From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

-hh wrote:

On 2/20/26 07:28, NoBody wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:04:02 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/19/26 06:49, NoBody wrote:

On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:47:41 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/17/26 07:25, NoBody wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:58:04 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/15/26 16:56, pothead wrote:

On 2026-02-15, Bradley K. Sherman <bks@panix.com> wrote:

New U.S. Boat Strike Kills 3 in the Caribbean
...

<https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/us/politics/boat-strike-kills-3.html>

--bks

And how many people might have died from the drugs
being smuggled? Do you have any proof that it wasn't a
narco operation?

"Guilty until proven innocent!" /s

We might know more about the story had Bradley cited a site
that wasn't paywalled garbage.

Perhaps YOU could provide something?

Oh, so are you looking for another free charity link to the
article?

Say so explicitly.

You're admission that you can't support the nonsense is noted.

Nah. I'm just showing readers that you know the source is
credible, but don't want to discuss that news, so as usual,
you're making excuses.

Did YOU read the article? If so post the content that backs the
nonsense you are referringt to? If you don't quote, I will presume
you won't pay for it either which makes posting a link no one can
read dumb and not credible.

I can post ... once you explicitly beg for the free link, you
skinflint.

You brag about making $25.00 dollars an hour from an organization you volunteered for and your calling him a skinflint?

Probably because of this point therein:

"Whatever its activities may have been, a broad array of legal specialists on the use of lethal force have said that the U.S.
strikes are illegal, extrajudicial killings rCo because the
military cannot deliberately target civilians who do not pose an
imminent threat of violence, even if they are suspected of
engaging in criminal acts."

So are you dodging still, or a free charity link to the article?

What am I dodging if I can read it?

"Did YOU read the article? If so post the content that backs the
nonsense you are referringt to?"

...happens to apply both ways.

DUH!

I think your intelligence is dropping by the day.

Of course it is, because I know that cognition peaks at age ~30.
Yet I'm still clearly doing much better than you are, old man.

You claim to know a lot of things Hughie.
Your problem is most of them do not make any sense.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2/20/26 20:50, PissClam wrote:

-hh wrote:

On 2/20/26 07:28, NoBody wrote:

On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 07:04:02 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/19/26 06:49, NoBody wrote:

On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 08:47:41 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/17/26 07:25, NoBody wrote:

On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 09:58:04 -0500, -hh wrote:

On 2/15/26 16:56, pothead wrote:

On 2026-02-15, Bradley K. Sherman <bks@panix.com> wrote:

New U.S. Boat Strike Kills 3 in the Caribbean
...

<https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/14/us/politics/boat-strike-kills-3.html>

--bks

And how many people might have died from the drugs
being smuggled? Do you have any proof that it wasn't a
narco operation?

"Guilty until proven innocent!" /s

We might know more about the story had Bradley cited a site
that wasn't paywalled garbage.

Perhaps YOU could provide something?

Oh, so are you looking for another free charity link to the
article?

Say so explicitly.

You're admission that you can't support the nonsense is noted.

Nah. I'm just showing readers that you know the source is
credible, but don't want to discuss that news, so as usual,
you're making excuses.

Did YOU read the article? If so post the content that backs the
nonsense you are referringt to? If you don't quote, I will presume
you won't pay for it either which makes posting a link no one can
read dumb and not credible.

I can post ... once you explicitly beg for the free link, you
skinflint.

You brag about making $25.00 dollars an hour from an organization you volunteered for and your calling him a skinflint?

Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer sockpuppet.
Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what year did
you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to prove it.

Probably because of this point therein:

"Whatever its activities may have been, a broad array of legal
specialists on the use of lethal force have said that the U.S.
strikes are illegal, extrajudicial killings rCo because the
military cannot deliberately target civilians who do not pose an
imminent threat of violence, even if they are suspected of
engaging in criminal acts."

So are you dodging still, or a free charity link to the article?

What am I dodging if I can read it?

"Did YOU read the article? If so post the content that backs the
nonsense you are referringt to?"

...happens to apply both ways.

DUH!

I think your intelligence is dropping by the day.

Of course it is, because I know that cognition peaks at age ~30.
Yet I'm still clearly doing much better than you are, old man.

