From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy
In article <10lraah$113g5$
2@dont-email.me>, nuh-
uh@nope.com says...
On 2026-02-02 14:51, David B. wrote:
On 02/02/2026 21:51, Tom Elam wrote:
On 2/2/2026 11:28 AM, David B. wrote:
Thanks if you will try!
https://idmsa.apple.com/IDMSWebAuth/signin?path=//thread/256233641?
login=true&language=US-
EN&instanceId=EN&appIdKey=529eb2b096d5a3d54162171f0f29ba797e602812660013123243e58bc7bedf56&rv=1
Can you take a screenshot of what Etresoft posted please, and show it >>> here?
That would be VERY much appreciated.
Thank you.
Access Denied
Access to this place or content is restricted. If you think this is a
mistake, please contact your administrator or the person who directed
you here.
Many thanks, Tom. Much appreciated. :-D
Please try Googling for.......
*2017 iMac Fusion Drive issues and external SSD workaround*
If you find the item, can you /then/ open the thread?
Please try fucking off.
You should follow your own advice Alan the stalker.
Dude, you have quite the reputation. Not as bad as that
other Apple fanatic snit but close.
Besides, snit is smarter than you are. That much is
obvious.
<
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.sys.mac.system/c/5xL1VOh
TnR8/m/kDG3OnGUGFYJ>
********Full Thread Describing Alan the Stalker *******
Alan Baker, My Creepy Internet Stalker!
47 views
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:19:48aAM
to
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan
Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to
molest.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker
from Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to
this website
people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to
pedophilia. Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child
predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-
security090507.htm
Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the
local, and Canadian
police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A
Macintosh bench
tech from Vancouver, BC.
Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to
avoid him and thus
remove themselves from danger.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:47:35aAM
to
In article <
AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that
could get
them sued.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the
possessions you've
bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a
federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the
deed to her
home?
Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench tech from Vancouver, BC.
Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus remove themselves from danger.
--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
"If you raise the ceiling four feet, move the fireplace
from that wall
to that wall, you'll still only get the full stereophonic
effect if you
sit in the bottom of that cupboard."
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:55:05aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-4A7C3C.00473513022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think
Alan Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to
molest.
People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
them sued.
Hire a lawyer and sue away. Two people can do research you
sick perv.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan
Baker from
Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according
to this website
people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads
to pedophilia.
Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child
predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-
security090507.htm
Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've
bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
www.irs.gov
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
home?
Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and
threaten to kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby
and quit spending
day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my
family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another
restraining order against
you.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:59:07aAM
to
In article <
BsSdnXHnHooULS_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-4A7C3C.00473513022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
them sued.
Hire a lawyer and sue away. Two people can do research you sick perv.
LOL
I'm sure "two people" can. You: no.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from
Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website
people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia.
Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
www.irs.gov
Is that an invitation?
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
home?
Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to kill them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending
day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order against you.
I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you. I've
just found
out a few facts.
But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.
:-)
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:05:31aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-7E962A.00590613022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
I believe that's a website.
I didn't invite you to call my grandparents at all hours
of the night that
sure didn't stop you.
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a
federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on
the deed to her
home?
Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am
and threaten to
kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby
and quit spending
day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my
family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another
restraining order
against
you.
I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you. I've just found
out a few facts.
But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.
You're not capable of bothering me. However when you
bother my elderly
grandparents and get family involved you are crossing the
line from online
weirdo, to complete psycho that needs help. You even
stated it was fun
earlier finding personal information on people online. If
your life really
that void. Perhaps instead of souring website after
website trying to verify
if I have this motorcycle or that car, or that house you
should get involved
in your own life. This sort of behavior has burned you
before and left you
so you are unemployable and must work fixing computers for
a living. You
should have learned your lesson the first time.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:10:54aAM
to
In article <
Pq-dnURy_atlLy_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
I'll make your crawling clearer (because it's is fun!).
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal Revenue
Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact them
and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can seize to
cover your
outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien
reproduced at the
address below?
<
http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/Pratt's%20Lien.jpg>
I didn't invite you to call my grandparents at all hours of the night that sure didn't stop you.
It can't stop what never happened.
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
home?
Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am and threaten to
kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a hobby and quit spending >> day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another restraining order
against
you.
I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you. I've just found
out a few facts.
But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.
You're not capable of bothering me. However when you bother my elderly grandparents and get family involved you are crossing the line from online weirdo, to complete psycho that needs help. You even stated it was fun earlier finding personal information on people online. If your life really that void. Perhaps instead of souring website after website trying to verify if I have this motorcycle or that car, or that house you should get involved in your own life. This sort of behavior has burned you before and left you
so you are unemployable and must work fixing computers for a living. You should have learned your lesson the first time.
I've not involved anyone, Pratt-fall.
But the very fact that you're claiming I have very nicely
demonstrates
how bothered you are...
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:20:26aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-A79E8E.01105413022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
They actually turned their phone off because of you. Good
job psycho. You
have problems.
Since you can't help but obsess over me just go back to
reading every post
in every motorcycle forum I've made, every post in every
jeep forum, every
post in the 300c forums. That should keep you busy enought
to quit bother my
family you nutjob. Don't you have some Macs to fix in the
morning? Go to
bed and quit harassing my family.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:23:03aAM
to
In article <
GYCdnawPKrnrKy_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Well, Pratt-fall? It was a simple question. Why can't you
answer it?
Yes or no...
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:32:15aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-1AF535.01230313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
Ooooooh. A tax lien. You've got me now, and only 5 years
old. Bwahahahaha
Yes I'm the first one to get in trouble for taxes.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:35:02aAM
to
In article <
d7GdnfAdzZ-hJC_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Ooooooh. A tax lien. You've got me now, and only 5 years old. Bwahahahaha
Yes I'm the first one to get in trouble for taxes.
You've still failed to answer the question...
And notice that once again, you've confirmed that you *do*
live at the
address you've claimed was your grandparent's. You're just
not good at
this...
