Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of
being a troll. Me included.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this
forum is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of
course). I don't accept excuses to privacy.
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being
a troll. Me included.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum
is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I don't accept excuses to privacy.
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being
a troll. Me included.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?8< snip >8
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being
a troll. Me included.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum
is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I don't accept excuses to privacy.
On Mon, 16 Feb 2026 22:41:35 +0100, Carlos E. R. wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being
a troll. Me included.
Join the club. It's the oldest trick in the book. Pretty sad that
someone is still trolling Usenet, after all these years. I almost pity
him.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?8< snip >8
100%
He's a nymshifting troll. I've added his latest sockpuppet, Maria
Sophia, in my (global) kill filter. Everybody should do the same.
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being
a troll. Me included.
Yup. And me.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Based on years of evidence, yes.
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum
is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I
don't accept excuses to privacy.
Correct. Consistent anonymity is pretty easy on usenet.
On 17.02.26 15:05, Chris wrote:
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being >>> a troll. Me included.
Yup. And me.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Based on years of evidence, yes.
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum >>> is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I >>> don't accept excuses to privacy.
Correct. Consistent anonymity is pretty easy on usenet.
Theoretically perhaps. But his linguistic patterns (like anybody elses) reveal his identitiy.
On 2026-02-17 15:44, J||rg Lorenz wrote:
On 17.02.26 15:05, Chris wrote:
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being >>>> a troll. Me included.
Yup. And me.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Based on years of evidence, yes.
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum >>>> is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I >>>> don't accept excuses to privacy.
Correct. Consistent anonymity is pretty easy on usenet.
Theoretically perhaps. But his linguistic patterns (like anybody elses)
reveal his identitiy.
I think that Chris is saying that it is quite difficult to know who is
Joe Somebody actually, we do not need to constantly shift names to keep
a modicum of privacy or anonymity.
On 17.02.26 18:57, Carlos E. R. wrote:
On 2026-02-17 15:44, J||rg Lorenz wrote:
On 17.02.26 15:05, Chris wrote:
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being >>>>> a troll. Me included.
Yup. And me.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Based on years of evidence, yes.
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum >>>>> is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I >>>>> don't accept excuses to privacy.
Correct. Consistent anonymity is pretty easy on usenet.
Theoretically perhaps. But his linguistic patterns (like anybody elses)
reveal his identitiy.
I think that Chris is saying that it is quite difficult to know who is
Joe Somebody actually, we do not need to constantly shift names to keep
a modicum of privacy or anonymity.
If you say so.
That is exactly where the linguistic patterns come in. Arlen can't hide anyway. Certainly not with a simple name change. His "adult" crap and
his wording is always identifying him irrespective of his fake identity.
His arrogance is not allowing him to recognise how stupid he is in reality.
On 17.02.26 15:05, Chris wrote:
Carlos E. R. <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
Arlen is accusing now Frank Slootweg of being a troll. He started a
thread on it.
He has accused, over the years, everybody that contradicts him, of being >>> a troll. Me included.
Yup. And me.
Thus we say that he is the troll here. Do you agree?
Based on years of evidence, yes.
Of course, the vote of a person that has never being heard in this forum >>> is not valid, it could be Arlen in disguise. ;-)
In my book, a person that routinely changes his name, ie, a name
shifter, is a trol for that single reason (there are more, of course). I >>> don't accept excuses to privacy.
Correct. Consistent anonymity is pretty easy on usenet.
Theoretically perhaps. But his linguistic patterns (like anybody elses) reveal his identitiy.
On 2026-02-17 22:01, J||rg Lorenz wrote:
If you say so.
That is exactly where the linguistic patterns come in. Arlen can't hide
anyway. Certainly not with a simple name change. His "adult" crap and
his wording is always identifying him irrespective of his fake identity.
His arrogance is not allowing him to recognise how stupid he is in reality.
Yes, but we do not know his real name.
J||rg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:
Theoretically perhaps. But his linguistic patterns (like anybody elses)
reveal his identitiy.
It means he's recognisable, not that we know his identity. He is still an unknown person.
Nymshifting doesn't change that either as he often asserts himself,because
he wants people to recognise him. He doesn't actually want to be anonymous.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 01:49:01 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| Messages: | 198,761 |