From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy
pothead <
pothead@snakebite.com> news:10mooav$2rmq4$
1@pothead.dont-email.me
Sat, 14 Feb 2026 02:57:36 GMT in comp.os.linux.advocacy, wrote:
Snit is simply lazy and for someone who claims he is honest and
honorable he nothing of the sort.
Fortunately, I've only met a few people who are anywhere near as shady as he is. His claims crack me up - because it's so *easy to disprove them*. He's very arrogant for assuming that he can fool people so easily with them. You and I both know that David isn't buying any of it either. He's using Snit. Snit just can't understand that aspect to David.
He drives his cars without insurance which is something honorable people
do not do.
I agree to a point. There are a few situations though where insurance might not be on that specific vehicle at the time but even under most of those situations the individual does have valid insurance. Snit wasn't so hot with the valid insurance aspect.
Especially when he does it multiple, like many, times and keeps getting caught by LEO which shows he is of low intelligence as well.
I don't think he's given anyone? who posts on acw the idea that he was of average or above intelligence. I could very well be mistaken, but, that's
the impression I get. Obviously I've excluded David Brooks in that line of thinking because I don't trust David to provide an honest reply wben it concerns Snit. I provide the repeated excuse from David Brooks concerning Snits strong need to be dishonest with what he often writes about others. "Snit has never lied to me"
I suppose David Brooks could be trying to be coy? with the statement. I
don't trust him either, obviously. For pretty much the same reasons as I
have for Snit. They actually do have a lot in common. More so actually than pcbutts and David Brooks did. Had I known about Snit at the time, I would
have rightfully awarded him first place, atleast for usenet, of one of the most dishonest people I've ever interacted with.
It would be one thing if the knowledge he actually shows he has could
support the arrogance he also shows he has. I can't think of a single technical subject in which Snit could. It's very easy to locate many threads of a technical nature where Snit was shown to be lost with ease though. Snit just isn't the technical person he wants people who don't know him to think
he is.
Yea.
And he is using money that could help someone who is truly in need of
public assistance.
Yep! He could work a part time job. No special skills required for many of them. I'm sure the wages wouldn't be that good, but, he once claimed to be a teacher so he should be used to being paid shit wages. In another discussion, I was thanking a poster for their chosen profession. Teachers don't get the credit or often the respect they have earned in most cases. My comment had nothing to do with Snit, I've never thought of that individual as a teacher and wasn't writing about him in the first place. He took it upon himself to thank me. ROFL! I didn't see a single teacher or teaching assistant license
of any kind when i was checking him out.
For someone who claims he is for equal rights how does he explain away
that one? Never mind. I don't give a hoot.
It's like the other nonsense he posts. He's out for him. He's been that way for a very very long time.
As for what he actually sounds like.. Ahem, have a listen: >><https://www.youtube.com/@PrescottComputerGuy/videos>
Nauseating.
Indeed.
He sounds like a drag queen during story hour at the local elementary
school.
Uhh. Well, since I've never experienced that myself I'm going to have to
take your word for it. :)
I don't think such things work work out very well where I happen to live. I don't really keep up with those sort of things so I can't say for absolute certainty - but - I don't think such a thing would go over very well where I live. I wouldn't be surprised to learn this has happened or is planned to in the next city over, though. Johnson City, TN has a reputation for multiple things. It's practically it's own mini country.
You hear of a minor car accident on a damn near daily basis taking place somewhere in that city. Where as here, there's probably two or possibly
three every month or so on a specific road that has 3 lanes per direction
with a center turning lane. The primary crash area in Johnson city is a
single lane each direction and sometimes it widens into a two lane.
Just wait until the radical Muslims invade his town, and they
will. Snit will be hung by the neck from a lamp post.
The religion of peace doesn't tolerate lbgtq type people.
They'd have to catch him outdoors. He's a bit of a home body. Probably the primary reason he wasn't curb stomped atleast a decade ago already.
Go ahead, view a video. Any video. :)
I've watched a couple and yuck is all I can say.
David Brooks has stated on more than one occasion how professional they are.
<G> David likely finds that voice to be enjoyable.
One of snit's classic trolls is his recipe troll where he lists some
things he does with recipe files that nobody would ever do because they
are not only outdated but bizarre.
