On 2025-12-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-12-25 10:14 p.m., Ignatz Mouse wrote:
In article <B%j3R.15314$5fN9.1448@fx05.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
On 12/25/25 3:31 PM, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-12-25 2:19 a.m., rbowman wrote:
On Wed, 24 Dec 2025 22:23:34 -0500, Joel W. Crump wrote:
No, it's you, because you're a phobe and a racist, you are OK with >>>>>>> computers as is required in COLA and CSMA, but you still manage to fail >>>>>>> to live up to a standard that you *claim* to uphold, namely
Christianity, it's the left-wing churches who have it right, but you're >>>>>>> clinging to homophobia and whatnot, it's Satanic, it's Nazi or white >>>>>>> nationalist, it's people like me who are the future.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLunlQy7nLI
I can't bear to witness.
I would respond to the flaming homosexual, but he resides quite
comfortably in my filter. Unfortunately, Christians have misinterpreted >>>>> Scripture for so long that we tolerate the existence of demons like
himself in our society. He should be exorcised, and gain another
opportunity at sparing himself an eternity in Hell.
I'm Jesus, dumbfuck.
That sounds exactly like something Jesus would say. I'm convinced.
ROTFLMAO!
Growing up in NYC the Jehovah's Witnesses were constantly going door to door. They were harmless but persistent.
Whenever they asked me if I know Jesus I would answer something like "yea, he lives across the street in that blue house" and point to it.
After a couple of times of this routine they would bypass my house.
It didn't go over well with my mom though. She was one of those kind soul types who would let them preach.
Either way, no harm done.
The Mac interface is under-developed.
In what specific ways?
It simply copies other OSes, being late to the game, never being
up to date.
Name such a copy.
Just the fact that they glued their proprietary system onto Unix
tells the story.
Not of supposed "copying" it doesn't.
It's not original work.
Which things aren't original and from what were they copied.
List at least one specific thing.
Even being a Unix flavor, it fails to act as one out of the box >>>>>>>> compared to a Linux distro,
In what way?
Is that not obvious to you?-a Darwin has a great potential, but
it's not a complete subsystem.-a At the end of the day, Microsoft's >>>>>> WSL 2 is better, because it implements GUI apps in a seamless-
enough way.
In what way is Darwin incomplete?
Can I use macOS as a Unix flavor out of the box?
Yup.
Who is supporting that?-a Certainly not Apple.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
This is why, objectively, I am right,
Given that you never offer anything but your personal opinions, >>>>>>> the word "objectively"...
...is objectively being used incorrectly.
If I like something, it must be really good, because I have
objective tastes and judgments on things.
You're a loony.
And yet I have quite a following.
In your head.
It's very real and I work hard at deserving it.
LOL!
ROTFLMAO!
Growing up in NYC the Jehovah's Witnesses were constantly going door to
door.
They were harmless but persistent.
Whenever they asked me if I know Jesus I would answer something like
"yea, he lives across the street in that blue house" and point to it.
After a couple of times of this routine they would bypass my house.
It didn't go over well with my mom though. She was one of those kind
soul types who would let them preach.
Either way, no harm done.
On 12/28/25 6:38 PM, Alan wrote:
The Mac interface is under-developed.
In what specific ways?
It simply copies other OSes, being late to the game, never being >>>>>>> up to date.
Name such a copy.
Just the fact that they glued their proprietary system onto Unix
tells the story.
Not of supposed "copying" it doesn't.
It's not original work.
Which things aren't original and from what were they copied.
List at least one specific thing.
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying the iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of smartphone. Greed Inc.
Even being a Unix flavor, it fails to act as one out of the box >>>>>>>>> compared to a Linux distro,
In what way?
Is that not obvious to you?-a Darwin has a great potential, but >>>>>>> it's not a complete subsystem.-a At the end of the day,
Microsoft's WSL 2 is better, because it implements GUI apps in a >>>>>>> seamless- enough way.
In what way is Darwin incomplete?
Can I use macOS as a Unix flavor out of the box?
Yup.
Who is supporting that?-a Certainly not Apple.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
This is why, objectively, I am right,
Given that you never offer anything but your personal opinions, >>>>>>>> the word "objectively"...
...is objectively being used incorrectly.
If I like something, it must be really good, because I have
objective tastes and judgments on things.
You're a loony.
And yet I have quite a following.
