| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 23 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:40:01 |
| Calls: | 583 |
| Files: | 1,139 |
| D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
| Messages: | 111,617 |
It's absurd the level of desperation the Apple religious zealots will go to in order to defend everything Apple to the death, no matter what.
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
It's absurd the level of desperation the Apple religious zealots will go to >> in order to defend everything Apple to the death, no matter what.
Well, I’m an iPhone user and have been since the 4 model. But I don’t understand the vehement denials of the iPhone’s shortcomings. Every manufacturer makes compromises in their products in order to maintain cost controls. Apple is no exception, and neither is Samsung or any other
premium phone maker. People act like Apple’s shit doesn’t ever stink, when
it obviously smells just as bad or worse than others. It’s like a religion to them.
It's absurd the level of desperation the Apple religious zealots will go to >> in order to defend everything Apple to the death, no matter what.
Well, I'm an iPhone user and have been since the 4 model. But I don't understand the vehement denials of the iPhone's shortcomings. Every manufacturer makes compromises in their products in order to maintain cost controls. Apple is no exception, and neither is Samsung or any other
premium phone maker. People act like Apple's shit doesn't ever stink, when
it obviously smells just as bad or worse than others. It's like a religion
to them.
Every Apple troll is a MAGA zealot.
Every Apple troll is imbued with the mantra: Make Apple Great Again
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
Every Apple troll is a MAGA zealot.
Every Apple troll is imbued with the mantra: Make Apple Great Again
LOL! I’ll bet that moniker really gets their goat!
On 2025-07-05 04:25, badgolferman wrote:
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
Every Apple troll is a MAGA zealot.
Every Apple troll is imbued with the mantra: Make Apple Great Again
LOL! I’ll bet that moniker really gets their goat!
Yeah...
...you'd lose that bet.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-07-05 04:25, badgolferman wrote:
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
Every Apple troll is a MAGA zealot.
Every Apple troll is imbued with the mantra: Make Apple Great Again
LOL! IrCOll bet that moniker really gets their goat!
Yeah...
...you'd lose that bet.
Maybe I am wrong and you donrCOt mind being MAGArCa
On 2025-07-04 11:26, badgolferman wrote:
Marion <marion@facts.com> wrote:
It's absurd the level of desperation the Apple religious zealots will
go to
in order to defend everything Apple to the death, no matter what.
Well, IrCOm an iPhone user and have been since the 4 model. But I donrCOt
understand the vehement denials of the iPhonerCOs shortcomings. Every
manufacturer makes compromises in their products in order to maintain
cost
controls. Apple is no exception, and neither is Samsung or any other
premium phone maker. People act like ApplerCOs shit doesnrCOt ever stink, >> when
it obviously smells just as bad or worse than others. ItrCOs like a
religion
to them.
What shortcomings have been denied in this conversation?
What we've denied is the obvious bullshit that Apple's devices are
failures because Apple chose to downrate their scores to a "B" on a 7
letter scale.
We deny the batteries that run iPhones for as long or longer than
competing smartphones are "cheap" or "crappy".
Etc.
Here's how to get the OEM's June 20th 2025 regulatory filings:
1. Go to the EPREL database: <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/>
2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"
<https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>
3. First search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.
4. Refine by "Model identifier" using the European model numbers above
(e.g., Samsung SM-A326B or Google GUR25 Pixel or Apple A3287 iPhone 16) 5. Despite marketing bullshit - these are actual truthful reports.
I just now ran a search for about a dozen brands sold in the EU.
Sorted alphabetically, the results for their best scores are...
The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A)
The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A"
The Fairphone (Gen.6) FP6 rating is "A"
The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A"
The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A"
The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A"
The Nokia (HMD) TA-1600 rating is "A"
The Nothing cmf A001 rating is "A"
The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A"
The Samsung SM-S937B/DS rating is "A"
The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A"
etc.
While some Android OEMs had all "A" ratings, others had a mix, but only
Apple had zero (yes, zero) phones that were even close to Android in efficiency.
Why is this highly advertised "efficiency" not showing up in Apple's own regulatory filings? Did Apple lie about efficiency. Would they do that?
The fundamental question is why do all iPhones suck at efficiency?
