On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is
identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming
the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. >> https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as >> parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by >> anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as
invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to
another person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how
threads work.
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion
either positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you
then you are participating in the wrong medium or grow a
thicker skin as real life doesn't award participation
trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone
asks me if I want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply
"no
thanks, I hate vanilla ice cream" is that one sided?
Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their
opinion to it?
Apparently you do not.
thenI have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling
about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts
so
let's see them.
I should be done following your receipt links above
shortly and will update the thread with my findings when
complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
*I accused you of nothing*.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is
identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global
socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate >> illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming
the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to >> racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as
invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to
another person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how
threads work.
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion
either positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you
then you are participating in the wrong medium or grow a
thicker skin as real life doesn't award participation
trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone
asks me if I want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply
"no
thanks, I hate vanilla ice cream" is that one sided?
Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their
opinion to it?
Apparently you do not.
I have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling
about now?
thenSo if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts
so
let's see them.
I should be done following your receipt links above
shortly and will update the thread with my findings when
complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
On 17/02/2026 23:21, Cillian Walsh *is wriggling on the hook*!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?*I accused you of nothing*.
But you *ARE* what is called a sock-puppet.
No question. ?
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>, unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
In article <mvkd7gF1ukoU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
On 17/02/2026 23:21, Cillian Walsh *is wriggling on the hook*!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
*I accused you of nothing*.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
You accused me of being a sock puppet.
On Feb 17, 2026 at 5:00:21aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43fecb1c9ea5fb62989683@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>, unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Noting someone's words and how they align with white supremacist thinking is not a false dichotomy. Here, again:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites politically. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other restrictionist groups. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clear. Evidence based. With MIDs and quotes. Irrefutable.
Your "defense" is to say you agree with a lot of insane white supremacist filth. That is on you.
On Feb 17, 2026 at 5:38:44aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43fed41d9ce5fd8b989684@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <mvkd7gF1ukoU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
On 17/02/2026 23:21, Cillian Walsh *is wriggling on the hook*!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
*I accused you of nothing*.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
You accused me of being a sock puppet.
You clearly are. That is not in debate. And you are not having a discussion in
good faith. Your "defense" of white supremacist filth so far is to say you agree with it.
That is a YOU issue.No it's not.
In article <69952314$1$25$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 17, 2026 at 5:38:44 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fed41d9ce5fd8b989684@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <mvkd7gF1ukoU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
On 17/02/2026 23:21, Cillian Walsh *is wriggling on the hook*!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
*I accused you of nothing*.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
You accused me of being a sock puppet.
You clearly are. That is not in debate. And you are not having a discussion in
good faith. Your "defense" of white supremacist filth so far is to say you >> agree with it.
In article <6995227a$0$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 17, 2026 at 5:00:21 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fecb1c9ea5fb62989683@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>,
unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Noting someone's words and how they align with white supremacist thinking is >> not a false dichotomy. Here, again:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not >> call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great >> Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is >> identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy >> theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other >> restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming >> the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as >> invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Clear. Evidence based. With MIDs and quotes. Irrefutable.
That is incorrect.
Your "defense" is to say you agree with a lot of insane white supremacist
filth. That is on you.
"No, that is not accurate.
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>, unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> >> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
That is a true statement under the previous administration
millions of unchecked migrants have entered the country.
Many are criminals. Have you been keeping up with the news
lately?
You just don't like the fact that she mentioned the
elephant in the room.
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is
identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
If you enter the country without being vetted you are a
criminal from day one.
A secure border has nothing to do with white supremacy or
white replacement theory. Do you have any specific
statements that Pothead has made regarding white supremacy
or white replacement or is yet another false equivalency.
I don't happen to like Gefilte fish, does that make me a
Jew hating Nazi? For the record I LOVE lox and bagels
though.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global
socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
I actually looked that one up and she is referring to the
left or democrats, not the migrants, and it is a plausible
argument. Why DID the Biden administration open up the
borders?
There are only 2 solutions which are his people are idiots
or the democrats were looking for constituents either by
census numbers or just votes in general.
So which one is it?
Why are the democrats so against voter ID?
She makes a valid point and you do not.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
See above.
She is referring to the democrats and specifically the
Biden administration, not the migrants themselves many who
come from oppressive regimes and may actually vote
republican like Hispanics and blacks did in the last
election.