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:48:56aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-F3D204.01350213022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
LOL! You've confirmed the what the IRS had as my mailing
address 5 years
ago.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:50:30aAM
to
In article <
5qGdnTg-Xfq5IC_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
So, five years ago you lived with your grandparents, is
that right?
Sort of strange for a trust fund baby, isn't it?
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 5:02:54aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-4C8458.01503013022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
No five years ago I was in Costa Rica, Nicaruaga, and
Panama for 8 months
surfing. You'll have to do some more research to verfiy
that one! I know
you're up for. I would start with surfline.com forums or
surfermag.com
forums. LOL, what am I thinking you probably already read
all of them right.
Pretty solid amateur footage with consumer camcorder no?!
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 5:13:59aAM
to
In article <
2_idnVNUUcr3XS_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
No, no, Pratt-fall! You're still not getting it!
You're claiming to be mega-rich and mega-rich people don't
change their
address because they're going to be out of town for a
while (well...
...actually, mega-rich people don't have outstanding tax
liens against
them for a measly seven grand, but that's another topic.).
They don't
change their addresses to their "grandparent's" house (nor
would the
mega-rich leave their grandparents living in such a dinky
little place,
but again: another time), they can afford to have people
take care of
their property and deal with their mail in their absence.
Really, you must try harder to make your new stories work
with your old
ones.
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 5:28:49aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-E73310.02135813022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
First. I didn't own a Mac.
Whoops there's a receipt with my name on it.
Then I didn't own a motorcycle....
Whoops there's me in every cycle forum with pics of me
taking several bikes
apart.
Then I live in my grandparents house....
whoops it's an over 55 community and that's impossible.
Now, you know the habits of rich people all over the world
and our defining
what "mega-rich" is.
Like I said, read more of my other forum posts....
stalker.
So why'd the phone calls to my grandparents stop. Did you
finally grow a
conscience? Reach the maturity level of a 8th grader?
Don't want to anymore
restraining orders?
MuahMan's profile photo
MuahMan
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 5:42:51aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> wrote in message news:alangbaker-E73310.02135813022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
Looks like Alan Baker from Vancouver, BC finally ran out
of cocaine. The
phone calls and the posts have stopped.
Chance Furlong's profile photo
Chance Furlong
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 7:37:30aAM
to
In article <
2_idnVNUUcr3XS_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
No, five years ago I was in Costa Rica, Nicaruaga, and Panama for 8 months surfing.
You know what they call men with surfers'
and swimmers' builds? Twinks.
So, Pratt, you finally admitted you are a twink.
Message has been deleted
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 10:33:53aAM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-1AF535.01230313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
2:23 AM:
I believe that's a website.
I'll make your crawling clearer (because it's is
fun!).
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal
Revenue Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact
them and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can seize
to cover your
outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien
reproduced at the
address below?
<http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/Pratt's%20Lien.jpg>
Well, Pratt-fall? It was a simple question. Why can't you answer it?
Yes or no...
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
--
Look, this is silly. It's not an argument, it's an armor
plated walrus with
walnut paneling and an all leather interior.
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:49:08aAM
to
You've been having fun these last few days, Muahman. I had
a look on
Google Earth at that place Alan linked to. Looks like a
good place to
live (maybe a few too many people around for my liking,
but...). Those
lakes, can you go boating on them? And the beaches! And
the sunshine! Cool.
Andy
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:51:29aAM
to
In article <
Gc-dnQsLk7_jWy_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
news:alangbaker-7E962A.00590613022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.
I never said that.
Whoops there's a receipt with my name on it.
And you the supposed trust fund baby stating that the Mac
was the only
laptop you owned...
Then I didn't own a motorcycle....
Whoops there's me in every cycle forum with pics of me taking several bikes apart.
Then I live in my grandparents house....
Your *mom's* house.
whoops it's an over 55 community and that's impossible.
For a liar and a cheat like you? Hardly.
Now, you know the habits of rich people all over the world and our defining what "mega-rich" is.
Well I certainly know the habits of more rich people than
*you*.
Like I said, read more of my other forum posts.... stalker.
So why'd the phone calls to my grandparents stop. Did you finally grow a conscience? Reach the maturity level of a 8th grader? Don't want to anymore restraining orders?
They never started.
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:53:22aAM
to
In article <
bcmdnZg03aJVVC_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
news:alangbaker-7E962A.00590613022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.
LOL
There never were any phone calls, Pratt-fall. The posts
stopped because
I went to bed.
I meant to ask: when I went to bed it was a little after
2:00am, but you
were up and posting until after 5 in the morning. Why is
the trust fund
baby working the graveyard shift and as what?
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:53:49aAM
to
Alan Baker wrote:
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal Revenue Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact them and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can seize to cover your outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien reproduced at the address below?
Hey Alan, you best leave this alone, he was enjoying the
nastiness
before but now he's getting agitated, and anyway, you
wouldn't seriously
grass anyone up like that would you?
Andy
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 12:04:31aPM
to
In article <fov7av$qvn$
4...@aioe.org>, nospamatall
<
nospa...@iol.ie>
wrote:
I'll leave it alone if he asks me to.
And no, I wouldn't. I was just making a "people living in
glass houses"
sort of statement.
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 12:28:56aPM
to
In article <C3D85BF1.A812F%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-1AF535.01230313022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08 2:23 AM:
I believe that's a website.
I'll make your crawling clearer (because it's is fun!).
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal Revenue Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact them and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can seize to cover your
outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien reproduced at the >>> address below?
<http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/Pratt's%20Lien.jpg>
Well, Pratt-fall? It was a simple question. Why can't you answer it?
Yes or no...
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are creepy... and completely inappropriate.
