From Newsgroup: comp.misc

From <https://www.cio.com/article/4030789/welcome-to-the-new-world-of-risk-microsoft-cuts-off-services-to-energy-company-without-notice.html>,
a customer of MicrosoftrCOs cloud found itself cut off from all services.
So it is suing Microsoft because the latter

... imposed an rCLabrupt and unilateral suspension of critical
services. Microsoft is currently restricting Nayara EnergyrCOs
access to its own data, proprietary tools, and products rCo despite
these being acquired under fully paid-up licenses. This decision,
based solely on MicrosoftrCOs unilateral interpretation of recent
European Union (EU) sanctions, sets a dangerous precedent for
corporate overreach and raises serious concerns regarding its
implications on IndiarCOs energy ecosystem.rCY

Presumably the cutoff was not done through a court order, otherwise
there would be no grounds to sue (but hey, what do I know). If one
Government can demand such a thing, whatrCOs to stop another one from
doing the same?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.misc

On 30/07/2025 07:03, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

From <https://www.cio.com/article/4030789/welcome-to-the-new-world-of-risk-microsoft-cuts-off-services-to-energy-company-without-notice.html>,
a customer of MicrosoftrCOs cloud found itself cut off from all services.
So it is suing Microsoft because the latter

... imposed an rCLabrupt and unilateral suspension of critical
services. Microsoft is currently restricting Nayara EnergyrCOs
access to its own data, proprietary tools, and products rCo despite
these being acquired under fully paid-up licenses. This decision,
based solely on MicrosoftrCOs unilateral interpretation of recent
European Union (EU) sanctions, sets a dangerous precedent for
corporate overreach and raises serious concerns regarding its
implications on IndiarCOs energy ecosystem.rCY

Presumably the cutoff was not done through a court order, otherwise
there would be no grounds to sue (but hey, what do I know). If one
Government can demand such a thing, whatrCOs to stop another one from
doing the same?

They've been restored. It was to do with EU sanctions against Russia and Russian backed companies like Nayara Energy.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.misc

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:19:51 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

They've been restored.

But the damage has been done. And if one Government can demand such a
thing, whatrCOs to stop another one doing the same?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.misc

On 30/07/2025 22:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:19:51 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

They've been restored.

But the damage has been done. And if one Government can demand such a
thing, whatrCOs to stop another one doing the same?

The damage was done when bean counters got a hard-on for The Cloud. "No
more expensive on-site servers and staff when The Cloud can handle our
needs and scale infinitely" was music to their dumb MBA brains. So they
punt all their critical infrastructure on to The Cloud. Or as we
technical types call it: other people's computers. And this is one of
the consequences, other people can hold you to ransom.

And if it wasn't MS it could be any of the major cloud providers.



--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.misc

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:52:56 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

On 30/07/2025 22:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:19:51 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

They've been restored.

But the damage has been done. And if one Government can demand such a
thing, whatrCOs to stop another one doing the same?

The damage was done when bean counters got a hard-on for The Cloud.

So the fact that services were rCLrestoredrCY doesnrCOt do anything to fix that,
does it?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: comp.misc

On 31/07/2025 23:43, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 08:52:56 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

On 30/07/2025 22:16, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 16:19:51 +0100, mm0fmf wrote:

They've been restored.

But the damage has been done. And if one Government can demand such a
thing, whatrCOs to stop another one doing the same?

The damage was done when bean counters got a hard-on for The Cloud.

So the fact that services were rCLrestoredrCY doesnrCOt do anything to fix that,
does it?

Obviously not. Anyone with clue will be taking steps to ensure this
cannot happen to their company.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2