It's not predictable either way.
You are using AI to focus on words that white supremacists
might say but that does not equate to others using the
same words.
By your metric blacks calling each other the N-word in
songs and elsewhere are racists and against blacks.
See the false equivalency once again?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate >>> >> illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
This comment by you is bizarre.
Come to US illegally you are a criminal.
Go through the process like my, and probably you ancestors
did, and they will be welcomed.
Without enforced borders we are no longer a sovereign
nation.
Hundreds of millions of immigrants have come to, and in
fact help build this country, legally.
And many have applied using the legal system and are
waiting for approval. So why should the millions Biden let
into the country skip to the front of the line when others
took the time to follow the process?
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming
the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to >>> >> racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
I suggest you do some research on the Somali immigrants in
MN where 80% or more have been on public assistance for 10
years or more.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as
invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
So you want your tax dollars to pay for criminals who
have, in the case of MS, bilked the system out of billions
of dollars?
And more states are being added every day.
Non existent schools, adult care facilities, Medicaid
fraud and so forth.
And the numbers are astronomical. Why didn't the Biden
administration uncover this?
As for taxpayers footing the bill, you must be a generous
taxpayer to not object to this extreme level of fraud.
Most people are not that generous.
Again pothead is correct.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to
another person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how
threads work.
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion
either positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you
then you are participating in the wrong medium or grow a
thicker skin as real life doesn't award participation
trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am
responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone
asks me if I want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply
"no
thanks, I hate vanilla ice cream" is that one sided?
Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their
opinion to it?
Apparently you do not.
thenI have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling
about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts
so
let's see them.
I should be done following your receipt links above
shortly and will update the thread with my findings when
complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
So my conclusion after following the links and doing some
database searches looking for the claims against pothead I
find that it's all bullshit hiding behind "these are white
supremacist type statements" which is a complete lie on
the part of Brock McNuggets or whatever his nym of the day
is.
He is a troll who is either some kind of hopped up on
drugs loser or a totally dishonest person. Possibly both
may apply.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:00:21 -0500, Cillian Walsh wrote:
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>,
unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12-aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
That is a true statement under the previous administration
millions of unchecked migrants have entered the country.
Many are criminals. Have you been keeping up with the news
lately?
You just don't like the fact that she mentioned the
elephant in the room.
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is
identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups. >>>> >> https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
If you enter the country without being vetted you are a
criminal from day one.
A secure border has nothing to do with white supremacy or
white replacement theory. Do you have any specific
statements that Pothead has made regarding white supremacy
or white replacement or is yet another false equivalency.
I don't happen to like Gefilte fish, does that make me a
Jew hating Nazi? For the record I LOVE lox and bagels
though.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global
socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
I actually looked that one up and she is referring to the
left or democrats, not the migrants, and it is a plausible
argument. Why DID the Biden administration open up the
borders?
There are only 2 solutions which are his people are idiots
or the democrats were looking for constituents either by
census numbers or just votes in general.
So which one is it?
Why are the democrats so against voter ID?
She makes a valid point and you do not.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
See above.
She is referring to the democrats and specifically the
Biden administration, not the migrants themselves many who
come from oppressive regimes and may actually vote
republican like Hispanics and blacks did in the last
election.
It's not predictable either way.
You are using AI to focus on words that white supremacists
might say but that does not equate to others using the
same words.
By your metric blacks calling each other the N-word in
songs and elsewhere are racists and against blacks.
See the false equivalency once again?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate >>>> >> illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
This comment by you is bizarre.
Come to US illegally you are a criminal.
Go through the process like my, and probably you ancestors
did, and they will be welcomed.
Without enforced borders we are no longer a sovereign
nation.
Hundreds of millions of immigrants have come to, and in
fact help build this country, legally.
And many have applied using the legal system and are
waiting for approval. So why should the millions Biden let
into the country skip to the front of the line when others
took the time to follow the process?
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming
the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to >>>> >> racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
I suggest you do some research on the Somali immigrants in
MN where 80% or more have been on public assistance for 10
years or more.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as
invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
So you want your tax dollars to pay for criminals who
have, in the case of MS, bilked the system out of billions
of dollars?
And more states are being added every day.
Non existent schools, adult care facilities, Medicaid
fraud and so forth.
