Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
Or here
https://tinyurl.com/32pjjryd
On 08/02/2026 00:03, Gilly wrote:
Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
This link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is "broken"!
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mur0brFp7dlU1@mid.individual.net
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 08:38:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 08/02/2026 00:03, Gilly wrote:
Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
This link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is "broken"!
It takes a second or so to correct the line to make it a single long line; which 'fixes' the link.
David, I'm surprised that you still think you are qualified to hunt bad guys when you can't even fix a link and incorrectly declare it's broken. I would laugh if this was a onetime thing, but, with you, it's a nearly everyday thing.
Drink less, David. What's left of your liver will thank you.
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mur0brFp7dlU1@mid.individual.net
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 08:38:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 08/02/2026 00:03, Gilly wrote:
Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
This link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is "broken"!
It takes a second or so to correct the line to make it a single long line; which 'fixes' the link.
David, I'm surprised that you still think you are qualified to hunt bad guys when you can't even fix a link and incorrectly declare it's broken.
I would laugh if this was a onetime thing, but, with you, it's a nearly everyday
thing.
Drink less, David. What's left of your liver will thank you.
On 10/02/2026 03:38, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mur0brFp7dlU1@mid.individual.net
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 08:38:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 08/02/2026 00:03, Gilly wrote:
Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
This link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is "broken"!
It takes a second or so to correct the line to make it a single long
line; which 'fixes' the link.
David, I'm surprised that you still think you are qualified to hunt bad
guys when you can't even fix a link and incorrectly declare it's
broken.
Of course I CAN fix a broken link - but maybe Gilly doesn't know how to
post UN-broken links. Maybe you'd like to explain?
I would laugh if this was a onetime thing, but, with you, it's a nearly
everyday thing.
Drink less, David. What's left of your liver will thank you.
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net[....]
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the dishonest stalking
troll you've always been known as. Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And you only have yourself to blame for that.
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 10/02/2026 03:38, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mur0brFp7dlU1@mid.individual.net
Sun, 08 Feb 2026 08:38:19 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
On 08/02/2026 00:03, Gilly wrote:
Can you see these links?
The link works fine here.
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOhT
nR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ
This link ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is "broken"!
It takes a second or so to correct the line to make it a single long
line; which 'fixes' the link.
David, I'm surprised that you still think you are qualified to hunt bad
guys when you can't even fix a link and incorrectly declare it's
broken.
Of course I CAN fix a broken link - but maybe Gilly doesn't know how to
post UN-broken links. Maybe you'd like to explain?
I seriously doubt that Gilly doesn't know what word wrap does, David. Oh,
you thought putting it in brackets means it's always going to be ok? :) No.
I would laugh if this was a onetime thing, but, with you, it's a nearly
everyday thing.
Drink less, David. What's left of your liver will thank you.
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine,
mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped drinking.
Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the dishonest stalking
troll you've always been known as. Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And you only have yourself to blame for that.
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net[....]
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped drinking. >> Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the dishonest stalking
troll you've always been known as. Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have >> not stopped drinking. Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you
anyway. And you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net[....]
Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped drinking. >>> Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the dishonest stalking
troll you've always been known as. Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have >>> not stopped drinking. Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you >>> anyway. And you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk> news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net >>>> Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:[....]
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped drinking.
Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the dishonest stalking >>>> troll you've always been known as. Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have
not stopped drinking. Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you >>>> anyway. And you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to believe him.
He HAS admitted, though, to taking illegal drugs. I always imagine him
as being like the young lad in "Breaking Bad"!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Pinkman
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wrote <mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:That not what he said Brock McNuggets.
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped
drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the
dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. Nothing has
changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. Stop lying,
fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And you only have
yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he has struggled there.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped
drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the
dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. Nothing has
changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. Stop lying,
fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And you only have
yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he has
struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net> news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026 22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018 >>>>>>>My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever stopped >>>>>>> drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're still the
dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. Nothing has >>>>>>> changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. Stop lying,
fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And you only have >>>>>>> yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he has
struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be obvious
to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can see
absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
On Feb 12, 2026 at 11:01:53rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote <XnsB3F2A7E4FA3CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net>
news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026
22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 >>>>>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March
2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever
stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're
still the dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. >>>>>>>> Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. >>>>>>>> Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And >>>>>>>> you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he
has struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be
obvious to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can
see absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
You DEMONSTRATED you cannot imagine quitting substance abuse. You
projected that onto David. Are you going to own your behavior or play
victim over it?
Silly question: OF COURSE you will play victim over it.
But the evidence is clear: you repeatedly insist OTHERS cannot stop
substance abuse... projecting your own challenges. Period.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.
com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
If that was true you would be able to SHOW it. You can't.
Meanwhile quoting you lying is trivial to do. Why did you tell so many contradictory stories about claimed degrees? Why not just be honest?
And notice it is another example of your projecting your nonsense onto someone (me in this case). NO evidence of my doing as you accuse.
Massive evidence of you doing AS YOU DO.
You bring anger and accusations and ego. I bring receipts.
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net> news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026
22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018 >>>>>>>My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever
stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're
still the dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as.
Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking.
Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And
you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he
has struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be obvious
to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can see
absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.c
om/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/s
nitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/s
nitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:698f85e2$9$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 12, 2026 at 11:01:53rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3F2A7E4FA3CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net>
news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026
22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 >>>>>>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March >>>>>>>>>> 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever
stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're >>>>>>>>> still the dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. >>>>>>>>> Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. >>>>>>>>> Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And >>>>>>>>> you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he
has struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be
obvious to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can
see absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
You DEMONSTRATED you cannot imagine quitting substance abuse. You
projected that onto David. Are you going to own your behavior or play
victim over it?
Once again Brock MCNuggets ""That not what he said Brock McNuggets.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit."
Gremlin says you are both and from what little I have seen of you I am inclined to agree.
Silly question: OF COURSE you will play victim over it.
But the evidence is clear: you repeatedly insist OTHERS cannot stop
substance abuse... projecting your own challenges. Period.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.
com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
If that was true you would be able to SHOW it. You can't.
And what is that supposed to mean?
You show yourself to be a stinking, lying troll every single day and as
for the links, are you serious claiming hundreds of people posting from various USNET groups you have posted in are wrong about you ?
Logic isn't one of your gifts is it Brock?
For the record I checked out some of the links to Google where the entire thread, or most of it anyway, is archived and it's trivial to see where
the comments in the above links come from.
You lying about socking up is one that shows up in multiple places.
Your claims about incest and sibling sex is another one. That's sick shit even for a deviant like you Brock.
When so very many people make the same claims or similar claims about you one of 2 things is true.
1. They are all lying.
2. You are lying and are representative of those claims.
And you seal your fate because you still behave as described in thos
links, where the threads point to direct poor behavior by you as you are part of those threads posting as SNIT.
It's trivial to line up your current behavior with those links.
This isn't rocket science Brock.
Well maybe it is for you but not for anyone who can read and think for themselves.
Had you changed your easily identifiable behavior after those links were published you might have point but you didn't because you are sick and
can't do it.
Meanwhile quoting you lying is trivial to do. Why did you tell so many
contradictory stories about claimed degrees? Why not just be honest?
And notice it is another example of your projecting your nonsense onto
someone (me in this case). NO evidence of my doing as you accuse.
Massive evidence of you doing AS YOU DO.
You bring anger and accusations and ego. I bring receipts.
You bring bullshit Brock. I've checked some of your recipts, like I have above regarding Gremlin and him using drugs, and you lie like a fucking 2 dollar whore claiming she is a virgin.
And I have also wasted some time checking a few of your other receipts
where you accuse posters of vile behavior and surprise! they don't
confirm your vile accusations either.
So as I have said twice now "You are either one hell of a liar or you
can't read for shit."
And I'm siding with Gremlin in that you are both.
You Brock are a dishonest liar who can't read worth a shit.
In fact I doubt you can even read your own receipts.
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:698f85e2$9$24$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 12, 2026 at 11:01:53rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3F2A7E4FA3CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net>
news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026
22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 >>>>>>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March >>>>>>>>>> 2018
My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever
stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're >>>>>>>>> still the dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. >>>>>>>>> Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. >>>>>>>>> Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And >>>>>>>>> you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he
has struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be
obvious to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can
see absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
You DEMONSTRATED you cannot imagine quitting substance abuse. You
projected that onto David. Are you going to own your behavior or play
victim over it?
Once again Brock MCNuggets ""That not what he said Brock McNuggets.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit."
Gremlin says you are both and from what little I have seen of you I am inclined to agree.
Silly question: OF COURSE you will play victim over it.
But the evidence is clear: you repeatedly insist OTHERS cannot stop
substance abuse... projecting your own challenges. Period.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.
com/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/
snitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
If that was true you would be able to SHOW it. You can't.
And what is that supposed to mean?
You show yourself to be a stinking, lying troll every single day and as
for the links, are you serious claiming hundreds of people posting from various USNET groups you have posted in are wrong about you ?
Logic isn't one of your gifts is it Brock?
For the record I checked out some of the links to Google where the entire thread, or most of it anyway, is archived and it's trivial to see where
the comments in the above links come from.
You lying about socking up is one that shows up in multiple places.
Your claims about incest and sibling sex is another one. That's sick shit even for a deviant like you Brock.
When so very many people make the same claims or similar claims about you one of 2 things is true.
1. They are all lying.
2. You are lying and are representative of those claims.
And you seal your fate because you still behave as described in thos
links, where the threads point to direct poor behavior by you as you are part of those threads posting as SNIT.
It's trivial to line up your current behavior with those links.
This isn't rocket science Brock.
Well maybe it is for you but not for anyone who can read and think for themselves.
Had you changed your easily identifiable behavior after those links were published you might have point but you didn't because you are sick and
can't do it.
Meanwhile quoting you lying is trivial to do. Why did you tell so many
contradictory stories about claimed degrees? Why not just be honest?
And notice it is another example of your projecting your nonsense onto
someone (me in this case). NO evidence of my doing as you accuse.
Massive evidence of you doing AS YOU DO.
You bring anger and accusations and ego. I bring receipts.
You bring bullshit Brock. I've checked some of your receipts, like I have above regarding Gremlin and him using drugs, and you lie like a fucking 2 dollar whore claiming she is a virgin.
And I have also wasted some time checking a few of your other receipts
where you accuse posters of vile behavior and surprise! they don't
confirm your vile accusations either.
