• Re: Several problems with HP printer.

    From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 21 15:19:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2024-11-27 11:45, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:

    [snip]


    Have you tried to print with a hard wired connection ie through USB or
    the printer cable (if present).

    If it prints directly it would possible isolate the problem to the
    wireless connection.

    HP printers are known for being WiFi only.

    Moral - do not use them!

    Go for one with USB and/or Ethernet.

    Fascinating. I've had several HP printers over the years, and only the
    last two have wifi and/or Ethernet. The rest were USB-only.

    No, I take that back. My Deskjet 5650 has USB or parallel port
    capability. I don't use it much these days because my color Laserjet is cheaper and faster, but when I do it still works great. Probably
    wouldn't work with Windows, but then I use Mageia Linux.

    Those last two printers, A Color Laserjet M254dw and an Envy Photo 7858
    both have USB, as well. They also work great with Mageia

    (Yes, I know this thread is a year old. I'm responding as much to test newsgroup posting with a Thunderbird update as anything else...)

    TJ
    Mageia Linux QA Team Leader
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 21 16:53:19 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/21/2025 3:19 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2024-11-27 11:45, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:

    [snip]


    Have you tried to print with a hard wired connection ie through USB
    or the printer cable (if present).

    If it prints directly it would possible isolate the problem to the
    wireless connection.

    HP printers are known for being WiFi only.

    Moral - do not use them!

    Go for one with USB and/or Ethernet.

    Fascinating. I've had several HP printers over the years, and only the
    last two have wifi and/or Ethernet. The rest were USB-only.

    No, I take that back. My Deskjet 5650 has USB or parallel port
    capability. I don't use it much these days because my color Laserjet is cheaper and faster, but when I do it still works great. Probably
    wouldn't work with Windows, but then I use Mageia Linux.

    Those last two printers, A Color Laserjet M254dw and an Envy Photo 7858
    both have USB, as well. They also work great with Mageia

    (Yes, I know this thread is a year old. I'm responding as much to test newsgroup posting with a Thunderbird update as anything else...)

    TJ
    Mageia Linux QA Team Leader

    I don't remember the exact details of the problem I was having with my
    HP printer, other that it was resolved. I now own my fourth HP printer
    an HP-7602. It is connected to three computers by wireless
    connnections. All three computer can print and scan with the computer.

    I have had the HP-7602 for over a year now. It is the econ tank type
    printer. Each color cartrige is about 70 ml and the black about twice
    that. I print personal documents and reports associated with the
    church finances. I don't know how many things that have been scanned.

    Once set up the HP-7602 performed perfectly, and the print quality is
    very good. I have had no clogging problems with the print heads.

    Prior to getting the new printer I was going through about 3 or 4 print cartridges per year at about $70/each. In the last year I have not
    spent a penny for printer ink.

    Base on the performance and cost of operation, it was one of the better
    items I have purchased.



    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 21 17:54:33 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-21 16:53, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/21/2025 3:19 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2024-11-27 11:45, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:

    [snip]


    Have you tried to print with a hard wired connection ie through USB
    or the printer cable (if present).

    If it prints directly it would possible isolate the problem to the
    wireless connection.

    HP printers are known for being WiFi only.

    Moral - do not use them!

    Go for one with USB and/or Ethernet.

    Fascinating. I've had several HP printers over the years, and only the
    last two have wifi and/or Ethernet. The rest were USB-only.

    No, I take that back. My Deskjet 5650 has USB or parallel port
    capability. I don't use it much these days because my color Laserjet
    is cheaper and faster, but when I do it still works great. Probably
    wouldn't work with Windows, but then I use Mageia Linux.

    Those last two printers, A Color Laserjet M254dw and an Envy Photo
    7858 both have USB, as well. They also work great with Mageia

    (Yes, I know this thread is a year old. I'm responding as much to test
    newsgroup posting with a Thunderbird update as anything else...)

    TJ
    Mageia Linux QA Team Leader

    I don't remember the exact details of the problem I was having with my
    HP printer, other that it was resolved.-a-a I now own my fourth HP printer an HP-7602.-a It is connected to three computers by wireless connnections.-a-a All three computer can print and scan with the computer.

    I have had the HP-7602 for over a year now.-a It is the econ tank type printer. Each color cartrige is about 70 ml and the black about twice that.-a-a I print personal documents and reports associated with the
    church finances.-a-a I don't know how many things that have been scanned.

    Once set up the HP-7602 performed perfectly, and the print quality is
    very good.-a I have had no clogging problems with the print heads.

    Prior to getting the new printer I was going through about 3 or 4 print cartridges per year at about $70/each.-a-a In the last year I have not
    spent a penny for printer ink.

    Base on the performance and cost of operation, it was one of the better items I have purchased.



    My first Laserjet was a gift, an old CP1215 rescued by my nephew when
    his employer upgraded. It worked OK, but was USB-only, no duplex, and
    rather slow. Last year a paper jam damaged the "intermediate transfer
    belt" so that it needed to be replaced. I could find the part on Ebay,
    but it was costly and installation was tricky. It was more effective to purchase a gently used M254dw.

    This particular printer came with toner cartridges almost used up, but
    was still using the original firmware, thus allowing it to function with aftermarket cartridges. I have disabled automatic firmware updates, so
    it will stay that way.

    I bought a set for around $50, installed them, and they've worked
    perfectly. I've used the printer for making signs for our farm stand,
    address labels, business cards, preparing the farm taxes, and printing a
    few photos. At the moment, the black cartridge indicates 80% left, and
    the color carts say over 90% left.

    Since it's close enough to my router I connected via Ethernet, as it is
    faster than wifi. I'm VERY happy with it so far.

    TJ
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 21 23:34:12 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Tue, 10/21/2025 5:54 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2025-10-21 16:53, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/21/2025 3:19 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2024-11-27 11:45, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:

    [snip]


    Have you tried to print with a hard wired connection ie through USB or the printer cable (if present).

    If it prints directly it would possible isolate the problem to the wireless connection.

    HP printers are known for being WiFi only.

    Moral - do not use them!

    Go for one with USB and/or Ethernet.

    Fascinating. I've had several HP printers over the years, and only the last two have wifi and/or Ethernet. The rest were USB-only.

    No, I take that back. My Deskjet 5650 has USB or parallel port capability. I don't use it much these days because my color Laserjet is cheaper and faster, but when I do it still works great. Probably wouldn't work with Windows, but then I use Mageia Linux.

    Those last two printers, A Color Laserjet M254dw and an Envy Photo 7858 both have USB, as well. They also work great with Mageia

    (Yes, I know this thread is a year old. I'm responding as much to test newsgroup posting with a Thunderbird update as anything else...)

    TJ
    Mageia Linux QA Team Leader

    I don't remember the exact details of the problem I was having with my HP printer, other that it was resolved.-a-a I now own my fourth HP printer an HP-7602.-a It is connected to three computers by wireless connnections.-a-a All three computer can print and scan with the computer.

    I have had the HP-7602 for over a year now.-a It is the econ tank type printer. Each color cartrige is about 70 ml and the black about twice that.-a-a I print personal documents and reports associated with the church finances.-a-a I don't know how many things that have been scanned.

    Once set up the HP-7602 performed perfectly, and the print quality is very good.-a I have had no clogging problems with the print heads.

    Prior to getting the new printer I was going through about 3 or 4 print cartridges per year at about $70/each.-a-a In the last year I have not spent a penny for printer ink.

    Base on the performance and cost of operation, it was one of the better items I have purchased.



    My first Laserjet was a gift, an old CP1215 rescued by my nephew when his employer upgraded. It worked OK, but was USB-only, no duplex, and rather slow. Last year a paper jam damaged the "intermediate transfer belt" so that it needed to be replaced. I could find the part on Ebay, but it was costly and installation was tricky. It was more effective to purchase a gently used M254dw.

    This particular printer came with toner cartridges almost used up, but was still using the original firmware, thus allowing it to function with aftermarket cartridges. I have disabled automatic firmware updates, so it will stay that way.

    I bought a set for around $50, installed them, and they've worked perfectly. I've used the printer for making signs for our farm stand, address labels, business cards, preparing the farm taxes, and printing a few photos. At the moment, the black cartridge indicates 80% left, and the color carts say over 90% left.

    Since it's close enough to my router I connected via Ethernet, as it is faster than wifi. I'm VERY happy with it so far.

    TJ

    One of the reasons HP resorted to Wifi-only printing, was to force users
    to use a smartphone APP or the like, for setup. This would lead the user through an HP SMART Ink subscription (an unnecessary shipping of HP-branded inks or toners which you're billed for and show up in your post box).
    This is so hated by some customers forced into it, you can find small
    boxes of HP print materials, sitting on the top of the postal boxes,
    where the people in my community feel that by not taking the ink home,
    it somehow gets you out of your contract.

    The result of this slick-willy approach to doing business is:

    1) You stop doing business with HP entirely, and tell them to
    shove their printers up their ass.

    2) You only select printers with backup print paths. Wifi+Eth, Wifi+USB.