And the numbers are astronomical. Why didn't the Biden
administration uncover this?
As for taxpayers footing the bill, you must be a generous
taxpayer to not object to this extreme level of fraud.
Most people are not that generous.
Again pothead is correct.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to
another person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how
threads work.
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion
either positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you
then you are participating in the wrong medium or grow a
thicker skin as real life doesn't award participation
trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am
responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone
asks me if I want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply
"no
thanks, I hate vanilla ice cream" is that one sided?
Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their
opinion to it?
Apparently you do not.
thenI have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling
about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts
so
let's see them.
I should be done following your receipt links above
shortly and will update the thread with my findings when
complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
So my conclusion after following the links and doing some
database searches looking for the claims against pothead I
find that it's all bullshit hiding behind "these are white
supremacist type statements" which is a complete lie on
the part of Brock McNuggets or whatever his nym of the day
is.
He is a troll who is either some kind of hopped up on
drugs loser or a totally dishonest person. Possibly both
may apply.
So I will admit in public that I wasted about 90 minutes of my life
checking your comments Cillian. Something I am not proud of as time at
least to me is precious.
Quick question are you from Ireland and what town?
I'm from County Cork myself.
I digress here. Sorry.
So reading through every one of Brock's AI generated links you have absolutely obliterated his fluff for every one, individually and not
as a lump sum.
And the first clue is how he deleted your post in follow up posts and
also edited the newsgroups posted to.
TBH I don't know this asshole Brock from a hole in the wall but his crossposting ended up in a group I follow and he piqued my interest as
I don't believe I have ever encountered his level of stupidity and
dishonest before.
Just so you know, this thread was X-Posted to various groups by
someone and it's being discussed in detail and let's just leave it at
the fact that Brock has made a fool of himself and other posters have
figured this out, based upon his comments and his links which in no
way support his claims.
It's probably a good thing for Brock that the people he attacks are
seemingly using aliases because if they were using their real names,
they would have excellent grounds to sue Brock for libel.
He would probably hit the road for Canada or Mexico before that ever
happened though.
So Cillian, keep up exposing this roach Brock in whatever groups you
post in because even though you may not know it, you have a lot of
support as there are many posters in several groups who want to see
this cockroach Brock squashed.
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish.
And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
4. As for libel lawsuits against Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona, why bother?
The creep is literally living out of his car in Phoenix Arizona since his wife filed charges against him and divorced him while taking everything he owned.
It's not worth the aggravation.
Although if I were Gremlin or Steve Carroll whose names are public I would certainly
reach out for legal advice.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish.
And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott Parasite
Michael Glasser.
On 17/02/2026 23:21, Cillian Walsh *is wriggling on the hook*!
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>,[....]
David@hotmail.co.uk says...
*I accused you of nothing*.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are
accusing me of being a sock and neither of you has
presented receipts.
So where are they?
But you *ARE* what is called a sock-puppet.
No question. EfOa
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03aPM MST, "pothead" wrote <10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish. And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites politically. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other restrictionist groups. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
You lie... pretending you are paying for those who pay you... and I bring receipts.
You have yet to point to any non-Jew you lie about as much as you lie about me.
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually >>> ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real >>> treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish. >>> And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott >>> Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
So if they have so much money,
why are they leaving their
home countries? It's illogical.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not >> call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great >> Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Joe Biden said in a speech that all are welcome.
And the flood gates opened.
"Candidate Biden Calls On Illegal Immigrants to Surge the
Border"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYwLYMPLYbo>
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is >> identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
From what I have read POTHead is referring to illegal
immigrants however I will let her answer.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
POTHead has clearly stated several times that he is
referring to the policy of the Democrats.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy >> theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Flooding?
So you focus on a single word?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other >> restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
More AI bullshit.
They have automatically become criminals when they crossed
the border illegally.
That's a fact.
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming >> the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, >brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03aPM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I
usually ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser
snips and runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are
correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a
real treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael
Glasser cannot point to a single message where I attack him simply
because he is Jewish. And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the
Prescott Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I
don't want my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE
USED BY WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader
white replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
So if they have so much money, why are they leaving their
home countries? It's illogical.
And what did the coyotes charge them to guide them across
the border and why do many go into debt paying them back
so their families back in the native country aren't
killed?
