Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:
"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that
many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."
https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false
Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.
On 6/14/25 02:05, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
Paul W. Schleck <pschleck@panix.com> wrote:
"In the context of Usenet discussion forums, Himelboim et al. (2009)
have undertaken a detailed study of new thread creation. They found that >>> many Usenet forums featured a small group of 'discussion catalysts'
whose seed posts inspired a lot of debate. Interestingly, these users
largely posted stories from elsewhere on the web with little or no
comment - a relatively conservative approach to setting the agenda."
https://academic.oup.com/jcmc/article/19/3/625/4067622?login=false
Ironically, Paul has posted something he didn't write.
Ironically, we replied.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (1 / 5) |
| Uptime: | 21:47:15 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
6 files (8,794K bytes) |
| Messages: | 186,234 |
| Posted today: | 1 |