• Heh Heh - New Fedora, HUGE Updates Needed

    From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Mar 1 01:40:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    Hilarious ! Downloaded a fresh Fedora-XFCE from their
    site yesterday. Got it installed as a KVM machine on
    Trixie (big fight, not as straight a path as with VBox).

    The FUNNY bit, despite being fresh off the press, it
    is now installing *764* updates over my slow-ass
    connection :-)

    Tried AQEMU, which is nice, but it wouldn't RUN the
    VM once I took the ISO CD out of the list. WAS able
    to import the QCOW2 and run it using 'virt-manager'
    however. Note that with AQUEMU you have to run it
    sudo or it just PRETENDS to create the virtual disk.
    MIGHT be fixable by adding 'disk' to the regular
    users groups ???

    AQUEMU, despite the fancy interface, does NOT seem
    to be able to recognize the wifi or even a bridge
    interface. Virt-manager MAYbe can if you set the
    network to, on my box, 'virbr0' which network-manager
    says is a bridge. I'll try that soon.

    Note HUGE amounts of VM stuff/apps had to be installed
    before virt-manager or AQEMU could find the QEMU
    'connection'.

    DID connect my box to the, oft shitty, hardwire
    ports on the router. This DID give it internet
    access, hence the updates. However it's not MY
    damned subnet. More fooling around to do ...

    Didn't things used to be a lot easier, like
    just a few years ago ???

    Was gonna go to sleep last night and then at the
    last moment stuff about the Iran war started up.
    Didn't sleep until maybe 8am ... major burn out :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Mar 1 18:13:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 01:40:58 -0500, c186282 wrote:


    AQUEMU, despite the fancy interface, does NOT seem to be able to
    recognize the wifi or even a bridge interface. Virt-manager MAYbe can if
    you set the network to, on my box, 'virbr0' which network-manager says
    is a bridge. I'll try that soon.

    I've wondered about the schedule for creating isos. The B&N store is next
    to the gym and I got curious last week. Linux Magazine still exists in hardcopy and, blast from the past, it has DVDs for both Ubuntu and Fedora
    43.

    In that model it's understandable the software will be stale, but with
    almost all isos it seems the first thing it does is look for a internet connection and phone home to update.

    I don't know about Xfce, but I'm running KDE which recently released
    Plasma 6. Both the Arch and Fedora boxes have been doing a lot of updates.
    The first round for Fedora was close to a GB. Yesterday's was also close
    to a GB, including the 6.18.13 kernel. The Arch box timed out but it was trying to get 6.18.13 too. Arch hadn't been updating the kernel as
    frequently and I believe they were waiting for 6.19.

    I used KVM and didn't have problems other than trying to use a img.zx.
    That didn't fly for some reason. I did VMs both on Fedora (Leap 16) and,
    for laughs, Ubuntu Server on the Raspberry Pi. Yeah, the Pi OS is based on Trixie and has KVM although some of the tests for it don't work as
    expected.

    In both cases the VM created a virtual NAT, using the host's connection.
    The VMs worked fine although the IPs were something like 192.168.101.93,
    not on my subnet as you mention. Now comes the fly in the ointment. My
    whole system is wireless, not an ethernet connection in sight. Using a
    bridge supposedly allows you to get on the subnet, 192.168.1.x in this
    case -- but it doesn't work with wireless. A NIC can handle it but not
    wifi. I can ping the VMs IP from the host but that's it. No problem for
    trying various distros but if I were to serve up a webpage from the VM
    only the host would be able to see it.

    The Linux users group met yesterday and the guy who had started it rolling (again) is a newbie (6 months) and tried the KVM route but it was too
    complex for him. He said he did get VirtualBox installed on Mint but
    didn't actually use it.

    fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
    but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Sun Mar 1 22:34:14 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 3/1/26 13:13, rbowman wrote:
    On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 01:40:58 -0500, c186282 wrote:


    AQUEMU, despite the fancy interface, does NOT seem to be able to
    recognize the wifi or even a bridge interface. Virt-manager MAYbe can if
    you set the network to, on my box, 'virbr0' which network-manager says
    is a bridge. I'll try that soon.

    I've wondered about the schedule for creating isos. The B&N store is next
    to the gym and I got curious last week. Linux Magazine still exists in hardcopy and, blast from the past, it has DVDs for both Ubuntu and Fedora
    43.

    Wow ! Well done Linux Mag !

    Though a tiny packet with a mini SD card might be
    cheaper and at this point more accessible than an
    olde tyme DVD.

    In that model it's understandable the software will be stale, but with
    almost all isos it seems the first thing it does is look for a internet connection and phone home to update.