So as I have said twice now "You are either one hell of a liar or you
can't read for shit."
And I'm siding with Gremlin in that you are both.
You Brock are a dishonest liar who can't read worth a shit.
In fact I doubt you can even read your own receipts.
Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote in news:XnsB3F2A7E4FA3CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5:
Rigor Mortis <deadisdead21@outlookmail.net>
news:698cfd0f$3$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com Wed, 11 Feb 2026
22:05:03 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:698c9f48$1$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:
On Feb 11, 2026 at 2:21:23rC>AM MST, ""David B."" wroteThat not what he said Brock McNuggets.
<mv300jF4pc6U1@mid.individual.net>:
On 11/02/2026 01:21, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Feb 10, 2026 at 3:53:30rC>PM MST, ""David B."" wrote
<mv1r7aFtgcbU1@mid.individual.net>:
On 10/02/2026 22:04, Gremlin wrote:
"David B." <David@hotmail.co.uk>[....]
news:mv1kvjFsg9iU1@mid.individual.net Tue, 10 Feb 2026 21:06:59 >>>>>>>> GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:
Your memory is shot Dustin. I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018 >>>>>>>>My memory is fine, mr OLAS. I don't believe that you ever
stopped drinking. Your behavior hasn't changed a bit. You're
still the dishonest stalking troll you've always been known as. >>>>>>>> Nothing has changed. Therefore, you have not stopped drinking. >>>>>>>> Stop lying, fool. No reasonable person believes you anyway. And >>>>>>>> you only have yourself to blame for that.
I tell the truth, Dustin.
I stopped drinking on 21 March 2018
Gremlin cannot imagine NOT drinking.
He's said he doesn't drink alcohol and I have no reason not to
believe him.
The fact that he repeatedly insists people cannot quit suggests he
has struggled there.
You are either one hell of a liar or you can't read for shit.
He's actually both. And thanks for pointing out what should be obvious
to anyone who isn't functionally illiterate. He as you can see
absolutely will try to spin and twist what you wrote to support
whatever response he provides.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Brock is already in spin mode.
He needs to smack the timer on the washing machine so it advances.
Are you actually the same person behind the snit nym?
As in these links.
<https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.c
om/snit.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/s
nitlist.html>
<https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/s
nitLieMethods.html>
Yes! Those links accurately describe him and provide examples
of how he does what he does.
Looks to be that way. I did backtrace some of the links provided with the poster comments and Brock/snit is indeed a participant in at least the random threads I selected and his posts and behavior is exactly what led
the poster to reach the conclusions about Brock/snit.
Point is, those comments are not just cherry picked from the sky nor are they fabricated. They are the result of threads where snit trolled.
This Brock specimen has some major "issues".
Gremlin is a good person who snit has profusely lied about.
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36aPM MST, "pothead" wrote <10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader. Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites politically. https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other restrictionist groups. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens. https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael >>> Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader. >>> Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not >> call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great >> Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is >> identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy >> theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other >> restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming >> the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as
parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by
anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as >> invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
I have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, snit,Michael
Glasser
of Prescott Arizona has the reading comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. She may not
call herself that, but her language repeats the same themes found in "Great
Replacement" and ethnonationalist propaganda. A few examples:
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals, terrorists, mental
patients etc."
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This framing is
identical to "invasion" propaganda used by white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global >> socialism means. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in
blue areas and ... gain control."
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement conspiracy
theory--the claim that elites import non-white immigrants to outnumber whites
politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here illegally, they
are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to equate
illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC on FAIR and other
restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of people gaming
the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been used to
racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants and minorities. >> https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and immigrants as >> parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points documented by >> anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same structure: immigrants as
invaders, elites as traitors, "real" citizens as victims. That's
white-supremacist rhetoric whether she admits it or not.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Several of your recent contributions
contain strong language and confrontational remarks, which
can make it difficult to maintain productive and
respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are
likely an adult participant in these forums. For that
reason, I would encourage a more measured and constructive
approach to discussion. Productive exchanges typically
involve balanced perspectives, credible sources, and
respectful engagement with differing viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am responding to.
I have begun reviewing the links you shared in this
thread. At this point, I do not see how they substantiate
the claims you are making. I will continue reviewing them
and provide more specific feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:00:21 -0500, Cillian Walsh wrote:----------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>,
unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>, David@hotmail.co.uk
says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12-aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets,
snit,Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona has the reading
comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point.
She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same
themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist
propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals,
terrorists, mental patients etc."
That is a true statement under the previous administration millions of
unchecked migrants have entered the country. Many are criminals. Have
you been keeping up with the news lately?
You just don't like the fact that she mentioned the elephant in the
room.
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This
framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by
white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement- an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement- theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
If you enter the country without being vetted you are a criminal from
day one.
A secure border has nothing to do with white supremacy or white
replacement theory. Do you have any specific statements that Pothead
has made regarding white supremacy or white replacement or is yet
another false equivalency. I don't happen to like Gefilte fish, does
that make me a Jew hating Nazi? For the record I LOVE lox and bagels
though.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with
a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with
people who will settle in blue areas and ... gain control."
I actually looked that one up and she is referring to the left or
democrats, not the migrants, and it is a plausible argument. Why DID
the Biden administration open up the borders?
