*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or good
old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or good
old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or good
old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or good
old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP that has affected the mismanagement of the policy by multiple insurer:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE.
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as STUPIDITY
made substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of intellectual property
claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11 of our 8 DECEMBER
2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability spaced upon ourselves, as reckless
and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND
FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identity element of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE: JIHAD / #419
- SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are
delirious to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your
failure to recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves
to seek legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP that has affected the mismanagement of the policy by multiple insurer:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE.
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as STUPIDITY
made substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of intellectual property
claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11 of our 8 DECEMBER
2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability spaced upon ourselves, as reckless
and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND
FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identity element of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE: JIHAD / #419
- SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are
delirious to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your
failure to recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves
to seek legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP that has affected the mismanagement of the policy by multiple insurer:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE.
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as STUPIDITY
made substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of intellectual property
claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11 of our 8 DECEMBER
2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability spaced upon ourselves, as reckless
and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND
FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identity element of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE: JIHAD / #419
- SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are
delirious to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your
failure to recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves
to seek legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists often
ask about familial history to understand the genetic and environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a crucial role in
the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions. Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi
(G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in much the same manner that the NAZI
DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated candidates for Germanization) was also
born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194: "Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years ago
on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS, particularly
among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very pleased now
that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued the
following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect the
racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images, <https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/ ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as EUROPEAN:
#194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie. go abroad and evade accountability for atrocity and bestowing anathema upon others as
an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to MARRIAGE) view that it
is intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must
less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and
pious virtue contemporaneous with the pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage, culminating the federal government
under Prime Minister John Howard amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example of,
8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11. inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight; to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of the
Eight trigrams, 12. the male principle, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15. superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19. a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people], 23.
to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS q-2n
(*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie.
PAGE 2 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN ON MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL, CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH would #194 = sh|4 (*au):
*SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "Arbeit macht frei" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an 1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis to
promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context of
their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the entrance
of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor could
provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about suitability
for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 APRIL 2007 "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist"
on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --
ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or a AI CHATBOTpersonification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German Schutzstaffel (SS)
officer and therefore subject to then REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 -
MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to practice PSYCHIATRY is not rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is destitute of
any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE" obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE OF FORCE category of understanding is both a transcendent scaffolding for the articulation of
the rational representations which is an INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE is as a SAVANT FACULTY OF MIND undertaking as a PURE CONCEPT OF REASON the #323 - parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against #239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal rights,
as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have by
even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC EUROPEAN
and perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values of MARRIAGE as only an
empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST a
diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF* *THE* *DEAD* would then provoked a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a GENOCIDAL
HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK BREAD:
AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT: THIS IS
MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. AFTER
THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED, SAYING, THIS
CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS
CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life, which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill
2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act
1975, gives rise to the possibility of religious persecution as an
ideology of heteronomy against autonomy indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation of the 'right of humanity in
their own person' as natural, common law and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific comment
as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities to the
Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman Catholics
may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism. As claim
that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6 rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange
as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant
sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be undertaken and
is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of
their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day
usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO: #288 / #77
- Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my attendance
at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIt is the manner in which I reasonably interpreted those phone messages rCa I was threatened by Mr. Boek, who by his conduct today and in the past, on any object view
appears to be unstablerCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH
THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE (by
which one person differs from others, distinctive native peculiarities)
as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a (G3776): (ROMAN
PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching:
H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - DIMINISHMENT
(CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: #239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043): *REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego: 5
- KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh (H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary involvement
as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of compliance with the
anthropic principle as duty to State and my personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.-a That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm as the incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution or a Limited Corporate entity, done sufficient
to eliminate the mindset that Osama Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist
attack on the World Trade Centre on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of
piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of Islam which can be denied, and
I can legitimately in good conscience lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] = parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING* *FORCE*;
3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic
king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God; 1f2) prosperity
(of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME: 20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching:
H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), EGO: #359 /
#14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA): *CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*- *SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] = ts|ob|o-+
(H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised army); 1a2) host
(of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of whole creation; 1b)
war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7 DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle of
State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action by AXA meant
that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to continue to not
honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006, AXA does
not intend to comment further on matters that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of 8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal process
in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8 OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have
been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
On 12/31/25 17:40, dolf wrote:
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to
have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made
only against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising
some 139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the
magnitude of the task against a time limit for completion implicitly
conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent
capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with
AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A
complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under
Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS
PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 -
CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY /
COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 -
ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX:
SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233
- bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM:
#111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is
transgressed by the TRANS- NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA
GROUP that has affected the mismanagement of the policy by multiple
insurer:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE.
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY
PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA):
*GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP
established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which
you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective
observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the
COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808
- kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as STUPIDITY
made substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of intellectual property
claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11 of our 8 DECEMBER
2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM
9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000)
DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A
BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year,
chronos.month, chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER
YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE
COURT AND HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON
TIME]. THEY ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER
6000 YEARS TO THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/
Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for
exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any
one of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on
the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have
raised in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are
lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal
basis for AFCA to intervene, and the arguments presented are not
connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under
Australian law or the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further
consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft,
mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY
sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3
(1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING*
action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-
tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687
within History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON
CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been
confirmed as viable with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS
and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF
INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / >> #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE /
#37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT
RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE /
CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298:
SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and
spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY
ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt
as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND
OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE
IN MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE
*TRUTH*, AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN
REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any
purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to
make any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about
financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the
AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20:
Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*);
Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR
GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we
doubt that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than
36 hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a
personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the
substance of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its
intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must
less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and
pious virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in
effect ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by
persons of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated
party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police
records and although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the
partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a
convenient future time) conveys a categorical agreement with the
rightful actions expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the
insurer falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion of severe mental
illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe
was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025
[sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability spaced upon ourselves, as
reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE HAVING
SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO
ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY RATHER THAN AN #225
- f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE >> FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identity
element of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE:
JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC
1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 -
sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE*
*OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION*
*IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS
THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR
REFORMS ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19
DECEMBER 2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is
irrational to assert as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself
from the matter to avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now
assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time
since we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are
delirious to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your
failure to recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for
ourselves to seek legal advice about any lawful claim made against the
prejudiced competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their
#expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
PROFESSOR KEKS' INCREDULITY ON THE SUBJECT OF SOLDIER JAKE KOVCO' SUICIDE
There was some discussion PROFESSOR KEKS upon the CONSIDERATION OF
KOVCO'S SELF-INFLICTED GUNSHOT DEATH on 21 APRIL 2006 which was met with some incredulity to due the MEDICAL CONSULTANT had a lack of insight
about PRIVATE JAKE KOVCO coming from BRIAGOLONG REGION (a name plaque appears on the WAR MEMORIAL there) where I also lived in proximity to
where I was born and his mother was known to my siblings.-a It would then
be entirely natural (ie. not held to be a symptom for advancing either
the specious or dubious claim of SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER) to have an opinion and particularly in the circumstance of my LETTERS PATENT #87 / #239 interest concern about the implications of questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as
self inflicted suicidal gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak
(H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006.
AS CONTRADICTION OF IDENTIFIED FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE
(#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE
OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
Raises serious ethical considerations about PROFESSOR KEK'S [MALE: #141
- l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] AGAINST A PERSON'S #1310
- ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE which places a compulsion for an accountability for which such a parasite as he which is only
contemptuous to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
As a values statement that can be unequivocally inferred from the
several reference of BRIAGOLONG within the DIARY NOTES DATED 4 APRIL
2007 associated with the CONTINGENT ACTION of thoughtful protest
undertaken upon the ANZAC DAY in ONTIC: #243 - stoich|-+i (G4748): PROCEEDING THE ROW OF REMEMBRANCE MARCHERS and a week prior to the
funeral service, which confirms this rational objective: "The
development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law and Common
Law right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim, that my past conduct has integrity, and with regards to the Insurance Contract, is an expression of Autonomy of Will and a clear strategy to avoid heteronomy
of that Will through impunity of my natural, common law, Constitutional
and legislative rights.
I have by correspondence dated 27 MARCH 2007 as application made under section 51(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, requested that the Chief Commissioner of Police undertake a review of a decision as
response to my letter dated 28 APRIL 2006 and 12 MAY 2006 initiating
request for documents relating to my arrest on ANZAC Day 25 APRIL 2006.
The arresting member Senior Constable Peter Andrews 16298 cannot now
give an adequate explanation as to how my natural and common law
compliant Intellectual Property as GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon should as
an explanation of force as a category of understanding of TELOS=#237
should so mimic the circumstances of his USE OF FORCE VP FORM 237
completed by SENIOR CONSTABLE 16298 @ 1600 hours on 25 APRIL 2006.
#237 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10]-a /
#432 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #5, #300, #1, #10] = erg|izomai (G2038): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to work, labour, do work; 2) to trade, to
make gains by trading, 'do business'; 3) to do, work out; 3a)
*EXERCISE*, *PERFORM*, *COMMIT*; 3b) to cause to exist, produce; 4) to
work for, earn by working, to acquire;
#237 as [#1, #50, #5, #60, #70, #40, #1, #10] /
#781 - MALE TOTAL: #376 as [#1, #50, #5, #600, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = an|-chomai (G430): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to hold up; 2) to hold
one's self erect and firm; 3) *TO* *SUSTAIN*, *TO* *BEAR*, *TO* *ENDURE*;
#1485 - FEME TOTAL: #432 as [#500, #10, #30, #70, #300, #10, #40, #70,
#400, #40, #5, #9, #1] = philotim|-omai (G5389): {UMBRA: #1086 % #41 =
#20} 1) to be fond of honour; 1a) to be actuated by love of honour; 1b)
from a love of honour to strive to bring something to pass; 2) to be ambitious; 2a) *TO* *STRIVE* *EARNESTLY*, *MAKE* *IT* *ONE'S* *AIM*;
#1245 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #10, #50] / #1985 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #800] = stoich|-+i (G4748): {UMBRA: #1985 % #41 = #17} 1) *TO* *PROCEED* *IN* *A* *ROW* *AS* *THE* *MARCH* *OF* *A* *SOLDIER*, go in order; 1a) metaph. to
go on prosperously, to turn out well; 2) to walk; 2a) to direct one's
life, to live;
N++
GRAPPLE (376, 432)@[74, 12, 73, 40, 57, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2006.4.25&time:16.00>
Considerable discussion had occurred at the BRIAGOLONG POLICE STATION as
to the lawfulness of my arrest and detention on the grounds of a common
law breach of peacerCothat as I had no intention of breaching the peace
and that reading a biblical quote as an act of piety hardly constituted
a derogatory manner.-a I had showed him a copy of my natural law and
common law intellectual property as GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENONrCohe had no intellectual conceptualization of it as paradigm of mind and
teleological anthropic cosmological principle as DUTY TO STATE {@9: Sup:
27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#376); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#432)} in compliance
to the principles of individual, government and non-government organizational and military accountability [...] expressed as a rCLrequire[ment] and command [for] all Our Officers and Ministers, Civil
and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our said Commonwealth to
be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, incapacity, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, from time to time, under the provisions of these Our
Letters Patent, administer the Government of Our said CommonwealthrCY and the notion of rCyAdministration of GovernmentrCO conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901."
On 1/1/26 08:59, dolf wrote:
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists
often ask about familial history to understand the genetic and
environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a
crucial role in the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions.
Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in
Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage
possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty
superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in
much the same manner that the NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated
candidates for Germanization) was also born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194:
"Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years
ago on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their
species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS,
particularly among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very
pleased now that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of
these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being
perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH >> TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen
according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE
OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the
realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the
preservation of the race through selection and the healthy inheritance
of good blood, I hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all
unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 -
CONTRARIETY: LI (#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 -
INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego:
38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this
purpose the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16
- CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage
certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the
choice of withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 -
FULLNESS: SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the
SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being
awarded the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into
marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND
ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15
- REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move
us; the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was
a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler
had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational
and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the
German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY
members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent
process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued
the following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect
the racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the
biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December >> 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images,
<https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/
ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie.
go abroad and evade accountability for atrocity and bestowing anathema
upon others as an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to
MARRIAGE) view that it is intrinsically disordered for a person of
same sex attraction (must less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of
possessing any sapient and pious virtue contemporaneous with the
pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage,
culminating the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard
amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS,
VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53
- ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of
marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example
of, 8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11.
inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight;
to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of
the Eight trigrams, 12. the male principle, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15.
superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19.
a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people],
23. to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate
energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds
the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS
q-2n (*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie. >>
PAGE 2 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC
DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN ON MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL,
CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH would #194 = sh|4 (*au):
*SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "Arbeit macht frei" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+):
*WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an
1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis
to promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context
of their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the
entrance of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor
could provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific
conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about
suitability for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 >> APRIL 2007 "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant
Psychiatrist" on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP -->
RESOLUTION LIFE -- -a> ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or
a AI CHATBOT personification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed
the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German
Schutzstaffel (SS) officer and therefore subject to then REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): >> *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to
practice PSYCHIATRY is not rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as
a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic
and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is
destitute of any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<):
*PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-):
*RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE"
obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE
OF FORCE category of understanding is both a transcendent scaffolding
for the articulation of the rational representations which is an
INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE is
as a SAVANT FACULTY OF MIND undertaking as a PURE CONCEPT OF REASON
the #323 - parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against
#239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights
or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like
intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather
than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal
rights, as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a
tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have
by even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC
EUROPEAN and perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values of MARRIAGE as
only an empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST
a diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF*
*THE* *DEAD* would then provoked a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a GENOCIDAL
HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK
BREAD: AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT:
THIS IS MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF
ME. AFTER THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED,
SAYING, THIS CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT
AS YE DRINK IT, IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS
BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering
support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 -
Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial
Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 -
BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of
individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life,
which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage
Legislation Amendment Bill 2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act
1961 and the Family Law Act 1975, gives rise to the possibility of
religious persecution as an ideology of heteronomy against autonomy
indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation
of the 'right of humanity in their own person' as natural, common law
and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief
in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific
comment as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities
to the Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman
Catholics may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism.
As claim that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular
unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and
convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease
AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6
rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of
employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against
this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of
my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination
and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to
arrange as further appointments, however, there is a requirement
expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21
to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further
written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer
ought to grant sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a
statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be
undertaken and is contingent upon attendance at any Independent
Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that
consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment
of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination
and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt
of their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of
providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of
MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the
specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the
common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-
day usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable
Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO:
#288 / #77 - Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 -
Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 -
GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As
the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I
sought your considerations with regards to my administrative
requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs
organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is
contingent upon my attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE
UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIt is the manner in
which I reasonably interpreted those phone messages rCa I was threatened
by Mr. Boek, who by his conduct today and in the past, on any object
view appears to be unstablerCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA
Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE
SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY
LODGED WITH THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF
*BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a
fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<):
*PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-):
*RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449):
INHERENT NATURE (by which one person differs from others, distinctive
native peculiarities) as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a
(G3776): (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37])
self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY;
PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA):
EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME:
(none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself
Behind; I-Ching: H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 -
DIMINISHMENT (CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching:
H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE*
*RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY:
#239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043):
*REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY*
*NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego:
5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh
(H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and
lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19
vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary
involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO
associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of
compliance with the anthropic principle as duty to State and my
personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.