    I don't know about Xfce, but I'm running KDE which recently released
    Plasma 6. Both the Arch and Fedora boxes have been doing a lot of updates. The first round for Fedora was close to a GB. Yesterday's was also close
    to a GB, including the 6.18.13 kernel. The Arch box timed out but it was trying to get 6.18.13 too. Arch hadn't been updating the kernel as
    frequently and I believe they were waiting for 6.19.

    I used KVM and didn't have problems other than trying to use a img.zx.
    That didn't fly for some reason. I did VMs both on Fedora (Leap 16) and,
    for laughs, Ubuntu Server on the Raspberry Pi. Yeah, the Pi OS is based on Trixie and has KVM although some of the tests for it don't work as
    expected.

    I'm doing opposite, Fedora VM on Trixie.

    As said, the VM can only see the hardwire net port
    but not the wifi. There may be workarounds, but not
    as clean as straight-up access to the local wifi.

    Fedora does not seem to have anything as convenient
    as Debs 'net-manager' where you can micro-tweak all
    the important stuff. Yea, the info is in a config
    file (or two or three), but that's more work. Gonna
    try altering the XML file that KVM uses to set the
    net addresses.

    As said, this AQEMU app is even nicer than virt-manager
    but it does have a few tricks - like you set up the VM
    and QCOW2 virtual disk first, THEN use the interface
    and add the install CD (yer ISO or image) and set it
    to bootable. Alas you need to remove the CD after the
    install and that's where it gets unhappy. There IS a
    'boot order' thingie, with the CD ahead of the HDD,
    maybe if I alter that stuff ... ?

    Note that VBox sometimes also requires exterminating
    the CD ... sometimes moving the ISO to a different dir ...
    so this issue isn't unique.

    In both cases the VM created a virtual NAT, using the host's connection.
    The VMs worked fine although the IPs were something like 192.168.101.93,
    not on my subnet as you mention.

    'Zactly

    Now comes the fly in the ointment. My
    whole system is wireless, not an ethernet connection in sight. Using a
    bridge supposedly allows you to get on the subnet, 192.168.1.x in this
    case -- but it doesn't work with wireless. A NIC can handle it but not
    wifi. I can ping the VMs IP from the host but that's it. No problem for trying various distros but if I were to serve up a webpage from the VM
    only the host would be able to see it.

    There are a whole two physical plugs on the back
    of my Air router - and I've had mixed experiences
    with them. I did plug the box in question direct
    into the router and was thus able to install/update.
    However it's not the best solution - and the odd
    subnet is, well, odd ... DHCP should have picked
    my real subnet.

    The Linux users group met yesterday and the guy who had started it rolling (again) is a newbie (6 months) and tried the KVM route but it was too
    complex for him. He said he did get VirtualBox installed on Mint but
    didn't actually use it.

    I got VBox working on mint. Alas the VM, and then
    the Mint host, started acting weirder and weirder.
    More and more latency even crept into the keyboard
    and mouse inputs. No obvious stuff hogging the system.
    Thus, flushed and am trying Trixie again as the host.

    I suppose Centos might be the best VM host, it was
    kinda adjusted for hosting multiple VMs in the modern
    fashion after all. Alas the thought of dealing with
    that horrible Gnome interface again ! :-)

    fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
    but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.

    Well, OSuse used to have some good GUI tools ... are
    they gone ???

    If not GUI then, well, apt/zypper/pacman/dnf and such are
    pretty much the same and one is as 'good' as another.

    My Fedora - for some reason 'dnfdragora' is malfunctioning
    after the updates. I'll try a few things to unstick it
    (sez updating cache at the start but never does, hanging
    the whole thing). Could try manually deleting the cache
    so it'll start fresh ...

    Anyway, my immediate issue is wifi in the KVM machine.
    This is not hard in VBox, but I've had a number of
    issues installing/using VBox of late (as said here)
    so the paved road, KVM/QEMU, may need to be walked
    for now.

    Ah, 'future issue' ... there used to be serverS - mail,
    DB, etc ... then everybody (foolishly) tried to save
    a dollar and bought just ONE good box and ran all the
    servers as VMs. Great, until yer one box craps. NOW
    however, local servers are being rapidly replaced by
    cloud servers/suites. Maybe great until the net does
    not work or Vlad cyberattacks everything.

    Oh well, stuff to keep me busy ...


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Mar 2 06:51:49 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 22:34:14 -0500, c186282 wrote:


    fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
    but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install
    but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to
    offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.

    Well, OSuse used to have some good GUI tools ... are they gone ???

    If not GUI then, well, apt/zypper/pacman/dnf and such are pretty much
    the same and one is as 'good' as another.

    Yast was one of the big selling points but Myrlyn is the new GUI package manager. It' okay and it says you can install yast2. I tend to use the CLI tools like zypper or dnf rather than the GUI. In most cases I know what I
    want and don't need to go shopping.