There are only 2 solutions which are his people are idiots or the
democrats were looking for constituents either by census numbers or
just votes in general.
So which one is it?
Why are the democrats so against voter ID?
She makes a valid point and you do not.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement
conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white
immigrants to outnumber whites politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement- an-explainer
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement- theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
See above.
She is referring to the democrats and specifically the Biden
administration, not the migrants themselves many who come from
oppressive regimes and may actually vote republican like Hispanics and
blacks did in the last election.
It's not predictable either way.
You are using AI to focus on words that white supremacists might say
but that does not equate to others using the same words.
By your metric blacks calling each other the N-word in songs and
elsewhere are racists and against blacks.
See the false equivalency once again?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here
illegally, they are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to
equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC
on FAIR and other restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation- american-immigration-reform
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
This comment by you is bizarre.
Come to US illegally you are a criminal.
Go through the process like my, and probably you ancestors did, and
they will be welcomed.
Without enforced borders we are no longer a sovereign nation.
Hundreds of millions of immigrants have come to, and in fact help build
this country, legally.
And many have applied using the legal system and are waiting for
approval. So why should the millions Biden let into the country skip to
the front of the line when others took the time to follow the process?
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of
people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been
used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants
and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson- jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement- an-explainer
I suggest you do some research on the Somali immigrants in MN where 80%
or more have been on public assistance for 10 years or more.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and
immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement- an-explainer
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points
documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same
structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real"
citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she
admits it or not.
So you want your tax dollars to pay for criminals who have, in the case
of MS, bilked the system out of billions of dollars?
And more states are being added every day.
Non existent schools, adult care facilities, Medicaid fraud and so
forth.
And the numbers are astronomical. Why didn't the Biden administration
uncover this?
As for taxpayers footing the bill, you must be a generous taxpayer to
not object to this extreme level of fraud. Most people are not that
generous.
Again pothead is correct.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided commentary
across multiple unrelated groups and participating in discussions
in a manner that many would consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response
and not on the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to another >>>>>person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions contain strong language and
confrontational remarks, which can make it difficult to maintain
productive and respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how threads work.
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion either >>>>>positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you then you are >>>>>participating in the wrong medium or grow a thicker skin as real life >>>>>doesn't award participation trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are likely an
adult participant in these forums. For that reason, I would
encourage a more measured and constructive approach to discussion.
Productive exchanges typically involve balanced perspectives,
credible sources, and respectful engagement with differing
viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am
responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone asks me if I >>>>>want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply "no thanks, I hate vanilla >>>>>ice cream" is that one sided? Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their opinion to >>>>>it?
Apparently you do not.
thenI have begun reviewing the links you shared in this thread. At this
point, I do not see how they substantiate the claims you are
making. I will continue reviewing them and provide more specific
feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it.
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts so let's see >>>>>them.
I should be done following your receipt links above shortly and will >>>>>update the thread with my findings when complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are accusing me of
being a sock and neither of you has presented receipts.
So where are they?
So my conclusion after following the links and doing some database
searches looking for the claims against pothead I find that it's all
bullshit hiding behind "these are white supremacist type statements"
which is a complete lie on the part of Brock McNuggets or whatever his
nym of the day is.
He is a troll who is either some kind of hopped up on drugs loser or a
totally dishonest person. Possibly both may apply.
So I will admit in public that I wasted about 90 minutes of my life
checking your comments Cillian. Something I am not proud of as time at
least to me is precious.
Quick question are you from Ireland and what town?
I'm from County Cork myself.
I digress here. Sorry.
So reading through every one of Brock's AI generated links you have absolutely obliterated his fluff for every one, individually and not as
a lump sum.
And the first clue is how he deleted your post in follow up posts and
also edited the newsgroups posted to.
TBH I don't know this asshole Brock from a hole in the wall but his crossposting ended up in a group I follow and he piqued my interest as I don't believe I have ever encountered his level of stupidity and
dishonest before.
Just so you know, this thread was X-Posted to various groups by someone
and it's being discussed in detail and let's just leave it at the fact
that Brock has made a fool of himself and other posters have figured
this out, based upon his comments and his links which in no way support
his claims.
It's probably a good thing for Brock that the people he attacks are
seemingly using aliases because if they were using their real names,
they would have excellent grounds to sue Brock for libel.
He would probably hit the road for Canada or Mexico before that ever
happened though.
So Cillian, keep up exposing this roach Brock in whatever groups you
post in because even though you may not know it, you have a lot of
support as there are many posters in several groups who want to see this cockroach Brock squashed.
From: Glock <glock@localhost.com>
Subject: Re: Was - David;;; Can You See the Alan Links?
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.fan.rush- limbaugh
References: <MPG.43f19cf97dd661ce989723@usnews.blocknews.net>
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>
<6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>
<699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<MPG.43feafc715e61cb1989681@paganini.bofh.team>
<mvk9p0F1c1pU1@mid.individual.net>
<mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>
<MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>
<MPG.43fecb1c9ea5fb62989683@paganini.bofh.team>
<69964d44$0$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
X-Draft-Attribution: On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500, Raymond wrote: X-Draft-Attribution-Author: Raymond <kicksithiphop@music.org> X-Draft-Attribution-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500 X-Draft-Attribution-Id: 69964d44$0$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <pan$4da37$987f52c8$9865f22b$1bf36b8b@localhost.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500, Raymond wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:00:21 -0500, Cillian Walsh wrote:----------------------------------------------------------------------
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>,
unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>, David@hotmail.co.uk
says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12-aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, >>>>>>>> snit,Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona has the reading
comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
an-explainerPothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. >>>>>>> She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same >>>>>>> themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist
propaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals,
terrorists, mental patients etc."