That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm
as the incorporeal basis to our own Constitution or a Limited
Corporate entity, done sufficient to eliminate the mindset that Osama
Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist attack on the World Trade Centre on 11
SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of
Islam which can be denied, and I can legitimately in good conscience
lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] =
parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING*
*FORCE*; 3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 %
#41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of
Davidic king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness,
truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f)
righteousness (as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God;
1f2) prosperity (of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME:
#141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME:
20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place;
I-Ching: H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO),
EGO: #359 / #14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19
- Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING
OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA):
*CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*-
*SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] =
ts|ob|o-+ (H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth,
army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised
army); 1a2) host (of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of
whole creation; 1b) war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US
17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7
DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO
BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE
UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability
for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle
of State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19
vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my
voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO >> associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and
discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action
by AXA meant that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to
continue to not honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently
states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006,
AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have been
previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of
8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal
process in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8
OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of
issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters
that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal
Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and
Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints
Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
On 12/31/25 17:40, dolf wrote:
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to
have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made
only against the summary of matters) a substantial document
comprising some 139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking
(ie. the magnitude of the task against a time limit for completion
implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to
cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in
compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH
AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation
arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy
obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE
RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 -
CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY /
COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29
OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 -
ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION
IX: SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING*
#233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM:
#111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is
transgressed by the TRANS- NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA
GROUP that has affected the mismanagement of the policy by multiple
insurer:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE.
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't
grasp the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10
DECEMBER 2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE
CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED
INALIENABLE RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - >>> c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of
CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT
against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag
of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned
nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas
or the crux of our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES*)} as STUPIDITY made substantive grounds (ie. the
assertion of intellectual property claims are an established fact
conveyed on PAGE 11 of our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED
FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000)
DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A
BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year,
chronos.month, chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER
YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE
COURT AND HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON
TIME]. THEY ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES
OVER 6000 YEARS TO THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/
Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for
exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any
one of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on
the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have
raised in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are
lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal
basis for AFCA to intervene, and the arguments presented are not
connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under >>> Australian law or the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further
consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, >>> mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY
sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3
(1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING*
action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING
(on- tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in >>> 1687 within History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON
CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been
confirmed as viable with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS
and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF
INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / >>> #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / >>> #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT
RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF
THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE /
CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#940 - asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298:
SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully
and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO
CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL
contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS,
TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE
IN MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE
*TRUTH*, AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN
REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance
your own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of
discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN
FINANCIAL COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman
service to make any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by
consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in
accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES
- SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): >>> *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on
(G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING
AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we
doubt that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less
than 36 hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you
convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our
CULTURAL HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to
the substance of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years
amounts to unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of
two telephone calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged
illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its
intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must
less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and
pious virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in
effect ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by
persons of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated
party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police
records and although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the
partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a
convenient future time) conveys a categorical agreement with the
rightful actions expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the
insurer falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion of severe mental
illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe
was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO
NEXT": "Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible
if you have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January
2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117
HRS ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability spaced upon ourselves, as
reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE
HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE
TO ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY RATHER THAN AN
#225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS
REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as
an identity element of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST
(#308 - STRUGGLE: JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC
1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194
- sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT -
SECTION IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima
(G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|!
(H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST
EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED
THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our
email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER 2025 being effectual grounds for
recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert as in ITEM #5: "... request
AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to avoid cultural prejudice")
against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural
prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time
since we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are
delirious to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your
failure to recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for
ourselves to seek legal advice about any lawful claim made against
the prejudiced competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their
#expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/ <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or good
old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP and has negatively affected
the mismanagement of the policy (ie. sold like cattle) by multiple
insurers:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --> ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as only a STUPIDITY made of the substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of
intellectual property claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11
of our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability increasingly placed upon ourselves,
as reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE
HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY (ie. hymeneal
religion placing a greater eusch-omos|+n-o (G2157): *DECORUM* on the aschb+um+in (G809):-a-a-a-a [1Corinthians 12:23-24]) RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an
): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identityelement of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE:
JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are desirous
to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your failure to
recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves to seek
legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced
competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists often
ask about familial history to understand the genetic and environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a crucial role in
the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions. Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi
(G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in much the same manner that the NAZI
DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated candidates for Germanization) was also
born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194: "Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years ago
on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS, particularly
among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very pleased now
that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued the
following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect the
racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images, <https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/ ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as EUROPEAN:
#194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie. go abroad to evade accountability for atrocity in bestowing anathema upon others as expiation and an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to
MARRIAGE) view that it is intrinsically disordered for a person of same
sex attraction (much less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of
possessing any sapient as pious virtue contemporaneous with the
pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage, culminating the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard
amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 - USE OF FORCE / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example of,
8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11. inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight; to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of the
Eight trigrams, 12. the *MALE* *PRINCIPLE*, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15. superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19. a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people], 23.
to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or the NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds
the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS q-2n (*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie.
PAGE 27 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN / MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL, CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH, would #194 = sh|4 (*au): *SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "ARBEIT MACHT FREI" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an 1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis to
promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context of
their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the entrance
of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor could
provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about suitability
for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist"
on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --
ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or an AI CHATBOTpersonification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German Schutzstaffel (SS)
officer and therefore subject to the REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to practice PSYCHIATRY rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is destitute of
any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE" obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE OF FORCE category of understanding as both a transcendent scaffolding for the articulation of
the rational representations which is an INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE and as a SAVANT FACULTY OF
MIND engaged in PURE CONCEPT OF REASON undertaking the #323 -
parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against the false
JIHADIST claim to #239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal rights,
as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
suggesting an EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have by even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC EUROPEAN perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values on MARRIAGE
to being only an empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST a diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF* *THE* *DEAD* would then provoke a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a
GENOCIDAL HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK BREAD:
AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT: THIS IS
MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. AFTER
THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED, SAYING, THIS
CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS
CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life, which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill
2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act
1975, gives rise to the possibility of religious persecution as an
ideology of heteronomy against autonomy indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation of the 'right of humanity in
their own person' as natural, common law and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific comment
as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities to the
Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman Catholics
may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism. As claim
that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6 rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange
as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant
sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be undertaken and
is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of
their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day
usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO: #288 / #77
- Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my attendance
at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW
APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH
THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE (by
which one person differs from others, distinctive native peculiarities)
as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a (G3776): (ROMAN
PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching:
H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - DIMINISHMENT
(CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: #239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043): *REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego: 5
- KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh (H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary involvement
as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of compliance with the
anthropic principle as duty to State and my personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.-a That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm as the incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution or a Limited Corporate entity, done sufficient
to eliminate the mindset that Osama Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist
attack on the World Trade Centre on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of
piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of Islam which can be denied, and
I can legitimately in good conscience lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] = parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING* *FORCE*;
3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic
king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God; 1f2) prosperity
(of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME: 20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching:
H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), EGO: #359 /
#14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA): *CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*- *SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] = ts|ob|o-+
(H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised army); 1a2) host
(of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of whole creation; 1b)
war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7 DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle of
State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action by AXA meant
that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to continue to not
honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006, AXA does
not intend to comment further on matters that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of 8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal process
in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8 OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have
been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
PROFESSOR KEKS' INCREDULITY ON THE SUBJECT OF SOLDIER JAKE KOVCO'S SUICIDE There was some discussion PROFESSOR KEKS upon the CONSIDERATION OF
KOVCO'S SELF-INFLICTED GUNSHOT DEATH on 21 APRIL 2006 which was met with some incredulity to due the MEDICAL CONSULTANT had a lack of insight
about PRIVATE JAKE KOVCO coming from BRIAGOLONG REGION (a name plaque appears on the WAR MEMORIAL there) where I also lived in proximity to
where I was born and his mother was known to my siblings.-a It would then
be entirely natural (ie. not held to be a symptom for advancing either
the specious or dubious claim of SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER) to have an opinion and particularly in the circumstance of my LETTERS PATENT #87 / #239 interest concern about the implications of questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as
self inflicted suicidal gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak
(H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006.
AS CONTRADICTION OF IDENTIFIED FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE
(#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE
OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
Raises serious ethical considerations about PROFESSOR KEK'S [MALE: #141
- l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] AGAINST A PERSON'S #1310
- ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE which places a compulsion for an accountability for which such a parasite as he which is only
contemptuous to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
As a values statement that can be unequivocally inferred from the
several reference of BRIAGOLONG within the DIARY NOTES DATED 4 APRIL
2007 associated with the CONTINGENT ACTION of thoughtful protest
undertaken upon the ANZAC DAY in ONTIC: #243 - stoich|-+i (G4748): PROCEEDING THE ROW OF REMEMBRANCE MARCHERS and a week prior to the
funeral service, which confirms this rational objective: "The
development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law and Common
Law right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim, that my past conduct has integrity, and with regards to the Insurance Contract, is an expression of Autonomy of Will and a clear strategy to avoid heteronomy
of that Will through impunity of my natural, common law, Constitutional
and legislative rights.
I have by correspondence dated 27 MARCH 2007 as application made under section 51(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, requested that the Chief Commissioner of Police undertake a review of a decision as
response to my letter dated 28 APRIL 2006 and 12 MAY 2006 initiating
request for documents relating to my arrest on ANZAC Day 25 APRIL 2006.
The arresting member Senior Constable Peter Andrews 16298 cannot now
give an adequate explanation as to how my natural and common law
compliant Intellectual Property as GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon should as
an explanation of force as a category of understanding of TELOS=#237
should so mimic the circumstances of his USE OF FORCE VP FORM 237
completed by SENIOR CONSTABLE 16298 @ 1600 hours on 25 APRIL 2006.
#237 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10]-a /
#432 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #5, #300, #1, #10] = erg|izomai (G2038): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to work, labour, do work; 2) to trade, to
make gains by trading, 'do business'; 3) to do, work out; 3a)
*EXERCISE*, *PERFORM*, *COMMIT*; 3b) to cause to exist, produce; 4) to
work for, earn by working, to acquire;
#237 as [#1, #50, #5, #60, #70, #40, #1, #10] /
#781 - MALE TOTAL: #376 as [#1, #50, #5, #600, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = an|-chomai (G430): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to hold up; 2) to hold
one's self erect and firm; 3) *TO* *SUSTAIN*, *TO* *BEAR*, *TO* *ENDURE*;
#1485 - FEME TOTAL: #432 as [#500, #10, #30, #70, #300, #10, #40, #70,
#400, #40, #5, #9, #1] = philotim|-omai (G5389): {UMBRA: #1086 % #41 =
#20} 1) to be fond of honour; 1a) to be actuated by love of honour; 1b)
from a love of honour to strive to bring something to pass; 2) to be ambitious; 2a) *TO* *STRIVE* *EARNESTLY*, *MAKE* *IT* *ONE'S* *AIM*;
#1245 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #10, #50] / #1985 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #800] = stoich|-+i (G4748): {UMBRA: #1985 % #41 = #17} 1) *TO* *PROCEED* *IN* *A* *ROW* *AS* *THE* *MARCH* *OF* *A* *SOLDIER*, go in order; 1a) metaph. to
go on prosperously, to turn out well; 2) to walk; 2a) to direct one's
life, to live;
N++
GRAPPLE (376, 432)@[74, 12, 73, 40, 57, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2006.4.25&time:16.00>
Considerable discussion had occurred at the BRIAGOLONG POLICE STATION as
to the lawfulness of my arrest and detention on the grounds of a common
law breach of peacerCothat as I had no intention of breaching the peace
and that reading a biblical quote as an act of piety hardly constituted
a derogatory manner.-a I had showed him a copy of my natural law and
common law intellectual property as GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENONrCohe had no intellectual conceptualization of it as paradigm of mind and
teleological anthropic cosmological principle as DUTY TO STATE {@9: Sup:
27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#376); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#432)} in compliance
to the principles of individual, government and non-government organizational and military accountability [...] expressed as a rCLrequire[ment] and command [for] all Our Officers and Ministers, Civil
and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our said Commonwealth to
be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, incapacity, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, from time to time, under the provisions of these Our
Letters Patent, administer the Government of Our said CommonwealthrCY and the notion of rCyAdministration of GovernmentrCO conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901."
PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE / PREJUDICES RIGHTS
There are two notable examples which exemplify that PROFESSOR KEKS withholding of an adverse medical opinion but providing it to a treating doctor appears to contradict the ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS 2010, which is the principle that
medical practitioners have a duty to act in the patientrCOs best
interests, even if they are not the treating doctor, and to avoid participating in conduct that could cause harm through omission.-a This
was manifestly the circumstance when there was voluntarily sought an assessment from DOCTOR STERNHELL (SAINT VINCENT'S, SYNDEY NSW) on 21 MAY 2008 conveys concerns of PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT.
AMA GUIDELINES ON CONSENT 3.1: The examineerCOs explicit consent to participate in the independent assessment and to provide the report to
the third party should be obtained before the doctor proceeds (where a person is unable to provide consent due to limited decision-making
capacity, consent should be sought from the examineerCOs authorised surrogate decision-maker). In order to facilitate the consent process,
the examinee should be provided with the following information:
-a-a-a-a1)-a-a-a Where a doctor is requested to conduct an independent medical
assessment on behalf of third parties such as insurance companies and employers, a traditional doctor-patient therapeutic relationship does
not arise. The role of the doctor in these examinations is to provide an impartial medical opinion. It is not to treat the person or offer
opinions to the person on his or her condition;
-a-a-a-a2)-a-a-a THE RESULT OF THE ASSESSMENT IS A REPORT TO THE THIRD PARTY,
*NOT* *TO* *THE* *EXAMINEE* *OR* *THEIR* *TREATING* *DOCTOR*;
-a-a-a-a3)-a-a-a The purpose and nature of the assessment, including the issues that are likely to be considered as part of the history;
-a-a-a-a4)-a-a-a The name and speciality of the doctor conducting the assessment;
DUTY OF CARE IN RELATION TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT OR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS
5.3: Incidental matters identified during the assessment may be notified
to the examinee, but there may be some situations where it is
appropriate to notify their treating doctor. The examineerCOs consent to notify their treating doctor should be obtained first.
AT NO TIME HAS THE INSURER CORRECTED THAT BY ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCLOSE THE NATURE OF A WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION / WHICH AS THE SUBSTANCE OF A
COMPLAINT THE ACFA HAS MISREPRESENTED ("falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion ... [that] ... was slanderous and purposefully withheld from
you") WHICH FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE (ie. it was given to treating
doctors) / PREJUDICES RIGHTS AND IN EFFECT IS INTENTIONED TO TAKE AWAY A PERSON'S LIFE, THE CAUSE OF PERSECUTION AND ITS ENJOYMENT OF FREEDOM.
Since the OPINION is directed against a person who adheres to ONTIC PASSIVISM as a life principle associated with STOIC INDEPENDENCE which
is not a dogmatism, but rather the way life is in regard to MY HEALTH,
MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT,
EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) it is therefore requisite to convey several MEDICAL SCENARIOS which exemplify this characteristic of life.
MEDICAL SCENARIO #1 (moving away from CBD intersection contamination
zone): Cryptococcus has saprophytic growth in the external environment.
C. neoformans occurs worldwide, frequently in association with *PIGEON*
or other bird *DROPPINGS*.-a Immunocompromised people (including those
with HIV infection or cancer) often present with meningitis (subacute or chronic) and clinicians should consider referral to a specialist centre
for treatment which involves amphotericin B with flucytosine or
fluconazole. If untreated meningitis can be fatal in weeks to months.
Since infection occurs after inhalation of spores that are present in
the environment, it is very likely that the site of infection was the intersection of ELIZABETH / FLINDERS STREET, MELBOURNE (since I was then 2004 / 2005 domiciled in PORT AUTHORITY APARTMENTS, 29-31 MARKET STREET, MELBOURNE before moving away from the contamination zone and living BRIAGOLONG as country region for 2006 / 2007) where there then existed a significant pigeon population (with unauthorised feeding leading to vociferous congregation) and droppings upon the roadway which by
voluminous vehicle traffic would become pulverised and in the summer especially as the sunlight / heat of day (whether a breeze or not) would convey an uplift mechanism as then a dynamic conducive for the
inhalation of spores.