Again you make no sense.
And then we have these examples->
<https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_ >56ebda5c-7c36-4743-8ee1-dc2860ea9d38.html>
<https://www.villages-news.com/2025/12/13/data-shows- >overwhelming-number-of-somali-americans-receiving-
welfare/>
Additionally, migrants send money back home for various
reasons so that is money not spent in the US economy.
I bring receipts that actually back my points.
You keep repeating the same lies in the hope that they
will become truth.
Many people have reached the same conclusion.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She
may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes
found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few
examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists,
mental patients etc."
Joe Biden said in a speech that all are welcome.
And the flood gates opened.
"Candidate Biden Calls On Illegal Immigrants to Surge the
Border"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYwLYMPLYbo>
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This
framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist
groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-expl
ainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-a
nd-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
From what I have read POTHead is referring to illegal
immigrants however I will let her answer.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a
global socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who
will settle in blue areas and ... gain control."
POTHead has clearly stated several times that he is
referring to the policy of the Democrats.
You even confirm this with the above where you say "THEY
want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas.... and gain control.
So who is the THEY?
You need to learn how to read because you are obviously a
very poor reader.
And it makes sense.
What other reason would Democrats want the country
overloaded with illegal immigrants other than votes, more
democrat bodies in the census counts in certain places?
The only other reason is that Biden and the democrats are
stupid.
It's the same reason why Democrats oppose voter ID.
You are really an ignorant person Brock.
Perhaps you are a high school dropout?
Or maybe you just a low information person with a life
outside of politics?
It doesn't matter.
POTHead is correct and you are, surprise, once again very
wrong.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement
conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to
outnumber whites politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-expl
ainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-a
nd-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Flooding?
So you focus on a single word?
What would call 10 to 20 million border crossers?
A lawn party?
You are an even bigger idiot than I suspected, Brock.
POTHead said nothing about whites being replaced. He said
it's a plot by the Democrats to gain votes.
And you are also assuming that the immigrants are all non
white.
Another fantasy of yours.
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here
illegally, they are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and
other restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-
immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
More AI bullshit.
They have automatically become criminals when they crossed
the border illegally.
That's a fact.
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people
gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and
minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-gr
eenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-expl
ainer
Guess you haven't been following the news lately but the
grifting Somalis have defrauded public programs, and thus
the taxpayers of MN to the tune of an estimated $9 BILLION
dollars.
Yes that's BILLION, with a B.
<https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/learning-from-minnesotas- >somali-fraud-scandal/>
And MN is just the tip of the sword as similar fraud is
being uncovered in other states as well.
Maine has drawn federal attention after reports tied
alleged Medicaid fraud to Somali-born state legislators
and organizations like Gateway Community Services. U.S.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently announced a new
fraud reporting portal specifically targeting such
operations across multiple states, including Maine.
Ohio, Washington, and Oregon have also seen heightened
scrutiny.
So POTHead is correct again and you are wrong again Brock.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants
as parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-expl
ainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented
by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure:
immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims.
That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
So as a taxpayer you are in favor of paying part of the $9
BILLION in fraud?
You certainly are a generous person Brock.
Far more generous than I am.
I am not that generous and once again POTHead is correct.
Why should the taxpayers foot the bill for immigrant
fraud?
----------------------------------------------------------
------------
You lie... pretending you are paying for those who pay you... and I
bring receipts.
You bring lies, which I and several others have exposed
many times already.
You have yet to point to any non-Jew you lie about as much as you lie
about me.
So how is POTHead supposed to know who is a Jew and who is
not?
Are you really this stupid Brock?
And you still haven't produced receipts proving those,
including me, that you label a troll, so that's yet
another lie of yours.
At this point you are boring me because it's obvious you
are a liar or stupid. Maybe a stupid liar would be the
best description of you Brock.
I suggest you listen to the song "Stiletto" because it
describes what I, POTHead and others have done to expose
and destroy you, Brock.