That is a true statement under the previous administration millions of
unchecked migrants have entered the country. Many are criminals. Have
you been keeping up with the news lately?
You just don't like the fact that she mentioned the elephant in the
room.
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This >>>>>>> framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by
white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violencehttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-
an-explainer
If you enter the country without being vetted you are a criminal from
day one.
A secure border has nothing to do with white supremacy or white
replacement theory. Do you have any specific statements that Pothead
has made regarding white supremacy or white replacement or is yet
another false equivalency. I don't happen to like Gefilte fish, does
that make me a Jew hating Nazi? For the record I LOVE lox and bagels
though.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with >>>>>>> a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with
people who will settle in blue areas and ... gain control."
I actually looked that one up and she is referring to the left or
democrats, not the migrants, and it is a plausible argument. Why DID
the Biden administration open up the borders?
There are only 2 solutions which are his people are idiots or the
democrats were looking for constituents either by census numbers or
just votes in general.
So which one is it?
Why are the democrats so against voter ID?
She makes a valid point and you do not.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement >>>>>>> conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white
immigrants to outnumber whites politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violencehttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-
american-immigration-reformhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
See above.
She is referring to the democrats and specifically the Biden
administration, not the migrants themselves many who come from
oppressive regimes and may actually vote republican like Hispanics and
blacks did in the last election.
It's not predictable either way.
You are using AI to focus on words that white supremacists might say
but that does not equate to others using the same words.
By your metric blacks calling each other the N-word in songs and
elsewhere are racists and against blacks.
See the false equivalency once again?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here
illegally, they are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to >>>>>>> equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC >>>>>>> on FAIR and other restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-
jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
This comment by you is bizarre.
Come to US illegally you are a criminal.
Go through the process like my, and probably you ancestors did, and
they will be welcomed.
Without enforced borders we are no longer a sovereign nation.
Hundreds of millions of immigrants have come to, and in fact help build
this country, legally.
And many have applied using the legal system and are waiting for
approval. So why should the millions Biden let into the country skip to
the front of the line when others took the time to follow the process?
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of
people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been
used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants >>>>>>> and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-
an-explainerhttps://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
an-explainer
I suggest you do some research on the Somali immigrants in MN where 80%
or more have been on public assistance for 10 years or more.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and
immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points
documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same >>>>>>> structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real"
citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she >>>>>>> admits it or not.
So you want your tax dollars to pay for criminals who have, in the case
of MS, bilked the system out of billions of dollars?
And more states are being added every day.
Non existent schools, adult care facilities, Medicaid fraud and so
forth.
And the numbers are astronomical. Why didn't the Biden administration
uncover this?
As for taxpayers footing the bill, you must be a generous taxpayer to
not object to this extreme level of fraud. Most people are not that
generous.
Again pothead is correct.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided commentary
across multiple unrelated groups and participating in discussions
in a manner that many would consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response
and not on the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
As for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to another
person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions contain strong language and
confrontational remarks, which can make it difficult to maintain
productive and respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that?
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how threads work. >>>>
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion either
positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you then you are >>>>>> participating in the wrong medium or grow a thicker skin as real life >>>>>> doesn't award participation trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are likely an >>>>>> adult participant in these forums. For that reason, I would
encourage a more measured and constructive approach to discussion. >>>>>> Productive exchanges typically involve balanced perspectives,
credible sources, and respectful engagement with differing
viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am >>>>> responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone asks me if I >>>>>> want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply "no thanks, I hate vanilla >>>>>> ice cream" is that one sided? Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their opinion to >>>>>> it?
Apparently you do not.
thenI have begun reviewing the links you shared in this thread. At this >>>>>> point, I do not see how they substantiate the claims you are
making. I will continue reviewing them and provide more specific
feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it. >>>>
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts so let's see >>>>>> them.
I should be done following your receipt links above shortly and will >>>>>> update the thread with my findings when complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are accusing me of
being a sock and neither of you has presented receipts.
So where are they?
So my conclusion after following the links and doing some database
searches looking for the claims against pothead I find that it's all
bullshit hiding behind "these are white supremacist type statements"
which is a complete lie on the part of Brock McNuggets or whatever his
nym of the day is.
He is a troll who is either some kind of hopped up on drugs loser or a
totally dishonest person. Possibly both may apply.
So I will admit in public that I wasted about 90 minutes of my life
checking your comments Cillian. Something I am not proud of as time at
least to me is precious.
Most posters only read snit's post in order to get a good laugh.
Other than that, they are a waste of time as the majority are simply lies. Based upon snit's own lengthy posting history he has zero credibility so nobody takes him seriously because he is well known USENET troll.
Quick question are you from Ireland and what town?
I'm from County Cork myself.
I digress here. Sorry.