    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Stuart@Spambin@argonet.co.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 16:30:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    In article <10d9jbk$ci2n$1@dont-email.me>,
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    I have an Epson WF-7715, A3 printer scanner, this has Wi-Fi, USB and
    ethernet, but most of my printing, B&W, is done on a Xerox B310 Laser,
    which also has full connectivity. To me Ethernet is essential for
    connecting to my several computers in various parts of the house. My
    entire network is wired apart from portable devices such as phones and
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!
    --
    Stuart Winsor

    Tools With A Mission
    sending tools across the world
    http://www.twam.co.uk/
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 13:21:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Wed, 10/22/2025 4:30 PM, Stuart wrote:
    In article <10d9jbk$ci2n$1@dont-email.me>,
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    I have an Epson WF-7715, A3 printer scanner, this has Wi-Fi, USB and ethernet, but most of my printing, B&W, is done on a Xerox B310 Laser,
    which also has full connectivity. To me Ethernet is essential for
    connecting to my several computers in various parts of the house. My
    entire network is wired apart from portable devices such as phones and tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!


    This shows a trend for at least some desktop boards,
    where the I/O plate has two SMA connectors.

    I don't know if this link will work for you. Having a lot of trouble
    with cleverly crafted web pages this morning.

    ASUS ROG Strix B550-F Gaming (WiFi 6) AMD AM4 - I/O Plate area showing two Wifi connectors

    https://c1.neweggimages.com/productimage/nb1280/13-119-311-V07.jpg

    Behind the I/O plate is a vertical Wifi module that
    plugs into a miniature slot on the PCB. The module type
    can be Intel, but more recently they're using MediaTek
    based Wifi.

    An antenna comes in the box, and the "thing" has two antennas on it,
    and a magnet in the base, allows the antennas to adhere to the
    side of a steel PC case. It doesn't even slide off and stays put,
    whether stuck to the side or resting on top of the PC.

    You can get PCIe cards with a laptop Wifi module on
    them as well. You can retrofit Wifi to a PC
    with a x1 PCIe slot available. There are also USB based
    Wifi (I have two of those), but those might be 802.11N
    and relatively slow as modules go.

    As far as I know, you get the best performance from those
    when using them with a Wifi router. Direct point to point
    Wifi operation does not seem to me, to be as good.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 13:30:06 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/22/2025 12:30 PM, Stuart wrote:
    wired apart from portable devices such as phones and
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!
    I have had two computers with WIFI. The HP desktop that was recently
    replaced had USB, so I was able to connect to the internet either by USB
    or WIFI. My new desktop also has the ability to connect both WIFI or
    USB. In my experience, many desktops and laptops use a card that
    combines both Bluetooth and WIFI on the same card. So I would expect any desktop the can connect with Bluetooth will also connect with WIFI.

    To me this makes sense as it means one radio sender and receiver, that
    can be used for either by changing the radio frequency.

    It has been stated else where in this tread that HP printers do not come
    with a USB port and must be connected wireless. While that maybe true
    for some models; in my research to buy my new printer, all HP printers
    that I looked at could be connect either wireless or USB port. On this
    model, HP7601, the port is on the front of the printer on the lower left
    side.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 14:04:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Wed, 10/22/2025 1:30 PM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/22/2025 12:30 PM, Stuart wrote:
    wired apart from portable devices such as phones and
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!
    I have had two computers with WIFI. The HP desktop that was recently replaced had USB, so I was able to connect to the internet either by USB or WIFI.-a My new desktop also has the ability to connect both WIFI or USB.-a In my experience, many desktops and laptops use a card that combines both Bluetooth and WIFI on the same card. So I would expect any desktop the can connect with Bluetooth will also connect with WIFI.

    To me this makes sense as it means one radio sender and receiver, that can be used for either by changing the radio frequency.

    It has been stated else where in this tread that HP printers do not come with a USB port and must be connected wireless.-a-a While that maybe true for some models; in my research to buy my new printer, all HP printers that I looked at could be connect either wireless or USB port.-a On this model, HP7601, the port is on the front of the printer on the lower left side.

    Some of these "adapters", they have two separate chips.
    The Wifi is one chip (with CMOS PA for 2.4 and 5GHZ operation).
    The Wifi chip connects to a PCIe x1 lane.
    The Bluetooth chip on the same PCB, has a USB interface and
    uses the USB pins on the PCIe slot. That's perfectly good
    as Bluetooth has relatively low datarates, and even USB2 is
    good enough for it.

    The Bluetooth output, is coupled into one of the two Wifi antennas
    that the Wifi chip drives.

    There was some deal, where the Bluetooth and the Wifi chip, they
    agree to not transmit at the same instant. There may be a signal
    that coordinates their usage of the antenna on transmit. If the
    Bluetooth and Wifi chips were different brands, the coordination
    might not be standardized enough, to make any two brands mixed
    together, to work.

    Bluetooth uses spread spectrum frequency hopping. It hops 1200 times
    a second or so. There might be eighty five channels of 1MHz width.
    If a channel is "degraded", the hop pattern can try using
    a different channel for the content, to punch its way through.
    This means, in a limited sense, the Bluetooth has an 85MHz total
    width, while Wifi has channels in increasing widths (like at
    higher Wifi rates, those might be 40MHz wide). In any case,
    the "second party to the trough", came up with a scheme
    which did not degrade the first party to use the airwaves,
    and they are supposed to be able to co-exist.

    Bluetooth can even tolerate another Bluetooth cabal in the
    same room. It can tolerate itself. Two groups of Bluetooth,
    can be using different hop patterns. I don't know how
    that stuff is controlled. But for the bandwidth offered, it's
    mostly borderline material. As it would take eons to
    transfer a file at 75KB/sec. Even for streaming sound,
    75KB/sec isn't all that much.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 18:58:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Paul wrote on 10/21/2025 10:34 PM:
    On Tue, 10/21/2025 5:54 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2025-10-21 16:53, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/21/2025 3:19 PM, TJ wrote:
    On 2024-11-27 11:45, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:

    [snip]


    Have you tried to print with a hard wired connection ie through USB or the printer cable (if present).

    If it prints directly it would possible isolate the problem to the wireless connection.

    HP printers are known for being WiFi only.

    Moral - do not use them!

    Go for one with USB and/or Ethernet.

    Fascinating. I've had several HP printers over the years, and only the last two have wifi and/or Ethernet. The rest were USB-only.

    No, I take that back. My Deskjet 5650 has USB or parallel port capability. I don't use it much these days because my color Laserjet is cheaper and faster, but when I do it still works great. Probably wouldn't work with Windows, but then I use Mageia Linux.

    Those last two printers, A Color Laserjet M254dw and an Envy Photo 7858 both have USB, as well. They also work great with Mageia

    (Yes, I know this thread is a year old. I'm responding as much to test newsgroup posting with a Thunderbird update as anything else...)

    TJ
    Mageia Linux QA Team Leader

    I don't remember the exact details of the problem I was having with my HP printer, other that it was resolved.-a-a I now own my fourth HP printer an HP-7602.-a It is connected to three computers by wireless connnections.-a-a All three computer can print and scan with the computer.

    I have had the HP-7602 for over a year now.-a It is the econ tank type printer. Each color cartrige is about 70 ml and the black about twice that.-a-a I print personal documents and reports associated with the church finances.-a-a I don't know how many things that have been scanned.

    Once set up the HP-7602 performed perfectly, and the print quality is very good.-a I have had no clogging problems with the print heads.

    Prior to getting the new printer I was going through about 3 or 4 print cartridges per year at about $70/each.-a-a In the last year I have not spent a penny for printer ink.

    Base on the performance and cost of operation, it was one of the better items I have purchased.



    My first Laserjet was a gift, an old CP1215 rescued by my nephew when his employer upgraded. It worked OK, but was USB-only, no duplex, and rather slow. Last year a paper jam damaged the "intermediate transfer belt" so that it needed to be replaced. I could find the part on Ebay, but it was costly and installation was tricky. It was more effective to purchase a gently used M254dw.

    This particular printer came with toner cartridges almost used up, but was still using the original firmware, thus allowing it to function with aftermarket cartridges. I have disabled automatic firmware updates, so it will stay that way.

    I bought a set for around $50, installed them, and they've worked perfectly. I've used the printer for making signs for our farm stand, address labels, business cards, preparing the farm taxes, and printing a few photos. At the moment, the black cartridge indicates 80% left, and the color carts say over 90% left.

    Since it's close enough to my router I connected via Ethernet, as it is faster than wifi. I'm VERY happy with it so far.

    TJ

    One of the reasons HP resorted to Wifi-only printing, was to force users
    to use a smartphone APP or the like, for setup. This would lead the user through an HP SMART Ink subscription (an unnecessary shipping of HP-branded inks or toners which you're billed for and show up in your post box).
    This is so hated by some customers forced into it, you can find small
    boxes of HP print materials, sitting on the top of the postal boxes,
    where the people in my community feel that by not taking the ink home,
    it somehow gets you out of your contract.

    The result of this slick-willy approach to doing business is:

    1) You stop doing business with HP entirely, and tell them to
    shove their printers up their ass.

    That's exactly what I did.