In your head.
It's very real and I work hard at deserving it.
LOL!
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that, Alan.
-aYou see me as a competitor, because of our views on computers, the
people reading in the shadows are simply judging the merits, I am very confident they find me highly compelling.
On 2025-12-28 17:44, Joel W. Crump wrote:
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying the
iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of
smartphone. Greed Inc.
Noting that you cannot produce a single instance of any of your supposed "countless things".
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
Again. What "support" do you feel is lacking?
Name something provide by other Unix OS producers that Apple doesn't provide.
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that,
Alan. -a-aYou see me as a competitor, because of our views on computers,
the people reading in the shadows are simply judging the merits, I am
very confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
On 2025-12-28 17:44, Joel W. Crump wrote:[...]
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that, Alan.
You see me as a competitor, because of our views on computers, the
people reading in the shadows are simply judging the merits, I am very confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
On 2025-12-28 5:01 p.m., pothead wrote:
On 2025-12-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-12-25 10:14 p.m., Ignatz Mouse wrote:
In article <B%j3R.15314$5fN9.1448@fx05.iad>,
joelcrump@gmail.com says...
I'm Jesus, dumbfuck.
That sounds exactly like something Jesus would say. I'm convinced.
ROTFLMAO!
Growing up in NYC the Jehovah's Witnesses were constantly going door
to door.
They were harmless but persistent.
Whenever they asked me if I know Jesus I would answer something like
"yea, he
lives across the street in that blue house" and point to it.
After a couple of times of this routine they would bypass my house.
It didn't go over well with my mom though. She was one of those kind soul
types who would let them preach.
Either way, no harm done.
I never bothered with the Jehovah's Witnesses, but I've since learned
that they doubt the divinity of Jesus Christ. As a result, I am
convinced that the members of that false religion, as well as those of Mormonism and muhammedism, are going straight to Hell.
The Mac interface is under-developed.
In what specific ways?
It simply copies other OSes, being late to the game, never being >>>>>>>> up to date.
Name such a copy.
Just the fact that they glued their proprietary system onto Unix
tells the story.
Not of supposed "copying" it doesn't.
It's not original work.
Which things aren't original and from what were they copied.
List at least one specific thing.
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying the
iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of
smartphone. Greed Inc.
Noting that you cannot produce a single instance of any of your supposed "countless things".
Even being a Unix flavor, it fails to act as one out of the >>>>>>>>>> box compared to a Linux distro,
In what way?
Is that not obvious to you?-a Darwin has a great potential, but >>>>>>>> it's not a complete subsystem.-a At the end of the day,
Microsoft's WSL 2 is better, because it implements GUI apps in a >>>>>>>> seamless- enough way.
In what way is Darwin incomplete?
Can I use macOS as a Unix flavor out of the box?
Yup.
Who is supporting that?-a Certainly not Apple.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
Again. What "support" do you feel is lacking?
Name something provide by other Unix OS producers that Apple doesn't provide.
This is why, objectively, I am right,
Given that you never offer anything but your personal opinions, >>>>>>>>> the word "objectively"...
...is objectively being used incorrectly.
If I like something, it must be really good, because I have
objective tastes and judgments on things.
You're a loony.
And yet I have quite a following.
In your head.
It's very real and I work hard at deserving it.
LOL!
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that,
Alan. -a-aYou see me as a competitor, because of our views on computers,
the people reading in the shadows are simply judging the merits, I am
very confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
On 2025-12-28 11:51 p.m., Alan wrote:
On 2025-12-28 17:44, Joel W. Crump wrote:
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying
the iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of
smartphone. Greed Inc.
Noting that you cannot produce a single instance of any of your
supposed "countless things".
Maybe Joel should ask his friend Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite
and Computer Guy how to create exhaustive lists the next time they have
sex.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
Again. What "support" do you feel is lacking?
Name something provide by other Unix OS producers that Apple doesn't
provide.
I'm actually curious about this one. As far as I know, the Apple implementation of UNIX is a pretty good one.
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that,
Alan. -a-aYou see me as a competitor, because of our views on
computers, the people reading in the shadows are simply judging the
merits, I am very confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
We all do.
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-12-28 17:44, Joel W. Crump wrote:
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that, Alan. >>> You see me as a competitor, because of our views on computers, the
people reading in the shadows are simply judging the merits, I am very
confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
I don't see him at all unless he's quoted. [fu2: bit-bucket]
On 12/28/25 11:51 PM, Alan wrote:
The Mac interface is under-developed.