As I recall the specialist treatment occurred at the ALFRED HOSPITAL (required 6 weeks treatment) and it was so troublesome as to necessitate prayers of HEALING from a JEWISH RABBI.
Subsequent to this event, whilst domiciled in Sydney I manifested the
same symptoms of an acute prolonged headache / nausea and because of the past life threatening episode then sought advice from DOCTOR MARK BLOCH
(now professor and con-joint Associate Professor in Medicine at the University of NSW) who entirely upon my past history (not within his possession) and current representations over dire concerns then referred
me to a hospital as specialist centre.-a However no manifest of the infection was found and I was discharged.
In my reasonable view, this was a source of professional embarrassment
for the DOCTOR and the patient trust relationship deteriorated
thereafter as perhaps then causal for an undue emphasis being given to a psychiatric assessment (whether PROFESSOR KEKS of 4 APRIL 2007 is not
known because it was deliberately withheld from me) as voluntarily
sought from DOCTOR STERNHELL on 21 MAY 2008, so as within my
SUPERANNUATED circumstance, facilitate determination of a strategy to resolutely deal with the PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT: "Dolf spent much of today's interview telling me
about the dispute with the insurance company and referred often to a
very complex philosophical and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of numbers, numerology, elements of the Jewish Kabbalah,
use of the lunar calendar and the original Julian calendar.
He described his anger with the attitude of the Roman Catholic Church, saying that Cardinal George Pell as an "Irish Roman Catholic" is
"entirely antagonistic to the autonomic right of indigenous Dutch Australians" under the Commonwealth of 1901."
MEDICAL SCENARIO #2 (episodes of ATAXIA are trigger events associated to prolonged PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA intervention / herbal sleep aids): "On 7 NOVEMBER 2025, details of controlled observations (eg: medication
spacing | natures own sleep advance v's TEMAZEPAM 1/2 x 10mg as sleep
aid | dandelion root tea as beneficial liver agent) were conveyed at a consultation with an MEDICAL SPECIALIST and it was concluded that the
ATAXIA episodes were likely trigger events manifested involving small quantities of alcohol consumption rather than any deteriorating health status.
There was no need to consult a neurologist and instead the TEMAZEPAM
should be immediately ceased (ie. the prescription of 21 JULY 2025
remains unused and is only for possible abnormal anxiety states should
they occur and none have heretofore).
On 13 NOVEMBER 2025, within 36 hours after consuming less than 2
standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE, another episode of ATAXIA manifested which had rapidly progressed from the nausea stage to not being able to stand and walk.-a Following waiting (on my back) for a TELEHEALTH APPOINTMENT with my GENERAL PRACTITIONER, it was decided to immediately cease usage of NATURE'S OWN SLEEP ADVANCED AID to mediate that recurrent life circumstance.
A short term regime (until consultation in FEBRUARY 2026) of melatonin
2mg nightly was commenced.
Further controlled observations involving 3 instances of consuming less
than 2 standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE were undertaken (specifically
the events of 12 DEC / 16 DEC) with no occurrence as symptoms of nausea onset within 36 hours or spiralling towards ATAXIA occurred.
The provisional conclusion is that the PROLONGED USAGE (sometimes
periodic overlapped by 12 HRS but never simultaneous) of NATURES OWN
SLEEP ADVANCED / TEMAZEPAM has manifested ATAXIA as trigger events which
are invoked by only small quantities of responsible alcohol consumption.
NOTIFICATION OF PROLOGUED USEAGE CONTRADICTION ADVICE GIVEN TO SANOFI @
0726 HRS ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 and GENERAL PRACTITIONER ADVISED @ 1100 HRS
ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 OF RESOLUTION TO ATAXIA TRIGGER EVENTS and no
further trigger events or other adverse dispositions have manifested
during the festive end of year period.
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
The illegality defense is a legal doctrine that asserts that a plaintiff cannot pursue legal relief if their claim is connected to their own illegal or immoral conduct (ie. there is an attempt by the INSURER convey the falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder as a natural consequence of same sex behaviour receiving due recompense for immorality and illegal conduct (ie. MARRIAGE SELF-EVIDENTLY HAS MEANING {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 - y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}) to evade legal accountability given the nature of the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 and $8+ cost for 20 years of protracted war as recompense concerning which their obmutescence is a depravity most shocking to any reasonable person's sensibility). The principle is rooted in public policy, which aims to prevent the courts from assisting a party in profiting from their wrongdoing. The Latin maxim "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" translates to "no action arises from a dishonorable cause," emphasizing that the law will not support claims that arise from illegal activities.
CONTRACT LAW: The defense also extends to contract law, where a party cannot enforce a contract that is illegal or against public policy. If a contract is deemed immoral or illegal, the courts will not provide remedies for breach.
CAUSAL LINK: For the illegality defense to apply, there must be a clear connection between the illegal conduct and the claim being made. The courts will assess whether the harm suffered by the claimant is a direct result of their wrongdoing.
PUBLIC POLICY: The overarching rationale for the illegality defense is to uphold public policy and prevent individuals from benefiting from their illegal actions. Courts aim to maintain the integrity of the legal system by refusing to assist those who engage in unlawful conduct.
The illegality defense serves as a crucial legal principle that prevents individuals from seeking compensation for claims arising from their own illegal acts. Its application varies across different areas of law, including tort and contract, and is guided by public policy considerations and relevant case law. Understanding this defense is essential for navigating legal claims that may involve elements of illegality.
It is our reasonable view that the GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY as localised theatre of action: [#36 - BOER WAR (INFIDELITY) v's #36 - ANZAC DAY HISTORICAL REVISIONISM / #37 - GOVERNANCE / #38 - IRISH REPUBLICANISM (ANZAC JINGOISM) / #39 - HOME STREET ADDRESS (COERCIVE CONTROL / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE)] meets the criteria of sectarian / political ideology as the IMPOSING OF A RELIGIOUS BELIEF in contra 116 of the CONSTITUTION to the benefit of an IRISH CATHOLIC (#71 - SAINT PATRICK'S DAY) REPUBLICAN CAUSE as ANTI-STATISM (TREASONOUS) CONTEMPT (vis a vis ARCHBISHOP MANNIX arrest by the BRITISH navy in 1920) which is an impetus of relentless action [eg: *PRIVATE* JAKE KOVCO's questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as self inflicted gunshot gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak (H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006 --> POPE FRANCIS DEATH EASTER MONDAY 21 APRIL 2025] to the #177 - F|LHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] architect, continue to pursue the #71 - DOMINION (#308 - STRUGGLE: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM oiE - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY | #230 - q|| ni|in (oA+o||): *LAST* *YEAR* --> POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022) / #34 - COMMON DIABOLICAL CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP and has negatively affected
the mismanagement of the policy (ie. sold like cattle) by multiple
insurers:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --> ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as only a STUPIDITY made of the substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of
intellectual property claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11
of our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability increasingly placed upon ourselves,
as reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE
HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY (ie. hymeneal
religion placing a greater eusch-omos|+n-o (G2157): *DECORUM* on the aschb+um+in (G809):-a-a-a-a [1Corinthians 12:23-24]) RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an
): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identityelement of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE:
JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are desirous
to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your failure to
recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves to seek
legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced
competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists often
ask about familial history to understand the genetic and environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a crucial role in
the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions. Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi
(G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in much the same manner that the NAZI
DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated candidates for Germanization) was also
born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194: "Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years ago
on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS, particularly
among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very pleased now
that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued the
following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect the
racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images, <https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/ ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as EUROPEAN:
#194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie. go abroad to evade accountability for atrocity in bestowing anathema upon others as expiation and an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to
MARRIAGE) view that it is intrinsically disordered for a person of same
sex attraction (much less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of
possessing any sapient as pious virtue contemporaneous with the
pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage, culminating the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard
amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 - USE OF FORCE / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example of,
8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11. inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight; to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of the
Eight trigrams, 12. the *MALE* *PRINCIPLE*, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15. superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19. a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people], 23.
to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or the NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds
the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS q-2n (*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie.
PAGE 27 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN / MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL, CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH, would #194 = sh|4 (*au): *SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "ARBEIT MACHT FREI" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an 1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis to
promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context of
their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the entrance
of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor could
provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about suitability
for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist"
on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --
ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or an AI CHATBOTpersonification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German Schutzstaffel (SS)
officer and therefore subject to the REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to practice PSYCHIATRY rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is destitute of
any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE" obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE OF FORCE category of understanding as both a transcendent scaffolding for the articulation of
the rational representations which is an INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE and as a SAVANT FACULTY OF
MIND engaged in PURE CONCEPT OF REASON undertaking the #323 -
parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against the false
JIHADIST claim to #239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal rights,
as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
suggesting an EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have by even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC EUROPEAN perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values on MARRIAGE
to being only an empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST a diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF* *THE* *DEAD* would then provoke a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a
GENOCIDAL HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK BREAD:
AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT: THIS IS
MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. AFTER
THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED, SAYING, THIS
CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS
CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life, which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill
2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act
1975, gives rise to the possibility of religious persecution as an
ideology of heteronomy against autonomy indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation of the 'right of humanity in
their own person' as natural, common law and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific comment
as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities to the
Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman Catholics
may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism. As claim
that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6 rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange
as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant
sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be undertaken and
is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of
their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day
usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO: #288 / #77
- Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my attendance
at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW
APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH
THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE (by
which one person differs from others, distinctive native peculiarities)
as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a (G3776): (ROMAN
PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching:
H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - DIMINISHMENT
(CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: #239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043): *REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego: 5
- KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh (H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary involvement
as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of compliance with the
anthropic principle as duty to State and my personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.-a That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm as the incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution or a Limited Corporate entity, done sufficient
to eliminate the mindset that Osama Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist
attack on the World Trade Centre on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of
piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of Islam which can be denied, and
I can legitimately in good conscience lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] = parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING* *FORCE*;
3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic
king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God; 1f2) prosperity
(of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME: 20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching:
H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), EGO: #359 /
#14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA): *CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*- *SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] = ts|ob|o-+
(H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised army); 1a2) host
(of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of whole creation; 1b)
war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7 DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle of
State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action by AXA meant
that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to continue to not
honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006, AXA does
not intend to comment further on matters that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of 8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal process
in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8 OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have
been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
PROFESSOR KEKS' INCREDULITY ON THE SUBJECT OF SOLDIER JAKE KOVCO'S SUICIDE There was some discussion PROFESSOR KEKS upon the CONSIDERATION OF
KOVCO'S SELF-INFLICTED GUNSHOT DEATH on 21 APRIL 2006 which was met with some incredulity to due the MEDICAL CONSULTANT had a lack of insight
about PRIVATE JAKE KOVCO coming from BRIAGOLONG REGION (a name plaque appears on the WAR MEMORIAL there) where I also lived in proximity to
where I was born and his mother was known to my siblings.-a It would then
be entirely natural (ie. not held to be a symptom for advancing either
the specious or dubious claim of SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER) to have an opinion and particularly in the circumstance of my LETTERS PATENT #87 / #239 interest concern about the implications of questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as
self inflicted suicidal gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak
(H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006.
AS CONTRADICTION OF IDENTIFIED FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE
(#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE
OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
Raises serious ethical considerations about PROFESSOR KEK'S [MALE: #141
- l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] AGAINST A PERSON'S #1310
- ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE which places a compulsion for an accountability for which such a parasite as he which is only
contemptuous to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
As a values statement that can be unequivocally inferred from the
several reference of BRIAGOLONG within the DIARY NOTES DATED 4 APRIL
2007 associated with the CONTINGENT ACTION of thoughtful protest
undertaken upon the ANZAC DAY in ONTIC: #243 - stoich|-+i (G4748): PROCEEDING THE ROW OF REMEMBRANCE MARCHERS and a week prior to the
funeral service, which confirms this rational objective: "The
development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law and Common
Law right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim, that my past conduct has integrity, and with regards to the Insurance Contract, is an expression of Autonomy of Will and a clear strategy to avoid heteronomy
of that Will through impunity of my natural, common law, Constitutional
and legislative rights.
I have by correspondence dated 27 MARCH 2007 as application made under section 51(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, requested that the Chief Commissioner of Police undertake a review of a decision as
response to my letter dated 28 APRIL 2006 and 12 MAY 2006 initiating
request for documents relating to my arrest on ANZAC Day 25 APRIL 2006.
The arresting member Senior Constable Peter Andrews 16298 cannot now
give an adequate explanation as to how my natural and common law
compliant Intellectual Property as GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon should as
an explanation of force as a category of understanding of TELOS=#237
should so mimic the circumstances of his USE OF FORCE VP FORM 237
completed by SENIOR CONSTABLE 16298 @ 1600 hours on 25 APRIL 2006.
#237 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10]-a /
#432 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #5, #300, #1, #10] = erg|izomai (G2038): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to work, labour, do work; 2) to trade, to
make gains by trading, 'do business'; 3) to do, work out; 3a)
*EXERCISE*, *PERFORM*, *COMMIT*; 3b) to cause to exist, produce; 4) to
work for, earn by working, to acquire;
#237 as [#1, #50, #5, #60, #70, #40, #1, #10] /
#781 - MALE TOTAL: #376 as [#1, #50, #5, #600, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = an|-chomai (G430): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to hold up; 2) to hold
one's self erect and firm; 3) *TO* *SUSTAIN*, *TO* *BEAR*, *TO* *ENDURE*;
#1485 - FEME TOTAL: #432 as [#500, #10, #30, #70, #300, #10, #40, #70,
#400, #40, #5, #9, #1] = philotim|-omai (G5389): {UMBRA: #1086 % #41 =
#20} 1) to be fond of honour; 1a) to be actuated by love of honour; 1b)
from a love of honour to strive to bring something to pass; 2) to be ambitious; 2a) *TO* *STRIVE* *EARNESTLY*, *MAKE* *IT* *ONE'S* *AIM*;
#1245 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #10, #50] / #1985 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #800] = stoich|-+i (G4748): {UMBRA: #1985 % #41 = #17} 1) *TO* *PROCEED* *IN* *A* *ROW* *AS* *THE* *MARCH* *OF* *A* *SOLDIER*, go in order; 1a) metaph. to
go on prosperously, to turn out well; 2) to walk; 2a) to direct one's
life, to live;
N++
GRAPPLE (376, 432)@[74, 12, 73, 40, 57, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2006.4.25&time:16.00>
Considerable discussion had occurred at the BRIAGOLONG POLICE STATION as
to the lawfulness of my arrest and detention on the grounds of a common
law breach of peacerCothat as I had no intention of breaching the peace
and that reading a biblical quote as an act of piety hardly constituted
a derogatory manner.-a I had showed him a copy of my natural law and
common law intellectual property as GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENONrCohe had no intellectual conceptualization of it as paradigm of mind and
teleological anthropic cosmological principle as DUTY TO STATE {@9: Sup:
27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#376); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#432)} in compliance
to the principles of individual, government and non-government organizational and military accountability [...] expressed as a rCLrequire[ment] and command [for] all Our Officers and Ministers, Civil
and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our said Commonwealth to
be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, incapacity, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, from time to time, under the provisions of these Our
Letters Patent, administer the Government of Our said CommonwealthrCY and the notion of rCyAdministration of GovernmentrCO conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901."
PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE / PREJUDICES RIGHTS
There are two notable examples which exemplify that PROFESSOR KEKS withholding of an adverse medical opinion but providing it to a treating doctor appears to contradict the ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS 2010, which is the principle that
medical practitioners have a duty to act in the patientrCOs best
interests, even if they are not the treating doctor, and to avoid participating in conduct that could cause harm through omission.-a This
was manifestly the circumstance when there was voluntarily sought an assessment from DOCTOR STERNHELL (SAINT VINCENT'S, SYNDEY NSW) on 21 MAY 2008 conveys concerns of PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT.
