kimmel noted the big boost in his viewership a couple days ago,
and, like the grateful and appreciative liberal he is, thanked
President Trump.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 07:17:48 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
Kimmel noted the big boost in his viewership a couple days ago,
and, like the grateful and appreciative liberal he is, thanked
President Trump.
Kimmel Youtube views:
Sept 25, 4,268,475
Sept 24, 8,055,728
Sept 23, 22,394,398
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHNYV71fKQ4>
He's doing better on Youtube than on Thetube.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor SwillIt will all be short lived.
<governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 07:17:48 -0400, Chris Ahlstrom
<OFeem1987@teleworm.us> wrote:
Kimmel noted the big boost in his viewership a couple days ago,
and, like the grateful and appreciative liberal he is, thanked
President Trump.
Kimmel Youtube views:
Sept 25, 4,268,475
Sept 24, 8,055,728
Sept 23, 22,394,398
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHNYV71fKQ4>
He's doing better on Youtube than on Thetube.
I'll bet ABC/Disney wishes he was doing better on "the tube."
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Rupert Murdoch and Larry Ellison are running Tik Tok, the world's
largest social media platform.
Elon Musk owns X.
Mark Zuckerberg is running Facebook.
Murdoch's son is in charge of Fox News, New York Post and the Wall
Street Journal.
Larry Ellison's son owns CBS and Paramount.
Carson.
Funny.
Letterman.
Funny
Leno
Funny.
Arsenio
semi funny.
Colbert
Semi funny
Kimmel.
Not funny.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Surely, in a competitive free market, the successful products/services are >owned by the winners who offer them. oLefto and orighto donAt come into
it: what matters is quality.
Does the US have a competitive free media market or not?
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 20:41:57 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Rupert Murdoch and Larry Ellison are running Tik Tok, the world's
largest social media platform.
Elon Musk owns X.
Mark Zuckerberg is running Facebook.
Murdoch's son is in charge of Fox News, New York Post and the Wall
Street Journal.
Larry Ellison's son owns CBS and Paramount.
Carson.
Funny.
Letterman.
Funny
Leno
Funny.
Arsenio
semi funny.
Colbert
Semi funny
Kimmel.
Not funny.
Blame Fox. It's their show.
Funny is irrelevant. The point here is that Fox, ABC, Nexstar and
Sinclair all bowed to a heavy public backlash. Clearly the First
Amendment isn't dead yet.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 21:00:02 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Surely, in a competitive free market, the successful products/services are >>owned by the winners who offer them. -oLeft-o and -oright-o don-At come into >>it: what matters is quality.
Exactly my point.
Does the US have a competitive free media market or not?
Probably the most competitive on the planet. There's a saying,
"Americans are the poorest informed but best entertained media
consumers on earth."
On 2025-09-27, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 21:00:02 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Surely, in a competitive free market, the successful
products/services are owned by the winners who offer them. -oLeft-o
and -oright-o don-At come into it: what matters is quality.
Exactly my point.
Does the US have a competitive free media market or not?
Probably the most competitive on the planet. There's a saying,
"Americans are the poorest informed but best entertained media
consumers on earth."
That's a true statement.
As I always say, the average American can tell you all about Dancing
With the Stars, but has no idea who their state representatives are.
That being said, with the exception of AM talk radio which is on life support, the left controls the media by far. At least the legacy
media. They always have.
On 2025-09-27, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:<snip>
Funny is irrelevant. The point here is that Fox, ABC, Nexstar and
Sinclair all bowed to a heavy public backlash. Clearly the First
Amendment isn't dead yet.
I have no problem with that
but it's still all about money
and if Kimmel
sinks again in the ratings, which I predict he will, he's gone.
Just like any entertainer.
And BTW, this was never a first amendment issue despite the left trying
to push the narrative.
On 2025-09-27, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 21:00:02 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Surely, in a competitive free market, the successful products/services are >>>owned by the winners who offer them. ?Left? and ?right? don?t come into >>>it: what matters is quality.
Exactly my point.
Does the US have a competitive free media market or not?
Probably the most competitive on the planet. There's a saying,
"Americans are the poorest informed but best entertained media
consumers on earth."
That's a true statement.