Not as "completely inappropriate" as the behavior trolls
like you and
Pratt have displayed on this forum. For once... someone is
fighting back
and the trolls don't like it. Boo f*cking hoo;)
Similar to the whacko and obsessive research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
LOL! Two idiotic newsgroups trolls are whining about the
lack of
anonymity in the same thread... I love it! No one
"researched" you until
you researched her. Poor hypocrite Snit;)
--
"Apple is pushing how green this is - but it [Macbook Air]
is
clearly disposable... when the battery dies you can pretty
much
just throw it away". - Snit
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 12:29:01aPM
to
In article <
d7GdnfAdzZ-hJC_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <
mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Then it's still valid. Hope you're planning on paying
it... Alan may
just take you up on your offer;)
Dave Fritzinger's profile photo
Dave Fritzinger
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 12:40:59aPM
to
On Feb 12, 8:19 pm, "MuahMan" <
muah...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench tech from Vancouver, BC.
Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus remove themselves from danger.
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
--
Dave Fritzinger
Honolulu, HI
John's profile photo
John
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:23:41aPM
to
"Snit" <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:C3D85BF1.A812F%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com...
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-1AF535.01230313022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08 2:23 AM:
I believe that's a website.
I'll make your crawling clearer (because it's is
fun!).
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal
Revenue Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact
them and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can
seize to cover your
outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien
reproduced at the
address below?
<http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/Pratt's%20Lien.jpg>
Well, Pratt-fall? It was a simple question. Why can't
you answer it?
Yes or no...
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
Message has been deleted
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:27:24aPM
to
In article <
DcOdnXqDRM0qqC7a...@netlojix.com>,
"John" <
nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that that
the kids have
got on the parents computers again...
Message has been deleted
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:38:13aPM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that that the kids have got on the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is
creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of the
bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a reasoned
person to do.
--
When thinking changes your mind, that's philosophy.
When God changes your mind, that's faith.
When facts change your mind, that's science.
Lefty Bigfoot's profile photo
Lefty Bigfoot
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:43:19aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:13 -0600, Snit wrote
(in article <C3D88725.A8199%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>):
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08 11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that that
the kids have got on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a reasoned person to do.
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not. You
saw
those posts, I'm sure.
--
Lefty
All of God's creatures have a place..........
.........right next to the potatoes and gravy.
See also:
http://www.gizmodo.com/gadgets/images/iProduct.gif
Lefty Bigfoot's profile photo
Lefty Bigfoot
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:44:03aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:26:57 -0600, Michelle Steiner wrote
(in article <
michelle-64C5F4...@news.west.cox.net>):
In article
<51c218e6-8f3f-4956...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Dave Fritzinger <dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
That's one's permanently returning ENOSPACE and has been
for
years. ;-)
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 1:47:47aPM
to
"Lefty Bigfoot" <
nu...@busyness.info> stated in post
0001HW.C3D89668...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 11:43 AM:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:13 -0600, Snit wrote
(in article <C3D88725.A8199%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>):
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post
alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that
that the kids have got on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is
creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of
the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a
reasoned person to do.
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not. You saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand... and
has become
completely inappropriate. Why would someone even ask if he
should
"stop"... he should not start... and if he does he should
know to stop on
his own.
I have not researched the history but there is no excuse I
can think of for
his actions. None.
--
If A = B and B = C, then A = C, except where void or
prohibited by law.
Roy Santoro, Psycho Proverb Zone
(
http://snipurl.com/BurdenOfProof)
Randy Howard's profile photo
Randy Howard
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:01:19aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:47:47 -0600, Snit wrote
(in article <C3D88963.A81A1%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>):
Habitually, intentionally, knowingly lying in every single
post to this
newsgroup for the last year or more is probably on the
list, but I
don't want to put words in Alan's mouth.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by
those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:11:11aPM
to
"Randy Howard" <
randy...@FOOverizonBAR.net> stated in post
0001HW.C3D89AA0...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 12:01 PM:
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is
creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out
of the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a
reasoned person to do.
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not.
You saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand...
and has become
completely inappropriate. Why would someone even ask if
he should
"stop"... he should not start... and if he does he
should know to stop on
his own.
I have not researched the history but there is no
excuse I can think of for
his actions. None.
Habitually, intentionally, knowingly lying in every single post to this newsgroup for the last year or more is probably on the list, but I
don't want to put words in Alan's mouth.
Oh to call someone on their lies about general facts is
one thing - but to
research someone's life and pull up and then *post*
supposed tax records is
just beyond anything that is even moderately reasonable.
It is despicable.
--
Picture of a tuna soda:
http://snipurl.com/f351
Feel free to ask for the recipe.
Message has been deleted
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:30:05aPM
to
In article <fov7av$qvn$
4...@aioe.org>, nospamatall
<
nospa...@iol.ie>
wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
You're a really strange one, Andy. You want Alan to leave
it alone
because Pratt is agitated. Weird. Maybe Alan won't do
anything... but
there are people that will, like Snit... and that's the
point here;
people like him, Pratt and zara need a little reality
check now and
then. If you're going to run around a newsgroup sexually
harassing
people or calling them pedophiles you're gonna get what
you have
coming... as you should.
Lefty Bigfoot's profile photo
Lefty Bigfoot
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:34:05aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:47:47 -0600, Snit wrote
(in article <C3D88963.A81A1%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>):
"Lefty Bigfoot" <nu...@busyness.info> stated in post 0001HW.C3D89668...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 11:43 AM:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 12:38:13 -0600, Snit wrote
(in article <C3D88725.A8199%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com>):
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post
alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that
that the kids have got
on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is
creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of
the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a
reasoned person to do.
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not. You
saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Fair enough.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand...
It has? What I saw was Muahmann make up a story to try and
take
the heat off. If it had gotten out of hand, we'd have
heard
about it on CNN. He's just playing the victim card, and it
seems to be working, at least with you.
and has become completely inappropriate. Why would someone even ask
if he should "stop"... he should not start...
It's public info. It's not like he's been camping out on
his
front lawn with a webcam feed, ffs.
and if he does he should know to stop on his own.
Pratt just keeps asking for more. He's apparently too
stupid to
know when to say 'uncle'.
I have not researched the history but there is no excuse I can think of for his actions. None.
Do you actually believe this phone call story? Tell me
you're
not that stupid.