It's a ruse though.
The challenge is set up to show things, useless as they are, that a Mac
can do that a Linux or Windows machine has difficulties executing.
Snit's run this same troll a few times and he gets outed every time.
Exactly! He's just trying to jerk people around.
I'm not sure how many videos your ears can tolerate listening to that
voice though. FFS! I can't handle more than a couple before I need a
break. It's almost as annoying as fingernails on a chalkboard for me.
Same.
Very irritating.
He sounds like a flamer to me.
Normally I despise auto tune - but in Snits case, I highly recommend that he use it with settings to change that voice some. I'm sure i'll be accused of sexism or something even worse when I write that I think he should use the software to sound more like the sex he's supposed to be. I don't think I'm asking too much here.
It didn't take you long to figure out atleast one aspect to him. Yes,
he's all about that sort of life style. So much so, his ex wife sought
out high schoolers (I hope it was limited to them considering) to form
school clubs to promote the above. I kid or otherwise bullshit you not!
Ewwwwe.....
I wouldn't let snit anywhere near a kid lbgtq or not.
He's like the gung ho scout leader who doesn't have kids.
Think about that.
He and his grifting wife at one point ran a Daycare center out of their home. I was not able to find records showing it to be a licensed one. I may have saved the picture that snits wife created to be printed as a poster and hung around the school hallways. It was heavily promoting the idea that students should form the lbtg (ad nausem) groups if one didn't already exist in their school. If I do have a copy, I'll upload it and share the link so you can
view it for yourself.
Snit calls everyone who points out his trolling a sock.
It's his feeble attempt at deflection while taking a cheap shot at SC (Steve Carroll). Snit has had an issue with the guy for a long time! My take on
that is SC calls snit out when he's being the dishonest twit he works so
hard to be and he doesn't appreciate it.
He actually offered up the excuse that someone broke into his home and
used his computer to make the posts. Ayep, no bullshit - he really
tried to further game people with that explanation.
What a moron.
Ayep. When asked how they were able to use his computer and seemed to know right where to go on usenet - no response has been forth coming to answer that. Even when additional questions concerning the condition of the
computer at the time. Was it locked out with a password? If so, how did the person who broke in know the password to unlock and make use of it? If the computer wasn't locked - why wasn't it locked?
Snit has never answered any of those questions either, as far as I'm aware. Maybe he thinks that ignoring them makes them as if they were never asked?
Who really knows what passes for logical thought it what passes for a
working brain in his case.
Snit's technical knowledge of computers is that of a rank amateur.
Agreed. He's a glorified end user.
The fact that an idiot like him actually believed he could run a
successful computer repair shop from his double wide trailer is
frightening.
He's of the mistaken impression that being able to use some specific
software well with a computer means that you have the necessary knowledge to repair them. <G>
He bricked enough computers that a shop local to him at the time pulled
an absolutely brilliant advertising campaign of sorts. They started to
offer a "Snit discount" - if you brought your computer to snit and he
messed it up, they'd give you a break on properly repairing it when you
brought it to them. He must have made them some business in order for
them to take the time and offer such a thing. <BFG>
True story.
A few years ago I called that shop and they knew all about Michael
Glasser and his ability to brick client's computers.
Yep! I couldn't resist calling and fact checking that one myself when I
first read about it. I was *surprised as hell* to learn it was all true!
I've never met anyone else who'd go and do what he actually did. Evidently, several of us have called the place to ask about the Snit discount and
gotten quite the story about how it came to be.
Snit of course denies this - claims we're all making it up. That no such
thing ever took place. He's been in denial mode concerning his court cases
via that website too. We didn't make that stuff up either.
If someone told snit to reverse his battery cables for the winter season
he probably would do it.
Or change the air in his tires out for 'winter air' and do the same during
the summer for 'summer air'
I read somewhere that snit got a flat tire on his car and called his
wife for help. She asked him what tire and he said the front left.
Then she asked how flat it was and snit answered " it's only flat on the bottom. The top of the tire is fine"
A perfect example of snit's lack of technical knowledge.
ROFLMFAO!
He does that with his Nazi accusations against me.
Yep! I've called him out several times for that false accusation! Some other posters have as well; one going practically line by line trying to teach
snit how to read for comprehension. As well as think from a logical perspective. It didn't go well, but, the individual tried.
