• Re: OT: who need the SAVE act ????

    From Mars Sellus@zed@is.dead to rec.food.cooking,aus.politics,can.politics,alt.politics.uk on Wed Feb 25 09:50:28 2026
    From Newsgroup: aus.politics

    On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 03:06:27 +1100
    Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On Wed, 25 Feb 2026 10:35:28 -0000 (UTC), Cindy Hamilton <chamilton5280@invalid.com> wrote:

    On 2026-02-25, Bruce <Bruce@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 18:34:26 -0600, Hank Rogers
    <Hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    So, she is fairly bright, but you are just a tiny bit slower?
    That can work well in many marriages. The best results are when
    each does their best, working at the things they do best as >>>individuals. Of course, assuming both love the other. Good luck
    and hope you do well for each other.

    Don't forget to mention that it's very important that both
    partners, especially the woman, are religious.

    Well, I've got T and most of the other people in this thread
    killfilled.

    My conclusion is that "high-value woman" depends on the beholder.
    Just as high-value man does.

    He's just another right-wing troll.

    Sayeth a left wing troll...etc...

    I wonder if trolls are often
    right-wing or if right-wingers are often trolls.

    Your denials of basic human behaviors leave only YOU standing as a
    sainted vegan leftard, is that about it?


    --- Synchronet 3.21b-Linux NewsLink 1.2