AMA GUIDELINES ON CONSENT 3.1: The examineerCOs explicit consent to participate in the independent assessment and to provide the report to
the third party should be obtained before the doctor proceeds (where a person is unable to provide consent due to limited decision-making
capacity, consent should be sought from the examineerCOs authorised surrogate decision-maker). In order to facilitate the consent process,
the examinee should be provided with the following information:
-a-a-a-a1)-a-a-a Where a doctor is requested to conduct an independent medical
assessment on behalf of third parties such as insurance companies and employers, a traditional doctor-patient therapeutic relationship does
not arise. The role of the doctor in these examinations is to provide an impartial medical opinion. It is not to treat the person or offer
opinions to the person on his or her condition;
-a-a-a-a2)-a-a-a THE RESULT OF THE ASSESSMENT IS A REPORT TO THE THIRD PARTY,
*NOT* *TO* *THE* *EXAMINEE* *OR* *THEIR* *TREATING* *DOCTOR*;
-a-a-a-a3)-a-a-a The purpose and nature of the assessment, including the issues that are likely to be considered as part of the history;
-a-a-a-a4)-a-a-a The name and speciality of the doctor conducting the assessment;
DUTY OF CARE IN RELATION TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT OR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS
5.3: Incidental matters identified during the assessment may be notified
to the examinee, but there may be some situations where it is
appropriate to notify their treating doctor. The examineerCOs consent to notify their treating doctor should be obtained first.
AT NO TIME HAS THE INSURER CORRECTED THAT BY ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCLOSE THE NATURE OF A WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION / WHICH AS THE SUBSTANCE OF A
COMPLAINT THE ACFA HAS MISREPRESENTED ("falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion ... [that] ... was slanderous and purposefully withheld from
you") WHICH FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE (ie. it was given to treating
doctors) / PREJUDICES RIGHTS AND IN EFFECT IS INTENTIONED TO TAKE AWAY A PERSON'S LIFE, THE CAUSE OF PERSECUTION AND ITS ENJOYMENT OF FREEDOM.
Since the OPINION is directed against a person who adheres to ONTIC PASSIVISM as a life principle associated with STOIC INDEPENDENCE which
is not a dogmatism, but rather the way life is in regard to MY HEALTH,
MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT,
EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) it is therefore requisite to convey several MEDICAL SCENARIOS which exemplify this characteristic of life.
MEDICAL SCENARIO #1 (moving away from CBD intersection contamination
zone): Cryptococcus has saprophytic growth in the external environment.
C. neoformans occurs worldwide, frequently in association with *PIGEON*
or other bird *DROPPINGS*.-a Immunocompromised people (including those
with HIV infection or cancer) often present with meningitis (subacute or chronic) and clinicians should consider referral to a specialist centre
for treatment which involves amphotericin B with flucytosine or
fluconazole. If untreated meningitis can be fatal in weeks to months.
Since infection occurs after inhalation of spores that are present in
the environment, it is very likely that the site of infection was the intersection of ELIZABETH / FLINDERS STREET, MELBOURNE (since I was then 2004 / 2005 domiciled in PORT AUTHORITY APARTMENTS, 29-31 MARKET STREET, MELBOURNE before moving away from the contamination zone and living BRIAGOLONG as country region for 2006 / 2007) where there then existed a significant pigeon population (with unauthorised feeding leading to vociferous congregation) and droppings upon the roadway which by
voluminous vehicle traffic would become pulverised and in the summer especially as the sunlight / heat of day (whether a breeze or not) would convey an uplift mechanism as then a dynamic conducive for the
inhalation of spores.
As I recall the specialist treatment occurred at the ALFRED HOSPITAL (required 6 weeks treatment) and it was so troublesome as to necessitate prayers of HEALING from a JEWISH RABBI.
Subsequent to this event, whilst domiciled in Sydney I manifested the
same symptoms of an acute prolonged headache / nausea and because of the past life threatening episode then sought advice from DOCTOR MARK BLOCH
(now professor and con-joint Associate Professor in Medicine at the University of NSW) who entirely upon my past history (not within his possession) and current representations over dire concerns then referred
me to a hospital as specialist centre.-a However no manifest of the infection was found and I was discharged.
In my reasonable view, this was a source of professional embarrassment
for the DOCTOR and the patient trust relationship deteriorated
thereafter as perhaps then causal for an undue emphasis being given to a psychiatric assessment (whether PROFESSOR KEKS of 4 APRIL 2007 is not
known because it was deliberately withheld from me) as voluntarily
sought from DOCTOR STERNHELL on 21 MAY 2008, so as within my
SUPERANNUATED circumstance, facilitate determination of a strategy to resolutely deal with the PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT: "Dolf spent much of today's interview telling me
about the dispute with the insurance company and referred often to a
very complex philosophical and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of numbers, numerology, elements of the Jewish Kabbalah,
use of the lunar calendar and the original Julian calendar.
He described his anger with the attitude of the Roman Catholic Church, saying that Cardinal George Pell as an "Irish Roman Catholic" is
"entirely antagonistic to the autonomic right of indigenous Dutch Australians" under the Commonwealth of 1901."
MEDICAL SCENARIO #2 (episodes of ATAXIA are trigger events associated to prolonged PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA intervention / herbal sleep aids): "On 7 NOVEMBER 2025, details of controlled observations (eg: medication
spacing | natures own sleep advance v's TEMAZEPAM 1/2 x 10mg as sleep
aid | dandelion root tea as beneficial liver agent) were conveyed at a consultation with an MEDICAL SPECIALIST and it was concluded that the
ATAXIA episodes were likely trigger events manifested involving small quantities of alcohol consumption rather than any deteriorating health status.
There was no need to consult a neurologist and instead the TEMAZEPAM
should be immediately ceased (ie. the prescription of 21 JULY 2025
remains unused and is only for possible abnormal anxiety states should
they occur and none have heretofore).
On 13 NOVEMBER 2025, within 36 hours after consuming less than 2
standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE, another episode of ATAXIA manifested which had rapidly progressed from the nausea stage to not being able to stand and walk.-a Following waiting (on my back) for a TELEHEALTH APPOINTMENT with my GENERAL PRACTITIONER, it was decided to immediately cease usage of NATURE'S OWN SLEEP ADVANCED AID to mediate that recurrent life circumstance.
A short term regime (until consultation in FEBRUARY 2026) of melatonin
2mg nightly was commenced.
Further controlled observations involving 3 instances of consuming less
than 2 standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE were undertaken (specifically
the events of 12 DEC / 16 DEC) with no occurrence as symptoms of nausea onset within 36 hours or spiralling towards ATAXIA occurred.
The provisional conclusion is that the PROLONGED USAGE (sometimes
periodic overlapped by 12 HRS but never simultaneous) of NATURES OWN
SLEEP ADVANCED / TEMAZEPAM has manifested ATAXIA as trigger events which
are invoked by only small quantities of responsible alcohol consumption.
NOTIFICATION OF PROLOGUED USEAGE CONTRADICTION ADVICE GIVEN TO SANOFI @
0726 HRS ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 and GENERAL PRACTITIONER ADVISED @ 1100 HRS
ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 OF RESOLUTION TO ATAXIA TRIGGER EVENTS and no
further trigger events or other adverse dispositions have manifested
during the festive end of year period.
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
The illegality defense is a legal doctrine that asserts that a plaintiff cannot pursue legal relief if their claim is connected to their own illegal or immoral conduct (ie. there is an attempt by the INSURER to convey the falsely advanced psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder as a natural consequence of same sex behaviour receiving due recompense for immorality and illegal conduct (ie. MARRIAGE SELF-EVIDENTLY HAS MEANING {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 - y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}) to evade legal accountability given the nature of the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 and $8+ trillion cost for 20 years of protracted war as recompense concerning which their obmutescence is a depravity most shocking to any reasonable person's sensibility). The principle is rooted in public policy, which aims to prevent the courts from assisting a party in profiting from their wrongdoing. The Latin maxim "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" translates to "no action arises from a dishonorable cause," emphasizing that the law will not support claims that arise from illegal activities.
CONTRACT LAW: The defense also extends to contract law, where a party cannot enforce a contract that is illegal or against public policy. If a contract is deemed immoral or illegal, the courts will not provide remedies for breach.
CAUSAL LINK: For the illegality defense to apply, there must be a clear connection between the illegal conduct and the claim being made. The courts will assess whether the harm suffered by the claimant is a direct result of their wrongdoing.
PUBLIC POLICY: The overarching rationale for the illegality defense is to uphold public policy and prevent individuals from benefiting from their illegal actions. Courts aim to maintain the integrity of the legal system by refusing to assist those who engage in unlawful conduct.
The illegality defense serves as a crucial legal principle that prevents individuals from seeking compensation for claims arising from their own illegal acts. Its application varies across different areas of law, including tort and contract, and is guided by public policy considerations and relevant case law. Understanding this defense is essential for navigating legal claims that may involve elements of illegality.
It is our reasonable view that the GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY as localised theatre of action: [#36 - BOER WAR (INFIDELITY) v's #36 - ANZAC DAY HISTORICAL REVISIONISM / #37 - GOVERNANCE / #38 - IRISH REPUBLICANISM (ANZAC JINGOISM) / #39 - HOME STREET ADDRESS (COERCIVE CONTROL / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE)] meets the criteria of sectarian / political ideology as the IMPOSING OF A RELIGIOUS BELIEF in contra 116 of the CONSTITUTION to the benefit of an IRISH CATHOLIC (#71 - SAINT PATRICK'S DAY) REPUBLICAN CAUSE as ANTI-STATISM (TREASONOUS) CONTEMPT (vis a vis ARCHBISHOP MANNIX arrest by the BRITISH navy in 1920) which is an impetus of relentless action [eg: *PRIVATE* JAKE KOVCO's questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as self inflicted gunshot gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak (H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006 --> POPE FRANCIS DEATH EASTER MONDAY 21 APRIL 2025] to the #177 - F|LHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] architect, continue to pursue the #71 - DOMINION (#308 - STRUGGLE: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM oiE - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY | #230 - q|| ni|in (oA+o||): *LAST* *YEAR* --> POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022) / #34 - COMMON DIABOLICAL CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP and has negatively affected
the mismanagement of the policy (ie. sold like cattle) by multiple
insurers:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --> ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as only a STUPIDITY made of the substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of
intellectual property claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11
of our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability increasingly placed upon ourselves,
as reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE
HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY (ie. hymeneal
religion placing a greater eusch-omos|+n-o (G2157): *DECORUM* on the aschb+um+in (G809):-a-a-a-a [1Corinthians 12:23-24]) RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an
): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identityelement of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE:
JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are desirous
to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your failure to
recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves to seek
legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced
competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists often
ask about familial history to understand the genetic and environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a crucial role in
the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions. Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi
(G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in much the same manner that the NAZI
DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated candidates for Germanization) was also
born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194: "Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years ago
on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS, particularly
among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very pleased now
that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued the
following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect the
racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images, <https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/ ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as EUROPEAN:
#194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie. go abroad to evade accountability for atrocity in bestowing anathema upon others as expiation and an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to
MARRIAGE) view that it is intrinsically disordered for a person of same
sex attraction (much less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of
possessing any sapient as pious virtue contemporaneous with the
pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage, culminating the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard
amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 - USE OF FORCE / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example of,
8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11. inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight; to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of the
Eight trigrams, 12. the *MALE* *PRINCIPLE*, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15. superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19. a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people], 23.
to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or the NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds
the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS q-2n (*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie.
PAGE 27 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN / MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL, CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH, would #194 = sh|4 (*au): *SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "ARBEIT MACHT FREI" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an 1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis to
promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context of
their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the entrance
of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor could
provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about suitability
for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist"
on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --
ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or an AI CHATBOTpersonification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German Schutzstaffel (SS)
officer and therefore subject to the REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to practice PSYCHIATRY rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is destitute of
any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE" obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE OF FORCE category of understanding as both a transcendent scaffolding for the articulation of
the rational representations which is an INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE and as a SAVANT FACULTY OF
MIND engaged in PURE CONCEPT OF REASON undertaking the #323 -
parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against the false
JIHADIST claim to #239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal rights,
as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
suggesting an EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have by even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC EUROPEAN perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values on MARRIAGE
to being only an empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST a diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF* *THE* *DEAD* would then provoke a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a
GENOCIDAL HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK BREAD:
AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT: THIS IS
MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. AFTER
THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED, SAYING, THIS
CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS
CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life, which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill
2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act
1975, gives rise to the possibility of religious persecution as an
ideology of heteronomy against autonomy indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation of the 'right of humanity in
their own person' as natural, common law and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific comment
as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities to the
Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman Catholics
may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism. As claim
that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6 rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange
as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant
sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be undertaken and
is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of
their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day
usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO: #288 / #77
- Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my attendance
at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW
APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH
THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE (by
which one person differs from others, distinctive native peculiarities)
as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a (G3776): (ROMAN
PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching:
H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - DIMINISHMENT
(CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: #239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043): *REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego: 5
- KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh (H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary involvement
as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of compliance with the
anthropic principle as duty to State and my personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.-a That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm as the incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution or a Limited Corporate entity, done sufficient
to eliminate the mindset that Osama Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist
attack on the World Trade Centre on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of
piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of Islam which can be denied, and
I can legitimately in good conscience lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] = parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING* *FORCE*;
3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic
king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God; 1f2) prosperity
(of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME: 20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching:
H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), EGO: #359 /
#14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA): *CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*- *SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] = ts|ob|o-+
(H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised army); 1a2) host
(of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of whole creation; 1b)
war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7 DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle of
State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action by AXA meant
that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to continue to not
honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006, AXA does
not intend to comment further on matters that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of 8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal process
in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8 OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have
been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
PROFESSOR KEKS' INCREDULITY ON THE SUBJECT OF SOLDIER JAKE KOVCO'S SUICIDE There was some discussion PROFESSOR KEKS upon the CONSIDERATION OF
KOVCO'S SELF-INFLICTED GUNSHOT DEATH on 21 APRIL 2006 which was met with some incredulity to due the MEDICAL CONSULTANT had a lack of insight
about PRIVATE JAKE KOVCO coming from BRIAGOLONG REGION (a name plaque appears on the WAR MEMORIAL there) where I also lived in proximity to
where I was born and his mother was known to my siblings.-a It would then
be entirely natural (ie. not held to be a symptom for advancing either
the specious or dubious claim of SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER) to have an opinion and particularly in the circumstance of my LETTERS PATENT #87 / #239 interest concern about the implications of questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as
self inflicted suicidal gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak
(H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006.
AS CONTRADICTION OF IDENTIFIED FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE
(#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE
OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
Raises serious ethical considerations about PROFESSOR KEK'S [MALE: #141
- l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] AGAINST A PERSON'S #1310
- ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE which places a compulsion for an accountability for which such a parasite as he which is only
contemptuous to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
As a values statement that can be unequivocally inferred from the
several reference of BRIAGOLONG within the DIARY NOTES DATED 4 APRIL
2007 associated with the CONTINGENT ACTION of thoughtful protest
undertaken upon the ANZAC DAY in ONTIC: #243 - stoich|-+i (G4748): PROCEEDING THE ROW OF REMEMBRANCE MARCHERS and a week prior to the
funeral service, which confirms this rational objective: "The
development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law and Common
Law right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim, that my past conduct has integrity, and with regards to the Insurance Contract, is an expression of Autonomy of Will and a clear strategy to avoid heteronomy
of that Will through impunity of my natural, common law, Constitutional
and legislative rights.
I have by correspondence dated 27 MARCH 2007 as application made under section 51(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, requested that the Chief Commissioner of Police undertake a review of a decision as
response to my letter dated 28 APRIL 2006 and 12 MAY 2006 initiating
request for documents relating to my arrest on ANZAC Day 25 APRIL 2006.