I actually saved the snit lies from the first accusation against me
and all of the morphing of his story along the way.
:) I've done the same.
I'm just waiting for the appropriate time to spring the trap and expose
snit for the pathological liar that he is.
Well, to be fair, you'd be another decent individual that is confirming that snits an awful troll and extreme liar. I believe Snit was exposed for the piece of shit dishonest troll he is a long time ago.
In effect the more he pushes the lie, the tighter the rope around his
scrawny neck becomes!
He's practically choking himself to death on the false nazi accusation already. He can't handle anyone who challenges his claims. Several have already. I anticipate that more will. His story is that poorly done. I don't think he even realizes how much he's exposing that what several of us have written about his ability to comprehend what he reads is true. He's
providing multiple examples as he works hard to try and attack us. All for writing the truth about him in a manner he finds unpleasant.
Bottom line is snit is a poser who is not fooling anyone.
No argument from me. I fully agree with you.
You bring up a good point that snit is unable to relocate the floodbot
to a real server.
Ayep. Likely because as with the aol chat bot, snit probably didn't write
the entire thing on his own.
I have no doubt that if Carroll were really behind the floodbot he would
be capable of doing that.
But not snit.
I have no doubt that SC could do it. But why would SC go and write something that google seeds nonsense about him and others yet avoids doing the same towards snit? That never made any sense to me either. <G> Snit has never provided a satisfactory explanation for why the bot would attack everyone except for snit but was supposed to be written by SC.
Snit often talks sideways from his mouth - relying his audience to know even less than he does. He picked the wrong newsgroups. The majority of the participants know considerably more than he does. David Brooks being an exception most of the time though.
I laugh whenever DB strokes snit's ego by giving him praise for the most insignificant post.
It's all an act of course.
Of course it is! Snit doesn't see that though. He really thinks David is his friend. We know that's not the case, but, Snit refuses to accept the truth.
He can't grasp that he's being used. Especially not the how and the whys.
DB may not be the brightest bulb in the box but snit's completely dead
and will not lite up at all.
It's complete driver circuit failure combined with burned out LEDs. No real seperation between low and high side. Allowed high side voltages to enter
and destroy the low voltage side along with the LED array they would have driven.
I've only seen this happen in a few chinese ones I bought from one of those fine sites for cheap and or often outright junk. These sort of purchases are imho, the very reason for a netspend prepaid card. <G> If you do get taken,
it won't be for more than what's already available on the card. No risk to actual bank account, no requirement to cancel and have bank card replaced
and a new number issued for it.
Most groups are keen on outing trolls and snit, no matter what sock he
uses to post, gets discovered quickly.
That's true enough.
As for DB, the best thing he can do is ignore snit because longterm
nothing good will come from supporting snit and let's face it
snit has nothing to offer DB.
DBs reputation is so badly damaged though that he's not sustaining more by choosing to be pals with Snit. If anything, snit runs the risk of slight
harm to his reputation - as crazy as that sounds. Snits previous stalking
was tied to a specific individual he knew personally. A family member. It's
no excuse for what snit did, but, it was a specific individual he knew irl
on a personal level. David tries to stalk people he doesn't even know. Along with their business details if he can find them. I can understand what snit did in this case, although I do not agree with it. I cannot understand
Davids when it comes to his stalking behaviour.
I also have to take into consideration that David Brooks had an in person visit with cops for a discussion concerning a 9mm handgun he threatened another posters kids with - told us he had a legal right to own it (but the cops couldn't find anything supporting that) and David wasn't able to
provide them the handgun he supposedly had permisssion to have.
Snits an awful lying, grifting troll - but he hasn't stalked people he
doesn't know (as far as I know anyway) and I haven't seen any posts from him where he went and threatened to shoot anyone. I haven't seen any posts from Snit claiming he owns a firearm and then denying it when police come to talk to him about it. As far as I know, he's had police interaction mostly over being a financially irresponsible driver - not because he threatened
someones kids with a 9mm handgun.
--
Liar, lawyer; mirror show me, what's the difference?
Kangaroo done hung the guilty with the innocent
Liar, lawyer; mirror for ya', what's the difference?
Kangaroo be stoned. He's guilty as the government
--- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2