    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 22 21:37:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-21 23:34, Paul wrote:
    One of the reasons HP resorted to Wifi-only printing, was to force users
    to use a smartphone APP or the like, for setup. This would lead the user through an HP SMART Ink subscription (an unnecessary shipping of HP-branded inks or toners which you're billed for and show up in your post box).
    This is so hated by some customers forced into it, you can find small
    boxes of HP print materials, sitting on the top of the postal boxes,
    where the people in my community feel that by not taking the ink home,
    it somehow gets you out of your contract.

    The result of this slick-willy approach to doing business is:

    1) You stop doing business with HP entirely, and tell them to
    shove their printers up their ass.

    2) You only select printers with backup print paths. Wifi+Eth, Wifi+USB.

    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    Paul

    The manuals for both of my Wifi-capable printers wanted me to use the smartphone app to install them, but buried deeply into those manuals,
    the last resort, was some kind of statement that you could also install
    by first connecting a usb cable.

    Of course, none of the manual's methods of installation would work for
    me because I'm using Linux, so I didn't really care. I simply used my
    distro's printer install tool - took about five minutes for each
    printer, if that. No mention of "instant Ink" subscriptions, though the
    manual said they are available. With Linux, *I* am in charge.

    Why TWO printers? The printer of my old usb-only Officejet went bad, but
    the scanner continued to work for three years. When the scanner finally
    quit I went looking for a stand-alone scanner, but quickly found the
    most economical way to buy a scanner was with a printer attached, so
    that's what I did. I almost never use that as a printer, but I use the
    scanner often.

    BTW, some admittedly brief web research doesn't turn up any HP printers
    that are Wifi-only, that don't have a usb port. This leads me to believe
    that such beasts are the exception, rather than the rule, and are
    difficult to find.

    TJ
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 04:12:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Thu, 11/28/2024 3:05 PM, Mark Lloyd wrote:
    [snip]

    Changing program to
    app is reminiscent of changing directory to folder, another unnecessary
    change meant to cater to people they think are too dumb to learn a new
    word. But it's worse because it's confusing and folder is not
    inherently confusing.

    I'd rather call them directories. "Folder" is an old way of carrying
    papers around, that you have to be very careful with or risk having an unsorted mess on the floor.

    [snip]


    We use "Folder" when doing a GUI level discussion, because Right-Context menu has

    New: Folder

    We want to be consistent with the OS documentation (if any exists).

    Whereas if you're having a platform-independent discussion
    about filesystems, then directory is a useful word. On NTFS
    "a directory is just a file" with a $I30 metadata tag.

    One of the reasons we know so little about the OS we use,
    is because platform-independent discussions seldom
    happen in official documentation. If I ask the average
    user here "is the registry a database or a filesystem",
    try and find an authoritative description of a registry.
    For example, I don't even know what a "Hive" is :-/
    I think it's a place to store your bees, but I'm not
    sure about that. The Registry files themselves, have
    a relatively boring icon in File Explorer.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 08:43:47 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
    In article <10d9jbk$ci2n$1@dont-email.me>,
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    I have an Epson WF-7715, A3 printer scanner, this has Wi-Fi, USB and ethernet, but most of my printing, B&W, is done on a Xerox B310 Laser,
    which also has full connectivity. To me Ethernet is essential for
    connecting to my several computers in various parts of the house. My
    entire network is wired apart from portable devices such as phones and tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop'
    (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi.
    The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 08:51:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> wrote:
    [...]
    It has been stated else where in this tread that HP printers do not come with a USB port and must be connected wireless. While that maybe true
    for some models; in my research to buy my new printer, all HP printers
    that I looked at could be connect either wireless or USB port. On this model, HP7601, the port is on the front of the printer on the lower left side.

    Exactly. I did a little search on the webshop of my main supplier for computer stuff. Of the 44 HP printers, 41 had both Wi-Fi and USB.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 09:20:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Thu, 10/23/2025 4:43 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
    In article <10d9jbk$ci2n$1@dont-email.me>,
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    I have an Epson WF-7715, A3 printer scanner, this has Wi-Fi, USB and
    ethernet, but most of my printing, B&W, is done on a Xerox B310 Laser,
    which also has full connectivity. To me Ethernet is essential for
    connecting to my several computers in various parts of the house. My
    entire network is wired apart from portable devices such as phones and
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop' (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi.
    The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.


    As a consumer, it doesn't hurt to check what a machine has.

    Of three retail motherboards (mid-range price), one has a Wifi
    on the I/O plate, two have no Wifi on them. It is easy to install
    a PCIe x1 lane card to add Wifi to the ones that don't have it.
    I have a couple TPLink cards with Intel AX200 underneath
    their heatsink, as examples of devices I've used for test.
    I have two PCIe ones, and two USB Wifi, for test.

    *******

    As an example of me forgetting to check stuff, on the
    machine that has the Wifi module on the retail motherboard,
    I get the thing home and discover it has no TPM header pins
    for a plug-in TPM. The BIOS has the fTPM function, but
    the reason that can be less-preferred is because on AMD,
    there have been some "stuttering" issues related to the usage
    of fTPM. Whereas the hardware plugin TPM module, does not
    have that exposure on an AMD-processor board (AM4/AM5). The
    Intel socket boards, I've not heard of an issue there with
    fTPM versus physical plugin TPM.

    What's ironic, is the BIOS on the machine with no TPM pins onboard,
    says this:

    Physical TPM <=== This is offered as a settings choice, when this is not physically possible
    fTPM
    None

    And that happened, because six motherboards use the same BIOS file (generic) and the other boards had TPM pins. If the board had the holes but no pins,
    I'd just solder the pins in myself... and test.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 14:53:14 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025/10/23 14:20:4, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 4:43 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:
    []
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop' ....................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
    (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi.
    The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.


    As a consumer, it doesn't hurt to check what a machine has.

    Of three retail motherboards (mid-range price), one has a Wifi
    I think to me and Frank, "retail motherboard" implies "built/assemble yourself".
    on the I/O plate, two have no Wifi on them. It is easy to install
    a PCIe x1 lane card to add Wifi to the ones that don't have it.
    And that certainly does :-) !
    []
    I haven't even _looked_ at pre-built PCs for so many years, but I
    _think_ I'd agree with Stuart that such (other than laptops, obviously) probably don't have wifi - except maybe the "novelty" ones like those
    little boxes.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 14:15:15 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    J. P. Gilliver <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
    On 2025/10/23 14:20:4, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 4:43 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

    []


    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop'

    ....................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi. >> The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.

    As a consumer, it doesn't hurt to check what a machine has.

    Of three retail motherboards (mid-range price), one has a Wifi

    I think to me and Frank, "retail motherboard" implies "built/assemble yourself".

    on the I/O plate, two have no Wifi on them. It is easy to install
    a PCIe x1 lane card to add Wifi to the ones that don't have it.

    And that certainly does :-) !
    []
    I haven't even _looked_ at pre-built PCs for so many years, but I
    _think_ I'd agree with Stuart that such (other than laptops, obviously) probably don't have wifi - except maybe the "novelty" ones like those
    little boxes.

    As I mentioned, at least in our country (The Netherlands), most
    pre-built consumer 'desktop' PCs, *do* come with Wi-Fi (see my text
    above). Or do you mean custom-built by some computer shop?

    And yes, my wife's 'novelty little box' (Mini-PC) comes with Wi-Fi,
    but also with two Gigabit LAN ports (and loads of others)! :-)
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 11:48:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/23/2025 9:53 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/23 14:20:4, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 4:43 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

    []


    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop'

    ....................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi. >>> The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.


    As a consumer, it doesn't hurt to check what a machine has.

    Of three retail motherboards (mid-range price), one has a Wifi

    I think to me and Frank, "retail motherboard" implies "built/assemble yourself".

    on the I/O plate, two have no Wifi on them. It is easy to install
    a PCIe x1 lane card to add Wifi to the ones that don't have it.

    And that certainly does :-) !
    []
    I haven't even _looked_ at pre-built PCs for so many years, but I
    _think_ I'd agree with Stuart that such (other than laptops, obviously) probably don't have wifi - except maybe the "novelty" ones like those
    little boxes.

    However I beleive most of the off the shelf units bought by the average
    use, will find both bluetooth and WIFI standard on those units.

    I doubt if the majority of user today have ever bought a motherboard or
    built one off computer.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 17:35:25 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 9:53 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/23 14:20:4, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 4:43 AM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> wrote:

    []

    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!

    Depends on where and what kind of 'desktop' computers you buy, but
    most consumer ready-to-use (i.e. not built/assemble) yourself) 'desktop'

    ....................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    (i.e. tower, lunchbox, all-in-one. etc.) computers *do* come with Wi-Fi. >>> The ones without Wi-Fi are the exception, not the rule.


    As a consumer, it doesn't hurt to check what a machine has.

    Of three retail motherboards (mid-range price), one has a Wifi

    I think to me and Frank, "retail motherboard" implies "built/assemble yourself".

    on the I/O plate, two have no Wifi on them. It is easy to install
    a PCIe x1 lane card to add Wifi to the ones that don't have it.

    And that certainly does :-) !
    []
    I haven't even _looked_ at pre-built PCs for so many years, but I
    _think_ I'd agree with Stuart that such (other than laptops, obviously) probably don't have wifi - except maybe the "novelty" ones like those little boxes.