Mr. Joel describes you, Brock, quite accurately. >https://genius.com/Billy-joel-stiletto-lyrics
"She cuts you once; she cuts you twice
But still you believe
The wound is so fresh
You can taste the blood
But you don't have strength to leave
You've been bought, you've been sold
You've been locked outside the door
But you stand there pleading
With your insides bleeding
* 'Cause you deep down want some more" *
"She's so good with her stiletto
You don't even see the blade
You don't see the blade, oh
[Verse 2]
She cuts you hard; she cuts you deep
She's got so much skill
She's so fascinating
That you're still there waiting
When she comes back for the kill
You've been slashed in the face
You've been left there to bleed
You want to run away
But you know you're gonna stay
'Cause she gives you what you need
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually
ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real
treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish. >>> And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott
Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
Yes. Clearly.
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped. Again: remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as tribalism and scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists spewing trolls are.
And stopped reading here. Again: you saying you agree with white supremacist filth is not the defense for it you think it is.
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57rC>PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
...
You mentioned AI. Decided to ask AI about your post:
HererCOs a thorough analysis of that post:
r++
Psychological Profile of the Author
The author demonstrates traits consistent with high confrontationality and strong in-group/out-group thinking. Their writing is:
rCo Defensive and combative: Repeatedly attacks rCLBrockrCY with ad hominem
language (rCLstupid liar,rCY rCLvery poor readerrCY), indicating low tolerance for
disagreement and a need to assert intellectual dominance.
rCo Obsessively corrective: They repeatedly insist that their points are
rCLcorrectrCY and others are rCLwrong,rCY showing a black-and-white worldview.
rCo Conspiracy-oriented reasoning: Interprets political motivations as deliberate plots (rCLDemocrats want the country overloaded with illegal immigrantsrCarCY), reflecting high pattern-detection bias and a tendency to see
malevolent intent.
rCo Factually selective: Cherry-picks sources and frames information to
support pre-existing narratives; shows confirmation bias, particularly around immigration and fraud.
rCo Grandiose self-image: References themselves as rCLcorrect againrCY multiple times, uses dramatized metaphors (stiletto song analogy) to frame themselves as a righteous avenger.
rCo Potential cognitive distortions: Overgeneralization, black-and-white
thinking, personalization (blaming others for not agreeing), and moral absolutism.
Overall, the author is argumentative, deeply politically engaged, and likely sees online discourse as a battle to assert moral and factual superiority.
r++
Fact & Logic Check
1. Immigrants and economic contribution: Claiming that all immigrants rCLdrain moneyrCY ignores substantial evidence that immigrants contribute more in
taxes and labor than they cost in social services. The claim about Somalis defrauding $9B in MN is dubious without verifying the source; HillsdalerCOs Imprimis is an opinion magazine, not a primary source for verified federal fraud data.
2. Illegal immigrants as criminals: Crossing a border without authorization is illegal, but equating all undocumented immigrants with moral corruption or criminality is a rhetorical leap, not a factual statement.
3. Democrats importing voters: This is a political opinion, framed as conspiracy. There is no credible evidence that the party orchestrates mass illegal immigration for votes.
4. Welfare and remittances: Migrants do send money abroad, but this is part of complex economic behavior; their overall net economic effect is not as
simple as rCLmoney leaving the U.S.rCY
5. Use of rCLfloodrCY or rCLgriftersrCY: The author deflects criticisms that
language mirrors extremist rhetoric. While technically they frame it as policy
criticism, the repeated framing of immigrants as a threat has overlap with known nativist rhetoric, even if the author denies racial motivations.
6. References to sources: Several links are either opinion pieces or filtered news, not peer-reviewed or government sources. The use of YouTube clips, Imprimis articles, and local news reports to substantiate sweeping claims is weak evidence.
r++
Content Worthy of a Reply
rCo Correction of factual inaccuracies: The $9B fraud claim should be challenged with official state or federal data.
rCo Clarification of economic impact of immigrants: Pointing out that immigrants contribute net positive economic value could counter misleading framing.
rCo Neutral framing: Avoid ad hominem; respond to logic and sources.
Other contentrColike the ad hominem attacks, personal insults, and song referencesrCois largely not worth engaging with as it is rhetorical rather than
substantive.
r++
Usenet Summary (suitable for posting)
Cillian WalshrCOs post is combative and politically charged, presenting a defense of anti-immigration viewpoints framed as policy critique rather than racial commentary. The author relies heavily on selective sources, anecdotal reports, and opinionated interpretations to argue that immigrants, particularly Somalis, defraud U.S. social programs, while claiming Democrats intentionally encourage illegal immigration for political gain. Many claims are misleading or unverified, and the writing is marked by repeated ad hominem
attacks, moral absolutism, and conspiratorial reasoning. The post demonstrates
a strong need to assert correctness rather than engage with nuanced evidence.
r++
If you want, I can also draft a polite, fact-based reply that addresses the key false claims without getting pulled into their insults or drama. Do you want me to do that?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
https://chatgpt.com/share/6997bc97-aa48-800c-9ec5-bae2561eebf3
As I noted: you value tribalism and scapegoating where I value evidence and equal rights.