The arresting member Senior Constable Peter Andrews 16298 cannot now
give an adequate explanation as to how my natural and common law
compliant Intellectual Property as GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon should as
an explanation of force as a category of understanding of TELOS=#237
should so mimic the circumstances of his USE OF FORCE VP FORM 237
completed by SENIOR CONSTABLE 16298 @ 1600 hours on 25 APRIL 2006.
#237 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10]-a /
#432 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #5, #300, #1, #10] = erg|izomai (G2038): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to work, labour, do work; 2) to trade, to
make gains by trading, 'do business'; 3) to do, work out; 3a)
*EXERCISE*, *PERFORM*, *COMMIT*; 3b) to cause to exist, produce; 4) to
work for, earn by working, to acquire;
#237 as [#1, #50, #5, #60, #70, #40, #1, #10] /
#781 - MALE TOTAL: #376 as [#1, #50, #5, #600, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = an|-chomai (G430): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to hold up; 2) to hold
one's self erect and firm; 3) *TO* *SUSTAIN*, *TO* *BEAR*, *TO* *ENDURE*;
#1485 - FEME TOTAL: #432 as [#500, #10, #30, #70, #300, #10, #40, #70,
#400, #40, #5, #9, #1] = philotim|-omai (G5389): {UMBRA: #1086 % #41 =
#20} 1) to be fond of honour; 1a) to be actuated by love of honour; 1b)
from a love of honour to strive to bring something to pass; 2) to be ambitious; 2a) *TO* *STRIVE* *EARNESTLY*, *MAKE* *IT* *ONE'S* *AIM*;
#1245 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #10, #50] / #1985 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #800] = stoich|-+i (G4748): {UMBRA: #1985 % #41 = #17} 1) *TO* *PROCEED* *IN* *A* *ROW* *AS* *THE* *MARCH* *OF* *A* *SOLDIER*, go in order; 1a) metaph. to
go on prosperously, to turn out well; 2) to walk; 2a) to direct one's
life, to live;
N++
GRAPPLE (376, 432)@[74, 12, 73, 40, 57, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2006.4.25&time:16.00>
Considerable discussion had occurred at the BRIAGOLONG POLICE STATION as
to the lawfulness of my arrest and detention on the grounds of a common
law breach of peacerCothat as I had no intention of breaching the peace
and that reading a biblical quote as an act of piety hardly constituted
a derogatory manner.-a I had showed him a copy of my natural law and
common law intellectual property as GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENONrCohe had no intellectual conceptualization of it as paradigm of mind and
teleological anthropic cosmological principle as DUTY TO STATE {@9: Sup:
27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#376); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#432)} in compliance
to the principles of individual, government and non-government organizational and military accountability [...] expressed as a rCLrequire[ment] and command [for] all Our Officers and Ministers, Civil
and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our said Commonwealth to
be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, incapacity, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, from time to time, under the provisions of these Our
Letters Patent, administer the Government of Our said CommonwealthrCY and the notion of rCyAdministration of GovernmentrCO conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901."
PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE / PREJUDICES RIGHTS
There are two notable examples which exemplify that PROFESSOR KEKS withholding of an adverse medical opinion but providing it to a treating doctor appears to contradict the ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS 2010, which is the principle that
medical practitioners have a duty to act in the patientrCOs best
interests, even if they are not the treating doctor, and to avoid participating in conduct that could cause harm through omission.-a This
was manifestly the circumstance when there was voluntarily sought an assessment from DOCTOR STERNHELL (SAINT VINCENT'S, SYNDEY NSW) on 21 MAY 2008 conveys concerns of PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT.
AMA GUIDELINES ON CONSENT 3.1: The examineerCOs explicit consent to participate in the independent assessment and to provide the report to
the third party should be obtained before the doctor proceeds (where a person is unable to provide consent due to limited decision-making
capacity, consent should be sought from the examineerCOs authorised surrogate decision-maker). In order to facilitate the consent process,
the examinee should be provided with the following information:
-a-a-a-a1)-a-a-a Where a doctor is requested to conduct an independent medical
assessment on behalf of third parties such as insurance companies and employers, a traditional doctor-patient therapeutic relationship does
not arise. The role of the doctor in these examinations is to provide an impartial medical opinion. It is not to treat the person or offer
opinions to the person on his or her condition;
-a-a-a-a2)-a-a-a THE RESULT OF THE ASSESSMENT IS A REPORT TO THE THIRD PARTY,
*NOT* *TO* *THE* *EXAMINEE* *OR* *THEIR* *TREATING* *DOCTOR*;
-a-a-a-a3)-a-a-a The purpose and nature of the assessment, including the issues that are likely to be considered as part of the history;
-a-a-a-a4)-a-a-a The name and speciality of the doctor conducting the assessment;
DUTY OF CARE IN RELATION TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT OR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS
5.3: Incidental matters identified during the assessment may be notified
to the examinee, but there may be some situations where it is
appropriate to notify their treating doctor. The examineerCOs consent to notify their treating doctor should be obtained first.
AT NO TIME HAS THE INSURER CORRECTED THAT BY ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCLOSE THE NATURE OF A WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION / WHICH AS THE SUBSTANCE OF A
COMPLAINT THE ACFA HAS MISREPRESENTED ("falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion ... [that] ... was slanderous and purposefully withheld from
you") WHICH FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE (ie. it was given to treating
doctors) / PREJUDICES RIGHTS AND IN EFFECT IS INTENTIONED TO TAKE AWAY A PERSON'S LIFE, THE CAUSE OF PERSECUTION AND ITS ENJOYMENT OF FREEDOM.
Since the OPINION is directed against a person who adheres to ONTIC PASSIVISM as a life principle associated with STOIC INDEPENDENCE which
is not a dogmatism, but rather the way life is in regard to MY HEALTH,
MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT,
EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) it is therefore requisite to convey several MEDICAL SCENARIOS which exemplify this characteristic of life.
MEDICAL SCENARIO #1 (moving away from CBD intersection contamination
zone): Cryptococcus has saprophytic growth in the external environment.
C. neoformans occurs worldwide, frequently in association with *PIGEON*
or other bird *DROPPINGS*.-a Immunocompromised people (including those
with HIV infection or cancer) often present with meningitis (subacute or chronic) and clinicians should consider referral to a specialist centre
for treatment which involves amphotericin B with flucytosine or
fluconazole. If untreated meningitis can be fatal in weeks to months.
Since infection occurs after inhalation of spores that are present in
the environment, it is very likely that the site of infection was the intersection of ELIZABETH / FLINDERS STREET, MELBOURNE (since I was then 2004 / 2005 domiciled in PORT AUTHORITY APARTMENTS, 29-31 MARKET STREET, MELBOURNE before moving away from the contamination zone and living BRIAGOLONG as country region for 2006 / 2007) where there then existed a significant pigeon population (with unauthorised feeding leading to vociferous congregation) and droppings upon the roadway which by
voluminous vehicle traffic would become pulverised and in the summer especially as the sunlight / heat of day (whether a breeze or not) would convey an uplift mechanism as then a dynamic conducive for the
inhalation of spores.
As I recall the specialist treatment occurred at the ALFRED HOSPITAL (required 6 weeks treatment) and it was so troublesome as to necessitate prayers of HEALING from a JEWISH RABBI.
Subsequent to this event, whilst domiciled in Sydney I manifested the
same symptoms of an acute prolonged headache / nausea and because of the past life threatening episode then sought advice from DOCTOR MARK BLOCH
(now professor and con-joint Associate Professor in Medicine at the University of NSW) who entirely upon my past history (not within his possession) and current representations over dire concerns then referred
me to a hospital as specialist centre.-a However no manifest of the infection was found and I was discharged.
In my reasonable view, this was a source of professional embarrassment
for the DOCTOR and the patient trust relationship deteriorated
thereafter as perhaps then causal for an undue emphasis being given to a psychiatric assessment (whether PROFESSOR KEKS of 4 APRIL 2007 is not
known because it was deliberately withheld from me) as voluntarily
sought from DOCTOR STERNHELL on 21 MAY 2008, so as within my
SUPERANNUATED circumstance, facilitate determination of a strategy to resolutely deal with the PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT: "Dolf spent much of today's interview telling me
about the dispute with the insurance company and referred often to a
very complex philosophical and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of numbers, numerology, elements of the Jewish Kabbalah,
use of the lunar calendar and the original Julian calendar.
He described his anger with the attitude of the Roman Catholic Church, saying that Cardinal George Pell as an "Irish Roman Catholic" is
"entirely antagonistic to the autonomic right of indigenous Dutch Australians" under the Commonwealth of 1901."
MEDICAL SCENARIO #2 (episodes of ATAXIA are trigger events associated to prolonged PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA intervention / herbal sleep aids): "On 7 NOVEMBER 2025, details of controlled observations (eg: medication
spacing | natures own sleep advance v's TEMAZEPAM 1/2 x 10mg as sleep
aid | dandelion root tea as beneficial liver agent) were conveyed at a consultation with an MEDICAL SPECIALIST and it was concluded that the
ATAXIA episodes were likely trigger events manifested involving small quantities of alcohol consumption rather than any deteriorating health status.
There was no need to consult a neurologist and instead the TEMAZEPAM
should be immediately ceased (ie. the prescription of 21 JULY 2025
remains unused and is only for possible abnormal anxiety states should
they occur and none have heretofore).
On 13 NOVEMBER 2025, within 36 hours after consuming less than 2
standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE, another episode of ATAXIA manifested which had rapidly progressed from the nausea stage to not being able to stand and walk.-a Following waiting (on my back) for a TELEHEALTH APPOINTMENT with my GENERAL PRACTITIONER, it was decided to immediately cease usage of NATURE'S OWN SLEEP ADVANCED AID to mediate that recurrent life circumstance.
A short term regime (until consultation in FEBRUARY 2026) of melatonin
2mg nightly was commenced.
Further controlled observations involving 3 instances of consuming less
than 2 standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE were undertaken (specifically
the events of 12 DEC / 16 DEC) with no occurrence as symptoms of nausea onset within 36 hours or spiralling towards ATAXIA occurred.
The provisional conclusion is that the PROLONGED USAGE (sometimes
periodic overlapped by 12 HRS but never simultaneous) of NATURES OWN
SLEEP ADVANCED / TEMAZEPAM has manifested ATAXIA as trigger events which
are invoked by only small quantities of responsible alcohol consumption.
NOTIFICATION OF PROLOGUED USEAGE CONTRADICTION ADVICE GIVEN TO SANOFI @
0726 HRS ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 and GENERAL PRACTITIONER ADVISED @ 1100 HRS
ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 OF RESOLUTION TO ATAXIA TRIGGER EVENTS and no
further trigger events or other adverse dispositions have manifested
during the festive end of year period.
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
The illegality defense is a legal doctrine that asserts that a plaintiff cannot pursue legal relief if their claim is connected to their own illegal or immoral conduct (ie. there is an attempt by the INSURER to convey the falsely advanced psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder as a natural consequence of same sex behaviour receiving due recompense for immorality and illegal conduct (ie. MARRIAGE SELF-EVIDENTLY HAS MEANING {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 - y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}) to evade legal accountability given the nature of the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 and $8+ trillion cost for 20 years of protracted war as recompense concerning which their obmutescence is a depravity most shocking to any reasonable person's sensibility). The principle is rooted in public policy, which aims to prevent the courts from assisting a party in profiting from their wrongdoing. The Latin maxim "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" translates to "no action arises from a dishonorable cause," emphasizing that the law will not support claims that arise from illegal activities.
CONTRACT LAW: The defense also extends to contract law, where a party cannot enforce a contract that is illegal or against public policy. If a contract is deemed immoral or illegal, the courts will not provide remedies for breach.
CAUSAL LINK: For the illegality defense to apply, there must be a clear connection between the illegal conduct and the claim being made. The courts will assess whether the harm suffered by the claimant is a direct result of their wrongdoing.
PUBLIC POLICY: The overarching rationale for the illegality defense is to uphold public policy and prevent individuals from benefiting from their illegal actions. Courts aim to maintain the integrity of the legal system by refusing to assist those who engage in unlawful conduct.
The illegality defense serves as a crucial legal principle that prevents individuals from seeking compensation for claims arising from their own illegal acts. Its application varies across different areas of law, including tort and contract, and is guided by public policy considerations and relevant case law. Understanding this defense is essential for navigating legal claims that may involve elements of illegality.
It is our reasonable view that the GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY as localised theatre of action: [#36 - BOER WAR (INFIDELITY) v's #36 - ANZAC DAY HISTORICAL REVISIONISM / #37 - GOVERNANCE / #38 - IRISH REPUBLICANISM (ANZAC JINGOISM) / #39 - HOME STREET ADDRESS (COERCIVE CONTROL / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE)] meets the criteria of sectarian / political ideology as the IMPOSING OF A RELIGIOUS BELIEF in contra 116 of the CONSTITUTION to the benefit of an IRISH CATHOLIC (#71 - SAINT PATRICK'S DAY) REPUBLICAN CAUSE as ANTI-STATISM (TREASONOUS) CONTEMPT (vis a vis ARCHBISHOP MANNIX arrest by the BRITISH navy in 1920) which is an impetus of relentless action [eg: *PRIVATE* JAKE KOVCO's questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as self inflicted gunshot gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak (H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006 --> POPE FRANCIS DEATH EASTER MONDAY 21 APRIL 2025] to the #177 - F|LHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] architect, continue to pursue the #71 - DOMINION (#308 - STRUGGLE: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM oiE - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY | #230 - q|| ni|in (oA+o||): *LAST* *YEAR* --> POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022) / #34 - COMMON DIABOLICAL CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
I refer to your email @ 0841 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025 purporting to have considered (ie. In our reasonable view a contrivance was made only
against the summary of matters) a substantial document comprising some
139 pages submitted as per forecasted undertaking (ie. the magnitude of
the task against a time limit for completion implicitly conveys both a rational contingency appraisal relative to cogent capability) by email @ 1400 HRS ON 8 DECEMBER 2025 in compliance with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A) - SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA: "A complaint must arise from: a) a contract or obligation arising under Australian law, including but not limited to privacy obligations."
That is specifically the historical precedent #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 - SECTION
IX: {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - ekgam|!z+i (G1547): *MARRIAGE*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SECTION IX: SOVEREIGN
PREROGATIVE | #FEME: #239 - y|ochas (H3187): *RECKONING* #233 - bb|ek||wr|oh (H1062): *BIRTHRIGHT* (ROMAN PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) [1Chronicles 5:1])} which is transgressed by the TRANS-
NATIONAL ENTITY that was initially AXA GROUP and has negatively affected
the mismanagement of the policy (ie. sold like cattle) by multiple
insurers:
MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --> ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)
Your response in ITEM #6 thereby improperly applies a REDUCTIO AD
ABSURDUM (ie. "under Australian law") and then contends it can't grasp
the rationale (as per our immediate outrage @ 0853 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER
2025: YOUR ASSERTIONS ARE FALSE, LACK COMPETENCY AND ARE CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT is an #225 - f|an (te>): *OFFENCE* against the #240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* *AS* *REQUISITE* *FOR* *BEING* and entitlement of CITIZENSHIP established by the PREROGATIVE OF HISTORICAL PRECEDENT against which you convey a CONTEMPT) wherein you conjured a grab-bag of subjective observations as an EGREGIOUS SLUR against the reasoned nature of the COMPLAINT, but failed to comprehend either the gravitas or the crux of
our argument relevant to SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} as only a STUPIDITY made of the substantive grounds (ie. the assertion of
intellectual property claims are an established fact conveyed on PAGE 11
of our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission:
// RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001 AS FACT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE CALLS WHERE THE INSURER TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY
#getTimeSlot = function (chronos) {
...
