• [Usenet Improvement Project] Blinky's return?

    From snipeco.2@snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) to news.software.readers on Fri Aug 22 11:49:54 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    I'm sure that many of you here will remember Blinky the Shark and his
    Usenet Improvement Project.

    It was my understanding that Blinky died ~15 years ago; is that true?
    I ask because somebody claiming to be Blinky has recently appeared.
    --
    ^-^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From VanguardLH@V@nguard.LH to news.software.readers on Fri Aug 22 10:14:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:

    I'm sure that many of you here will remember Blinky the Shark and his
    Usenet Improvement Project.

    It was my understanding that Blinky died ~15 years ago; is that true?
    I ask because somebody claiming to be Blinky has recently appeared.

    After Blinky's death, and to prevent loss of his work, his pages were
    moved to:

    http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

    Alas, it disappeared from that site. According to web.archive.org, the
    last copy of that web page at that site was from Jan 24, 2025:

    https://web.archive.org/web/20250124145634/http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/

    Now those pages are over at:

    http://suckmyfuckingcock.com/improve-usenet.org/

    Obviously a really bad choice of domain name having complete absense of professionalism. Blinky's work will probably die over there, too, since
    users are unlikely to visit a web site named as such, and it is some
    joker's personal project, so he'll change his mind, or decide to stop
    paying the domain ransom (you don't own a domain, but instead rent it
    from a domain registrar). Too bad no one upstanding and trustworthy
    grabbed Blinky's content before twovoyagers decided to drop them.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Colin Macleod@user7@newsgrouper.org.invalid to news.software.readers on Fri Aug 22 20:12:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> posted:
    from a domain registrar). Too bad no one upstanding and trustworthy
    grabbed Blinky's content before twovoyagers decided to drop them.

    It mostly seems to be just slagging off Google Groups as an interface
    to Usenet, which is only of historical significance now.
    --
    Colin Macleod ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ https://cmacleod.me.uk

    FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED FEED
    GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA GAZA
    NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW! NOW!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Ralph Fox@-rf-nz-@-.invalid to news.software.readers on Sat Aug 23 09:13:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:49:54 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:

    I'm sure that many of you here will remember Blinky the Shark and his
    Usenet Improvement Project.

    It was my understanding that Blinky died ~15 years ago; is that true?
    I ask because somebody claiming to be Blinky has recently appeared.

    FYI, some evidence from 2009

    1. <https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/30863813>
    2. <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware/c/_de0Ex4PpJ0/m/tmp3Cpp5NbcJ> 3. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/78M6SnIGUW4/m/PmcBsLQhuh4J>
    4. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/ryggoyeh--A/m/aq_EAVD7MaoJ>
    5. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/K8W9cZb-D8A/m/KFvwHZsPNbgJ>
    6. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/AUc4xCcoq0A/m/OvTm5dVHs28J>
    --
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From snipeco.2@snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) to news.software.readers on Fri Aug 22 22:44:32 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    Ralph Fox <-rf-nz-@-.invalid> wrote:

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 11:49:54 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:

    I'm sure that many of you here will remember Blinky the Shark and his Usenet Improvement Project.

    It was my understanding that Blinky died ~15 years ago; is that true?
    I ask because somebody claiming to be Blinky has recently appeared.


    FYI, some evidence from 2009

    1. <https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/30863813>
    2. <https://groups.google.com/g/alt.comp.freeware/c/_de0Ex4PpJ0/m/tmp3Cpp5NbcJ>
    3. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/78M6SnIGUW4/m/PmcBsLQhuh4J>
    4. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/ryggoyeh--A/m/aq_EAVD7MaoJ>
    5. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/K8W9cZb-D8A/m/KFvwHZsPNbgJ>
    6. <https://groups.google.com/g/news.software.readers/c/AUc4xCcoq0A/m/OvTm5dVHs28J>


    Thank you again, Ralph. Sadly, that is indeed the confirmation
    that I expected. RIP, Blinky The Shark, an example to us all.
    --
    ^-^. Sn!pe, PTB, FIBS My pet rock Gordon just is.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From BlinkyTheShark@Blinky@imback.com to news.software.readers on Fri Aug 22 23:49:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 20:12:11 GMT, Colin Macleod wrote:

    VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> posted:
    from a domain registrar). Too bad no one upstanding and trustworthy
    grabbed Blinky's content before twovoyagers decided to drop them.

    It mostly seems to be just slagging off Google Groups as an interface to Usenet, which is only of historical significance now.

    Yes, and thanks to my earlier work on this matter, Google Groups was shut down.

    If it weren't for me, we all would still have to deal with nasty Groupers.

    My main reason for kook obsessing like a stark raving idiot about Google Groupers, to the point where it was my only concern and the only friends I
    had were online, was that real Usenet users didn't need them around. They didn't deserve a way to access Usenet like we did because they stank and didn't groom properly and weren't nearly as smart as old head geezer
    Usenet users.

    We were, and are, a much more advanced life form than anyone who ever used Google Groups. If I could have, I would have taken away their Internet
    access also, not just an easy way to access Usenet.

    In my opinion, these Google Groupers didn't really deserve to live. If
    someone can't setup and use a newsreader, and have to rely on a web
    interface to access our beloved Usenet that belongs to us and only us,
    they weren't really valuable to planet Earth.

    That's why I tried to harm them and hurt them and shut them out from any enjoyment in any way I could. I thought, and think, it's so cool to make people suffer for no reason. It gives me a kick, kind of makes me stiff,
    you know. I feel powerful and in control when I can fuck something up for someone else based on my virtuous and pristine ideals.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From VanguardLH@V@nguard.LH to news.software.readers on Sun Aug 24 14:52:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: news.software.readers

    BlinkyTheShark <Blinky@imback.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 23:12:58 +0200, issdr wrote:

    Sn!pe wrote:

    A guess is that it's one of the alt.usenet.kook crew from way back in
    its gory days before the Novins lawsuit. I have a name but I'd better
    not divulge it in public in case I'm wrong. (email works)

    no way to investigate based on that?

    it's disgusting what they're doing.

    Turns out, when I supposedly died alone, forgotten, and unloved by real-
    life people who really knew me, four delusional souls showed up at my pitiful funeral. My ex-wife and her brother and two weird and disgusting slobs from Usenet.

    That's what I get for being a complete and total asshole and underhandedly devoting all my life and time and efforts to harming new users of Usenet
    who weren't "cool" enough to use a newsreader.

    What a sad motherfucker I really was, looking back. I didn't realize it then, because I am slightly mentally retarded, but I was a pretentious, overbearing, ostentatious, acrimonious, virulent prick whose main goal in life was to prevent others from enjoying life online in any way possible. Why should anyone else be happy if I couldn't be?

    Only on Usenet would people celebrate that type of person and hold him up
    as an everlasting symbol of honorable intentions and pristine values. In retrospect, I was right at home in these bloody, nasty, polluted, foul waters of Usenet where a demonic character is celebrated as ethical.

    Paganini, Blinky the Forger's injection node into Usenet, has become the
    new Google Groups. Tis what happens with free UNregistered providers,
    like AIOE and paganini: they appeal to trolls, peuriles, forgers,
    malcontents, and other dross.

    Just as with GG, filtering out other garbage sources, like on the
    injection node in PATH, gets rid of Blinky The Forger, and his ilk
    through the new Google Groups aka Paganini BOFH. The Usenet Improvement Project still has value today, but for more than GG noise that the real
    Blinky helped to delete at the client end.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2