From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:695ab6c5$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 9:16:03rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote <XnsB3CA729E9E880ao1092mm@62.164.182.22>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a8e2e$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 8:29:10rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<XnsB3CA6AAB6FBC7ao1092mm@62.164.182.26>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a84b8$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:33:35rC>AM MST, ""J. P. Gilliver"" wrote
<10jd8kv$1a0cd$2@dont-email.me>:

On 2026/1/4 3:24:17, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Jan 3, 2026 at 5:49:01rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3C9C996DCBE3HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6959dd36-2e44-800c-a06e-46bb669f4a75
-----
Gremlin responds to a killfile discussion by asserting,

[8 more lines snipped]

-----

I'm not interested in your opinion of other posters, if negative.

I was about to give a simple "these posts are not written for you"
reply which would be accurate -- but here is more context.

* In part I do reply out of exhaustion of the lies told about my
online life, my business life, my legal history, and my personal
life. They are pretty much non-stop.

I think that is fair.

Narcissist much?

No thank you. I have no interest in that. A shame, though, that you
did not understand my comments. Care to read them again and try --
even if you offer no response?

You ignored the content to post a false insinuation. Seriously, given
your clear interest why not try to understand what you are responding
to? Do you want some help?

Projection again snit?
Hint: I'm not the person who has well known reading comprehension and projection issues. That would be you.
I also do not support and defend incest like you do.
You should be locked away in a psych ward so you can be treated, snit.


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:13:08rC>PM MST, "Nobody" wrote <XnsB3CA9AD0A25ECao1092mm@62.164.182.21>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:695ab6c5$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 9:16:03rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<XnsB3CA729E9E880ao1092mm@62.164.182.22>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a8e2e$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 8:29:10rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<XnsB3CA6AAB6FBC7ao1092mm@62.164.182.26>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a84b8$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:33:35rC>AM MST, ""J. P. Gilliver"" wrote
<10jd8kv$1a0cd$2@dont-email.me>:

On 2026/1/4 3:24:17, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Jan 3, 2026 at 5:49:01rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3C9C996DCBE3HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6959dd36-2e44-800c-a06e-46bb669f4a75 >>>>>>>> -----
Gremlin responds to a killfile discussion by asserting,

[8 more lines snipped]

-----

I'm not interested in your opinion of other posters, if negative. >>>>>>

I was about to give a simple "these posts are not written for you" >>>>>> reply which would be accurate -- but here is more context.

* In part I do reply out of exhaustion of the lies told about my
online life, my business life, my legal history, and my personal
life. They are pretty much non-stop.

I think that is fair.

Narcissist much?

No thank you. I have no interest in that. A shame, though, that you
did not understand my comments. Care to read them again and try --
even if you offer no response?

You ignored the content to post a false insinuation. Seriously, given
your clear interest why not try to understand what you are responding
to? Do you want some help?

You did not answer the question.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:695ace89$1$18 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:13:08rC>PM MST, "Nobody" wrote <XnsB3CA9AD0A25ECao1092mm@62.164.182.21>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695ab6c5$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 9:16:03rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<XnsB3CA729E9E880ao1092mm@62.164.182.22>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a8e2e$4$21$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 8:29:10rC>AM MST, "Nobody" wrote
<XnsB3CA6AAB6FBC7ao1092mm@62.164.182.26>:

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in
news:695a84b8$0$22$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:33:35rC>AM MST, ""J. P. Gilliver"" wrote
<10jd8kv$1a0cd$2@dont-email.me>:

On 2026/1/4 3:24:17, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Jan 3, 2026 at 5:49:01rC>PM MST, "Gremlin" wrote
<XnsB3C9C996DCBE3HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5>:

https://chatgpt.com/share/6959dd36-2e44-800c-a06e-46bb669f4a75 >>>>>>>>> -----
Gremlin responds to a killfile discussion by asserting,

[8 more lines snipped]

-----

I'm not interested in your opinion of other posters, if

negative.

I was about to give a simple "these posts are not written for

you"

reply which would be accurate -- but here is more context.

* In part I do reply out of exhaustion of the lies told about my >>>>>>> online life, my business life, my legal history, and my personal >>>>>>> life. They are pretty much non-stop.

I think that is fair.

Narcissist much?

No thank you. I have no interest in that. A shame, though, that you
did not understand my comments. Care to read them again and try --
even if you offer no response?

You ignored the content to post a false insinuation. Seriously, given
your clear interest why not try to understand what you are responding
to? Do you want some help?

You did not answer the question.

Actually I did answer the question however your deceptive snipping
removed my reply.
Here it is again snit.
"

"Projection again snit?
Hint: I'm not the person who has well known reading comprehension and projection issues. That would be you.
I also do not support and defend incest like you do.
You should be locked away in a psych ward so you can be treated, snit.
"

Get help Michael.
Quickly.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.sys.mac.advocacy

On Jan 4, 2026 at 1:49:09rC>PM MST, "Nobody" wrote <XnsB3CAA0EBB1368ao1092mm@62.164.182.26>:

Actually I did answer the question

Nope. Nor do you have any interest in doing so.
--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace with you.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2