In what specific ways?
It simply copies other OSes, being late to the game, never
being up to date.
Name such a copy.
Just the fact that they glued their proprietary system onto Unix >>>>>>> tells the story.
Not of supposed "copying" it doesn't.
It's not original work.
Which things aren't original and from what were they copied.
List at least one specific thing.
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying
the iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of
smartphone. Greed Inc.
Noting that you cannot produce a single instance of any of your
supposed "countless things".
Even being a Unix flavor, it fails to act as one out of the >>>>>>>>>>> box compared to a Linux distro,
In what way?
Is that not obvious to you?-a Darwin has a great potential, but >>>>>>>>> it's not a complete subsystem.-a At the end of the day,
Microsoft's WSL 2 is better, because it implements GUI apps in >>>>>>>>> a seamless- enough way.
In what way is Darwin incomplete?
Can I use macOS as a Unix flavor out of the box?
Yup.
Who is supporting that?-a Certainly not Apple.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
Again. What "support" do you feel is lacking?
Name something provide by other Unix OS producers that Apple doesn't
provide.
This is why, objectively, I am right,
Given that you never offer anything but your personal
opinions, the word "objectively"...
...is objectively being used incorrectly.
If I like something, it must be really good, because I have >>>>>>>>> objective tastes and judgments on things.
You're a loony.
And yet I have quite a following.
In your head.
It's very real and I work hard at deserving it.
LOL!
Fellow Usenet posters are not a good sample of an opinion on that,
Alan. -a-aYou see me as a competitor, because of our views on
computers, the people reading in the shadows are simply judging the
merits, I am very confident they find me highly compelling.
I see you as a joke.
You *are* a joke, and so are Macs.
On 12/27/25 8:46 PM, Alan wrote:
The Mac interface is under-developed.
In what specific ways?
It simply copies other OSes, being late to the game, never being up >>>>> to date.
Name such a copy.
Just the fact that they glued their proprietary system onto Unix
tells the story.
Not of supposed "copying" it doesn't.
It's not original work.
Even being a Unix flavor, it fails to act as one out of the box >>>>>>> compared to a Linux distro,
In what way?
Is that not obvious to you?-a Darwin has a great potential, but it's >>>>> not a complete subsystem.-a At the end of the day, Microsoft's WSL 2 >>>>> is better, because it implements GUI apps in a seamless-enough way.
In what way is Darwin incomplete?
Can I use macOS as a Unix flavor out of the box?
Yup.
Who is supporting that?-a Certainly not Apple.
so it has to be judged by macOS apps specifically, and there are >>>>>>> stellar ones as I mentioned and acknowledged, but on the whole
it's quirky software by comparison to what is common with Windows >>>>>>> and Linux systems.
Give an example of this supposedly "quirky" software and how it is >>>>>> claimed to be "quirky".
I didn't prefer Mac software, on the whole.
Which doesn't make it quirky.
My opinions carry extra weight, because of my identity.
You're a loon.
It would be hard for you to see it.
This is why, objectively, I am right,
Given that you never offer anything but your personal opinions,
the word "objectively"...
...is objectively being used incorrectly.
If I like something, it must be really good, because I have
objective tastes and judgments on things.
You're a loony.
And yet I have quite a following.
In your head.
It's very real and I work hard at deserving it.
On 2025-12-28 11:51 p.m., Alan wrote:
On 2025-12-28 17:44, Joel W. Crump wrote:
The really amusing thing is how they got mad at Google for copying the
iPhone, it's OK for them to do it on countless things for their
products, but they want to have a monopoly on that style of
smartphone. Greed Inc.
Noting that you cannot produce a single instance of any of your
supposed "countless things".
Maybe Joel should ask his friend Snit Michael Glasser Prescott Parasite
and Computer Guy how to create exhaustive lists the next time they have
sex.
What do you mean by "supporting"?
Its Unix support as it is sold by Apple is rudimentary.
Again. What "support" do you feel is lacking?
Name something provide by other Unix OS producers that Apple doesn't
provide.
I'm actually curious about this one. As far as I know, the Apple implementation of UNIX is a pretty good one.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 14:02:43 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (2,681K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,722 |
| Posted today: | 1 |