    However I beleive most of the off the shelf units bought by the average
    use, will find both bluetooth and WIFI standard on those units.

    Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward,
    too much work and *why*? It's not that their Wi-Fi is slower than their broadband connection and they probably need Wi-Fi anyway for their other devices, like smartphones, tablets and ... <drum roll> ... printers. :-)

    I doubt if the majority of user today have ever bought a motherboard or built one off computer.

    Propably even true for the majority of users in these groups. For
    example, I fiddled with stuff like drives, I/O cards, RAM, etc., but
    that was always with desktops/towers which were pre-built at the factory
    or a computer shop.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 14:14:44 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/23/2025 1:35 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward,
    too much work and*why*?
    You forgot the expense of fishing the cables through the walls and
    attic, if available.

    I had new circuits installed in my house, and know the work of pulling
    cable through the house will be several hundered dollars per cable. I
    had some electric lines pulled from on side of my house to the garage on
    the other side. It was $250 per line. The third line I planned to put
    in was from an existing box to another about four feet up the wall on an
    open unfinished wall. They wanted $250 for the also, I ended up doing it myself.

    Some years before, my brother and I pulled coax for a TV from the garage
    to my living room. It took the two of us working together over and hour
    to finish the job.

    I think rather than "not be bothered", a cost analysis of the
    performance of the two techniques, would find the Cable looses by a wide margin.

    The cost of the cable alone, not counting labor would be several times
    more than cost of a good wireless router, and the router would provide
    access in nearly any part of their house, not just the point where the
    cable comes out of the wall.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham J@nobody@nowhere.co.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 22:09:55 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 1:35 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    -a Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward,
    too much work and*why*?
    You forgot the expense of fishing the cables through the walls and
    attic, if available.

    [snip]

    Here in the UK many old houses have stone walls at least a foot thick. Wireless signals don't pass through such walls. Attempts to make WiFi
    work using mesh techniques or whatever usually fail. YMMV.

    If you need WiFi you have to put a Wireless Access Point in each room
    and connect them to the router via Ethernet cable. So usually you run
    cables up the wall and through the roof space, or take outdoor grade
    cables through wooden window frames and around the external walls. This
    all takes time, but mostly you can do it yourself. Perhaps pay a
    qualified technician to terminate and test the cables.
    --
    Graham J
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 18:16:24 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Thu, 10/23/2025 5:09 PM, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 1:35 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    -a Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward, >>> too much work and*why*?
    You forgot the expense of fishing the cables through the walls and attic, if available.

    [snip]

    Here in the UK many old houses have stone walls at least a foot thick. Wireless signals don't pass through such walls.-a Attempts to make WiFi work using mesh techniques or whatever usually fail.-a YMMV.

    If you need WiFi you have to put a Wireless Access Point in each room and connect them to the router via Ethernet cable.-a So usually you run cables up the wall and through the roof space, or take outdoor grade cables through wooden window frames and around the external walls.-a This all takes time, but mostly you can do it yourself.-a Perhaps pay a qualified technician to terminate and test the cables.


    https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/products/docs/wireless/2-4-vs-5ghz.html

    2.4 GHz can deliver a typical over-the-air max speed of up to 100 megabits per second (Mbps). 12.5MB/sec
    5 GHz can deliver up to 1 gigabit per second (Gbps). 112MB/sec
    6 GHz can deliver up to 2 Gbps. 224MB/sec

    (60 GHz) 5.6 Gbps at ~7 feet and signal won't go past 25 feet or penetrate walls or doorways 700MB/sec

    And 6GHz is not going to penetrate walls well

    Realtek is making several models of NIC at 10GbE which should start to appear on motherboards next year some time. The PCIe connection is a bit starved
    and in one test was doing 700MB/sec when it should be closer to maybe 1100MB/sec.
    The thing really should have had x4 lanes and then if a motherboard only
    wants to wire with an x1 interface, they could do that if they wanted.
    Not many boards are going to have a PCIe x1 Rev4 lane sitting around
    not doing anything. My non-state-of-the-art kit would be a Rev3 lane.

    While the RealTek *chip* was supposed to be a nominal $10, the
    card is at least $35 (transformers) and retail pricing is likely to seek a good profit on those on top of that figure. If I can pay $70 for a shit
    Intel card, I don't see much hope of good pricing in the end for
    the add-on card version.

    But the point is, that's going to be a bit faster than the realistic
    rates you could expect from the latest Wifi.

    When there were Wifi review articles, for the longest while the best
    case seemed to be ~100MB/sec or so as the Wifi standards number
    got bumped up. The Intel numbers are "aspirational", which is fine.
    YMMV. Not every house (without paper thin walls) is going to give
    the Intel numbers every time. Even if your router has the "eight
    antennas on top" and has a fighting dragon spray painted on the lid. .

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 18:34:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/23/2025 5:09 PM, Graham J wrote:
    knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 1:35 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    -a Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward, >>> too much work and*why*?
    You forgot the expense of fishing the cables through the walls and
    attic, if available.

    [snip]

    Here in the UK many old houses have stone walls at least a foot thick. Wireless signals don't pass through such walls.-a Attempts to make WiFi
    work using mesh techniques or whatever usually fail.-a YMMV.

    If you need WiFi you have to put a Wireless Access Point in each room
    and connect them to the router via Ethernet cable.-a So usually you run cables up the wall and through the roof space, or take outdoor grade
    cables through wooden window frames and around the external walls.-a This all takes time, but mostly you can do it yourself.-a Perhaps pay a
    qualified technician to terminate and test the cables.

    We all communicate and you forget that we are all over the world.

    I in Raleigh NC. Most of the houses are built with 2X4 studs and 2X8 or greater, floors and ceilings joist. Almost all houses are built on a
    crawl space. Outside walls, ceilings, and floor are insulated with
    fiberglass bats between the studs and joist The inside walls are dry
    wall and paint. While it takes time fishing the wires through the walls
    it can be done with time.

    Relatively speaking we live in straw houses when compared to your stone
    ones.

    Wireless signals easily penetrate the drywall.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Thu Oct 23 18:54:30 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/23/2025 6:16 PM, Paul wrote:
    And 6GHz is not going to penetrate walls well
    See my previous post in response to Graham J.

    When talking about what will the various frequency penetrate, talking generalities can cause problems. When talking what the frequency will penetrate, you must consider the house you live in. If you live in a
    house with stone inside and outside walls the penetration will be significantly different than if you live in a house with wooden studs
    cover by drywall.

    Our house is the later. I have a router that uses 4x4 802.11ax on
    2.4GHz, and 4x4 802.11axon 5GHz. With this router I get good reception
    in my 2 story about 2000 sqft house.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Fri Oct 24 00:56:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Thu, 10/23/2025 6:54 PM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 6:16 PM, Paul wrote:
    And 6GHz is not going to penetrate walls well
    See my previous post in response to Graham J.

    When talking about what will the various frequency penetrate, talking generalities can cause problems.-a When talking what the frequency will penetrate, you must consider the house you live in.-a-a If you live in a house with stone inside and outside walls the penetration will be significantly different than if you live in a house with wooden studs cover by drywall.

    Our house is the later.-a I have a router that uses 4x4 802.11ax on 2.4GHz, and 4x4 802.11axon 5GHz.-a-a
    With this router I get good reception in my 2 story about 2000 sqft house.

    But, you're getting good reception on 2.4GHz and the 5GHz is unlikely to be as good.

    There are general RF principles involved here. For example, moisture absorbs RF,
    which is why snow or rain outside affects things like WISP (community radio). But even *air* absorbs RF, there is loss per meter.

    This is why the 60GHz WiMax only works out to 25 feet in air. If you were in
    a church hall, having a supper, the 60GHz WiMax would not reach from one end
    of the hall to the other. If you were doing a cable-less HDMI transmitter
    at the end of the hall, the monitor would not light up, because that
    was too far for it. The 60GHz units cheat by also supporting 2.4GHz and
    5GHz, so at 100 feet they still give "some service" by cheating
    and not running at 700MB/sec. You are then limited to much lower rates
    and your monitor at the end of the church hall is like a slide show if
    it runs at all.

    The fire department uses 900MHz. The fire fighter stand near the
    elevator core, when communicating between floors.

    GPS does not work inside the house (except if you press your gear
    right up against the window). That's a microwave frequency.

    But AM and FM radio easily penetrate the house shell. You can likely
    manage to block that, with foil backed insulation everywhere. but for
    a lot of houses, the AM/FM radio works OK. These are lower frequencies
    that penetrate materials (88-108MHz for FM).

    We can communicate with submarines at depth. The data rate is poor.
    Radio is "not supposed to work underwater", but we made it work.
    This involves ultra-low frequencies and transmitters with four large
    diesel generators running to make it work. If we tried to make Wifi
    work at the bottom of your swimming pool... that's not going to work.

    There are general principles involved. The lower the frequency,
    the more possible it is to penetrate something.

    We use these stations, to make self-calibrating wall clocks.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_VLF_transmitters

    WWVB Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 60.0 kHz # Serves North America, reception once a day usually
    # Sufficient to calibrate a clock, once a day. 100uV level.