Visiting Ireland is on my bucket list.
So reading through every one of Brock's AI generated links you have
absolutely obliterated his fluff for every one, individually and not as
a lump sum.
Yep.
Snit's claims are preposterous.
For example I know people who fly the stars and bars next to the American flag on holidays.
They do this because they lost relatives during the civil war.
Does that make them white supremacists?
By snit's criteria the answer is yes.
So one of these families is a mixed race family.
Are they white supremacists?
See where snit's lack of logic crumbles?
You should although snit never will because he is a moron.
And the first clue is how he deleted your post in follow up posts and
also edited the newsgroups posted to.
TBH I don't know this asshole Brock from a hole in the wall but his
crossposting ended up in a group I follow and he piqued my interest as I
don't believe I have ever encountered his level of stupidity and
dishonest before.
It's typical of trolls like snit.
They are counting on people not checking out the thread.
That may have worked in the past but with current tools it's trivial to catch these snip and run trolls.
Just so you know, this thread was X-Posted to various groups by someone
and it's being discussed in detail and let's just leave it at the fact
that Brock has made a fool of himself and other posters have figured
this out, based upon his comments and his links which in no way support
his claims.
That's what snit gets for splattering his trolls all over USENET.
The interesting part is that snit has no idea that people are laughing and ridiculing him and he is unable to respond because he is not smart enough
to figure out which groups.
It's probably a good thing for Brock that the people he attacks are
seemingly using aliases because if they were using their real names,
they would have excellent grounds to sue Brock for libel.
He would probably hit the road for Canada or Mexico before that ever
happened though.
I ran this one by my sister who is a lawyer and she told me that even if a person uses a nym, and this is key. the nym is well known in the
blogosphere they would have a strong case against someone like snit.
That would be someone like caturd who is a well known blogger.
I have no idea about people in this group.
And from what I read, snit is basically destitute and living on the
streets
so what could be gained by suing him?
It's a waste of time IMHO.
Besides ethically let's keep USENET on USENET and stop going outside of
the
medium.
My opinion for what it is worth.
So Cillian, keep up exposing this roach Brock in whatever groups you
post in because even though you may not know it, you have a lot of
support as there are many posters in several groups who want to see this
cockroach Brock squashed.
Cockroach is an appropriate moniker for the snit troll.
Others have said if the US has a nuclear strike only the cockroaches will survive.
That includes snit.
Glock wrote:
From: Glock <glock@localhost.com>snit wins
Subject: Re: Was - David;;; Can You See the Alan Links?
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,comp.sys.mac.advocacy,alt.fan.rush-
limbaugh
References: <MPG.43f19cf97dd661ce989723@usnews.blocknews.net>
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>
<6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>
<699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<MPG.43feafc715e61cb1989681@paganini.bofh.team>
<mvk9p0F1c1pU1@mid.individual.net>
<mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>
<MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>
<MPG.43fecb1c9ea5fb62989683@paganini.bofh.team>
<69964d44$0$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
X-Draft-Attribution: On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500, Raymond wrote:
X-Draft-Attribution-Author: Raymond <kicksithiphop@music.org>
X-Draft-Attribution-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500
X-Draft-Attribution-Id: 69964d44$0$21958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <pan$4da37$987f52c8$9865f22b$1bf36b8b@localhost.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 18:37:40 -0500, Raymond wrote:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 19:00:21 -0500, Cillian Walsh wrote:---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>> Pothead's posts echo white-supremacist rhetoric point for point. >>>>>>>> She may not call herself that, but her language repeats the same >>>>>>>> themes found in "Great Replacement" and ethnonationalist
In article <MPG.43fec212d5e1b8a989682@paganini.bofh.team>,
unicornspotogold@yahoomail.com says...
In article <mvka9hF1ereU1@mid.individual.net>, David@hotmail.co.uk
says...
n article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
On 17/02/2026 22:52, David B. replied on a different Usenet group!
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 15, 2026 at 3:45:12 PM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote
<MPG.43fc1683725ebdbf989680@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <6991fa5c$0$23$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
On Feb 14, 2026 at 7:31:36 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<10mrb68$3m509$1@pothead.dont-email.me>:
You may not have stumbled on this factoid but Brock McNuggets, >>>>>>>>> snit,Michael Glasser of Prescott Arizona has the reading
comprehension skills of a third grader.
Seriously.
But at least I am not a white supremacist:
<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
an-explainerpropaganda. A few examples:
Really?
What you wrote above is a false equivalency.
Shall we continue?
Quote: "There is no number. Come one, come all. Criminals,
terrorists, mental patients etc."
That is a true statement under the previous administration millions of >>>> unchecked migrants have entered the country. Many are criminals. Have
you been keeping up with the news lately?
You just don't like the fact that she mentioned the elephant in the
room.
Dehumanizing immigrants, treating them as a criminal horde. This >>>>>>>> framing is identical to "invasion" propaganda used by
white-nationalist groups.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violencehttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-
an-explainer
If you enter the country without being vetted you are a criminal from
day one.
A secure border has nothing to do with white supremacy or white
replacement theory. Do you have any specific statements that Pothead
has made regarding white supremacy or white replacement or is yet
another false equivalency. I don't happen to like Gefilte fish, does
that make me a Jew hating Nazi? For the record I LOVE lox and bagels
though.