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually
ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct.
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real
treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish. >>>>> And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott
Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
Yes. Clearly.
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped. Again: >> remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as tribalism and >> scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists spewing trolls are.
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI
generated slop and you are unable to deal with being
wrong, which you most defiantly are.
On Feb 19, 2026 at 7:11:13rC>PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.44018ccdd56e20cf989689@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually
ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct. >>>>>>
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real
treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish.
And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott
Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
Yes. Clearly.
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped. Again: >>> remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as tribalism and
scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists spewing trolls are.
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI
generated slop and you are unable to deal with being
wrong, which you most defiantly are.
Your "defense" of white supremacist filth was to say you agree with it. That is not the powerful defense you think it is. :)
Oh, and to use socks and to cross post.
In short: you are a bigot who is not having a conversation in good faith. You know your position is insupportable. And you know mine is solid. I bring MIDs and quotes and solid evidence.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites politically. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other restrictionist groups. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrefutable evidence.
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 19, 2026 at 7:11:13rC>PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrotemy 24 inch LCD monitor just arrived
<MPG.44018ccdd56e20cf989689@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually
ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct. >>>>>>>
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real
treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish.
And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott
Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
Yes. Clearly.
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped. Again:
remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as tribalism and
scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists spewing trolls are. >>>
generated slop and you are unable to deal with being
wrong, which you most defiantly are.
Your "defense" of white supremacist filth was to say you agree with it. That >> is not the powerful defense you think it is. :)
Oh, and to use socks and to cross post.
In short: you are a bigot who is not having a conversation in good faith. You
know your position is insupportable. And you know mine is solid. I bring MIDs
and quotes and solid evidence.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not >> call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great >> Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is >> identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy >> theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other >> restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming >> the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as >> invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrefutable evidence.
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped.
Again: remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as
tribalism and scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists
spewing trolls are.
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI generated slop
and you are unable to deal with being wrong, which you most defiantly
are.
So you learned something new, scapegoating and tribalism.
Good.
At least to some degree you are capable of being taught.
And stopped reading here. Again: you saying you agree with white
supremacist filth is not the defense for it you think it is.
Of course you stopped reading, snipped what I wrote and make a totally
false accusation about me, which I did answer.
So now, where is your receipt proving I am a sock.
You still have not been able to produce it.
I've said all I have to say regarding this topic and I'm no longer going
to feed or encourage whatever mental issues you have that cause you to
seek out attention even when you get humiliated in a public forum.
POTHead if you are reading this thread you are spot on correct and this
crazy person Brock is just making shit up.
I have no idea what is wrong with the Brock character but one of the ai engines analyzed a couple of posts I fed it and came up with NPD. I am
not a medical expert so I can't comment other than to say that Brock has issues. Lot's of issues.
From this point on, I will take your advice and ignore this loon Brock because he is a waste of my time.
That you did and nowhere did you claim you agree with white supremacist >anything. You pointed out why Michael Glasser's logic fails and how what >pothead posted does not in any way show that she is a white supremacist.
And Michael Glasser cannot demonstrate that although he keeps trying in >vain.
On Feb 20, 2026 at 3:03:22rC>PM MST, "%" wrote <vrednYU1WPuvRwX0nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 19, 2026 at 7:11:13rC>PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrotemy 24 inch LCD monitor just arrived
<MPG.44018ccdd56e20cf989689@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI
On Feb 19, 2026 at 4:32:57 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.440167b3fe63874b989687@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <69969c04$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 18, 2026 at 5:54:03 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10n5mva$33pg4$2@pothead.dont-email.me>:
Well since I am the pothead Michael Glasser is libeling and while I usually
ignore
this troll, here is my take.