    I downloaded the offline iso. It's huge, 4.4 GB which led to the learning experience that you need to format the USB stick to exfat. vfat can't do
    over 4 GB. Admittedly it has both GNOME and KDE, maybe even Xfce, and the LibreOffice crap. What it doesn't have is gcc and friends. It does have Python.

    The KDE version is pretty much KDE same as the Fedora and Arch boxes.
    Other than Myrlyn I didn't see any special openSUSE secret sauce.

    Anyway, my immediate issue is wifi in the KVM machine. This is not
    hard in VBox, but I've had a number of issues installing/using VBox
    of late (as said here)
    so the paved road, KVM/QEMU, may need to be walked for now.

    I didn't do anything special on Fedora or the Pi's Trixie version, just pointed it at the iso and accepted the defaults. When I look at the VM
    Info NIC entry it shows a Virtual NAT and the 192 IP address. I didn't
    mess with it after doing the research and finding br0 isn't going to fly
    over a wifi connection.

    That makes sense to me. You can go out through the NIC to the ethernet
    router and it's going to assign a IP on the subnet but the wireless router doesn't work like that. No big deal except I can't access it from anyplace other than the host. I can ping machines on the 192.168.1.x subnet. I
    haven't tried it but I probably could mount the NFS export with my music
    since it's * in exportfs.


    Oh well, stuff to keep me busy ...

    Yeah, time to go back to the Pi. I've played around with the Picos but
    never did too much with the GPIO on the Pi. I doubt it is as fast as the
    Picos because of the Cortex-A architecture but it works.

    The PiDog does fine with a 3+ but it has a hat between the Pi and all the servos, sensors, and so forth.



    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Mar 2 03:58:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 3/2/26 01:51, rbowman wrote:
    On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 22:34:14 -0500, c186282 wrote:


    fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
    but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install
    but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to
    offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.

    Well, OSuse used to have some good GUI tools ... are they gone ???

    If not GUI then, well, apt/zypper/pacman/dnf and such are pretty much
    the same and one is as 'good' as another.

    Yast was one of the big selling points but Myrlyn is the new GUI package manager. It' okay and it says you can install yast2. I tend to use the CLI tools like zypper or dnf rather than the GUI. In most cases I know what I want and don't need to go shopping.

    Yast/2 was GREAT. THE main selling point for OSuse.
    It was the Mark Above.

    I downloaded the offline iso. It's huge, 4.4 GB which led to the learning experience that you need to format the USB stick to exfat. vfat can't do
    over 4 GB. Admittedly it has both GNOME and KDE, maybe even Xfce, and the LibreOffice crap. What it doesn't have is gcc and friends. It does have Python.

    The KDE version is pretty much KDE same as the Fedora and Arch boxes.
    Other than Myrlyn I didn't see any special openSUSE secret sauce.

    Anyway, my immediate issue is wifi in the KVM machine. This is not
    hard in VBox, but I've had a number of issues installing/using VBox
    of late (as said here)
    so the paved road, KVM/QEMU, may need to be walked for now.

    I didn't do anything special on Fedora or the Pi's Trixie version, just pointed it at the iso and accepted the defaults. When I look at the VM
    Info NIC entry it shows a Virtual NAT and the 192 IP address. I didn't
    mess with it after doing the research and finding br0 isn't going to fly
    over a wifi connection.

    Hmmm ... just spent an hour+ working on the KVM Fedora
    VM. Online instructions say you can do 'connections'
    and then choose 'bridged'. Well, there IS NO 'bridged'
    anymore ... a number of other, useless, options, but ...

    TRY to set whatever to the local net and you get an
    "in use by <enpxxx>" on the host and it won't work.
    Can't even boot the VM. Did save the orig def, but
    it didn't really deliver.

    Sorry, but this seems pretty much USELESS. The one good
    bit about KVM VMs was that you could set them so they'd
    be on your LOCAL net - same as a separate box plugged in.

    Spent hours trying all options.

    No, I'm NOT gonna use SSH connections ... that's retarded.


    That makes sense to me. You can go out through the NIC to the ethernet
    router and it's going to assign a IP on the subnet but the wireless router doesn't work like that. No big deal except I can't access it from anyplace other than the host. I can ping machines on the 192.168.1.x subnet. I haven't tried it but I probably could mount the NFS export with my music since it's * in exportfs.


    Oh well, stuff to keep me busy ...

    Yeah, time to go back to the Pi. I've played around with the Picos but
    never did too much with the GPIO on the Pi. I doubt it is as fast as the Picos because of the Cortex-A architecture but it works.

    The PiDog does fine with a 3+ but it has a hat between the Pi and all the servos, sensors, and so forth.

    Well, I'm retired now ... so none of this is "for the money"
    anymore. However I'd really really LIKE it to work for some
    reasons I've mentioned.