<https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=21867&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#21867>
Why is Apple's 44-page report filled with excuses, while the Android makers have no problem reporting efficiency results without 43 pages of excuses?
Why are iPhones so inefficient in legal factual regulatory filings?
On 2025-06-29 15:26, Marion wrote:
Here's how to get the OEM's June 20th 2025 regulatory filings:
1. Go to the EPREL database: <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/>
2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"
<https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>
3. First search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.
4. Refine by "Model identifier" using the European model numbers above
(e.g., Samsung SM-A326B or Google GUR25 Pixel or Apple A3287 iPhone 16)
5. Despite marketing bullshit - these are actual truthful reports.
I just now ran a search for about a dozen brands sold in the EU.
Sorted alphabetically, the results for their best scores are...
The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A)
The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A"
The Fairphone (Gen.6) FP6 rating is "A"
The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A"
The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A"
The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A"
The Nokia (HMD) TA-1600 rating is "A"
The Nothing cmf A001 rating is "A"
The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A"
The Samsung SM-S937B/DS rating is "A"
The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A"
etc.
While some Android OEMs had all "A" ratings, others had a mix, but only
Apple had zero (yes, zero) phones that were even close to Android in
efficiency.
Why is this highly advertised "efficiency" not showing up in Apple's own
regulatory filings? Did Apple lie about efficiency. Would they do that?
The fundamental question is why do all iPhones suck at efficiency?
<https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=21867&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#21867>
Why is Apple's 44-page report filled with excuses, while the Android makers >> have no problem reporting efficiency results without 43 pages of excuses?
Why are iPhones so inefficient in legal factual regulatory filings?
Easy:
Apple has far more to lose with bad publicity if they are alleged to
have given their phones higher ratings than they deserve.
In short, every tech news site will check Apple's results...
...and won't bother checking anyone else's.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-06-29 15:26, Marion wrote:
Here's how to get the OEM's June 20th 2025 regulatory filings:
1. Go to the EPREL database: <https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/>
2. Select the product category: "Smartphones and tablets"
<https://eprel.ec.europa.eu/screen/product/smartphonestablets20231669>
3. First search by brand, e.g., Google, Apple, Samsung, etc.
4. Refine by "Model identifier" using the European model numbers above
(e.g., Samsung SM-A326B or Google GUR25 Pixel or Apple A3287 iPhone 16)
5. Despite marketing bullshit - these are actual truthful reports.
I just now ran a search for about a dozen brands sold in the EU.
Sorted alphabetically, the results for their best scores are...
The Apple A3287 iPhone 16 rating is "B" (with B being worse than A)
The ASUS ASUSAI2501H rating is "A"
The Fairphone (Gen.6) FP6 rating is "A"
The Google GUR25 Pixel rating is "A"
The Honor DNP-NX9 rating is "A"
The Motorola g86 5G (XT2527-2) rating is "A"
The Nokia (HMD) TA-1600 rating is "A"
The Nothing cmf A001 rating is "A"
The Oppo CPH2695 rating is "A"
The Samsung SM-S937B/DS rating is "A"
The Xiaomi 24129PN74G rating is "A"
etc.
While some Android OEMs had all "A" ratings, others had a mix, but only
Apple had zero (yes, zero) phones that were even close to Android in
efficiency.
Why is this highly advertised "efficiency" not showing up in Apple's own >>> regulatory filings? Did Apple lie about efficiency. Would they do that?
The fundamental question is why do all iPhones suck at efficiency?
<https://www.novabbs.com/computers/article-flat.php?id=21867&group=misc.phone.mobile.iphone#21867>
Why is Apple's 44-page report filled with excuses, while the Android makers >>> have no problem reporting efficiency results without 43 pages of excuses? >>>
Why are iPhones so inefficient in legal factual regulatory filings?
Easy:
Apple has far more to lose with bad publicity if they are alleged to
have given their phones higher ratings than they deserve.
In short, every tech news site will check Apple's results...
...and won't bother checking anyone else's.
LOL LOL LOL !!!
Apple has far more to lose with bad publicity if they are alleged to
have given their phones higher ratings than they deserve.
In short, every tech news site will check Apple's results...
...and won't bother checking anyone else's.
LOL LOL LOL !!!