    DCF77 Mainflingen, Mainhausen, Germany 77.5 kHz # Each of these transmitters, runs at different power levels
    # and some have extensive long-wire antenna systems.

    There are some pictures of the clock-works, the ferrite antenna, on
    a self calibrating clock. And this works inside the house.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DCF77

    Some country systems can calibrate most of the day, others
    rely on "skip" for distant signal reception at night.

    Some broadcast TV systems in cottage country, work because
    there are "two hops over water". And I consider it hilarious,
    when a grain ship sailing out in the bay... and the analog TV stops
    or the picture starts to ripple :-) That's a propagation
    effect at a distance. Some people in cities, were receiving
    broadcast analog television, because it was reflected off a billboard
    on the side of a hill. Productive multi-path. Nobody thought of
    replacing that or duplicating it, with a purpose built reflector.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Fri Oct 24 08:29:49 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025/10/24 5:56:41, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 6:54 PM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 6:16 PM, Paul wrote:
    And 6GHz is not going to penetrate walls well
    6 or 60?
    See my previous post in response to Graham J.

    When talking about what will the various frequency penetrate, talking generalities can cause problems.-a When talking what the frequency will penetrate, you must consider the house you live in.-a-a If you live in a house with stone inside and outside walls the penetration will be significantly different than if you live in a house with wooden studs cover by drywall.

    Our house is the later.-a I have a router that uses 4x4 802.11ax on 2.4GHz, and 4x4 802.11axon 5GHz.-a-a
    With this router I get good reception in my 2 story about 2000 sqft house.

    But, you're getting good reception on 2.4GHz and the 5GHz is unlikely to be as good.
    Yes, most devices (I think all) that have 5 GHz also have 2.4 GHz - I'm
    not aware of any that only have 5, though older (nowadays quite old) may
    only have 2.4.

    There are general RF principles involved here. For example, moisture absorbs RF,
    That's how microwave cooking works (domestic ones mostly use around 2.4
    GHz - inside a "Faraday cage" or metal box, so as not to cook the user).
    which is why snow or rain outside affects things like WISP (community radio).
    And satellite TV, when that was common.
    But even *air* absorbs RF, there is loss per meter.

    This is why the 60GHz WiMax only works out to 25 feet in air. If you were in
    With the permitted power levels, that is, and fairly non-directional
    aerials at both ends. The permitted levels are low for safety reasons.
    a church hall, having a supper, the 60GHz WiMax would not reach from one end of the hall to the other. If you were doing a cable-less HDMI transmitter
    at the end of the hall, the monitor would not light up, because that
    was too far for it. The 60GHz units cheat by also supporting 2.4GHz and> 5GHz, so at 100 feet they still give "some service" by cheating
    and not running at 700MB/sec. You are then limited to much lower rates
    and your monitor at the end of the church hall is like a slide show if
    it runs at all.

    The fire department uses 900MHz. The fire fighter stand near the
    elevator core, when communicating between floors.

    GPS does not work inside the house (except if you press your gear
    right up against the window). That's a microwave frequency.
    In the GHz, yes.

    But AM and FM radio easily penetrate the house shell. You can likely
    manage to block that, with foil backed insulation everywhere. but for
    a lot of houses, the AM/FM radio works OK. These are lower frequencies
    that penetrate materials (88-108MHz for FM).
    And around 1 MHz for AM (about 500 to 1600 kHz). That's "MW" or medium
    wave; LW (long wave) isn't used in north America (which is odd as it
    travels further; the 198 kHz [formerly 200] station covers most of UK
    with one main transmitter), though LW is being gradually turned off in
    Europe (there are only a handful of transmitters left, though a new one recently opened, in Finland I think).

    We can communicate with submarines at depth. The data rate is poor.
    In the bits - or at best, tens of bits - per second. Definitely text only!
    Radio is "not supposed to work underwater", but we made it work.
    This involves ultra-low frequencies and transmitters with four large
    diesel generators running to make it work. If we tried to make Wifi
    And the subs using "towed arrays", basically long wires! And the land
    ends needing _very_ long ones - or "peninsular antennas", meaning you
    drop wires over the sides of a peninsula and use the sea route around
    the peninsula as the aerial.
    work at the bottom of your swimming pool... that's not going to work.

    There are general principles involved. The lower the frequency,
    the more possible it is to penetrate something.

    We use these stations, to make self-calibrating wall clocks.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_VLF_transmitters

    WWVB Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 60.0 kHz # Serves North America, reception once a day usually
    # Sufficient to calibrate a clock, once a day. 100uV level.

    DCF77 Mainflingen, Mainhausen, Germany 77.5 kHz # Each of these transmitters, runs at different power levels
    # and some have extensive long-wire antenna systems.

    There are some pictures of the clock-works, the ferrite antenna, on
    a self calibrating clock. And this works inside the house.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DCF77
    Yes, I have one that I think uses DCF77 - runs for years, genuinely, on
    a single AA cell. That's continuous, or at least more than once a day -
    it may be only once a minute. (MSF Rugby in UK, on 16, 19, and 60 kHz,
    used to be second pulses, but I'm not sure if that's still operating.)

    Some country systems can calibrate most of the day, others
    rely on "skip" for distant signal reception at night.
    Though that's more AM radio on MW and SW (shortwave).

    Some broadcast TV systems in cottage country, work because
    there are "two hops over water". And I consider it hilarious,
    when a grain ship sailing out in the bay... and the analog TV stops
    or the picture starts to ripple :-) That's a propagation
    Does USA still have some analog TV then?
    effect at a distance. Some people in cities, were receiving
    broadcast analog television, because it was reflected off a billboard
    on the side of a hill. Productive multi-path. Nobody thought of
    replacing that or duplicating it, with a purpose built reflector.
    Though - originally set up in analogue days, but digital TV uses the
    same bands - some especially in Scotland community aerial systems use
    two aerials connected together on opposite sides of hills/mountains,
    sometimes passively sometimes with amplification, to provide signals to otherwise shaded valleys/glens.
    2.4 GHz is 12.5 cm; 5 GHz is 6 cm; 60 GHz is 5 mm. The shorter ones
    penetrate far less, though do bounce round a bit more inside a room. At
    the low end, the clock signals - 60 kHz is 5 km, and the frequencies for submarines are in the 15 to 20 km wavelength range! (Does penetrate the
    sea _a bit_, but needs a long aerial at both ends, especially the
    transmitting end!)

    Paul
    John
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From wasbit@wasbit@REMOVEhotmail.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Fri Oct 24 09:33:29 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 22/10/2025 18:30, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/22/2025 12:30 PM, Stuart wrote:
    wired apart from portable devices such as phones and
    tablets. Desktop computers don't come with Wi-Fi!
    I have had two computers with WIFI. The HP desktop that was recently replaced had USB, so I was able to connect to the internet either by USB
    or WIFI.-a My new desktop also has the ability to connect both WIFI or USB.-a In my experience, many desktops and laptops use a card that
    combines both Bluetooth and WIFI on the same card. So I would expect any desktop the can connect with Bluetooth will also connect with WIFI.

    To me this makes sense as it means one radio sender and receiver, that
    can be used for either by changing the radio frequency.

    It has been stated else where in this tread that HP printers do not come with a USB port and must be connected wireless.-a-a While that maybe true for some models; in my research to buy my new printer, all HP printers
    that I looked at could be connect either wireless or USB port.-a On this model, HP7601, the port is on the front of the printer on the lower left side.

    The USB port on the front is for input eg a thumb drive. The USB 'B'
    port for connectivity is on the back.
    --
    Regards
    wasbit
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Fri Oct 24 11:34:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Fri, 10/24/2025 3:29 AM, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/24 5:56:41, Paul wrote:

    Some broadcast TV systems in cottage country, work because
    there are "two hops over water". And I consider it hilarious,
    when a grain ship sailing out in the bay... and the analog TV stops
    or the picture starts to ripple :-) That's a propagation

    Does USA still have some analog TV then?
    This was back in analog TV days. I saw the TV start to act up,
    looked out the window and could see a large (metallic) vessel
    crossing the path the TV signal would follow.

    We were well out of range of the TV signal, but being analog,
    you could sometimes faintly see the news announcer, and the
    audio might still be working. For the signal to be received,
    it needed to bounce a couple times over water, and this meant
    it was easily disturbed.

    Now that digital transmission is involved, that television
    set today (equipped with a digital STB) is "black screen".
    There just isn't enough signal for digital recovery (FEC).

    For a while, there was a free satellite we could receive
    and a dish for it, but all satellites eventually have to
    shut down, and that bird is gone now, and only a
    terrestrial signal is available (with a Yagi maybe). The
    good thing about TV there, is the available OTA transmitters all
    share the same hill. You don't need a rotator. But the
    Yagi would need to be a pretty big one. And that roof...
    I don't even want to think about climbing up there. There's
    no ladder at the builders-merchant big enough to scale it.
    Near the seashore, the wind can be ferocious (not good if
    you're on a tall ladder). The roof materials only last half
    as long on that place, as the house in the city.