As I always say, the average American can tell you all about Dancing With the Stars,
but has no idea who their state representatives are.
That being said, with the exception of AM talk radio which is on life support, the left
controls the media by far. At least the legacy media.
They always have.
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in >news:10b9u1p$21grr$2@pothead.dont-email.me:
On 2025-09-27, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 21:00:02 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro wrote:
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:34:21 -0400, Governor Swill wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Surely, in a competitive free market, the successful
products/services are owned by the winners who offer them. -oLeft-o
and -oright-o don-At come into it: what matters is quality.
Exactly my point.
Does the US have a competitive free media market or not?
Probably the most competitive on the planet. There's a saying,
"Americans are the poorest informed but best entertained media
consumers on earth."
That's a true statement.
As I always say, the average American can tell you all about Dancing
With the Stars, but has no idea who their state representatives are.
That being said, with the exception of AM talk radio which is on life
support, the left controls the media by far. At least the legacy
media. They always have.
Tell that to the millions who couldn't
watch the Kimmel return because Sinclair
stations all over the country refused to
broadcast it.
And the "liberal" ABC News who fired
him. And the "liberal" CBS who fired
Steven Colbert.
The Conservative Agenda:
Make life harder for veterans
Make life harder for retirees
Make life harder for teachers
Make life harder for farmers
Make life harder for consumers
Make life harder for students
Make life harder for disaster victims
Make life harder for tourists
Make life harder for gay people
Make life harder for trans people
Make life harder for sick people
Make life harder for students
Make life harder for voters
Update: All the Sinclair and Nexstar affiliates have since pickedThat's a true statement.
As I always say, the average American can tell you all about Dancing
With the Stars, but has no idea who their state representatives are.
That being said, with the exception of AM talk radio which is on life
support, the left controls the media by far. At least the legacy
media. They always have.
Tell that to the millions who couldn't
watch the Kimmel return because Sinclair
stations all over the country refused to
broadcast it.
Kimmel back up after their late night ratings collapsed.
On Fri, 26 Sep 2025 21:58:20 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D|+Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 16:19:30 -0700, chine.bleu wrote:
Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025 18:30:57 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D-AOliveiro wrote: >>>>>
So, Kimmel is going back on air. The political pressure from the
right- wing nutjobs was ultimately outweighed by a pure business
decision: Disney lost about $5 billion of its stock value. So much
for -olow ratings-o for Kimmel!
However, note that the Nexstar and Sinclair (aggressive right-wing
owner) networks are still going to pre-empt Kimmel.
Their customers can do their own boycott if it matters to them.
And now one of those right-wing affiliate networks has folded and
returned Kimmel to its feed >><https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/09/sinclair-gets-nothing-it-asked-for-puts-jimmy-kimmel-back-on-anyway/>.
No, reading further down, actually *both* of those affiliates have put >>Kimmel back on!
One fun bit:
Sinclair also announced it would air a special in remembrance of
Kirk in Kimmel's time slot, but then decided to put it on YouTube
instead.
Money talks louder than religious or political ideology. Or at least
it does to sensible people ...
As I wrote a couple of days ago, when they find that Kimmel gets
better ratings than re-runs of Andy Griffith, they'll be putting him
back on the air.
On Sat, 27 Sep 2025 20:41:57 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:
For those who complain that the liberal left owns American media:
Rupert Murdoch and Larry Ellison are running Tik Tok, the world's
largest social media platform.
Elon Musk owns X.
Mark Zuckerberg is running Facebook.
Murdoch's son is in charge of Fox News, New York Post and the Wall
Street Journal.
Larry Ellison's son owns CBS and Paramount.
Carson.
Funny.
Letterman.
Funny
Leno
Funny.
Arsenio
semi funny.
Colbert
Semi funny
Kimmel.
Not funny.
Blame Fox. It's their show.
Funny is irrelevant. The point here is that Fox, ABC, Nexstar and
Sinclair all bowed to a heavy public backlash. Clearly the First
Amendment isn't dead yet.
<https://www.weaversdepartmentstore.com/products/cool_gifts/securitybyfife_license_plate_good_one.jpg>
The for profit media is not liberal or conservative. They are only interested in profit.
