• Re: Nice way of allocating flexible struct.

    From Tim Rentsch@tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com to comp.lang.c on Tue Jan 6 18:24:27 2026
    From Newsgroup: comp.lang.c

    Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

    bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes:

    On 09/10/2025 04:49, BGB wrote:

    [...]

    Nobody cares about C syntax.

    That is so manifestly untrue that I can't imagine what you actually
    meant.

    Many of us, myself included, don't particularly like some aspects of
    C syntax, but that's not the same as not caring about it.

    Learning all its ins and outs seems be
    a rite of passage.

    Perhaps. It's also necessary if you want to work with the language.

    The trouble is that C-style is so dominant, few people would know
    what a decent syntax looks like. Or, more, likely, they associate
    a clean, well-designed syntax with toy or scripting languages, and
    can't take it seriously.

    But if it looks as hairy as C++ then it must be the business!

    C syntax has survived and been propagated to other languages because
    it's well known, not, I think, because anybody really likes it.

    I like C syntax, most of it anyway. Even the parts I don't
    especially like aren't horrendous, which is more than I can
    say for some other popular languages.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2