Lefty Bigfoot's profile photo
Lefty Bigfoot
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:36:50aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:15:43 -0600, Michelle Steiner wrote
(in article <
michelle-D03D2B...@news.west.cox.net>):
In article <0001HW.C3D89693...@news.verizon.net>,
Lefty Bigfoot <nu...@busyness.info> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
That's one's permanently returning ENOSPACE and has
been for years.
;-)
What is ENOSPACE?
It was a joke, a nerdy one, no question. The underlying
part
being that Usenet was filled with so many paranoid retards
that
any attempts to post to it would return an error. Yes, I
know
this doesn't make logical sense, but jokes often don't.
I just browsed there, and found 25 messages (10 of
which were killed by my filters) dating from 7/30/06 to 1/20/08 (not
counting the killed messages; all I have is the count of how many were killed, so I don't know when they were dated).
I'm guessing most were crossposted as followups. I didn't
even
think it really existed, and I'd be really surprised if
people
subscribed to it. ;-)
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:39:11aPM
to
In article <C3D88EDF.A81B8%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Randy Howard" <randy...@FOOverizonBAR.net> stated in post 0001HW.C3D89AA0...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 12:01 PM:
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is creepy.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of the bounds of >>>> anything that is even moderately acceptable for a reasoned person to do. >>>
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not. You saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand... and has become
completely inappropriate. Why would someone even ask if he should
"stop"... he should not start... and if he does he should know to stop on >> his own.
I have not researched the history but there is no excuse I can think of for
his actions. None.
Habitually, intentionally, knowingly lying in every single post to this newsgroup for the last year or more is probably on the list, but I
don't want to put words in Alan's mouth.
Oh to call someone on their lies about general facts is one thing
You're as confused as you usually are. His reference is to
Pratt being
the one doing the lying here. Of course... I can see why
you don't want
to see something like this happen... you're possibly next
in that line,
therefore, your defense of Pratt makes complete sense.
- but to
research someone's life and pull up and then *post* supposed tax records is just beyond anything that is even moderately reasonable. It is despicable.
It's public info. Pratt should think about that before he
trolls
newsgroups. Sometimes people can get pissed off enough to
do something
about things like trolling... folks like you and Pratt
should keep that
in mind.
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:57:02aPM
to
"Lefty Bigfoot" <
nu...@busyness.info> stated in post
0001HW.C3D8A24C...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 12:34 PM:
...
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out
of the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a
reasoned person to do.
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not.
You saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Fair enough.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand...
It has? What I saw was Muahmann make up a story to try and take
the heat off. If it had gotten out of hand, we'd have heard
about it on CNN. He's just playing the victim card, and it
seems to be working, at least with you.
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has written
about phone calls and the like - but clearly something
that appears to be a
tax record of his has been posted. That is despicable...
Both are acting in completely inappropriate ways.
and has become completely inappropriate. Why would
someone even ask
if he should "stop"... he should not start...
It's public info. It's not like he's been camping out on his
front lawn with a webcam feed, ffs.
Sure: there is a lot of public info on many of us - but
that does not make
it reasonable for people to search for it and post it in a
forum such as
this.
and if he does he should know to stop on his own.
Pratt just keeps asking for more. He's apparently too stupid to
know when to say 'uncle'.
His actions are not right, either.
I have not researched the history but there is no
excuse I can think of for
his actions. None.
Do you actually believe this phone call story? Tell me you're
not that stupid.
I believe not a word of the phone call story... not a
single word. And,
yes, one would have to be pretty stupid to believe it.
Jolly Roger's profile photo
Jolly Roger
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 2:57:30aPM
to
In article <
michelle-64C5F4...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <
mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article
<51c218e6-8f3f-4956...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Dave Fritzinger <dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd
never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
--
Note: Please send all responses to the relevant news
group. If you
must contact me through e-mail, let me know when you send
email to
this address so that your email doesn't get eaten by my
SPAM filter.
JR
Warren Oates's profile photo
Warren Oates
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:00:12aPM
to
In article
<
jollyroger-F0BD6...@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
Jolly Roger <
jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
I'm tending to agree. I mean, who are these people?
--
W. Oates
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:09:32aPM
to
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Lefty Bigfoot" <nu...@busyness.info> stated in post 0001HW.C3D8A24C...@news.verizon.net on 2/13/08 12:34 PM:
...
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of the bounds of >>>> anything that is even moderately acceptable for a reasoned person to do. >>>
He asked him, repeatedly, if he should stop or not. You saw
those posts, I'm sure.
Actually, no - I did not.
Fair enough.
Clearly the whole thing has gotten way out of hand...
It has? What I saw was Muahmann make up a story to try and take
the heat off. If it had gotten out of hand, we'd have heard
about it on CNN. He's just playing the victim card, and it
seems to be working, at least with you.
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what Muahman has written about phone calls and the like - but clearly something that appears to be a tax record of his has been posted. That is despicable...
Learn how the real world works, Snit... tax liens are
*public* info.
Both are acting in completely inappropriate ways.
and has become completely inappropriate. Why would someone even ask
if he should "stop"... he should not start...
It's public info. It's not like he's been camping out on his
front lawn with a webcam feed, ffs.
Sure: there is a lot of public info on many of us - but that does not make
it reasonable for people to search for it and post it in a forum such as this.
and if he does he should know to stop on his own.
Pratt just keeps asking for more. He's apparently too stupid to
know when to say 'uncle'.
His actions are not right, either.
He's not behaved any more poorly than you have on this ng
(with the
exception of calling George Graves a pedophile with not a
shred of
proof... by doing that he definitely entered your league).
I have not researched the history but there is no excuse I can think of for
his actions. None.
Do you actually believe this phone call story? Tell me you're
not that stupid.
I believe not a word of the phone call story... not a single word. And,
yes, one would have to be pretty stupid to believe it.
--
Message has been deleted
George Graves's profile photo
George Graves
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:26:40aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:10:54 -0800, Alan Baker wrote
(in article
<alangbaker-A79E8E.01105413022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]>):
In article <Pq-dnURy_atlLy_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-7E962A.00590613022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <BsSdnXHnHooULS_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> wrote in message
news:alangbaker-4A7C3C.00473513022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net]...