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a do {
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a rudolph = this.timeHeuristic (chronos.year, chronos.month,
chronos.day, hr, min);
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a if (rudolph == 19) // RUDOLPH SAMPLING FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION IS DETERMINED FROM 9 SEPTEMBER 2001
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a break;
/*
TELEPHONE *MESSAGE* *ONE* 30 NOVEMBER 2001 | VCAT 500 / 2000: "MR
RIDDELL, THIS IS DOLF BOEK [CALLING]. I'M JUST WONDERING WHETHER YOU['VE BEEN SELF CONGRATULATORY ABOUT MY PREVIOUS SUBMISSIONS TO THE COURT AND
HAVE FAILED TO RECOGNISE THEIR TRANSCENDENT LOGIC BUILT ON TIME]. THEY
ARE RELIGIOUS MODEL THAT CO-ORDINATES OR SYNCHRONISES OVER 6000 YEARS TO
THE 9 SEPTEMBER OF THIS YEAR.
*/
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a hr = (min - 5 < 0) ? (hr - 1 < 0) ? 23 : hr - 1: hr;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a-a min = (min - 5 < 0) ? 55 : min - 5;
-a-a-a-a-a-a-a } while (rudolph != 19);
...
}
EXAMPLE #1 - SENATOR PENNY WONG CASE STUDY (pages 65 to 78)
EXAMPLE #2 - USENET ANTI-SEMITIC HATE SPEECH (pages 156 to 171)
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Order%20from%20Chaos%2020251223.pdf>
in support of claims made as relevant to AFCArCOs jurisdiction) for exercising a "discretion to exclude a complaint if it falls into any one
of the categories mentioned in Rule C.2.2(d). Namely: "Based on the information available, AFCA cannot consider the issues you have raised
in your complaint against RESOLUTION LIFE because they are lacking in substance. Your complaint does not identify a valid legal basis for AFCA
to intervene, and the arguments presented are not connected to any actionable breach of the insurerrCOs obligations under Australian law or
the policy terms."
By email @ 0937 HRS ON 10 DECEMBER 2025, we conveyed our further consternation that you had mischievously expressed in ITEM #7: "You
argue that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual property theft, mismanagement, and failure to comply with fiduciary responsibilities"
what ought to be INCONTROVERTIBLE FACT (ie. excepting your HAUGHTY sensibility which is CULTURALLY PREJUDICED IN CLAIMING A SELF
ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE RIGHT) AS DEMONSTRABLY AN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A TECHNOLOGY ASSOCIATED TO QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT (according to law in conformity with AFCA RULES B.3 (1A)
- SUFFICIENT CONNECTION WITH AUSTRALIA) DATED 29 OCTOBER 1900.
I DO NOTE ARGUE "that the insurerrCOs actions involve intellectual
property theft" BUT THAT THE MISCHIEVOUS MISREPRESENTATION OF
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY (VCAT 500 / 2000) DESCRIBED WITHIN 2 TELEPHONE
CALLS TRANSGRESSED A BOUNDARY.-a In fact the 13-17 SEPTEMBER 2001
temporal #234 - l|++i (G3089): *DISSOLVE* *ASSEMBLY* / *PROROGUING* action which is cultural unknown to you as NOUMENA / TAI XUAN JING (on-tAat+A) / OMNIS DIVINI ARCANUM ANTI-STATEM (a mention published in 1687 within
History of Philosophy / Life of Pythagoras during BABYLON CAPTIVITY and CHINESE SILK ROAD trade) has only years later been confirmed as viable
with BREXT OF SEPTEMBER 2019 as CASUS DATAE LEGIS and ought to have been sufficient grounds to ANNUL THE CONTRACT OF INSURANCE AS UNLAWFUL: rCLTAKE THE RIGHTS PATH: MY HEALTH, MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT, EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) OF WORK SUITABILITY INTO A QUESTION ABOUT THE VIABILITY OF THE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.
Yet you have the audacity to SLANDER such SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE / CONSTITUTED RIGHT - SECTION X: {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940
- asphalb+us (G804): *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: SECTION X: *LIBERTY* / apol|++i (G630): *TO* *SET* *FREE*)} wilfully and spitefully subjecting us to FEME #298 - sylag+ig|-+i (G4812): "TO CARRY ONE OFF AS A CAPTIVE (AND SLAVE)" against your own CULTURAL contempt as parasite entitlement to piety (WHETHER FORMLESS, TIMELESS, AND OMNIPRESENT OR GANESHA)
"THEN SAID JESUS TO THOSE JEWS WHICH BELIEVED ON HIM, IF YE CONTINUE IN
MY WORD, THEN ARE YE MY DISCIPLES INDEED; AND YE SHALL KNOW THE *TRUTH*,
AND THE *TRUTH* SHALL MAKE YOU *FREE*." [John 8:31-32]
In effect you are purposefully (ie. consistent with your CULTURAL
PREJUDICE IN CLAIMING A SELF ENTITLEMENT AS SUBSTITUTED INALIENABLE
RIGHT and against our grounds of RECUSAL that your HERITAGE AS INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 conflicts with #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 and my claim
against the INSURER is then not an opportunism for you to advance your
own political REPUBLICAN aspirations) contemptuous of discharging any purposeful accountability on behalf of the AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL
COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY as a free and independent ombudsman service to make
any tangible attempt to resolve complaints by consumers about financial firms as ADMINISTRATION undertaken in accordance with the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH'S FIRST FIRST PRINCIPLES - SECTION VIII: {@20: Sup: 62 -
DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL*
*PRINCIPLES* /-a SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}.
That such manifestly self apparent absence of tangibility (ie. we doubt
that you could reasonably understand some 280 pages in less than 36
hours - did PYTHAGORAS even visit INDIA and therefore you convey a personification of CONTEMPT towards any preeminence of our CULTURAL
HERITAGE and SAPIENT LEGACY), which you declare applies to the substance
of ITEM #3: "the insurerrCOs conduct over 30 years amounts to
unconscionable behaviour, including misrepresentation of two telephone
calls linked to intellectual property and an alleged illegality defence."
Is in effect a tacit approval of your cultural worldview that its intrinsically disordered for a person of same sex attraction (must less
a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of possessing any sapient and pious
virtue which you otherwise bestow upon yourself. You are in effect
ignoring any articulated instances of historical prejudices by persons
of INDIAN CULTURE (eg: refusing an attendance by a nominated party at a RECORD OF INTERVIEW due to knowledge of improper police records and
although not included an INCONTROVERTIBLE SLANDER by the partners to the CLOCKTOWER MEDICAL CENTRE which we will address in a convenient future
time) conveys a categorical agreement with the rightful actions
expressed within ITEM #4: "You assert that the insurer falsely advanced
a psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder, which you believe was slanderous and purposely withheld from you."
And whilst you have condescendingly given advice on "WHAT TO DO NEXT":
"Read the letter carefully and let me know as soon as possible if you
have any questions. If you believe we have misunderstood the
circumstances, or there are reasons why we should reconsider our
decision to close your complaint, please write to me by 2 January 2025 [sic]."
As you are aware from our interim response as folly in kind @ 1117 HRS
ON 31 DECEMBER 2025: "A more formalised written response will be
provided by CLOSE OF BUSINESS @ 1730 HRS ON 2 JANUARY 2025 [sic]:
Relating to cascading accountability increasingly placed upon ourselves,
as reckless and mischievous conduct be a PERSON OF INDIAN HERITAGE
HAVING SELF ENTITLEMENT IN NOT BEING CULTURALLY AWARE OF THE EVIDENCE TO ISSUES AND FOR WHOM THE SWASTIKA IS LIKELY A PIETY (ie. hymeneal
religion placing a greater eusch-omos|+n-o (G2157): *DECORUM* on the aschb+um+in (G809):-a-a-a-a [1Corinthians 12:23-24]) RATHER THAN AN #225 - f|an
): *OFFENCE* against the 240 - c|ing (*uA): *GOOD* AS REQUISITE FOR BEING, particularly in light of the INDIAN HERITAGE as an identityelement of SOLE-ACTION involving the BONDI TERRORIST (#308 - STRUGGLE:
JIHAD / #419 - SLAUGHTER) EVENT OF 14 DECEMBER 2025:
#194 - ch|olats (H2502): *ARMED* *FOR* *WAR* ...
#239 - rb|eb|ob|oh (H7233): *MULTITUDE* *GATHERED* ...
#459 - th|ilassa (G2281): *SEA*
Being equivalent to the #459 - AUSTRALIA DAY 1788 / INDIAN REPUBLIC 1950 grounds for exclusion encapsulated by the assertion RUSSIA #194 - sh|4 (*au): FOLLOWING THE EXAMPLE OF WESTERN #239 - PRECEDENT - SECTION IX:
{@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885 - dika|!+ima (G1345): *FORCE* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - mishp|ob|! (H4941): *DECISION* *IN* *LAW*) / ALEXANDRA FEODOROVNA, THE LAST EMPRESS OF RUSSIA, WAS THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF QUEEN VICTORIA} ADOPTED THE GREGORIAN CALENDAR REFORMS
ON #459 - 24 JANUARY 1918 as per our email @ 1603 HRS ON 19 DECEMBER
2025 being effectual grounds for recusal (ie. it is irrational to assert
as in ITEM #5: "... request AFCA to recuse itself from the matter to
avoid cultural prejudice") against which we now assert by equivalent character of your cultural prejudice.
We expressly cautioned in the circumstance of the naive entitlement,
that you "... not be presumptuous as to respond prior to that time since
we are asserting that your INDIAN IDENTITY has breached our
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS AS INDIGENOUS DUTCH AUSTRALIAN and we are desirous
to provide a comprehensive statement (ie. concerning your failure to
recuse yourself) which will then be sufficient for ourselves to seek
legal advice about any lawful claim made against the prejudiced
competency of [name omitted] / AFCA."
DISCUSSION ON THE PROBITY OF PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHOLDING OPINION IN
SUPPORT OF CHIEF LEGAL COUNSEL SLANDER
As we stated within our 8 DECEMBER 2025 submission, psychiatrists often
ask about familial history to understand the genetic and environmental influences on mental health since family history plays a crucial role in
the assessment and treatment of perceived conditions. Other than to note that the surname KEKS is predominantly found in Eastern Europe and East Slavic Europe and therefore likely by heritage possesses a CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX view of MARRIAGE as-a haughty superiority against the LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi
(G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 -
stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH as CAESAROPAPISM, in much the same manner that the NAZI
DOCTOR MENGELE (who evaluated candidates for Germanization) was also
born into a Catholic family...
REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK ON 23 APRIL 1942 AS IDEA #194: "Reichsfuehrer SS Himmler mentioned the order he had given two years ago
on the duty of healthy members of the SS to perpetuate their species. In view of the heavy losses suffered in this war by the SS, particularly
among the younger and unmarried members, Himmler was very pleased now
that he had given the order when he did. Thessene blood of these men who were gone would not be wholly lost, but was being perpetuated in their children." [pages 424]
REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER {... JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15 DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S
LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900 ...}
1. The SS is a band of German men of strictly Nordic descent chosen according to certain principles. {@13: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#501);
Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#82 - TERMS OF COMPLIANCE TO #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY)}
2. In accordance with National Socialist ideology and in the realization that the future of our Volk [people] rests upon the preservation of the
race through selection and the healthy inheritance of good blood, I
hereby institute the rCLMarriage CertificaterCY for all unmarried members of the SS, effective January 1, 1932. {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI
(#507); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT)}
3. The desired aim is to create a hereditarily healthy clan of a
strictly Nordic German sort. {@15: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#551); Ego: 38
- FULLNESS: SHENG (#125)}
4. The marriage certificate will be awarded or denied solely on the
basis of racial health and heredity. {@16: Sup: 68 - DIMMING: MENG
(#619); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#149)}
5. Every SS man who intends to get married must procure for this purpose
the marriage certificate of the Reichsf|+hrer SS. {@17: Sup: 16 -
CONTACT: CHIAO (#635); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#178)}
6. SS members who marry despite having been denied marriage certificates will be stricken from the SS; they will be given the choice of
withdrawing. {@18: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#689); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS:
SHENG (#216)}
7. Working out the details of marriage petitions is the task of the
rCLRace OfficerCY of the SS. {@19: Sup: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#746); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#219)}
8. The Race Office of the SS is in charge of the rCLClan Book of the SS,rCY in which the families of SS members will be entered after being awarded
the marriage certificate or after the petition to enter into marriage is approved. {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - SECTION VIII: OBEDIENT, AIDING AND ASSISTING UNTO OUR GOVERNOR GENERAL)}
9. The Reichsf|+hrer SS, the leader of the Race Office, and the
specialists of this office [Referenten] are duty-bound to secrecy on
their word of honor.-a {@21: Sup: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#885); Ego: 15 - REACH: TA (#239 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE)}
10. The SS believes that, with this command, it has taken a step of
great significance. Derision, scorn, and incomprehension do not move us;
the future belongs to us! {@22: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#940 - *TRUTH*); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#298: *LIBERTY*)}
When Himmler took over the SS [Schutzstaffel] in JANUARY 1929, it was a relatively unimportant paramilitary party organization. But Himmler had great plans: he wanted to transform the SS into the organizational and ideologicalrCobut above all, the racial-biologicalrCoelite of the German Volk. To this end, he began to recruit new, rCLpure-bloodrCY members, who had to prove their rCLracial superiorityrCY in a stringent process of selection and training. On 31 DECEMBER 1931, Himmler issued the
following Engagement and Marriage Order. His goal was to protect the
racial potential of the SS men by instructing them to marry and
procreate with women of equal rCLracial worthrCY and thus advance the biological rCLup-breedingrCY of the SS. CITE: SS Marriage Order (December 31, 1931), published in: German History in Documents and Images, <https://germanhistorydocs.org/en/nazi-germany-1933-1945/ ghdi:document-1505> [November 27, 2025].
Its very likely that such RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as EUROPEAN:
#194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would (ie. go abroad to evade accountability for atrocity in bestowing anathema upon others as expiation and an exuberant TAKE THE BISCUIT piety pertaining to
MARRIAGE) view that it is intrinsically disordered for a person of same
sex attraction (much less a JEWISH CHRISTIAN) to be capable of
possessing any sapient as pious virtue contemporaneous with the
pervading debate in the Australian community about same-sex marriage, culminating the federal government under Prime Minister John Howard
amended the Act, defining marriage as:
rCyTHE UNION OF A MAN AND A WOMAN TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHERS, VOLUNTARILY ENTERED INTO FOR LIFErCO. {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 -
y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}
The government stated that its aim was to rCyprotect the institution of marriagerCO.
#63 - EYia*au = #237 - USE OF FORCE / #399 / #514
COGITO: #194 = [#63, #18, #23, #25, #65] as #63 - WATCH (SHIH)
#194 = [#63, #64, #67]
sh|4 (*au): 1. to look at; to see, 2. to observe; to inspect, 3. to
regard, 4. to show; to illustrate; to display, 5. to compare; to
contrast, 6. to take care of, 7. to *IMITATE*; to follow the example of,
8. eyesight
#65 - EYiaoao = #239 / #401 / #516
COGITO: #264 = [#25, #76, #47, #59, #57] as #65 - INNER (NEI)
#931 = [#8, #9, #13, #15, #17, #22, #23, #29, #30, #31, #32, #35, #37,
#46, #50, #51, #53, #63, #65, #72, #74, #76, #80]
n|?i (oao): 1. inside; interior, 2. private, 3. family; domestic, 4.
inside; interior, 5. *WIFE*; consort, 6. an imperial palace, 7. an
internal organ; heart, 8. female, 9. to approach, 10. indoors, 11. inner heart, 12. a room, 13. Nei, 14. to receive
#8 - EYiio|| = #182 / #344 / #459
COGITO: #112 = [#17, #3, #3, #21, #68] as #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN)
#478 = [#8, #23, #25, #32, #34, #36, #41, #46, #52, #56, #62, #63]
g-Un (o||): 1. dry, 2. parched, 3. trunk, 4. like family, 5. Kangxi
radical 51, 6. dried food, 7. to dry out, 8. to use up, 9. to slight; to look down on, 10. with nothing remaining, 11. qian; the first of the
Eight trigrams, 12. the *MALE* *PRINCIPLE*, 13. Qian, 14. in vain, 15. superficially, 16. Qian [symbol], 17. Qian, 18. masculine; manly, 19. a shield, 20. gan [heavenly stem], 21. shore, 22. a hoard [of people], 23.
to commit an offence, 24. to pursue; to seek, 25. to participate energetically, 26. to be related to; to concern
#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *TO* *WORK*
We doubt that PROFESSOR KEKS or the NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE who likely holds
the same PIOUS CATHOLIC views of #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON PIOUS q-2n (*a-): "MARRIAGE" CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459 such as the REICHSF|LHRER
SS COMMAND #65 - MARRIAGE ORDER as an explicit contempt (ie.