    You could put an antenna in the loft, but that loses you
    6dB when there is rainwater on the roof. And that takes
    all the fun out of trying to aim a high gain antenna in
    a loft, when you're losing that much signal.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 10:45:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-23 03:37, TJ wrote:
    On 2025-10-21 23:34, Paul wrote:
    One of the reasons HP resorted to Wifi-only printing, was to force users
    to use a smartphone APP or the like, for setup. This would lead the user
    through an HP SMART Ink subscription (an unnecessary shipping of HP-
    branded
    inks or toners which you're billed for and show up in your post box).
    This is so hated by some customers forced into it, you can find small
    boxes of HP print materials, sitting on the top of the postal boxes,
    where the people in my community feel that by not taking the ink home,
    it somehow gets you out of your contract.

    The result of this slick-willy approach to doing business is:

    1) You stop doing business with HP entirely, and tell them to
    -a-a-a shove their printers up their ass.

    2) You only select printers with backup print paths. Wifi+Eth, Wifi+USB.

    Sure, my other-brand printer has Wifi, but it also has USB, and
    that's why I felt safe in buying it. If there is a USB port it
    means the company wants to do business the proper way, with the
    consumer in control and no arm-twisting and slick-willy crap.

    -a-a-a Paul

    The manuals for both of my Wifi-capable printers wanted me to use the smartphone app to install them, but buried deeply into those manuals,
    the last resort, was some kind of statement that you could also install
    by first connecting a usb cable.

    Of course, none of the manual's methods of installation would work for
    me because I'm using Linux, so I didn't really care. I simply used my distro's printer install tool - took about five minutes for each
    printer, if that. No mention of "instant Ink" subscriptions, though the manual said they are available. With Linux, *I* am in charge.

    Why TWO printers? The printer of my old usb-only Officejet went bad, but
    the scanner continued to work for three years. When the scanner finally
    quit I went looking for a stand-alone scanner, but quickly found the
    most economical way to buy a scanner was with a printer attached, so
    that's what I did. I almost never use that as a printer, but I use the scanner often.

    BTW, some admittedly brief web research doesn't turn up any HP printers
    that are Wifi-only, that don't have a usb port. This leads me to believe that such beasts are the exception, rather than the rule, and are
    difficult to find.

    My Laserjet M209dw has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want
    the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status
    page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main led with
    several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but it
    was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is still
    with the original toner, I use it very little.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 10:54:05 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-23 20:14, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 1:35 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    -a Yes. I forgot to mention that most consumers very likely can't be
    bothered to pull/mount LAN cables through their house. Much too awkward,
    too much work and*why*?
    You forgot the expense of fishing the cables through the walls and
    attic, if available.

    I had new circuits installed in my house, and know the work of pulling
    cable through the house will be several hundered dollars per cable.-a-a I had some electric lines pulled from on side of my house to the garage on
    the other side. It was $250 per line.-a-a The third line I planned to put
    in was from an existing box to another about four feet up the wall on an open unfinished wall. They wanted $250 for the also, I ended up doing it myself.

    Amazing prices.

    I wired a flat in Madrid, using existing tubes designed for phone lines,
    from sitting room to three bedrooms, and another connection behind the
    sofa. I only hired the man to pull the cables, me being the other chap
    in the team (you typically need 2 people to pull-push cables). I did all
    the connections and bought the materials, so I hired a normal
    electrician that was willing, because many say they don't do computer
    cables (they don't understand them, no training).

    I think I paid him about 150re4.


    Some years before, my brother and I pulled coax for a TV from the garage
    to my living room.-a It took the two of us working together over and hour
    to finish the job.

    I think rather than "not be bothered", a cost analysis of the
    performance of the two techniques, would find the Cable looses by a wide margin.

    The cost of the cable alone, not counting labor would be several times
    more than cost of a good wireless router, and the router would provide access in nearly any part of their house, not just the point where the
    cable comes out of the wall.

    Telef||nica here has an offer to wire the house using fibre to the rooms,
    but they put it externally, glued or nailed to the walls.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 11:12:31 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-24 06:56, Paul wrote:
    On Thu, 10/23/2025 6:54 PM, knuttle wrote:
    On 10/23/2025 6:16 PM, Paul wrote:

    ...
    The fire department uses 900MHz. The fire fighter stand near the
    elevator core, when communicating between floors.

    The building should have a special coax cable going to basement to top,
    maybe in the elevator well or nearby, that misses a section of the mesh
    at each flat, acting as a duct for the waves from floor to floor.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leaky_feeder


    GPS does not work inside the house (except if you press your gear
    right up against the window). That's a microwave frequency.

    But AM and FM radio easily penetrate the house shell. You can likely
    manage to block that, with foil backed insulation everywhere. but for
    a lot of houses, the AM/FM radio works OK. These are lower frequencies
    that penetrate materials (88-108MHz for FM).

    We can communicate with submarines at depth. The data rate is poor.
    Radio is "not supposed to work underwater", but we made it work.
    This involves ultra-low frequencies and transmitters with four large
    diesel generators running to make it work. If we tried to make Wifi
    work at the bottom of your swimming pool... that's not going to work.

    AFAIK it is unidirectional, from land to sub. The sub trails a long wire behind. They use slow morse.

    But there is related system that work in caves. ELF waves. I saw a
    prototype in an electronics magazine long ago.

    ...

    Some broadcast TV systems in cottage country, work because
    there are "two hops over water". And I consider it hilarious,
    when a grain ship sailing out in the bay... and the analog TV stops
    or the picture starts to ripple :-) That's a propagation
    effect at a distance. Some people in cities, were receiving
    broadcast analog television, because it was reflected off a billboard
    on the side of a hill. Productive multi-path. Nobody thought of
    replacing that or duplicating it, with a purpose built reflector.

    HAMs used Moon reflection. I think there was a test with a satellite
    that was a big metallized balloon.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Graham J@nobody@nowhere.co.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 10:19:04 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    [snip]


    I wired a flat in Madrid, using existing tubes designed for phone lines, from sitting room to three bedrooms, and another connection behind the
    sofa.

    I think here in the UK we could learn a lot from Spain. The idea of
    having tubes in place ready for phone line installation is marvellous.
    Do you also have tubes for electrical power cables? And ducting for
    water pipes?

    Perhaps even ducts beside roads for electricity, water, and sewage? So
    there would never be any need to dig up roads to install or repair these?
    --
    Graham J
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 12:03:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-27 11:19, Graham J wrote:
    Carlos E.R. wrote:

    [snip]


    I wired a flat in Madrid, using existing tubes designed for phone
    lines, from sitting room to three bedrooms, and another connection
    behind the sofa.

    I think here in the UK we could learn a lot from Spain.-a The idea of
    having tubes in place ready for phone line installation is marvellous.
    Do you also have tubes for electrical power cables?-a And ducting for
    water pipes?

    There are ducts for cables since many years. The ducts for phones in new
    homes became mandatory on March 2, 1998. A law named "common
    infrastructure in buildings for access to telecommunications services".
    That year we also got diverse telephone companies, competition started.

    No ducts for water pipes, though.



    Perhaps even ducts beside roads for electricity, water, and sewage?-a So there would never be any need to dig up roads to install or repair these?

    On new streets there are indeed ducts for electricity and
    telecommunications, same law I think. They also have to install the
    water and sewage pipes.

    My house gets electricity and telecoms via aerial cables, installed on
    the walls of the block. It is old.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Mon Oct 27 11:14:28 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025/10/27 10:12:31, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-10-24 06:56, Paul wrote:
    []
    We can communicate with submarines at depth. The data rate is poor.
    Radio is "not supposed to work underwater", but we made it work.
    This involves ultra-low frequencies and transmitters with four large
    diesel generators running to make it work. If we tried to make Wifi
    work at the bottom of your swimming pool... that's not going to work.

    AFAIK it is unidirectional, from land to sub. The sub trails a long wire
    I'm pretty sure it is. The subs would not have the power to reply!
    behind. They use slow morse.
    I don't think so now - some very low data rate teletype (almost
    certainly with encryption).

    But there is related system that work in caves. ELF waves. I saw a
    prototype in an electronics magazine long ago.

    I think such systems (also used for signalling in WW1 I think!) also tap
    into the ground/rock as part of a conductor - i. e. not pure radio,
    there's some element of direct conduction too.> ...

    Some broadcast TV systems in cottage country, work because
    there are "two hops over water". And I consider it hilarious,
    when a grain ship sailing out in the bay... and the analog TV stops
    or the picture starts to ripple :-) That's a propagation
    effect at a distance. Some people in cities, were receiving
    broadcast analog television, because it was reflected off a billboard
    on the side of a hill. Productive multi-path. Nobody thought of
    replacing that or duplicating it, with a purpose built reflector.

    HAMs used Moon reflection. I think there was a test with a satellite
    that was a big metallized balloon.

    I think they still do use moonbounce occasionally, though I think it's
    mainly as a novelty. It does need a pretty high-gain aerial!
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nuno Silva@nunojsilva@invalid.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 01:39:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-27, Carlos E.R. wrote:


    My Laserjet M209dw has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want
    the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status
    page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things
    difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main
    led with several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but
    it was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is
    still with the original toner, I use it very little.

    ... wait, they're doing that in LASER too? I thought it'd be inkjet
    only, I mean, that *is* the segment known for overly expensive ink
    cartridges and workflows that tend to waste more ink.