In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think
Alan Baker has had
practice researching the little kiddies he likes to
molest.
People whose lives are so public shouldn't say
things that could get
them sued.
Hire a lawyer and sue away. Two people can do
research you sick perv.
LOL
I'm sure "two people" can. You: no.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker
Alan Baker from
Vancouver,
BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As
according to this
website
people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not
leads to pedophilia.
Alan
Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a
child predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-
security090507.htm
Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the
possessions you've
bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
www.irs.gov
Is that an invitation?
I believe that's a website.
I'll make your crawling clearer (because it's is fun!).
Yes or no, Brian: is your posting of the Internal Revenue Services
website domain name an invitation for me to contact them and let them
know that you now have possessions that they can seize to cover your outstanding taxes as outlined in the federal tax lien reproduced at the address below?
<http://www3.telus.net/bakermedia/Pratt's%20Lien.jpg>
I didn't invite you to call my grandparents at all
hours of the night that
sure didn't stop you.
It can't stop what never happened.
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a
federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on
the deed to her
home?
Do your parents know you harass elderly people at 1am
and threaten to
kill
them on the phone?
Seriously get over your obsession with me. Find a
hobby and quit spending
day and night worrrying, stalking, and threatening my
family.
Keep bothering my family and you'll have another
restraining order
against
you.
I've never bothered anyone, Pratt-fall. Not even you.
I've just found
out a few facts.
But say, "Uncle" and I'll stop posting 'em.
You're not capable of bothering me. However when you
bother my elderly
grandparents and get family involved you are crossing
the line from online
weirdo, to complete psycho that needs help. You even
stated it was fun
earlier finding personal information on people online.
If your life really
that void. Perhaps instead of souring website after
website trying to
verify
if I have this motorcycle or that car, or that house
you should get
involved
in your own life. This sort of behavior has burned you
before and left you
so you are unemployable and must work fixing computers
for a living. You
should have learned your lesson the first time.
I've not involved anyone, Pratt-fall.
But the very fact that you're claiming I have very nicely demonstrates
how bothered you are...
Here's a jerk (Pratt) who libels people on a public forum
and then has the
temerity to say that Alan Baker has "crossed the line"!
Can you say irony? I
knew you could!
Jolly Roger's profile photo
Jolly Roger
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:28:17aPM
to
In article <130220081419328498%
dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca>,
Dave Balderstone <
dave@N_O_T_T_H_I_Sbalderstone.ca> wrote:
In article
<jollyroger-F0BD6...@earthlink.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net>,
Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
In article <michelle-64C5F4...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article
<51c218e6-8f3f-4956...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Dave Fritzinger <dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
And if people would refrain from replying to threads like this one,
people who know how to filter wouldn't see it AT ALL.
Hint, hint.
My only reason for replying is to stop the freaking
replying! Surely
you can see value in that! = )
Message has been deleted
Alan Baker's profile photo
Alan Baker
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:35:45aPM
to
In article <
michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <
mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted. That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if someone broke into confidential records or fabricated it.
And you'll note I only posted after asking twice if it was
alright and
after he started in with his more despicable bullshit...
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:40:29aPM
to
In article <
0001HW.C3D8A2F2...@news.verizon.net>,
Lefty Bigfoot <
nu...@busyness.info> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:15:43 -0600, Michelle Steiner wrote
(in article <michelle-D03D2B...@news.west.cox.net>):
In article <0001HW.C3D89693...@news.verizon.net>,
Lefty Bigfoot <nu...@busyness.info> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
That's one's permanently returning ENOSPACE and has been for years.
;-)
What is ENOSPACE?
It was a joke, a nerdy one, no question. The underlying part
being that Usenet was filled with so many paranoid retards that
any attempts to post to it would return an error. Yes, I know
this doesn't make logical sense, but jokes often don't.
I would have gotten it if it'd been EMOSPACE.
I just browsed there, and found 25 messages (10 of
which were killed by my filters) dating from 7/30/06 to 1/20/08 (not counting the killed messages; all I have is the count of how many were killed, so I don't know when they were dated).
I'm guessing most were crossposted as followups. I didn't even
think it really existed, and I'd be really surprised if people
subscribed to it. ;-)
--
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:59:06aPM
to
"Michelle Steiner" <
mich...@michelle.org> stated in post
michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net on 2/13/08 1:34 PM:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly
something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted. That
is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if someone broke into confidential records or fabricated it.
Using such records to harass someone is, in my view,
inexcusable. Not sure
why this would even be a matter of debate.
--
Nothing in all the world is more dangerous than sincere
ignorance and
conscientious stupidity. -- Martin Luther King, Jr.
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 3:59:51aPM
to
"Alan Baker" <
alang...@telus.net> stated in post alangbaker-AD8FD9.12354513022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
1:35 PM:
In article <michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly
something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted.
That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if
someone broke into
confidential records or fabricated it.
And you'll note I only posted after asking twice if it was alright and
after he started in with his more despicable bullshit...
Do not get me wrong: I do not defend Muahman's actions...
and his claims
against you are also despicable. You both have taken a
Usenet debate way
too far.
Message has been deleted
Mike Rosenberg's profile photo
Mike Rosenberg
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:26:24aPM
to
Jolly Roger <
jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
And then someone like you comes along, removes CSMA, and
suddenly I'm
aware of a thread I'd been blissfully ignorant of until
now! ;-)
--
<
http://designsbymike.net/shop/mac.cgi> Mac and geek T-
shirts & gifts
<
http://designsbymike.net/shop/musings.cgi> Muckraking T-
shirts
<
http://designsbymike.net/shop/prius.cgi> Prius
shirts/bumper stickers
<
http://bogart-tribute.net> Tribute to Humphrey Bogart
Reverand Al's profile photo
Reverand Al
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:44:22aPM
to
"Michelle Steiner" <
mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message news:
michelle-A9125F...@news.west.cox.net...
In article <Gc-dnQsLk7_jWy_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
So why'd the phone calls to my grandparents stop.
