1. Forum
  2. USENET
  3. misc.test

  • Re: TEST June 2025

    From Marco Moock@mm@dorfdsl.de to misc.test on Wed Jun 4 11:35:13 2025
    From Newsgroup: misc.test

    On 02.06.2025 00:00 yeti yeti wrote:

    rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING, sub-human
    devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron) wrote: ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    And that's a real working address?

    Theworld as an ISP exists and operates SMTP. This domain also has MX
    records set.

    I assume it is a shelluser.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From yeti@yeti@tilde.institute to misc.test on Wed Jun 4 00:00:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: misc.test

    Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> wrote:

    On 02.06.2025 00:00 yeti yeti wrote:

    rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING, sub-human
    devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron) wrote:
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    And that's a real working address?

    Theworld as an ISP exists and operates SMTP. This domain also has MX
    records set.

    I assume it is a shelluser.

    That from line format just looks strange.

    | From: rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING, sub-human devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron)
    --
    I do not bite, I just want to play.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marco Moock@mm@dorfdsl.de to misc.test on Wed Jun 4 15:13:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: misc.test

    On 04.06.2025 00:00 yeti yeti wrote:

    That from line format just looks strange.

    | From: rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING,
    sub-human devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron)

    A really long name, but that doesn't affect the technical address at
    all.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Marcel Logen@333200007110-0201@ybtra.de to misc.test on Fri Jun 6 22:23:39 2025
    From Newsgroup: misc.test

    Marco Moock in misc.test:

    On 04.06.2025 00:00 yeti yeti wrote:

    That from line format just looks strange.

    | From: rjac@shell02.TheWorld.com (Christians against SPAMMING,
    sub-human devil worshiper, Andrew 'Andrzej' Baron)

    A really long name, but that doesn't affect the technical address at
    all.

    <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5536.html#section-3.1.2>

    Aus <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5322#section-3.4>:

    | Normally, a mailbox is composed of two parts: (1) an optional display
    | name that indicates the name of the recipient (which can be a person
    | or a system) that could be displayed to the user of a mail
    | application, and (2) an addr-spec address enclosed in angle brackets
    | ("<" and ">"). There is an alternate simple form of a mailbox where
    | the addr-spec address appears alone, without the recipient's name or
    | the angle brackets. The Internet addr-spec address is described in
    | section 3.4.1.
    |
    | Note: Some legacy implementations used the simple form where the
    | addr-spec appears without the angle brackets, but included the
    | name of the recipient in parentheses as a comment following the
    | addr-spec. Since the meaning of the information in a comment is
    | unspecified, implementations SHOULD use the full name-addr form of
    | the mailbox, instead of the legacy form, to specify the display
    | name associated with a mailbox. Also, because some legacy
    | implementations interpret the comment, comments generally SHOULD
    | NOT be used in address fields to avoid confusing such
    | implementations.

    Marcel
    --
    Fri Jun 6 22:23:39 2025 CEST (1749241419)
    pc-731
    87 jz5o 62q5
    Lines: 42
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2