    And, yeah, toner easily lasts years for low usage.
    --
    Nuno Silva
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J. P. Gilliver@G6JPG@255soft.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 12:09:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025/10/28 1:39:10, Nuno Silva wrote:
    On 2025-10-27, Carlos E.R. wrote:


    My Laserjet M209dw has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to
    associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want>> the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status>> page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things
    difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main
    led with several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but
    it was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is
    still with the original toner, I use it very little.

    ... wait, they're doing that in LASER too? I thought it'd be inkjet
    If by "that" you mean no display, laser printers have traditionally been connected to networks, so the design philosophy of interrogating status remotely was stronger - especially if supported by an IT department, who
    would _prefer_ not to come out to look at it.
    only, I mean, that *is* the segment known for overly expensive ink
    cartridges and workflows that tend to waste more ink.
    They need to self-clean from time to time to stop the heads clogging up
    - and ink is the only liquid they have to clear them out with. (Rather
    like certain human bodily functions which use what is available, though
    it can be wasteful.)>
    And, yeah, toner easily lasts years for low usage.

    Indeed. Basically, an unused laser printer is _not_ doing anything
    equivalent to the drying-out-and-clogging that an inkjet one does.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()ALIS-Ch++(p)Ar++T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Carlos E.R.@robin_listas@es.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 14:50:43 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-28 13:09, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/28 1:39:10, Nuno Silva wrote:
    On 2025-10-27, Carlos E.R. wrote:


    My Laserjet M209dw has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to
    associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want
    the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status
    page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things
    difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main
    led with several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but
    it was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is
    still with the original toner, I use it very little.

    ... wait, they're doing that in LASER too? I thought it'd be inkjet

    If by "that" you mean no display,

    He means toner subscriptions.

    Yes, this printer has that, but was optional. I asked the vendor before purchasing it, otherwise I would not have bought it. I don't know if
    being in the EU has something to do with it being optional.

    laser printers have traditionally been
    connected to networks, so the design philosophy of interrogating status remotely was stronger - especially if supported by an IT department, who would _prefer_ not to come out to look at it.

    My older colour printer, CP1515n has a tiny display and some keys
    (yes/Ok, no/cancel, left, right, back). I think I could configure the IP address there, but that was a decade ago.

    My cousin has a much more modern colour laser printer with a better
    menu. I seem to recall you could access functions to print from an USB
    stick, and you have to navigate it. I don't remember if it also has a
    scanner.
    --
    Cheers, Carlos.
    ESEfc-Efc+, EUEfc-Efc|;
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 12:17:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/28/2025 9:50 AM, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-10-28 13:09, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/28 1:39:10, Nuno Silva wrote:
    On 2025-10-27, Carlos E.R. wrote:


    My Laserjet M209dw-a has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to
    associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want >>>> the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status >>>> page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things
    difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main
    led with several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but
    it was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is
    still with the original toner, I use it very little.

    ... wait, they're doing that in LASER too? I thought it'd be inkjet

    If by "that" you mean no display,

    He means toner subscriptions.

    Yes, this printer has that, but was optional. I asked the vendor before purchasing it, otherwise I would not have bought it. I don't know if
    being in the EU has something to do with it being optional.

    laser printers have traditionally been
    connected to networks, so the design philosophy of interrogating status
    remotely was stronger - especially if supported by an IT department, who
    would _prefer_ not to come out to look at it.

    My older colour printer, CP1515n has a tiny display and some keys (yes/
    Ok, no/cancel, left, right, back). I think I could configure the IP
    address there, but that was a decade ago.

    My cousin has a much more modern colour laser printer with a better
    menu. I seem to recall you could access functions to print from an USB stick, and you have to navigate it. I don't remember if it also has a scanner.


    Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about the availability
    of HP printers to connect by a USB connection. As said before most HP printers can be connected wireless or by USB. It is possible that when
    they look at the printer they do not see the USB plug that has become
    standard on most computer. (The one about that is about 1/8" by 3/8".)
    Many of the HP printers use the less common plug that is shaped like a
    house. It they have used this type of plug since at least 2000, as it
    was on the HP932c printer that I bought in the late 1990's
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Frank Slootweg@this@ddress.is.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 16:54:09 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    knuttle <keith_nuttle@yahoo.com> wrote:
    [...]
    Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about the availability
    of HP printers to connect by a USB connection. As said before most HP printers can be connected wireless or by USB. It is possible that when
    they look at the printer they do not see the USB plug that has become standard on most computer. (The one about that is about 1/8" by 3/8".)
    Many of the HP printers use the less common plug that is shaped like a house. It they have used this type of plug since at least 2000, as it
    was on the HP932c printer that I bought in the late 1990's

    Indeed, many printers, at least the HP ones, use USB-B receptacles on
    the device side, like is also common on many scanners.

    Many people are used to seeing USB-A receptacles and overlook the
    USB-B ones.

    See
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#/media/File:USB_2.0_and_3.0_connectors.svg>
    on what the plugs look like.
    (redirect from <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_hardware#Connectors>).

    As the reference says, these are 'legacy' plugs, not the more modern
    USB-C ones. But many, many devices still use 'legacy' receptacles/plugs,
    for example my WD Elements disk drives have (USB 3.X) Micro-B on the
    device end and (USB 3.X) A on the computer end of the cable.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 14:38:11 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Tue, 10/28/2025 12:17 PM, knuttle wrote:

    Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about the availability
    of HP printers to connect by a USB connection.-a As said before most HP printers
    can be connected wireless or by USB.-a It is possible that when they look at the printer they do not see the USB plug that has become standard on most computer. (The one about that is about 1/8" by 3/8".) Many of the HP printers
    use the less common plug that is shaped like a house.-a-a It they have used this type of plug since at least 2000, as it was on the HP932c printer
    that I bought in the late 1990's

    There are two sizes of USB-B connector end (USB3 bigger than USB2, printers normally use a USB2 one).

    There are a couple disk enclosures in the other room, with USB-B.
    I can't reuse the USB-B there, because it is the taller one and
    won't fit the printer (haven't tried).

    There's nothing particularly abnormal about an A-to-B cable,
    except you don't have many of those in the house when you need
    one :-) If you went to the computer store and said "I need a USB
    printer cable", they should know which one that is.

    *******

    https://www.reddit.com/r/printers/comments/1dt0ten/hp_is_pulling_the_ripcord_and_finally_ditches_hp/

    https://boingboing.net/2024/07/09/hp-will-no-longer-sell-printers-that-require-online-connection.html

    "Machines that print onto paper" are a fading business: everyone knows that you can buy a
    ~$100 Brother Whatever and you're good for another 5 years. Hence the ink fracking shenanigans,
    lock-in schemes, clear-eyed hatred of own customers, etc."

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hank Rogers@Hank@nospam.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 18:04:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Paul wrote on 10/28/2025 1:38 PM:
    "Machines that print onto paper" are a fading business: everyone knows that you can buy a
    ~$100 Brother Whatever and you're good for another 5 years. Hence the ink fracking shenanigans,
    lock-in schemes, clear-eyed hatred of own customers, etc."

    Paul

    I am 100% DONE with any HP, Canon, epson printer.

    Brother is marginal, but still the least evil. They all follow the
    Ferengi rules of acquisition, and are to be despised. Brother's
    software is the pits, but the printer works OK once you clean everything up.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From TJ@TJ@noneofyour.business to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 21:32:34 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-28 09:50, Carlos E.R. wrote:
    On 2025-10-28 13:09, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    On 2025/10/28 1:39:10, Nuno Silva wrote:
    On 2025-10-27, Carlos E.R. wrote:


    My Laserjet M209dw-a has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to
    associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want >>>> the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    In retrospect, maybe making the printer print the diagnostic or status >>>> page would print the MAC before configuration. HP makes things
    difficult because the printer doesn't have a display, just a big main
    led with several colours, and a few tiny leds and buttons.

    This printer came with an option for smart "toner" subscription, but
    it was not mandatory (EU thing?). The printer may have 3 years and is
    still with the original toner, I use it very little.

    ... wait, they're doing that in LASER too? I thought it'd be inkjet

    If by "that" you mean no display,

    He means toner subscriptions.

    Yes, this printer has that, but was optional. I asked the vendor before purchasing it, otherwise I would not have bought it. I don't know if
    being in the EU has something to do with it being optional.

    I don't think so. The Amazon listing for my M254dw from "The HP Store"
    has this as one of the "features:"

    "Never shop for toner again: Save 10% with Amazon Dash Replenishment
    upon activation; your printer measures toner levels and places smart
    reorders when you are running low; no subscription fees "

    Of course, the "smart reorders are from HP, where a full set of 4
    high-yield toner cartridges would cost in excess of $500US. But it IS optional.

    Alternatively, if you were lucky enough to avoid firmware updates, the
    M254dw will operate just fine with aftermarket toner, at about 10% of
    the HP toner cost. There is a risk in that - there are complaints about
    toner leakage. I've only had my printer for a year or so, bought it used
    on ebay and had to replace the toner soon after, but the aftermarket
    carts are working just the same as the HP ones they replaced. No leakage whatsoever.

    laser printers have traditionally been
    connected to networks, so the design philosophy of interrogating status
    remotely was stronger - especially if supported by an IT department, who
    would _prefer_ not to come out to look at it.