I doubt that there ever were any phone calls to your parents; you have repeatedly demonstrated that you are a lying shit.
Yo Fat Cunt. Wanna dance?
Message has been deleted
Reverand Al's profile photo
Reverand Al
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 4:46:50aPM
to
"Michelle Steiner" <
mich...@michelle.org> wrote in message news:
michelle-64C5F4...@news.west.cox.net...
In article
<51c218e6-8f3f-4956...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>,
Dave Fritzinger <dfri...@hotmail.com> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
Let me explain it to you, Cunt. Retards didn't pray to God
to be that way.
Just like you didn't beg God to be the Fat Fucking Whore,
you are. Fucking
Cunt.
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Jolly Roger's profile photo
Jolly Roger
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 6:06:33aPM
to
In article <1ic9bwa.8buo1s1kwg7jhN%mike...
@TOGROUPmacconsult.com>,
mike...@TOGROUPmacconsult.com (Mike Rosenberg) wrote:
Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
And then someone like you comes along, removes CSMA, and suddenly I'm
aware of a thread I'd been blissfully ignorant of until now! ;-)
Touche.
I should just hide killed messages again and be done with
it. Every now
and then I unhide them - I guess out of pure curiosity,
but also because
I worry something legit may be killed by accident (though
that hasn't
happened to date). I'm anal-retentive like that sometimes.
My apologies.
Randy Howard's profile photo
Randy Howard
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 7:31:35aPM
to
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:47:16 -0600, Lewis wrote
(in article <
gkreme-1BF155....@news.giganews.com>):
In article <michelle-D03D2B...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article <0001HW.C3D89693...@news.verizon.net>,
Lefty Bigfoot <nu...@busyness.info> wrote:
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to
comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
Rather, how about alt.conspiracy.paranoid.retards?
That's one's permanently returning ENOSPACE and has
been for years.
;-)
What is ENOSPACE? I just browsed there, and found 25
messages (10 of
which were killed by my filters) dating from 7/30/06 to
1/20/08 (not
counting the killed messages; all I have is the count
of how many were
killed, so I don't know when they were dated).
zomg, the group exists?
When Usenet was more active, it was extremely popular for
people to
newgrp in the alt hierarchy just to annoy people. In many
cases, the
names of people would appear (unflatteringly) in the group
names.
--
Randy Howard (2reply remove FOOBAR)
"The power of accurate observation is called cynicism by
those
who have not got it." - George Bernard Shaw
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:06:04aPM
to
Hey, here's an idea. Get this crap back to comp.sys.mac.advocacy,
where it belongs (?).
--
Dave Fritzinger
Honolulu, HI
When did that happen? (follow-up set)
Andy
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:10:56aPM
to
Randy Howard wrote:
Habitually, intentionally, knowingly lying in every single post to this newsgroup for the last year or more is probably on the list, but I
don't want to put words in Alan's mouth.
MuahMan's been fishing here a long time, and now he's got
something too
big that's threatening to capsize his boat, but he won't
let go.
Follow-up set,
Andy
John's profile photo
John
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:12:52aPM
to
Alan Baker wrote:
In article <michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net>,
Michelle Steiner <mich...@michelle.org> wrote:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly
something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted.
That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if
someone broke into
confidential records or fabricated it.
And you'll note I only posted after asking twice if it was alright and
after he started in with his more despicable bullshit...
Get on some medication.
John's profile photo
John
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:13:29aPM
to
Snit wrote:
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> stated in post michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net on 2/13/08 1:34 PM:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly
something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted.
That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if
someone broke into
confidential records or fabricated it.
Using such records to harass someone is, in my view, inexcusable. Not sure why this would even be a matter of debate.
Alan has now joined the ranks of Elizabot and Steve.
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:23:27aPM
to
sorry, I hadn't noticed the crosspost, and replied a
couple of times.
But since then I'll trim the headers. MuahMan is one of
the trolls that
luckily stays in CSMA.
Andy
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:26:01aPM
to
Jolly Roger wrote:
Hint, hint.
My only reason for replying is to stop the freaking replying! Surely
you can see value in that! = )
And it worked a bit, at least that was what made me notice
the headers.
Who was it that included CSMS?
Andy
nospamatall's profile photo
nospamatall
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:32:11aPM
to
Mike Rosenberg wrote:
Jolly Roger <jolly...@pobox.com> wrote:
If you guys would use filters to filter out CSMA, you'd
never see this
crap to begin with. Hint, hint.
And then someone like you comes along, removes CSMA, and suddenly I'm
aware of a thread I'd been blissfully ignorant of until now! ;-)
Well, it should make you happy to know the good work we
are doing over
in CSMA. You should go over and feed the trolls yourself
sometimes, only
takes a minute and you get to spread some happiness!
Andy
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:48:10aPM
to
In article <
1YednXmuvL0kCC7a...@netlojix.com>,
John <
nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
Yup... challenging trolls on their BS and showing them
that their antics
are not done anonymously.
John's profile photo
John
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 8:54:34aPM
to
Steve Carroll wrote:
In article <1YednXmuvL0kCC7a...@netlojix.com>,
John <nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
Snit wrote:
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> stated in
post
michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net on 2/13/08 1:34
PM:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what
Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly
something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted.
That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if
someone broke into
confidential records or fabricated it.
Using such records to harass someone is, in my view,
inexcusable. Not sure
why this would even be a matter of debate.
Alan has now joined the ranks of Elizabot and Steve.
Yup... challenging trolls on their BS and showing them that their antics
are not done anonymously.
WRONG!! Acting stupid while off prescribed medication!!
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 9:02:13aPM
to
In article <
Fs6dne_Htp7GAi7a...@netlojix.com>,
John <
nos...@nospam.com> wrote:
Given the situation, Alan acted in a manner that made
complete sense to
me. That loons like you, Snit and zara are on the opposite
side of this
fence is to be expected.