Quote: "They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with >>>>>>>> a global socialism means. They want to flood the country with
people who will settle in blue areas and ... gain control."
I actually looked that one up and she is referring to the left or
democrats, not the migrants, and it is a plausible argument. Why DID
the Biden administration open up the borders?
There are only 2 solutions which are his people are idiots or the
democrats were looking for constituents either by census numbers or
just votes in general.
So which one is it?
Why are the democrats so against voter ID?
She makes a valid point and you do not.
"Flooding" language is lifted straight from the Great Replacement >>>>>>>> conspiracy theory--the claim that elites import non-white
immigrants to outnumber whites politically.
https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
theory-and-how-does-it-fuel-racist-violencehttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/what-is-great-replacement-
american-immigration-reformhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Replacement_conspiracy_theory
See above.
She is referring to the democrats and specifically the Biden
administration, not the migrants themselves many who come from
oppressive regimes and may actually vote republican like Hispanics and >>>> blacks did in the last election.
It's not predictable either way.
You are using AI to focus on words that white supremacists might say
but that does not equate to others using the same words.
By your metric blacks calling each other the N-word in songs and
elsewhere are racists and against blacks.
See the false equivalency once again?
Quote: "Do it legally and you are welcomed." / "They came here >>>>>>>> illegally, they are criminals."
Boundary-drawing rhetoric used by organized nativist networks to >>>>>>>> equate illegality with moral corruption and inferiority. See SPLC >>>>>>>> on FAIR and other restrictionist groups.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/federation-
jonathan-greenblatt-immigration-3ef70ca8eff84dd2c424288be1cc2f48https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton
This comment by you is bizarre.
Come to US illegally you are a criminal.
Go through the process like my, and probably you ancestors did, and
they will be welcomed.
Without enforced borders we are no longer a sovereign nation.
Hundreds of millions of immigrants have come to, and in fact help build >>>> this country, legally.
And many have applied using the legal system and are waiting for
approval. So why should the millions Biden let into the country skip to >>>> the front of the line when others took the time to follow the process? >>>>
Quote: "Trump is going after these lazy grifters" / "a LOT of
people gaming the system..."
Echoes the "welfare leech" trope. That stereotype has long been >>>>>>>> used to racialize poverty and build resentment against immigrants >>>>>>>> and minorities.
https://apnews.com/article/race-and-ethnicity-tucker-carlson-
an-explainerhttps://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
an-explainer
I suggest you do some research on the Somali immigrants in MN where 80% >>>> or more have been on public assistance for 10 years or more.
Quote: "Why are my tax dollars funding this?"
Classic "resource theft" framing--portraying minorities and
immigrants as parasites stealing from "real" citizens.
https://www.splcenter.org/resources/extremist-files/john-tanton >>>>>>>> https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/the-great-replacement-
Each of these aligns directly with extremist talking points
documented by anti-hate researchers. Together they form the same >>>>>>>> structure: immigrants as invaders, elites as traitors, "real"
citizens as victims. That's white-supremacist rhetoric whether she >>>>>>>> admits it or not.
So you want your tax dollars to pay for criminals who have, in the case >>>> of MS, bilked the system out of billions of dollars?
And more states are being added every day.
Non existent schools, adult care facilities, Medicaid fraud and so
forth.
And the numbers are astronomical. Why didn't the Biden administration
uncover this?
As for taxpayers footing the bill, you must be a generous taxpayer to
not object to this extreme level of fraud. Most people are not that
generous.
Again pothead is correct.
upon the data your have provided. You call it receipts.It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided commentary >>>>>>> across multiple unrelated groups and participating in discussions >>>>>>> in a manner that many would consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response >>>>>> and not on the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you. I am giving my opinion based
thenAs for one sided, you do understand what an opinion to another
person's post (that's you) is do you not?
How do you explain your one sided focus here?
Pivot to projection.
Stop right there.
See above.
Several of your recent contributions contain strong language and >>>>>>> confrontational remarks, which can make it difficult to maintain >>>>>>> productive and respectful dialogue.
See: DEEPLY one sided of you. Extremely so. How do you explain that? >>>>>
DEEPLY one sided of me?a
When you post inaccurate garbage do you actually expect
reply to your post to pat you on the back?
You seem to have a cognitive issue in understanding how threads work. >>>>>
1. Poster #1 posts something.
2. Poster #2 posts a response expressing their opinion either
positive or negative.
3. Rinse and repeat ad infinitum.
This is how usenet and other forums work.
If you believe that everyone is going to agree with you then you are >>>>>>> participating in the wrong medium or grow a thicker skin as real life >>>>>>> doesn't award participation trophies.
Based on your posting history, I understand that you are likely an >>>>>>> adult participant in these forums. For that reason, I would
encourage a more measured and constructive approach to discussion. >>>>>>> Productive exchanges typically involve balanced perspectives,
credible sources, and respectful engagement with differing
viewpoints.
Again, DEEPLY one sided of you. You do not at all speak of what I am >>>>>> responding to.
It's an observation.
MY OBSERVATION.
One sided has nothing to do with it.
For example, I detest vanilla ice cream and if someone asks me if I >>>>>>> want a vanilla ice cream cone and I reply "no thanks, I hate vanilla >>>>>>> ice cream" is that one sided? Your logic is flawed.