    My older colour printer, CP1515n has a tiny display and some keys (yes/
    Ok, no/cancel, left, right, back). I think I could configure the IP
    address there, but that was a decade ago.

    Sounds like my old CP1215. That one was usb-only, no duplex. Printing on
    both sides of the paper was a pain in the butt.

    My cousin has a much more modern colour laser printer with a better
    menu. I seem to recall you could access functions to print from an USB stick, and you have to navigate it. I don't remember if it also has a scanner.


    My M254dw has a touchscreen display, which told me the printer's IP. It
    also made it extremely easy to connect to my network, changing that IP.
    And Mageia Linux on all my computers made installing the printer on each
    one a breeze, took less than 5 minutes even on the slowest one.

    TJ
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From knuttle@keith_nuttle@yahoo.com to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Tue Oct 28 21:33:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 10/28/2025 7:04 PM, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Paul wrote on 10/28/2025 1:38 PM:
    -a-a-a-a-a "Machines that print onto paper" are a fading business: everyone >> knows that you can buy a
    -a-a-a-a-a-a-a ~$100 Brother Whatever and you're good for another 5 years. >> Hence the ink fracking shenanigans,
    -a-a-a-a-a-a-a lock-in schemes, clear-eyed hatred of own customers, etc."

    -a-a Paul

    I am 100% DONE with any HP, Canon, epson printer.

    Brother is marginal, but still the least evil.-a They all follow the
    Ferengi rules of acquisition, and are to be despised.-a Brother's
    software is the pits, but the printer works OK once you clean everything
    up.

    I believe the printer will be with us for many years to come. It the
    1970 the word was that paper would disappear, as with the computer and
    its ability to communicate it would no longer be needed. However we
    still have paper printers over 50 years later and we still have budget
    item for paper in most families and organizations.

    My son in law said the desktops and laptops would disappear, however
    they are still with us.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Wed Oct 29 09:12:00 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Tue, 10/28/2025 9:33 PM, knuttle wrote:


    My son in law said the desktops and laptops would disappear, however they are still with us.

    The distinction there, is "someone wanted the desktops and laptops to go away". They want us to use platforms that make it easier for them to abuse us.

    I'm still free to do whatever I want with my desktop.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Nuno Silva@nunojsilva@invalid.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 08:46:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On 2025-10-28, knuttle wrote:

    Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about the
    availability of HP printers to connect by a USB connection. As said
    before most HP printers can be connected wireless or by USB. It is
    possible that when they look at the printer they do not see the USB
    plug that has become standard on most computer. (The one about that is
    about 1/8" by 3/8".) Many of the HP printers use the less common plug
    that is shaped like a house. It they have used this type of plug
    since at least 2000, as it was on the HP932c printer that I bought in
    the late 1990's

    The "house-like" one *is* standard, if this is type B we're talking
    about, in fact, while I haven't looked at many printers (and scanners
    too), and haven't dealt with more recent ones (so maybe there has been
    some change owing to USB 3 or type C?), I think I haven't seen such
    devices using anything other than a type B socket for a USB connection
    to a host computer.
    --
    Nuno Silva
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 10:16:03 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Nuno Silva wrote:

    The "house-like" oneis standard, if this is type B we're talking
    about, in fact, while I haven't looked at many printers (and scanners
    too), and haven't dealt with more recent ones (so maybe there has been
    some change owing to USB 3 or type C?), I think I haven't seen such
    devices using anything other than a type B socket for a USB connection
    to a host computer.

    All this dates back to early USB spec, where there was a strict split
    between "USB host" using type-A connectors and "USB peripherals" using
    type-B connectors on portable devices (cameras/phones/mice) these tended
    to be the mini-B or micro-B, or horrid proprietary connectors.

    I don't believe I ever saw a mini-A or micro-A connector

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USB_On-The-Go#/media/File:USB_2.0_connectors.svg>

    Then along came OTG with the extra pin to decide which side is host or peripheral, and which side provides power.

    Now of course, we have the nirvana of type C connectors :-P
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 06:18:41 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Sun, 11/2/2025 3:46 AM, Nuno Silva wrote:
    On 2025-10-28, knuttle wrote:

    Earlier in this thread there was some discussion about the
    availability of HP printers to connect by a USB connection. As said
    before most HP printers can be connected wireless or by USB. It is
    possible that when they look at the printer they do not see the USB
    plug that has become standard on most computer. (The one about that is
    about 1/8" by 3/8".) Many of the HP printers use the less common plug
    that is shaped like a house. It they have used this type of plug
    since at least 2000, as it was on the HP932c printer that I bought in
    the late 1990's

    The "house-like" one *is* standard, if this is type B we're talking
    about, in fact, while I haven't looked at many printers (and scanners
    too), and haven't dealt with more recent ones (so maybe there has been
    some change owing to USB 3 or type C?), I think I haven't seen such
    devices using anything other than a type B socket for a USB connection
    to a host computer.


    You can buy USB-C to USB-B cables. I'm not going to check, but
    if one exists, the other should exist. USB-C to USB-B2 and USB-C to USB-B3. They pretend here, that only a Mac has a USB-C connector. All my new
    computers have (one) USB-C connector :-) A token connector to say "yup,
    we got one". I don't have *any* USB-C peripherals. And I wouldn't
    buy a USB-C peripheral... until they stop selling garbage (many devices
    cannot sustain high I/O rates for very long, making the promise of
    "speed" a false promise). If MLC storage devices existed as peripherals,
    they could run at wire speed all day long -- now, count how many
    of those exist. The number is zero.

    https://www.amazon.ca/CableCreation-Printer-Scanner-Macbook-Printers/dp/B012V563B6

    For passthru video purposes, sure, the cable runs at high speed
    all day long. But that is unidirectional transmission and this
    is hardly something worth paying for, when a DP++ or HDMI port
    does the same thing. And the cables are longer on DP++
    or HDMI. And you can't even trust there is a graphics signal
    on your USB-C port. You don't know. You're supposed to
    "assume" it is there, on "some" products, and you will be
    able to tell by the odor of flop sweat emanating from the
    product, as to whether it has that or not. The adverts are
    always coy about such things.

    Paul

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Andy Burns@usenet@andyburns.uk to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 11:25:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    Paul wrote:

    I don't have any USB-C peripherals.

    My first type-C device was (RIP) from 2014, I'm trying to have as few type-B/mini-B/micro-B as possible.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Allodoxaphobia@trepidation@example.net to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 13:54:45 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 10:45:35 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:

    My Laserjet M209dw has wifi and ethernet, but no usb. I had to
    configure it using my phone. And I had the trouble of having to
    configure twice, because I needed to find the MAC address in order to associate a fixed address in the router. I use Linux, and I don't want
    the printer to have a different IP each week or day.

    $ arp
    Address HWtype HWaddress Flags Mask Iface
    192.168.0.95 ether 04:0e:3c:e3:e7:d1 C enp3s0
    router ether 28:ee:52:6b:a1:3d C enp3s0
    nix4 ether 00:06:4f:22:be:29 C enp3s0

    "HWaddress" == MAC
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Lloyd@not.email@all.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 20:03:35 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 06:18:41 -0500, Paul wrote:

    [snip]

    You can buy USB-C to USB-B cables. I'm not going to check, but if one
    exists, the other should exist. USB-C to USB-B2 and USB-C to USB-B3.
    They pretend here, that only a Mac has a USB-C connector. All my new computers have (one) USB-C connector :-) A token connector to say "yup,
    we got one". I don't have *any* USB-C peripherals. And I wouldn't buy a
    USB-C peripheral...

    Phones normally have USB-C, even the recent iPhones.

    until they stop selling garbage (many devices cannot
    sustain high I/O rates for very long, making the promise of "speed" a
    false promise). If MLC storage devices existed as peripherals,
    they could run at wire speed all day long -- now, count how many of
    those exist. The number is zero.

    [snip]

    Paul
    --
    53 days until the winter celebration (Thursday, December 25, 2025 12:00
    AM for 1 day).

    Mark Lloyd
    http://notstupid.us/

    "So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You'd better
    rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe." -- Isaac Asimov and Robert Silverberg _Nightfall_
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mark Lloyd@not.email@all.invalid to comp.periphs.printers,alt.comp.os.windows-10,alt.comp.os.windows-11 on Sun Nov 2 20:06:38 2025
    From Newsgroup: comp.periphs.printers

    On Sun, 2 Nov 2025 11:25:45 +0000, Andy Burns wrote:

    Paul wrote:

    I don't have any USB-C peripherals.

    My first type-C device was (RIP) from 2014, I'm trying to have as few type-B/mini-B/micro-B as possible.

    I have a few non-data devices that use USB-C for charging, a fireplace lighter, an electric screwdriver, and a couple of power banks.

    --
    53 days until the winter celebration (Thursday, December 25, 2025 12:00
    AM for 1 day).

    Mark Lloyd
    http://notstupid.us/

    "So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You'd better
    rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe." -- Isaac Asimov and Robert Silverberg _Nightfall_
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2