From Newsgroup: muc.lists.freebsd.ports

--000000000000a39f550647c50a0f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Hello,

I am a student exploring a student-proposed GSoC 2026 project focused on collecting poudriere build results in a structured form and providing basic historical analysis and reporting.

While testing poudriere, it becomes clear that results are easy to analyze
for a single run but become difficult as usage scales. There is currently
no structured way to compare runs, detect regressions, or summarize
failures without manually reading logs.

I wanted to ask whether this is considered a valid problem area for GSoC,
and if so, who would be the right person or mentor to discuss this further with.

Thank you for your time,
Raghav

--000000000000a39f550647c50a0f
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hello,<br><br>I am a student exploring a student-proposed = GSoC 2026 project focused on collecting poudriere build results in a struct= ured form and providing basic historical analysis and reporting.<br><br>Whi=
le testing poudriere, it becomes clear that results are easy to analyze for=
a single run but become difficult as usage scales. There is currently no s= tructured way to compare runs, detect regressions, or summarize failures wi= thout manually reading logs.<br><br>I wanted to ask whether this is conside= red a valid problem area for GSoC, and if so, who would be the right person=
or mentor to discuss this further with.<br><br>Thank you for your time,<br= >Raghav<br></div>

--000000000000a39f550647c50a0f--


--
Posted automagically by a mail2news gateway at muc.de e.V.
Please direct questions, flames, donations, etc. to news-admin@muc.de
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2