    And no, ffmpeg STILL crashes or hangs on Mint, MX and Trixie
    after so many startups. Can NOT find any reason.

    Shit, all I want to do is make sequential rtsp captures
    with sound - scaled a bit so they don't use much space.
    The ffmpeg params are well documented and DO work - but
    now only for AWHILE. One hour, six hours, eight hours -
    then disaster. Really don't want to reboot the box every
    hour or two. This shit started around late December and
    PERSISTS. I feel betrayed.

    No, NOT gonna use Winder$ .......

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From jayjwa@jayjwa@atr2.ath.cx.invalid to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Mar 2 12:04:25 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> writes:

    As said, this AQEMU app is even nicer than virt-manager
    but it does have a few tricks - like you set up the VM
    and QCOW2 virtual disk first, THEN use the interface
    and add the install CD (yer ISO or image) and set it
    to bootable. Alas you need to remove the CD after the
    install and that's where it gets unhappy. There IS a
    'boot order' thingie, with the CD ahead of the HDD,
    maybe if I alter that stuff ... ?
    I'm not a fan of these "wrapper" applications for QEMU because QEMU is
    already complex enough without having to deal with it with mittens on
    besides. In plain QEMU, the -boot option sets the devices you want to
    look to in order to boot. This way, it doesn't matter if the install
    media is present or not after the initial install.

    -boot order=cda,menu=on

    That's usually, but depending on your guest OS:
    Search first hard disk.
    Look to cdrom.
    Search removable media (floppy).

    In both cases the VM created a virtual NAT, using the host's connection.
    The VMs worked fine although the IPs were something like 192.168.101.93,
    not on my subnet as you mention.
    Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode with
    the qemu-bridge-helper program (which must be SETRUID). br0 should exist beforehand.


    -rws--x--x 1 root root 2598232 Sep 10 18:33 /usr/libexec/qemu-bridge-helpe

    This will plug a tap into your bridge and off you go, assuming DHCP,
    SLAAC or similar on the brige and proper routing. The external device
    does not exactly have to be in the bridge.

    I suppose Centos might be the best VM host, it was
    kinda adjusted for hosting multiple VMs in the modern
    fashion after all.
    Slackware - it doesn't try to be the system admin for you and assume
    this and that nor does it change upstream so much that it's
    unrecognizable. That's perfect for doing advanced stuff. Right now I
    have 6 different hosts, with different networking technologies.

    Here's a networked FreeDOS with sound, able to reach the internet via
    ip4:

    qemu-system-i386 -cpu 486 -m 256M -rtc base=localtime\
    -device pci-serial -vga vmware -device adlib \
    -device pcnet,netdev=net0,mac=52:54:00:12:34:62 \
    -netdev bridge,id=net0 -serial pty \
    -drive file=c_harddisk_freedos_sf.img,format=qcow2,media=disk\
    -cdrom FD14BNS.iso -boot order=cda,menu=on -daemonize

    When it starts, it will tell you the device that will become the first
    COM device in the guest. If it's a Unix guest, you can then, for
    example, login with ttyS0, use kermit, or even run uucp.
    --
    PGP Key ID: 781C A3E2 C6ED 70A6 B356 7AF5 B510 542E D460 5CAE
    "The Internet should always be the Wild West!"
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From rbowman@bowman@montana.com to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Mar 2 18:56:19 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On Mon, 02 Mar 2026 12:04:25 -0500, jayjwa wrote:

    Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode with
    the qemu-bridge-helper program (which must be SETRUID). br0 should exist beforehand.

    Once again -- no ethernet, no bridge. The host only uses wifi.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to comp.os.linux.misc on Mon Mar 2 20:11:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.misc

    On 3/2/26 13:56, rbowman wrote:
    On Mon, 02 Mar 2026 12:04:25 -0500, jayjwa wrote:

    Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode with
    the qemu-bridge-helper program (which must be SETRUID). br0 should exist
    beforehand.

    Once again -- no ethernet, no bridge. The host only uses wifi.

    Very vexing !

    Somewhere I saw an option to 'network' via SSH.
    That's awfully round-about and surely much slower
    than wifi, but it'd be SOME connection, enough
    to xfer files at least. There's also the 'shared
    folder' option - again unclean but in theory you
    can shuttle lots of files through it.

    When I used VMs on the job the boxes were always
    wired connections to the local net ... thus I
    never really noticed this lacking in KVM.

    VBox easily finds/uses bridged connections - but, as
    said, it's currently very flakey on the latest
    Deb-derived. Works fine on my last-year's MX, but not
    on the latest one. Hopefully Trixie will get it more
    together by the .1 version - may just have to wait.

    Hmmm ... somewhere I do have a wifi bridge/repeater.
    Plug the hardwire into that and set the adapter to
    my local wifi subnet ? They're not expensive.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2