Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 27 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 40:26:59 |
Calls: | 631 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 1,187 |
D/L today: |
24 files (29,813K bytes) |
Messages: | 174,392 |
On Sat, 9 Mar 2024 14:47:48 -0800, HenHanna wrote:
i'd like to seea moreaa strange,a prettya chars like these:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa ??a
U+A9C1 JAVANESE LEFT RERENGGAN, U+A9C2 JAVANESE RIGHT RERENGGAN
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks as
if it might be something.
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one
that actually looks as if it might be something.
I did? Whereover did i do that?
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks
as if it might be something.
I did? Where|2ver did i do that?
My mistake, I confused your X-Face with Blueshirt's in e-s.s; apologies.
I stand by my comment about your own X-Face;
what is it supposed to be?
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:24:48 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote in <1qq7jrv.n1h8gnw6346N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>:
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks
as if it might be something.
I did? Whereover did i do that?
My mistake, I confused your X-Face with Blueshirt's in e-s.s; apologies.
I stand by my comment about your own X-Face;
what is it supposed to be?
Give them time -- they just got their sig sorted.
vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:[...snip encoded data...]
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 14:24:48 +0000, snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote in
<1qq7jrv.n1h8gnw6346N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>:
Blue-Maned_Hawk <bluemanedhawk@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:[...]
Apropos of not much: Your X-Face looks broken here.
No, that's meant to look like that.
Really? Bizarre.
I noticed that elsewhere you use a different one that actually looks
as if it might be something.
I did? Where|2ver did i do that?
My mistake, I confused your X-Face with Blueshirt's in e-s.s; apologies. >> >
I stand by my comment about your own X-Face;
what is it supposed to be?
Give them time -- they just got their sig sorted.
I've just had another look at Blue-Maned_Hawk's X-Face.
He's encoded it, no wonder it doesn't work here.
This is his header (which I've had to rewrap so that it will post):-
-----
X-Face:
- which IMO is a pretty darned convoluted way of going about things.
I've just had another look at Blue-Maned_Hawk's X-Face.
He's encoded it, no wonder it doesn't work here.
When you've decoded it, what does the XFACE image look like?
HenHanna <HenHanna@dev.null> wrote:
my X-Face???
(about 200 lines of high bit crap deleted here)
Yes, you have an X-Face in your header. I always thought those were silly, but if you're going to use it you might as well send something vaguely useful with it.
--scott