• MODERATOR FOUND: comp.programming.literate

    From Usenet Big-8 Management Board@board@big-8.org to news.groups.proposals,news.announce.newgroups on Thu Mar 28 16:21:50 2024
    From Newsgroup: news.announce.newgroups

    REPLACEMENT MODERATOR FOUND
    comp.programming.literate

    The Big-8 Management Board is pleased to announced that Edward McGuire
    has volunteered to moderate the newsgroup comp.programming.literate.

    We are informed that the group's last known active moderator, Norman
    Ramsey, had resigned some years ago.

    The new moderator has already taken over duties and the group has been accepting new posts since March 25, 2024, as evidenced in article <slrnv03mp5.vvu.metaed@newjersey.metaed.com>.


    MODERATOR INFO: comp.programming.literate

    Moderator: Edward McGuire
    Article submission address: cpl@newjersey.metaed.com
    Moderation team contact: cpl-board@newjersey.metaed.com
    Technical team contact: cpl-admin@newjersey.metaed.com


    CHARTER: comp.programming.literate

    A forum for the discussion of literate programming.

    (1) To share ideas, questions, experiences, and knowledge about
    the reading and writing of literate programs or more generally
    the presentation of code for human readers (e.g., prettyprinting).

    (2) To discuss the merits of the currently existing literate-
    programming and related tools.

    (3) To discuss the design of new literate-programming and related
    tools.


    Moderation Policies:

    Any posting that bears a plausible relationship to literate
    programming is welcome. For example, discussion may include
    techniques for prettyprinting code or other techniques for documenting
    design or code.

    Advertising of tools or services related to literate programming
    (e.g., offers to review programs for pay) is considered acceptable.
    Other advertising is unacceptable.

    Moderation will primarily be automatic, by robo-moderator.
    Submissions from regular contributors will be accepted immediately,
    without human intervention. The human moderators will examine other submissions; any submission that conforms to the newsgroup charter
    will be accepted, and the person making the submission will be added
    to the list of regular contributors (whose posts are automatically
    accepted). In the unlikely event that a regular contributor sends a
    number of off-topic posts, that person will be notified by a moderator
    and removed from the list of regular contributors. The exact number
    of such posts required to trigger this action is left to the good
    judgement of the moderators. The moderators will continue to accept
    on-topic posts from such persons; no person is ever to be prohibited
    from posting articles deemed acceptable under this charter.

    Background:

    The rest of this section presents some background information to help
    people identify what topics are related to literate programming.

    In an article published in _The Computer Journal_ 27 (1984), 97-111,
    Donald E. Knuth proposed a "literate" programming style:

    I believe that the time is ripe for significantly better
    documentation of programs, and that we can best achieve this by
    considering programs to be works of literature. Hence, my title:
    "Literate Programming."

    Let us change our traditional attitude to the construction of
    programs: Instead of imagining that our main task is to instruct
    a *computer* what to do, let us concentrate rather on explaining
    to *human beings* what we want a computer to do.

    The practitioner of literate programming can be regarded as an
    essayist, whose main concern is with exposition and excellence of
    style. Such an author, with thesaurus in hand, chooses the names
    of variables carefully and explains what each variable means. He
    or she strives for a program that is comprehensible because its
    concepts have been introduced in an order that is best for human
    understanding, using a mixture of formal and informal methods that
    reinforce each other.

    There is reasonable (but not unanimous) consensus that a
    literate-programming system can be characterized by the following
    properties:

    - The compilable program and the publishable documentation should be
    generated *automatically* from a *single* source.

    - The program can be presented in the order that is best for human
    understanding, regardless of any requirements of the programming
    language.

    - The program should be automatically indexed and cross-referenced.

    - The program may be formatted or prettyprinted in a way that makes
    it especially readable.

    Existing literate-programming systems support a wide range of
    programming languages and documentation systems. Specialized tools
    have been written for Ada, Awk, C, C++, Fortran, Modula-2, Modula-3,
    Pascal and Scheme, and there are language-independent tools exist that
    support almost any programming language (including Perl, sh, and
    make). Documentation systems supported include HTML, TeX, Troff, and
    Word for Windows.


    DISTRIBUTION:

    news.announce.newgroups
    news.groups.proposals


    CHANGE HISTORY:

    2024-03-28 Announcement
    --
    Usenet Big-8 Management Board
    https://www.big-8.org/
    board@big-8.org

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2