And why do you keep pivoting to me?
You made the initial post.
Do you not understand that people will reply with their opinion to >>>>>>> it?
Apparently you do not.
I have begun reviewing the links you shared in this thread. At this >>>>>>> point, I do not see how they substantiate the claims you are
making. I will continue reviewing them and provide more specific >>>>>>> feedback shortly.
This shows you are a sock and explains why you are one sided. Got it. >>>>>
SMH?
What in the wide wide world of sports are you babbling about now?
So if you claim, falsely of course that I am a sock, >>
accusations.the burden of proof is one you to prove that >>
Remember, you are the one who claims to bring receipts so let's see >>>>>>> them.
I should be done following your receipt links above shortly and will >>>>>>> update the thread with my findings when complete.
For now, you have your homework assignment.
Don't be late now or you will lose points.
I think the sock was Steve Carroll!
Really?
I've seen the name mentioned however both of you are accusing me of
being a sock and neither of you has presented receipts.
So where are they?
So my conclusion after following the links and doing some database
searches looking for the claims against pothead I find that it's all
bullshit hiding behind "these are white supremacist type statements"
which is a complete lie on the part of Brock McNuggets or whatever his >>>> nym of the day is.
He is a troll who is either some kind of hopped up on drugs loser or a >>>> totally dishonest person. Possibly both may apply.
So I will admit in public that I wasted about 90 minutes of my life
checking your comments Cillian. Something I am not proud of as time at
least to me is precious.
Most posters only read snit's post in order to get a good laugh.
Other than that, they are a waste of time as the majority are simply lies. >> Based upon snit's own lengthy posting history he has zero credibility so
nobody takes him seriously because he is well known USENET troll.
Quick question are you from Ireland and what town?
I'm from County Cork myself.
I digress here. Sorry.
Visiting Ireland is on my bucket list.
So reading through every one of Brock's AI generated links you have
absolutely obliterated his fluff for every one, individually and not as
a lump sum.
Yep.
Snit's claims are preposterous.
For example I know people who fly the stars and bars next to the American
flag on holidays.
They do this because they lost relatives during the civil war.
Does that make them white supremacists?
By snit's criteria the answer is yes.
So one of these families is a mixed race family.
Are they white supremacists?
See where snit's lack of logic crumbles?
You should although snit never will because he is a moron.
And the first clue is how he deleted your post in follow up posts and
also edited the newsgroups posted to.
TBH I don't know this asshole Brock from a hole in the wall but his
crossposting ended up in a group I follow and he piqued my interest as I >>> don't believe I have ever encountered his level of stupidity and
dishonest before.
It's typical of trolls like snit.
They are counting on people not checking out the thread.
That may have worked in the past but with current tools it's trivial to
catch these snip and run trolls.
Just so you know, this thread was X-Posted to various groups by someone
and it's being discussed in detail and let's just leave it at the fact
that Brock has made a fool of himself and other posters have figured
this out, based upon his comments and his links which in no way support
his claims.
That's what snit gets for splattering his trolls all over USENET.
The interesting part is that snit has no idea that people are laughing and >> ridiculing him and he is unable to respond because he is not smart enough
to figure out which groups.
It's probably a good thing for Brock that the people he attacks are
seemingly using aliases because if they were using their real names,
they would have excellent grounds to sue Brock for libel.
He would probably hit the road for Canada or Mexico before that ever
happened though.
I ran this one by my sister who is a lawyer and she told me that even if a >> person uses a nym, and this is key. the nym is well known in the
blogosphere they would have a strong case against someone like snit.
That would be someone like caturd who is a well known blogger.
I have no idea about people in this group.
And from what I read, snit is basically destitute and living on the
streets
so what could be gained by suing him?
It's a waste of time IMHO.
Besides ethically let's keep USENET on USENET and stop going outside of
the
medium.
My opinion for what it is worth.
So Cillian, keep up exposing this roach Brock in whatever groups you
post in because even though you may not know it, you have a lot of
support as there are many posters in several groups who want to see this >>> cockroach Brock squashed.
Cockroach is an appropriate moniker for the snit troll.
Others have said if the US has a nuclear strike only the cockroaches will
survive.
That includes snit.
In article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you.
I am giving my opinion based upon
the data your have provided.
You call it receipts.
On Feb 17, 2026 at 3:03:43aPM MST, "Cillian Walsh" wrote <MPG.43feafc715e61cb1989681@paganini.bofh.team>:
In article <699343a3$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>, brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com says...
...
It appears that you have been posting highly one-sided
commentary across multiple unrelated groups and
participating in discussions in a manner that many would
consider disruptive.
I respond to attacks with receipts. For you to focus on my response and not on
the attack I am responding to is very one sided.
I am not attacking you.
This is a direct lie.
If you want to have a conversation have one in good faith. You use socks and lie.
I am giving my opinion based upon
the data your have provided.
This is another direct lie on your part.
You call it receipts.
Irrefutable proof.
Your response is to say you agree with a lot of the white supremacist rhetoric. That is not the "gotcha" you think it is.
I should be done following your receipt links above
shortly and will update the thread with my findings when
complete.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 19:50:18 |
| Calls: | 812 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
20 files (23,248K bytes) |
| Messages: | 210,075 |