You claim to know a lot of things Hughie.
Your problem is most of them do not make any sense.

FYI, if something doesn't make sense to you, it is because its you.
As you've illustrated by using _another_ sockpuppet to whine with.


-hh
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

PissClam wrote:

-highhorse wrote:

NoBody wrote:

I think your intelligence is dropping by the day.

Of course it is, because I know that cognition peaks at age ~30.

That worked out well for me, since that's about how old I was when I
went back to college, full-time.

Yet I'm still clearly doing much better than you are, old man.

There's no way in hell that I could do, today, what I did back then.
I may be past my prime, but I'm still a valued team member, at work.

You claim to know a lot of things Hughie.
Your problem is most of them do not make any sense.

LOL +1

-highhorse is "something else".
--
"of the major desktop OSs, the one today whose advocates still have a
huge inferiority complex is ... Linux." - lying asshole "-hh"
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

-hh wrote:

PissClam wrote:

You brag about making $25.00 dollars an hour from an organization you
volunteered for and your calling him a skinflint?

Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer sockpuppet.
Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what year did
you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to prove it.

$50k a year? I passed that in the late 90's. As an engineer, I've
always made about twice what the average jerk makes, or triple what
"low enders" make.

I'm not wealthy, but I sure won't complain. I've had the incredible
fortune of living a solid "middle class" life in the richest country
in history.
--
'Soon Google will replace Android and poof! the Linux "operating
system" is back to where it only ever belonged: as a dumb OS hosting
databases and files.' - some dumb fsck, June 2017
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On 2/21/26 19:06, chrisv wrote:

-hh wrote:

PissClam wrote:

You brag about making $25.00 dollars an hour from an organization you
volunteered for and your calling him a skinflint?

Nah, I used that minor windfall to poke at another luzer sockpuppet.
Since they ran, you're welcome to take their arrow: in what year did
you exceed $25/hr in your career (if ever)? Do be ready to prove it.

$50k a year? I passed that in the late 90's.

Similar here too, but that wasn't the point.

The point was that it sufficed to drive off an anonymous trolls.

As an engineer, ...

...you should have known better than to jump into a cross-posted thread without doing your research first.

But yeah, I get it: you saw my name and were immediately triggered.

But as has been said before, you need to work on your anger management.


-hh
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:03:54 -0500, -hh
<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

The point was that it sufficed to drive off an anonymous trolls.

Actually, it was Hughie that ran away when I mentioned his lack of documentation.

--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

At Sun, 22 Feb 2026 09:26:14 -0500, Socialism is for losers <MeanDog@Snarl.Dash> wrote:

On Sun, 22 Feb 2026 08:03:54 -0500, -hh
<recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:

The point was that it sufficed to drive off an anonymous trolls.

Actually, it was Hughie that ran away when I mentioned his lack of documentation.

--
Only losers want Socialism or Communism.

1) Your sig is borked. "-- " with a space, please.

2) Hugh is proper.

3) Your Trumpian denials are off-topic in cola.

4) ObLinux:

You can use "HEAD -S" (all caps) or "curl -I" to check
http redirects.
--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 Mem: 258G
OS: Linux 6.19.3 D: Mint 22.3 DE: Xfce 4.18 (X11)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090Ti (24G) (580.126.18)
"Shift key? this keyboard is an automatic!"
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

-hh wrote:

But yeah, I get it: you saw my name and were immediately triggered.

hahaha! You "got it" wrong, as usual. It seems that you're the one
who has been "triggered".

But as has been said before, you need to work on your anger management.

My post was not at all "angry", kook.
--
"The facts are that chrisv has not provided any material support for
his unsubstantiated 'nice' claim." - butthurt loser "-hh"
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.os.linux.advocacy

vallor wrote:

2) Hugh is proper.

'Since Apple did take share from MS, it can be nothing less than an
affront to the Linux "Church" since they're not righteous. Thus,
Apple is marked as a usurping "Heretic", and the zealots will lie to
try to have a chance to burn Apple at the stake, just like how Jan Hus
was lied to, in 1415 in Konstanz.' - kook "-hh"
--
By the way, "hh", you are a pretentious piece of eurotrash-wannabe.
Kindly die in a fire. - vallor
--- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2