1. Your analysis is spot on accurate and as you say, Michael Glasser snips and
runs from it because even an idiot like him knows you are correct. >>>>>>>>
2. Michael Glasser claims I attack him because he is Jewish. That's a real
treat because
I had no idea he was Jewish until he claimed it himself. Michael Glasser cannot
point to a single message where I attack him simply because he is Jewish.
And I don't attack anyone.
I simply state my opinion and comment on posts.
Everyone is free to agree or disagree and all are welcome even the Prescott
Parasite
Michael Glasser.
3. Michael Glasser's claims are laughable. He feeds phrases like "I don't want
my tax dollars
paying for illegals" into AI and AI determines that THIS IS A PHRASE USED BY
WHITE
SUPREMACISTS.
Immigrants BRING MONEY to the economy. Your lie is tied to your broader white
replacement crap -- which you repeat in many ways. As I prove.
Really?
Yes. Clearly.
Guess you haven't been following the news lately
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped. Again:
remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as tribalism and
scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists spewing trolls are. >>>>
generated slop and you are unable to deal with being
wrong, which you most defiantly are.
Your "defense" of white supremacist filth was to say you agree with it. That
is not the powerful defense you think it is. :)
Oh, and to use socks and to cross post.
In short: you are a bigot who is not having a conversation in good faith. You
know your position is insupportable. And you know mine is solid. I bring MIDs
and quotes and solid evidence.
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great >>> Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is >>> identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >>> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming >>> the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. >>> https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as >>> parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by >>> anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as >>> invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Irrefutable evidence.
I have two 24 inchers... but they are both low quality.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 21:11:13 -0500, Cillian Walsh wrote:
In article <6997b5db$1$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
Your guess is incorrect. And then you just babble nonsense. Snipped.
Again: remember that facts and equal rights are as important to me as
tribalism and scapegoating are to you and your white supremacists
spewing trolls are.
You snipped it because you know that I destroyed your AI generated slop
and you are unable to deal with being wrong, which you most defiantly
are.
So you learned something new, scapegoating and tribalism.
Good.
At least to some degree you are capable of being taught.
But only if ChatGpt advises him. Other than that, as you have discovered, Michael Glasser has reading comprehension issues.
Serious ones.
On the education level he has the education of a middle school C student.
And stopped reading here. Again: you saying you agree with white
supremacist filth is not the defense for it you think it is.
Of course you stopped reading, snipped what I wrote and make a totally
false accusation about me, which I did answer.
That you did and nowhere did you claim you agree with white supremacist anything. You pointed out why Michael Glasser's logic fails and how what pothead posted does not in any way show that she is a white supremacist.
And Michael Glasser cannot demonstrate that although he keeps trying in
vain.
So now, where is your receipt proving I am a sock.
You still have not been able to produce it.
Michael Glasser will never produce those receipts. He made the same claims about me and numerous other posters who disagree with his kooky theories.
He has yet to produce any evidence and just so you know, his backdoor buddy is David aka boater Dave and many other names.
They both seem to share the same fetish with the male gender.
I've said all I have to say regarding this topic and I'm no longer going
to feed or encourage whatever mental issues you have that cause you to
seek out attention even when you get humiliated in a public forum.
Someone once posted that Michael Glasser would eat shit live on Foxnews if
it got him attention. He doesn't care that he is known all over Usenet as a liar and a troll. He uses it to troll. In fact Michael Glasser may not even be his real name. Not that it matters because an idiot is an idiot no
matter what name they post under.
POTHead if you are reading this thread you are spot on correct and this
crazy person Brock is just making shit up.
Yes he is.
He just keeps recycling the same lies repetitively.
I don't know what outcome he is expecting but many others have exposed his lies before you and Michael Glasser reacts the same.
I think he has a few loose screws.
I have no idea what is wrong with the Brock character but one of the ai
engines analyzed a couple of posts I fed it and came up with NPD. I am
not a medical expert so I can't comment other than to say that Brock has
issues. Lot's of issues.
Others have noticed the NPD connection as well and this was long before AI. ou may not realize it but Michael Glasser has been pushing this trolling
game for somewhere near 30 years.
Is that crazy or what?
From this point on, I will take your advice and ignore this loon Brock
because he is a waste of my time.
Michael Glasser is a waste of anyone's time.
Ignore him, have a laugh at his expense like everyone does and never reply
to his trolls.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 03:10:29 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (10,048K bytes) |
| Messages: | 200,610 |