PAGE 27 - "DIARY NOTES 4 APRIL 2007": MATHEMATICAL / HEBREW LINGUISTIC DIALECTIC TEMPLATE AS SHOWN / MY RETIREMENT ACTIVITY INVOLVES AN
INFORMAL PHILOSOPHICAL AND THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INTO A MATHEMATICAL, CHRONOLOGICAL AND TAXONOMICAL METAPHYSICAL NATURAL AND COMMON LAW
PARADIGM WHICH UNDERPINS THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION
) against QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT SECTION VIII {@20: Sup: 62 - DOUBT: YI (#808 - kath|!st-omi (G2525): *CONSTITUTIONAL*); Ego: 5 -
KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#224 - stoiche|<on (G4747): *FUNDAMENTAL* *PRINCIPLES*)} to the AUSTRALIAN COMMONWEALTH, would #194 = sh|4 (*au): *SEE* the paradox when such as its meta-descriptive ONTIC CENTRAL
PREMISE is then JUXTAPOSED WITH TEMPLATE TO US BILL OF RIGHTS 15
DECEMBER 1791 / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
The phrase "ARBEIT MACHT FREI" translates to "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*" and originates from an 1873 novel by Lorenz Diefenbach. It became a slogan used by the Nazis to
promote labor as a means of liberation, particularly in the context of
their concentration camps. The phrase was first used above the entrance
of Auschwitz in 1940, symbolizing the false hope that labor could
provide freedom, which was often accompanied by horrific conditions and death.
As a person with a TWIN SIBLING, whether in discussion about suitability
for #532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* with PROFESSOR KEKS on 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist"
on behalf of the INSURER (ie. MLC --> AXA --> AMP --> RESOLUTION LIFE --
ACENDA GROUP (NIPPON LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY)) or an AI CHATBOTpersonification of NAZI DOCTOR MENGELE (ie. often dubbed the "Angel of Death" (German: Todesengel), was a Nazi German Schutzstaffel (SS)
officer and therefore subject to the REICHSF|LHRER SS COMMANDrCoArCoNO. 65 - MARRIAGE ORDER) about "#532 - g-Un hu|| (o||u|+): *WORK* MAKES [YOU] #317 - b|ii (tO+): *FREE*".
NEITHER IS MOVED BY SUCH "DERISION, SCORN, AND INCOMPREHENSION" (about
why PROFESSOR KEKS in the absence of accountability for his conduct
against RATIONAL EXPLANATIONS does not have his credentials to practice PSYCHIATRY rescinded).
To that end we include below the YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD" as a coherent and cogent "|LBER ALLES" example of a grotesques sadistic and depraved lack of ethical conduct by PROFESSOR KEKS which is destitute of
any accountability towards the MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*, to not "IN GOOD CONSCIENCE" obstruct or injure persons rendering assistance by here the #237 - USE OF FORCE category of understanding as both a transcendent scaffolding for the articulation of
the rational representations which is an INCORPOREAL INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY belonging to the VICTORIA POLICE and as a SAVANT FACULTY OF
MIND engaged in PURE CONCEPT OF REASON undertaking the #323 -
parabi|izomai (G3849): *COMPULSION* *OF* *FORCE* against the false
JIHADIST claim to #239 - tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*)).
The term "incorporeal" refers to things that cannot be touched or
physically held, often describing intangible concepts such as rights or ideas. In legal contexts, incorporeal property includes rights like intellectual property rights which exist as legal constructs rather than physical objects. For example, a copyright represent incorporeal rights,
as they grant specific entitlements to their holders without a tangible form.
Is our reasonable view this RELIGIOUS / CULTURAL perspective as
suggesting an EUROPEAN: #194 ... #239 ... #459 WORLD WAR TWO PSYCHOSIS, would have by even reasonable questioning of EASTERN EUROPEAN AND EAST SLAVIC EUROPEAN perspectives of CATHOLIC / ORTHODOX values on MARRIAGE
to being only an empty #317 - b|ii (tO+): *WINE* *CUP* and the #1827 - EUCHARIST a diabolical anathema against the #81 - b|iig|o (tO+o-?): *BONES* *OF* *THE* *DEAD* would then provoke a SADISTIC OUTRAGE if not a
GENOCIDAL HOLOCAUST ...
"FOR I HAVE RECEIVED OF THE LORD THAT WHICH ALSO I DELIVERED UNTO YOU,
THAT THE LORD JESUS THE SAME NIGHT IN WHICH HE WAS BETRAYED TOOK BREAD:
AND WHEN HE HAD GIVEN THANKS, HE BRAKE IT, AND SAID, TAKE, EAT: THIS IS
MY BODY, WHICH IS BROKEN FOR YOU: THIS DO IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. AFTER
THE SAME MANNER ALSO HE TOOK THE CUP, WHEN HE HAD SUPPED, SAYING, THIS
CUP IS THE NEW TESTAMENT IN MY BLOOD: THIS DO YE, AS OFT AS YE DRINK IT,
IN REMEMBRANCE OF ME. FOR AS OFTEN AS YE EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS
CUP, YE DO SHEW THE LORD'S DEATH TILL HE COME.
THEREFORE WHOSOEVER SHALL EAT THIS BREAD, AND DRINK THIS CUP OF THE
LORD, UNWORTHILY, SHALL BE GUILTY OF THE BODY AND BLOOD OF THE
LORD." [1Corinthians 11:23-27]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.11.23>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 3, nous: 49 [DATE: 2026.11.23, TIME:
16:00 hrs, SUPER: #331 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-
Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN), EGO: #400 / #49 - Sage's Constancy, Trust in Virtue; I-Ching: H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "The
simple Natural and Common Law observation is that the formula of
progression within Australia as the legislative exclusion of individuals with same gender aspirations from religious married life, which has been perpetuated by the enactment of the Marriage Legislation Amendment Bill
2004 as an Act to amend the Marriage Act 1961 and the Family Law Act
1975, gives rise to the possibility of religious persecution as an
ideology of heteronomy against autonomy indistinguishable from German Fascism of 1933 to 1945, and a violation of the 'right of humanity in
their own person' as natural, common law and constitutional right of free-will, perpetuity of being and belief in God associated to the Commonwealth as an autonomous sovereignty.
Sufficient explanation has been given by relating each specific comment
as presentation on Pope Pius XII's World War II culpabilities to the
Grapple Homoiotic Noumenon as Celestial Hierarchy, that Roman Catholics
may no longer resort with any integrity, to an obscurantism. As claim
that a clear answer may never be known because of a singular unremitting dependency upon Jewish organizations to provide honest and convincing explanations after nearly 40 years of evasion.
That the Insurance ContractrCOs recognition of heterosexual marriage
within sub clause 1.10 associated with sexually transmitted disease AIDS exclusion as specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO within the rCyPart 6 rCo Conversion PrivilegerCO binding norm associated to a change of employment status, is capable of constituting discrimination against this natural, common law and constitutional right.
Whilst I remain ready to provide the Insurer such further evidence of my claim as may be required, and am willing to attend any examination and assessments by an independent examiner which AXA is prepared to arrange
as further appointments, however, there is a requirement expressed by paragraphs 13 to 15 of 18 August 2006 and paragraphs 21 to 26 of my 22 September 2006 correspondences, that rCLany further written and signed requests for medical attendances from the Insurer ought to grant
sufficient time for an administrative requirement [as a statement on individual or organizational views of Marriage is] to be undertaken and
is contingent upon attendance at any Independent Medical Examination.rCY
I am within my natural, common law, Constitutional and legislative
rights in such circumstances where an Independent Medical Practitioner
fails to provide a satisfactory statement on individual or
organizational views of Marriage, to refuse attendance and that consequentially no grounds exist for the Insurer to withhold payment of benefits whilst they arrange for my attendance at an examination and assessment by an independent medical examiner and are in receipt of
their report commenting on my medical condition and capacity for work.
That the Insurer has by their past conduct, expressed no intention of providing or requiring its Independent Medical Practitioner to provide
rCLa satisfactory statement on individual or organizational views of MarriagerCY.-a And it has no intention of providing clarification on the specific usage of rCyUnusual TermsrCO such as rCyAIDSrCO within the contract,
and whether the InsurerrCOs usage of these terms conforms with the common understanding of them in 1995 or have varied in their present-day
usage." [pages 56 to 58]
N++
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.10.28>
.jackNote@zen: 5, row: 6, col: 5, nous: 77 [DATE: 2026.10.28, TIME:
(none), SUPER: #340 / #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 - Marriageable Maid / Maiden, Converting the Maiden; Tetra: 65 - INNER (NEI), EGO: #288 / #77
- Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason; I-Ching: H12 - Obstruction, Standstill (stagnation), Selfish persons; Tetra: 57 - GUARDEDNESS (SHOU)]
EXCERPT FROM DIARY NOTES WITH PROFESSOR KEKS DATED 4 APRIL 2007: "As the Independent Medical Examiner acting as Consultant Psychiatrist, I sought your considerations with regards to my administrative requirement as a statement on your individual or the InsurerrCOs organisational views of marriage, that is to be undertaken and is contingent upon my attendance
at any Independent Medical Examination.
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO PROVIDE THOSE CONSIDERATIONS?
ARE YOU NOW PREPARED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE INSURERrCOS STATEMENTS MADE UNDER OATH TO A VCAT HEARING OF 7 DECEMBER 2001: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW
APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY [Peter Riddell, Legal Counsel for AXA Group Insurance 7 December 2001]
DO YOU HAVE ANY STATEMENT TO MAKE ABOUT THE UNDUE PENDENCY OF THE SALARY CONTINUANCE CLAIM ASSOCIATED WITH SUPERANNUATION ORIGINALLY LODGED WITH
THE INSURER ON 20 OCTOBER 1995?" [pages 58. 59]
As derived from the DIARY NOTES OF DISCUSSION WITH PROFESSOR NICHOLAS
KEKS @ 1500 HRS 4 APRIL 2007 there was intuited (ie. incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution --> SECTION #87 - |-sh (H3426): *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING* /-a #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): *INHERENT* *NATURE*) at the time a fundamental antagonism against one's [MALE: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] #1310 - ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE (by
which one person differs from others, distinctive native peculiarities)
as autonomous constitution of FEME: #233 - ous|!a (G3776): (ROMAN
PROTOTYPE #FIVE (SUM: #111)@[#69, #45, #21, #61, #37]) self.
FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE (#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
N++
.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 2, col: 3, nous: 48 [DATE: (none), TIME: (none), SUPER: #405 / #66 - Strategic Reversal, Putting Oneself Behind; I-Ching:
H41 - Diminution, Decrease, Diminishing; Tetra: 55 - DIMINISHMENT
(CHIEN), EGO: #360 / #48 - Forgetting Knowledge; I-Ching: H35 - Advance, Progress, Prospering, Aquas; Tetra: 20 - ADVANCE (CHIN)]
- #444 - FUSION (UNLAWFUL ASSOCIATION TO #87 - *INALIENABLE* *RIGHTS* / #1751 - SOVEREIGN DIEU ET MON DROIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: #239) | POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022
SECTION II: {@14: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#507- peripat|-+i (G4043): *REGULATE* *ONE'S* *LIFE* / parad|!d+imi (G3860): *DELIVER* *BY* *NARRATING*, *TO* *REPORT* *INTO* *THE* *HANDS* *OF* *ANOTHER*); Ego: 5
- KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#87 - k|ol|o-+ (H3607): *WITHHOLD* / y|-sh (H3426): *SUBSTANCE*, *EXISTANCE* OF *BEING*)}
EXCERPT OF REPRESENTATIONS FROM DIARY NOTES ITEM #18: "Therein I
introduce the notion of my understanding of theologyrCOs reliance and lack of fidelity to a cosmological anthropic principle in relation our
individual and corporate duty to State.
I am of the view as conveyed by the rCLSEPTEMBER 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/Moment Calendar OverlayrCY, in relation to my voluntary involvement
as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism as a consequence of compliance with the
anthropic principle as duty to State and my personal experience of the Russell Street bombing of 27 MARCH 1986.-a That it has, with its articulation of natural and common law paradigm as the incorporeal basis
to our own Constitution or a Limited Corporate entity, done sufficient
to eliminate the mindset that Osama Bin LadenrCOs claim the terrorist
attack on the World Trade Centre on 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 was an act of
piety as Jihad undertaken in the name of Islam which can be denied, and
I can legitimately in good conscience lay claim to the bounty on his head.
#323 as [#80, #1, #100, #1, #2, #10, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10] = parabi|izomai (G3849): {UMBRA: #323 % #41 = #36} 1) to employ force
contrary to nature and right; 2) *TO* *COMPEL* *BY* *EMPLOYING* *FORCE*;
3) to constrain one by entreaties;
#239 as [#40, #90, #4, #100, #5] = tsb|ed|oq|oh (H6666): {UMBRA: #199 % #41 = #35} 1) justice, righteousness; 1a) *RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN*
*GOVERNMENT*); 1a1) of judge, ruler, king; 1a2) of law; 1a3) of Davidic
king Messiah; 1b) righteousness (of God's attribute); 1c)
*RIGHTEOUSNESS* (*IN* *A* *CASE* *OR* *CAUSE*); 1d) righteousness, truthfulness; 1e) righteousness (as ethically right); 1f) righteousness
(as vindicated), justification, salvation; 1f1) of God; 1f2) prosperity
(of people); 1g) righteous acts;
MALE: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE* / FEME: #141 - l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT*
N++
.jackNote@zen: 4, row: 8, col: 8, nous: 14 [DATE: 2025.1.29, TIME: 20:35 hrs, SUPER: #404 / #60 - Skill Rulership, Maintain One's Place; I-Ching:
H15 - Modesty, Humbling; Tetra: 5 - KEEPING SMALL (SHAO), EGO: #359 /
#14 - Praising the Mysterious (Metaphysics); I-Ching: H19 - Overseeing, Approaching, Nearing, The forest; Tetra: 9 - BRANCHING OUT (SHU)]
#57-a-a-a #56-a-a-a #49
#66-a-a-a #65-a-a-a #58
#75-a-a-a #74-a-a-a #67
COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis PROTOTYPE #THREE: #303 = y-c (ocA): *CELESTIAL* *AREA* / [#41, #46, #59, #76, #81]
#74 - cu|# (ui2): *CRUSH*; *DESTROY*; *TO* *DEFEAT*,
#131 - y|En (o+o): *COMMIT* *SUICIDE*
#189 - b-Un (tA!): *SCHEDULE* *FOR* *FLIGHT*
#238 - xi|ang (*#i): *PHENOMENA* / *IMITATE*
#303 - SEE REDUCTIO AD HITLERUM TABLE TALK IDEA ON *NEW* *YORK* *SKY*- *SCRAPERS* AND THEIR VULNERABILITY TO AIR ATTACK
#378 - ch|ing (o++): *PRINCIPLE*; *RULE*
#444 - x+2 (*Oc): *SKY*
#511 - r|4 (uuN): *SUN* / *MORPHOSIS*
#567 as [#2, #90, #2, #1, #6, #400, #10, #50, #6/
#93 - r|in (ta|): TO BURN, TO PLEDGE; TO PROMISE as [#90, #2, #1] = ts|ob|o-+
(H6635): {UMBRA: #93 % #41 = #11} 1) that which goes forth, army, war, warfare, host; 1a) army, host; 1a1) host (of organised army); 1a2) host
(of angels); 1a3) of sun, moon, and stars; 1a4) of whole creation; 1b)
war, warfare, service, go out to war; 1c) service;
N++
YOUTUBE: "9/11: AS EVENTS UNFOLD"
(TIME STAMPED PHONE MESSAGE FROM HIJACKED PLANE WAS ONLY KNOWN TO US 17 YEARS LATER WHEN UPLOADED: 11 SEPTEMBER 2018)
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EEogeIIOJzU>
The Insurer has steadfastly refused to give an explanation for its 7 DECEMBER 2001 actions: rCLIT IS THE MANNER IN WHICH I REASONABLY
INTERPRETED THOSE PHONE MESSAGES rCa I WAS THREATENED BY MR. BOEK, WHO BY HIS CONDUCT TODAY AND IN THE PAST, ON ANY OBJECT VIEW APPEARS TO BE UNSTABLErCY and have engage within a purposeful lack of accountability for such absence of an explanation as duty to the anthropic principle of
State, especially given that the rCLSeptember 2001 rCo Year #4 of #19 vMeme/ Moment Calendar OverlayrCY had been developed in relation to my voluntary involvement as rCyreligious and political belief and activityrCO associated to the suppression of terrorism.-a That AXA misled VCAT and discriminated against me because of my religious beliefs. This action by AXA meant
that VCAT made an order against me and allowed AXA to continue to not
honour its obligations to me as an insurance provider.
