On 2025-12-28 3:30 p.m., pothead wrote:
On 2025-12-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-12-28 1:36 p.m., Squid wrote:Well since snit is a card carrying member of LBGTQ+ for Palestine, that's
On 12/28/2025 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 27, 2025 at 6:12:29aPM MST, "RonB" wrote
<slrn10l10vr.kesi.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>:
On 2025-12-28, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:...
Yes.
I was the same. In fact that is how I first encountered the snit troll.
I was considering a Mac and was asking questions in various fora and he
answered.
I reached the same conclusion as you, overpriced, for me, but if >>>>>> people buy
them
and like them, great!
Can't argue with any of this. Choice is good.
It is what I have been advocating for over the years. Windows, Linux, >>>> macOS,
ChromeOS, whatever. Use what you like.
Please put a lid on it snit because you've lost all credibility due to >>> your many years of trolling and dishonesty.
Here is a small, albeit incomplete sample of your years of trolling.
<http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
"Psychopath Snit Michael Glasser's Techniques For Lying
1. Lies by simply making things up.
2. Lies by omission.
3. Lies by intentionally misunderstanding or misinterpreting.
4. Lies by exaggeration.
5. Lies by quoting out of context.
6. Lies by misquoting.
7. Lies by ignoring refutations of his lies and other bad
behavior. This enables him to always claim that he "won"
the debate. It is the height of dishonesty.
8. Lies by introducing nonsense, e.g., "Marshmallow Men".
9. Lies by invalid generalization.
10. Lies by reversing implication, e.g., "Firetrucks are red,
this apple is red, therefore this apple is a firetruck."
11. Lies by "straw man" -- falsely attributing a bogus (often
exaggerated) claim to the person he's attacking, then refuting it.
12. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "changed his story"
or "moved the goalposts" whenever the person clarified what he
said in order to refute Snit's previous lie about it.
13. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "whines" or "babbles".
He never says that about his anti-Linux propaganda partners.
14. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "ran away" if they
don't obey his commands and meet his demands exactly.
15. Lies by claiming that the person he's attacking is a member of
"the herd" and therefore is not capable of independent thought
and should not be listened to. Snit uses this attack only
against Linux users.
16. Lies by refusing to make common-sense connections among facts
that he's given. In that way he stalls or kills the discussion.
He ignores facts without explicitly refuting them, which allows
him to kill the discussion without looking bad.
17. Lies by introducing personal attacks and nonsense arguments
and claims into the discussion, in order to motivate the person
he's attacking to withdraw from the discussion. Glasser then
claims victory.
18. Lies by refusing to believe anything remembered by the person he's >>> attacking, and saying that it's irrelevant, when it isn't. Example:
"some recollection of what you think you remember from 10 years ago
is not on topic or of interest".
19. Lies by claiming that the person he's attacking is mentally ill.
He repeatedly offers to find the person help in overcoming his
alleged "illness". Snit Michael Glasser is a psychopath who
pretends to be a psychologist.
20. Lies by falsely attributing negative emotions to the person
he's attacking, when they haven't displayed any at all.
He sounds like a muhammedan.
a possibility.
I've offered to pay his airfare to go fight along side Hamas with the condition
that he have the video of him being tossed off a tall building forwarded to me.
To date, he has refused.
Yes. He is *THAT* dumb.
Oh, I'm quite acquainted with Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite and Computer Guy. He's the first thing I filter whenever I recreate a Usenet account.
In article <6951c8e8$0$21961$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>,
crude@sausa.ge says...
On 2025-12-28 3:30 p.m., pothead wrote:
On 2025-12-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-12-28 1:36 p.m., Squid wrote:Well since snit is a card carrying member of LBGTQ+ for Palestine, that's >>> a possibility.
On 12/28/2025 11:49 AM, Brock McNuggets wrote:
On Dec 27, 2025 at 6:12:29-aPM MST, "RonB" wrote
<slrn10l10vr.kesi.ronb02NOSPAM@3020m.home>:
On 2025-12-28, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:...