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:04:03aPM
to
"John" <
nos...@nospam.com> stated in post
1YednXmuvL0kCC7a...@netlojix.com on 2/13/08 6:13 PM:
Well he is playing the same game but is not in their
league... he has not,
as far as I know, done what the two of them did. To be as
bad as they are
he would need to
* Disclose that he followed the research of them long
enough to
find when close family members died and make that public
knowledge... and then associate that with the concept
of necrophilia.
* Post information about family members *including* errors
that
were found only in the *print* edition of the person's
local
paper
* Post information about when and where someone works and
threaten
to contact people there and repeat their online lies to
the
person's employer.
* Follow someone around for many posts demanding they say
how
the concept of "incest" makes them feel.
* Do continued research and find out when someone is
expecting
a child and then whine about how the person did not
discuss
family planning options with him.
* Repeatedly lie about how someone has called you and
emailed
you, your family, and your neighbors.
* Publicly accuse someone of rape - including claiming to
be
the victim of being raped by that person.
* Insist that you "rejected" someone's sexual or romantic
advances.
* Threaten to call the police and make false accusations.
And on and on. No, Alan is not nearly as despicable as
those you mention...
but his actions still are despicable.
--
I am one of only .3% of people who have avoided becoming a
statistic.
John's profile photo
John
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:31:53aPM
to
"Snit" <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote in message news:C3D90BC3.A83E6%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com...
Those people are even sicker fucks then I originally
thought.
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 13, 2008, 11:58:02aPM
to
"John" <
nos...@nospam.com> stated in post
coCdnX--ZdneWS7a...@netlojix.com on 2/13/08 9:31 PM:
After I posted that list I realized I left a lot out,
including:
* He would have to state he knows where someone lives and
say
he has people watching ... and give the names of home
owners in the area
* Research when someone's anniversary is and demand they
tell you how they spent it
* Find family photos and insist that a man without a shirt
holding his daughter is somehow a sign of incest.
And on and on and on. It is 100% predictable that Carroll
will deny these
things - so I keep a list of quotes with full references
and links to posts
in the Google archive that prove all of those things -
available on request
if anyone, for reasons I cannot imagine, actually wanted
to see it. :)
--
Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.
--Aldous Huxley
Message has been deleted
Wally's profile photo
Wally
unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 4:02:52aAM
to
On 14/2/08 3:38 AM, in article C3D88725.A8199%CS...
@gallopinginsanity.com,
"Snit" <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post
alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08 11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that that
the kids have got on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is creepy.
So you prefer your way Snit ... To Make claims about
people *without* any
research or foundation at all to back them up?
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a reasoned person to do.
Don't believe everything you're told Snit!
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted
Snit's profile photo
Snit
unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 8:49:11aAM
to
"Wally" <
Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post C3DA32C9.17DC4%
Wa...@wally.world.net on 2/14/08 2:02 AM:
On 14/2/08 3:38 AM, in article C3D88725.A8199%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post
alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@
[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08
11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are
creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive
research - and open
lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that
that the kids have got on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is
creepy.
So you prefer your way Snit ... To Make claims about people *without* any research or foundation at all to back them up?
I prefer a lack of personal attacks, Wally.
Posting your findings in a public forum is well out of
the bounds of
anything that is even moderately acceptable for a
reasoned person to do.
Don't believe everything you're told Snit!
--
What do you call people who are afraid of Santa Claus?
Claustrophobic.
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 9:49:00aAM
to
In article <C3D994E7.A84DB%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Wally" <Wa...@wally.world.net> stated in post C3DA32C9.17DC4%Wa...@wally.world.net on 2/14/08 2:02 AM:
On 14/2/08 3:38 AM, in article C3D88725.A8199%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com, "Snit" <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"Alan Baker" <alang...@telus.net> stated in post
alangbaker-D4F717.10272313022008@[74.223.185.199.nw.nuvox.net] on 2/13/08 >> 11:27 AM:
Frankly, Alan, your research and your questions are creepy... and
completely
inappropriate. Similar to the whacko and obsessive research - and open >>>>> lying - that was done against me a while back.
Alan Baker is a known wacko from way back.
LOL
Where being a "known wacko" means recognizing that that the kids have got >>> on
the parents computers again...
Doing the type of "research" you have on someone is creepy.
So you prefer your way Snit ... To Make claims about people *without* any research or foundation at all to back them up?
I prefer a lack of personal attacks, Wally.
As too many of us have proven with Google's help... you
seem fine with
personal attacks when you're not the one on the receiving
end, Mr.
Hypocrite.
Steve Carroll's profile photo
Steve Carroll
unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 10:00:50aAM
to
In article <C3D90BC3.A83E6%
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <
CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
"John" <nos...@nospam.com> stated in post
1YednXmuvL0kCC7a...@netlojix.com on 2/13/08 6:13 PM:
Snit wrote:
"Michelle Steiner" <mich...@michelle.org> stated in post
michelle-D9F8A0...@news.west.cox.net on 2/13/08 1:34 PM:
In article <C3D8999E.A81F2%CS...@gallopinginsanity.com>,
Snit <CS...@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
Do not get me wrong: I do not believe a word of what Muahman has
written about phone calls and the like - but clearly something that
appears to be a tax record of his has been posted. That is
despicable...
Why? It is there for anyone to find. It's not as if someone broke into >>> confidential records or fabricated it.
Using such records to harass someone is, in my view, inexcusable. Not sure >> why this would even be a matter of debate.
Alan has now joined the ranks of Elizabot and Steve.
Well he is playing the same game but is not in their league... he has not,
as far as I know, done what the two of them did.
What "the two of them did"? Hmmm... let's take a look at
what you
*allege* (undoubtedly, with no proof) the "two" of us
did...
To be as bad as they are he would need to
* Disclose that he followed the research of them long enough to
find when close family members died and make that public
knowledge... and then associate that with the concept
of necrophilia.
You're lying... I never did this. But I have to ask... why
is it that I
see no proof of what you are claiming on my behalf, only a
completely
unsupported assertion by you?
