AQUEMU, despite the fancy interface, does NOT seem to be able to
recognize the wifi or even a bridge interface. Virt-manager MAYbe can if
you set the network to, on my box, 'virbr0' which network-manager says
is a bridge. I'll try that soon.
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 01:40:58 -0500, c186282 wrote:
AQUEMU, despite the fancy interface, does NOT seem to be able to
recognize the wifi or even a bridge interface. Virt-manager MAYbe can if
you set the network to, on my box, 'virbr0' which network-manager says
is a bridge. I'll try that soon.
I've wondered about the schedule for creating isos. The B&N store is next
to the gym and I got curious last week. Linux Magazine still exists in hardcopy and, blast from the past, it has DVDs for both Ubuntu and Fedora
43.
In that model it's understandable the software will be stale, but with
almost all isos it seems the first thing it does is look for a internet connection and phone home to update.
I don't know about Xfce, but I'm running KDE which recently released
Plasma 6. Both the Arch and Fedora boxes have been doing a lot of updates. The first round for Fedora was close to a GB. Yesterday's was also close
to a GB, including the 6.18.13 kernel. The Arch box timed out but it was trying to get 6.18.13 too. Arch hadn't been updating the kernel as
frequently and I believe they were waiting for 6.19.
I used KVM and didn't have problems other than trying to use a img.zx.
That didn't fly for some reason. I did VMs both on Fedora (Leap 16) and,
for laughs, Ubuntu Server on the Raspberry Pi. Yeah, the Pi OS is based on Trixie and has KVM although some of the tests for it don't work as
expected.
In both cases the VM created a virtual NAT, using the host's connection.
The VMs worked fine although the IPs were something like 192.168.101.93,
not on my subnet as you mention.
Now comes the fly in the ointment. My
whole system is wireless, not an ethernet connection in sight. Using a
bridge supposedly allows you to get on the subnet, 192.168.1.x in this
case -- but it doesn't work with wireless. A NIC can handle it but not
wifi. I can ping the VMs IP from the host but that's it. No problem for trying various distros but if I were to serve up a webpage from the VM
only the host would be able to see it.
The Linux users group met yesterday and the guy who had started it rolling (again) is a newbie (6 months) and tried the KVM route but it was too
complex for him. He said he did get VirtualBox installed on Mint but
didn't actually use it.
fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.
fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install
but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to
offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.
Well, OSuse used to have some good GUI tools ... are they gone ???
If not GUI then, well, apt/zypper/pacman/dnf and such are pretty much
the same and one is as 'good' as another.
Anyway, my immediate issue is wifi in the KVM machine. This is not
hard in VBox, but I've had a number of issues installing/using VBox
of late (as said here)
so the paved road, KVM/QEMU, may need to be walked for now.
Oh well, stuff to keep me busy ...
On Sun, 1 Mar 2026 22:34:14 -0500, c186282 wrote:
fwiw, I think the Leap 16 VM would really like to do a bunch of updates
but I'm not going to. I did KDE after an extremely brief GNOME install
but with KDE on Arch and Fedora I really can't see what openSUSE has to
offer except 'zypper' instead of apt, dnf, or pacman for updates.
Well, OSuse used to have some good GUI tools ... are they gone ???
If not GUI then, well, apt/zypper/pacman/dnf and such are pretty much
the same and one is as 'good' as another.
Yast was one of the big selling points but Myrlyn is the new GUI package manager. It' okay and it says you can install yast2. I tend to use the CLI tools like zypper or dnf rather than the GUI. In most cases I know what I want and don't need to go shopping.
I downloaded the offline iso. It's huge, 4.4 GB which led to the learning experience that you need to format the USB stick to exfat. vfat can't do
over 4 GB. Admittedly it has both GNOME and KDE, maybe even Xfce, and the LibreOffice crap. What it doesn't have is gcc and friends. It does have Python.
The KDE version is pretty much KDE same as the Fedora and Arch boxes.
Other than Myrlyn I didn't see any special openSUSE secret sauce.
Anyway, my immediate issue is wifi in the KVM machine. This is not
hard in VBox, but I've had a number of issues installing/using VBox
of late (as said here)
so the paved road, KVM/QEMU, may need to be walked for now.
I didn't do anything special on Fedora or the Pi's Trixie version, just pointed it at the iso and accepted the defaults. When I look at the VM
Info NIC entry it shows a Virtual NAT and the 192 IP address. I didn't
mess with it after doing the research and finding br0 isn't going to fly
over a wifi connection.
That makes sense to me. You can go out through the NIC to the ethernet
router and it's going to assign a IP on the subnet but the wireless router doesn't work like that. No big deal except I can't access it from anyplace other than the host. I can ping machines on the 192.168.1.x subnet. I haven't tried it but I probably could mount the NFS export with my music since it's * in exportfs.
Oh well, stuff to keep me busy ...
Yeah, time to go back to the Pi. I've played around with the Picos but
never did too much with the GPIO on the Pi. I doubt it is as fast as the Picos because of the Cortex-A architecture but it works.
The PiDog does fine with a 3+ but it has a hat between the Pi and all the servos, sensors, and so forth.
As said, this AQEMU app is even nicer than virt-managerI'm not a fan of these "wrapper" applications for QEMU because QEMU is
but it does have a few tricks - like you set up the VM
and QCOW2 virtual disk first, THEN use the interface
and add the install CD (yer ISO or image) and set it
to bootable. Alas you need to remove the CD after the
install and that's where it gets unhappy. There IS a
'boot order' thingie, with the CD ahead of the HDD,
maybe if I alter that stuff ... ?
Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode withIn both cases the VM created a virtual NAT, using the host's connection.
The VMs worked fine although the IPs were something like 192.168.101.93,
not on my subnet as you mention.
I suppose Centos might be the best VM host, it wasSlackware - it doesn't try to be the system admin for you and assume
kinda adjusted for hosting multiple VMs in the modern
fashion after all.
Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode with
the qemu-bridge-helper program (which must be SETRUID). br0 should exist beforehand.
On Mon, 02 Mar 2026 12:04:25 -0500, jayjwa wrote:
Messy and not very functional. Use a bridge and use -bridge mode with
the qemu-bridge-helper program (which must be SETRUID). br0 should exist
beforehand.
Once again -- no ethernet, no bridge. The host only uses wifi.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 18:02:54 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| D/L today: |
10 files (21,017K bytes) |
| Messages: | 193,396 |