Yes.
I was the same. In fact that is how I first encountered the snit troll.
I was considering a Mac and was asking questions in various fora and he
answered.
I reached the same conclusion as you, overpriced, for me, but if >>>>>>>> people buy
them
and like them, great!
Can't argue with any of this. Choice is good.
It is what I have been advocating for over the years. Windows, Linux, >>>>>> macOS,
ChromeOS, whatever. Use what you like.
Please put a lid on it snit because you've lost all credibility due to >>>>> your many years of trolling and dishonesty.
Here is a small, albeit incomplete sample of your years of trolling. >>>>>
<http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html>
"Psychopath Snit Michael Glasser's Techniques For Lying
1. Lies by simply making things up.
2. Lies by omission.
3. Lies by intentionally misunderstanding or misinterpreting.
4. Lies by exaggeration.
5. Lies by quoting out of context.
6. Lies by misquoting.
7. Lies by ignoring refutations of his lies and other bad
behavior. This enables him to always claim that he "won"
the debate. It is the height of dishonesty.
8. Lies by introducing nonsense, e.g., "Marshmallow Men".
9. Lies by invalid generalization.
10. Lies by reversing implication, e.g., "Firetrucks are red,
this apple is red, therefore this apple is a firetruck."
11. Lies by "straw man" -- falsely attributing a bogus (often
exaggerated) claim to the person he's attacking, then refuting it.
12. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "changed his story"
or "moved the goalposts" whenever the person clarified what he
said in order to refute Snit's previous lie about it.
13. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "whines" or "babbles". >>>>> He never says that about his anti-Linux propaganda partners.
14. Lies by claiming the person he's attacking "ran away" if they
don't obey his commands and meet his demands exactly.
15. Lies by claiming that the person he's attacking is a member of
"the herd" and therefore is not capable of independent thought
and should not be listened to. Snit uses this attack only
against Linux users.
16. Lies by refusing to make common-sense connections among facts
that he's given. In that way he stalls or kills the discussion.
He ignores facts without explicitly refuting them, which allows
him to kill the discussion without looking bad.
17. Lies by introducing personal attacks and nonsense arguments
and claims into the discussion, in order to motivate the person
he's attacking to withdraw from the discussion. Glasser then
claims victory.
18. Lies by refusing to believe anything remembered by the person he's >>>>> attacking, and saying that it's irrelevant, when it isn't. Example:
"some recollection of what you think you remember from 10 years ago
is not on topic or of interest".
19. Lies by claiming that the person he's attacking is mentally ill. >>>>> He repeatedly offers to find the person help in overcoming his
alleged "illness". Snit Michael Glasser is a psychopath who
pretends to be a psychologist.
20. Lies by falsely attributing negative emotions to the person
he's attacking, when they haven't displayed any at all.
He sounds like a muhammedan.
I've offered to pay his airfare to go fight along side Hamas with the condition
that he have the video of him being tossed off a tall building forwarded to me.
To date, he has refused.
Yes. He is *THAT* dumb.
Oh, I'm quite acquainted with Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite and
Computer Guy. He's the first thing I filter whenever I recreate a Usenet
account.
Computer guy?
How so?
He doesn't seem to know much about computers.
Maybe he's
in retail? Like a Best Buy sales monkey?
I stumbled upon this Brock McNuggets fool over in
alt.fan.rush-limbaugh. He seemed to be a moderate liberal
as I am but something didn't add up with this guy.
The dots just did not connect.
I subsequently discovered that he is a professional troll
who is a major disrupter of newsgroups. At least he is
easily filtered when I grow tired of poking at him. Does
he have any aliases that he uses?
myriad of psychological issues he claims he is afflicted with."Myriad" does not take "of":
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 17:44:20 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (8,203K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,414 |
| Posted today: | 1 |