* Post information about family members *including* errors that
were found only in the *print* edition of the person's local
paper
You're lying here... I never once looked at your local
paper. Again, I
see no proof by you of what you are claiming for me.
* Post information about when and where someone works and threaten
to contact people there and repeat their online lies to the
person's employer.
You're lying... I never did this. You forget that I'm the
guy who didn't
believe your 'I'm a teacher' story... or that you even had
a real job
*anywhere*. And once again... I see no proof by you of
what you are
claiming on my behalf, just an unsupported assertion, care
to explain?
Or do you prefer people believe about you what you are
making obvious
here?
* Follow someone around for many posts demanding they say how
the concept of "incest" makes them feel.
You're lying... I never did this, either... and it's the
same story
here... I see no proof at all for your unsupported
allegation. In any
event, it was weird watching you talk about incest for
hundreds and
hundreds of posts... with the most bizarre where you were
talking about
left vs. right political views with Jason McNorton and he
said he does
not "believe in anything goes"... where you wrote to
McNorton with the
following brand of 'logic':
"While I find it ... um... distasteful... for couples who
can enter into
a relationship as potential equals, I do not see any
*logical* reason
to disallow incest. I suppose the concentration of
potentially harmful
genes could be used, but I would want to see the argument
for this".
McNorton:
"It's often good to see just how sick the left is".
Your reply:
"I am waiting to see your logical reasons.
Or are you basing your views off of your emotions? I find
that both
the left wing and the right wing folks focus on arguments
based on
emotions and not on reasoning... which is one reason I do
not identify
well with either".
--
<chq396$
n...@odak26.prod.google.com>
According to you, the "potentially harmful genes" argument
is not yet a
form of 'logic', thus, you obviously believe that incest
should be
allowed until it can be proven to *your* satisfaction that
the argument
is logical. I believe you have a daughter and a son...I
guess I'm old
fashioned in my thinking to someone as 'advanced' as
you... but I find
it incomprehensible that a parent could hold such a view
in light of the
contrary medical evidence that has been presented and
accepted by the
medical community at large.
By the way, note what real evidence of a claim looks
like... it has a
quote containing the person's wording and a link so that
people can
easily verify if the truth is being told (something you
apparently have
no interest in). Contrast this with your unsupported
allegations that
contain no quotes and no links.
* Do continued research and find out when someone is expecting
a child and then whine about how the person did not discuss
family planning options with him.
No proof by you... just another assertion, why is that?
You're lying...
again... I never did this.
* Repeatedly lie about how someone has called you and emailed
you, your family, and your neighbors.
Another lie by you... I never said you emailed me or my
neighbors. I
said that my wife once received an email from a person I
believed was
you... I also stated that I couldn't prove it was you.
* Publicly accuse someone of rape - including claiming to be
the victim of being raped by that person.
I said you were a newsgroup rapist ... of course, that
doesn't stop you
from trying to turn it into something other than what I
actually said.
* Insist that you "rejected" someone's sexual or romantic
advances.
You're lying... I never insisted any such thing... just
another
unsupported allegation... a pattern with you.
* Threaten to call the police and make false accusations.
You're lying... I never did this (though, you did) and I
*still* see no
proof by you of what you are claiming on my behalf.
And on and on. No, Alan is not nearly as despicable as those you mention... but his actions still are despicable.
You're nothing but a delusional liar who is fooling only
John (and
apparently Andy, at least, for the time being... but I
suspect that'll
change) and this post proves it... again. Anyone who had
previously
thought you weren't full of shit has since changed their
mind due to
their realization that they were duped by you. I keep
telling you...
people just aren't as stupid as you need them to be. You
can fool some
of the people some of the time... but if you make fools of
them long
enough they'll figure you out.
PeterBP's profile photo
PeterBP
unread,
Feb 14, 2008, 10:33:32aAM
to
Alan Baker <
alang...@telus.net> wrote:
In article <AZ-dnccH3pK9ES_a...@comcast.com>,
"MuahMan" <mua...@cumcast.net> wrote:
Yikes. He's spent the last 48 hours researching me.
Nope. I took about 45 minutes.
They should make internet stalking illegal, I think Alan Baker has had practice researching the little kiddies he likes to molest.
People whose lives are so public shouldn't say things that could get
them sued.
Also noteworthy that the maggot has to hie behind an anon
alias to have
the guts to say such.
Anyone thinking of hiring this internet stalker Alan Baker from Vancouver, BC should certainly give him a psych eval. As according to this website people that
stalk others on the internet more times than not leads to pedophilia. Alan Baker is obviously bordering on or has become a child predator.
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2007/internet-security090507.htm
Or perhaps I should just inform the IRS about the possessions you've
bragged about to clear up that tax lien...
Did your mother, Patricia, even know that you had a federal tax lien
hanging over your head when she agreed to put you on the deed to her
home?
Yikes. If something happens to me please make sure the local, and Canadian police no that I was being stalked online by Alan Baker, A Macintosh bench tech from Vancouver, BC.
Please post this every newsgroup so your children know to avoid him and thus
remove themselves from danger.
WinDroids start out dumb, then upgrade to obnoxious and
graduate as
bloody annoying fucktards.
This guy is in the criminal category. Book 'im, Danno.
--
regards , Peter B. P.
http://macplanet.dk
Washington D.C.: District of Criminals
"I dont drink anymore... of course, i don't drink any
less, either!
Message has been deleted
zara's profile photo
zara
unread,
Feb 15, 2008, 8:54:19aAM
to
"Gavrilo Prinzip" <
g...@not.on.your.life> wrote in message news:
gav-6D1640.0...@news.mixmin.net...
In article <8zJsj.32157$1f.1...@bignews9.bellsouth.net>,
"Reverand Al" <sh...@harlemparasites.org> wrote:
Let me explain it to you, Cunt. Retards didn't pray to
God to be that
way.
Just like you didn't beg God to be the Fat Fucking
Whore, you are.
Fucking
Cunt.
God prays to the retards like you and your sister, I heard, to save
hisself from finding blood in his stool like your mother did after she
sucked you off this morning.
How did that stool taste
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2