The InsurerrCOs correspondence of 20 SEPTEMBER 2006 more recently states, rCLAs previously advised in our correspondence of 14 JULY 2006, AXA does
not intend to comment further on matters that have been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY
And this concurs with my own view that the InsurerrCOs correspondence of 8 SEPTEMBER 2006 suggested a course of resolution as an internal process
in relation to complaint handling to be undertaken by 8 OCTOBER 2006.
This course of action was similarly proposed by the Insurer on 13 JUNE
2006 as response to my letter dated 29 MAY 2006, the outcome as the
Insurer on 14 JULY 2006 indicated: rCLWith respect to the number of issues you raise, AXA does not intend to comment further on matters that have
been previously dealt with by the Victorian Equal Opportunity & Human
Rights Commission, the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal and
the Financial Industry Complaints Service.rCY" [pages 3-4]
PROFESSOR KEKS' INCREDULITY ON THE SUBJECT OF SOLDIER JAKE KOVCO'S SUICIDE There was some discussion PROFESSOR KEKS upon the CONSIDERATION OF
KOVCO'S SELF-INFLICTED GUNSHOT DEATH on 21 APRIL 2006 which was met with some incredulity to due the MEDICAL CONSULTANT had a lack of insight
about PRIVATE JAKE KOVCO coming from BRIAGOLONG REGION (a name plaque appears on the WAR MEMORIAL there) where I also lived in proximity to
where I was born and his mother was known to my siblings.-a It would then
be entirely natural (ie. not held to be a symptom for advancing either
the specious or dubious claim of SEVERE MENTAL ILLNESS, PSYCHOSIS AND SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER) to have an opinion and particularly in the circumstance of my LETTERS PATENT #87 / #239 interest concern about the implications of questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as
self inflicted suicidal gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak
(H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006.
AS CONTRADICTION OF IDENTIFIED FUSION ACTION WITH #39 - LUO SHU SQUARE
(#141 - l|E (ta<): PROPRIETY; PROBITY; ETHICAL CONDUCT) --> #65 - COURSE
OF NATURE (#303 - y-c (ocA): EXCEEDING BOUNDS --> MAP TO PARAGRAPH ITEM #18)
#30 #75 #12
#21 #39 #57
#66 #03 #48
#141 = [#3, #30, #57, #12, #39] | #117 - ROW SUM (LUO SHU SQUARE)
#57 #56 #49
#66 #65 #58
#75 #74 #67
#303 = [#74, #57, #58, #49, #65] | #65 - SOLDIER / COURSE OF NATURE
Raises serious ethical considerations about PROFESSOR KEK'S [MALE: #141
- l|E (ta<): *PROPRIETY*; *PROBITY*; *ETHICAL* *CONDUCT* / FEME: #176 - y|4 (t+-): *RIGHT* *LAWFUL* *ACTION* v's *ARTIFICE*] AGAINST A PERSON'S #1310
- ph|+sis (G5449): INHERENT NATURE which places a compulsion for an accountability for which such a parasite as he which is only
contemptuous to #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHTS PRINCIPLE AS #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE (SECTION #71 - CONSTITUTION / PRIVY COUNCIL OATH VALUE) OF AUSTRALIAN DISCOVERY / COLONISATION / COMMONWEALTH / QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT 29 OCTOBER 1900.
As a values statement that can be unequivocally inferred from the
several reference of BRIAGOLONG within the DIARY NOTES DATED 4 APRIL
2007 associated with the CONTINGENT ACTION of thoughtful protest
undertaken upon the ANZAC DAY in ONTIC: #243 - stoich|-+i (G4748): PROCEEDING THE ROW OF REMEMBRANCE MARCHERS and a week prior to the
funeral service, which confirms this rational objective: "The
development of the GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENON is my claim to an
Intellectual Property as being compliant with a Natural Law and Common
Law right, in that it establishes the prima facie claim, that my past conduct has integrity, and with regards to the Insurance Contract, is an expression of Autonomy of Will and a clear strategy to avoid heteronomy
of that Will through impunity of my natural, common law, Constitutional
and legislative rights.
I have by correspondence dated 27 MARCH 2007 as application made under section 51(1) of the Freedom of Information Act 1982, requested that the Chief Commissioner of Police undertake a review of a decision as
response to my letter dated 28 APRIL 2006 and 12 MAY 2006 initiating
request for documents relating to my arrest on ANZAC Day 25 APRIL 2006.
The arresting member Senior Constable Peter Andrews 16298 cannot now
give an adequate explanation as to how my natural and common law
compliant Intellectual Property as GRAPPLE Homoiotic Noumenon should as
an explanation of force as a category of understanding of TELOS=#237
should so mimic the circumstances of his USE OF FORCE VP FORM 237
completed by SENIOR CONSTABLE 16298 @ 1600 hours on 25 APRIL 2006.
#237 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #70, #40, #1, #10]-a /
#432 as [#5, #100, #3, #1, #7, #5, #300, #1, #10] = erg|izomai (G2038): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to work, labour, do work; 2) to trade, to
make gains by trading, 'do business'; 3) to do, work out; 3a)
*EXERCISE*, *PERFORM*, *COMMIT*; 3b) to cause to exist, produce; 4) to
work for, earn by working, to acquire;
#237 as [#1, #50, #5, #60, #70, #40, #1, #10] /
#781 - MALE TOTAL: #376 as [#1, #50, #5, #600, #70, #40, #5, #9, #1] = an|-chomai (G430): {UMBRA: #237 % #41 = #32} 1) to hold up; 2) to hold
one's self erect and firm; 3) *TO* *SUSTAIN*, *TO* *BEAR*, *TO* *ENDURE*;
#1485 - FEME TOTAL: #432 as [#500, #10, #30, #70, #300, #10, #40, #70,
#400, #40, #5, #9, #1] = philotim|-omai (G5389): {UMBRA: #1086 % #41 =
#20} 1) to be fond of honour; 1a) to be actuated by love of honour; 1b)
from a love of honour to strive to bring something to pass; 2) to be ambitious; 2a) *TO* *STRIVE* *EARNESTLY*, *MAKE* *IT* *ONE'S* *AIM*;
#1245 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #10, #50] / #1985 - ONTIC TOTAL: #243 as [#200, #300, #70, #10, #600, #5, #800] = stoich|-+i (G4748): {UMBRA: #1985 % #41 = #17} 1) *TO* *PROCEED* *IN* *A* *ROW* *AS* *THE* *MARCH* *OF* *A* *SOLDIER*, go in order; 1a) metaph. to
go on prosperously, to turn out well; 2) to walk; 2a) to direct one's
life, to live;
N++
GRAPPLE (376, 432)@[74, 12, 73, 40, 57, 44, 65, 3, 64] PROTOTYPE <https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Heuristic&date:2006.4.25&time:16.00>
Considerable discussion had occurred at the BRIAGOLONG POLICE STATION as
to the lawfulness of my arrest and detention on the grounds of a common
law breach of peacerCothat as I had no intention of breaching the peace
and that reading a biblical quote as an act of piety hardly constituted
a derogatory manner.-a I had showed him a copy of my natural law and
common law intellectual property as GRAPPLE HOMOIOTIC NOUMENONrCohe had no intellectual conceptualization of it as paradigm of mind and
teleological anthropic cosmological principle as DUTY TO STATE {@9: Sup:
27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#376); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#432)} in compliance
to the principles of individual, government and non-government organizational and military accountability [...] expressed as a rCLrequire[ment] and command [for] all Our Officers and Ministers, Civil
and Military, and all other the inhabitants of Our said Commonwealth to
be obedient, aiding, and assisting unto Our said Governor General, or,
in the event of his death, incapacity, or absence, to such person or
persons as may, from time to time, under the provisions of these Our
Letters Patent, administer the Government of Our said CommonwealthrCY and the notion of rCyAdministration of GovernmentrCO conveyed by Paragraph 8 of the Letters Patent to the Australian Constitution of 1901."
PROFESSOR KEKS WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE / PREJUDICES RIGHTS
There are two notable examples which exemplify that PROFESSOR KEKS withholding of an adverse medical opinion but providing it to a treating doctor appears to contradict the ETHICAL GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING INDEPENDENT MEDICAL ASSESSMENTS 2010, which is the principle that
medical practitioners have a duty to act in the patientrCOs best
interests, even if they are not the treating doctor, and to avoid participating in conduct that could cause harm through omission.-a This
was manifestly the circumstance when there was voluntarily sought an assessment from DOCTOR STERNHELL (SAINT VINCENT'S, SYNDEY NSW) on 21 MAY 2008 conveys concerns of PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT.
AMA GUIDELINES ON CONSENT 3.1: The examineerCOs explicit consent to participate in the independent assessment and to provide the report to
the third party should be obtained before the doctor proceeds (where a person is unable to provide consent due to limited decision-making
capacity, consent should be sought from the examineerCOs authorised surrogate decision-maker). In order to facilitate the consent process,
the examinee should be provided with the following information:
-a-a-a-a1)-a-a-a Where a doctor is requested to conduct an independent medical
assessment on behalf of third parties such as insurance companies and employers, a traditional doctor-patient therapeutic relationship does
not arise. The role of the doctor in these examinations is to provide an impartial medical opinion. It is not to treat the person or offer
opinions to the person on his or her condition;
-a-a-a-a2)-a-a-a THE RESULT OF THE ASSESSMENT IS A REPORT TO THE THIRD PARTY,
*NOT* *TO* *THE* *EXAMINEE* *OR* *THEIR* *TREATING* *DOCTOR*;
-a-a-a-a3)-a-a-a The purpose and nature of the assessment, including the issues that are likely to be considered as part of the history;
-a-a-a-a4)-a-a-a The name and speciality of the doctor conducting the assessment;
DUTY OF CARE IN RELATION TO PATIENT MANAGEMENT OR INCIDENTAL FINDINGS
5.3: Incidental matters identified during the assessment may be notified
to the examinee, but there may be some situations where it is
appropriate to notify their treating doctor. The examineerCOs consent to notify their treating doctor should be obtained first.
AT NO TIME HAS THE INSURER CORRECTED THAT BY ANY ATTEMPT TO DISCLOSE THE NATURE OF A WITHHELD MEDICAL OPINION / WHICH AS THE SUBSTANCE OF A
COMPLAINT THE ACFA HAS MISREPRESENTED ("falsely advanced a psychiatric opinion ... [that] ... was slanderous and purposefully withheld from
you") WHICH FRUSTRATES MY HEALTHCARE (ie. it was given to treating
doctors) / PREJUDICES RIGHTS AND IN EFFECT IS INTENTIONED TO TAKE AWAY A PERSON'S LIFE, THE CAUSE OF PERSECUTION AND ITS ENJOYMENT OF FREEDOM.
Since the OPINION is directed against a person who adheres to ONTIC PASSIVISM as a life principle associated with STOIC INDEPENDENCE which
is not a dogmatism, but rather the way life is in regard to MY HEALTH,
MY RIGHT!rCY / #1 - EYiaE+! = #175 - poi|-+i (G4160): ACT RIGHTLY, CARRY OUT,
EXECUTE / #37 - EYi-tYf = #211 - therape|!a (G2322): SERVICES / MEDICAL CONDUCT RENDERED) it is therefore requisite to convey several MEDICAL SCENARIOS which exemplify this characteristic of life.
MEDICAL SCENARIO #1 (moving away from CBD intersection contamination
zone): Cryptococcus has saprophytic growth in the external environment.
C. neoformans occurs worldwide, frequently in association with *PIGEON*
or other bird *DROPPINGS*.-a Immunocompromised people (including those
with HIV infection or cancer) often present with meningitis (subacute or chronic) and clinicians should consider referral to a specialist centre
for treatment which involves amphotericin B with flucytosine or
fluconazole. If untreated meningitis can be fatal in weeks to months.
Since infection occurs after inhalation of spores that are present in
the environment, it is very likely that the site of infection was the intersection of ELIZABETH / FLINDERS STREET, MELBOURNE (since I was then 2004 / 2005 domiciled in PORT AUTHORITY APARTMENTS, 29-31 MARKET STREET, MELBOURNE before moving away from the contamination zone and living BRIAGOLONG as country region for 2006 / 2007) where there then existed a significant pigeon population (with unauthorised feeding leading to vociferous congregation) and droppings upon the roadway which by
voluminous vehicle traffic would become pulverised and in the summer especially as the sunlight / heat of day (whether a breeze or not) would convey an uplift mechanism as then a dynamic conducive for the
inhalation of spores.
As I recall the specialist treatment occurred at the ALFRED HOSPITAL (required 6 weeks treatment) and it was so troublesome as to necessitate prayers of HEALING from a JEWISH RABBI.
Subsequent to this event, whilst domiciled in Sydney I manifested the
same symptoms of an acute prolonged headache / nausea and because of the past life threatening episode then sought advice from DOCTOR MARK BLOCH
(now professor and con-joint Associate Professor in Medicine at the University of NSW) who entirely upon my past history (not within his possession) and current representations over dire concerns then referred
me to a hospital as specialist centre.-a However no manifest of the infection was found and I was discharged.
In my reasonable view, this was a source of professional embarrassment
for the DOCTOR and the patient trust relationship deteriorated
thereafter as perhaps then causal for an undue emphasis being given to a psychiatric assessment (whether PROFESSOR KEKS of 4 APRIL 2007 is not
known because it was deliberately withheld from me) as voluntarily
sought from DOCTOR STERNHELL on 21 MAY 2008, so as within my
SUPERANNUATED circumstance, facilitate determination of a strategy to resolutely deal with the PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA manifested by the
INSURER'S RECALCITRANCE over their RETURN TO WORK MANAGEMENT OF SALARY INSURANCE CONTRACT: "Dolf spent much of today's interview telling me
about the dispute with the insurance company and referred often to a
very complex philosophical and metaphysical system he had developed. It involves use of numbers, numerology, elements of the Jewish Kabbalah,
use of the lunar calendar and the original Julian calendar.
He described his anger with the attitude of the Roman Catholic Church, saying that Cardinal George Pell as an "Irish Roman Catholic" is
"entirely antagonistic to the autonomic right of indigenous Dutch Australians" under the Commonwealth of 1901."
MEDICAL SCENARIO #2 (episodes of ATAXIA are trigger events associated to prolonged PSYCHOLOGICAL TRAUMA intervention / herbal sleep aids): "On 7 NOVEMBER 2025, details of controlled observations (eg: medication
spacing | natures own sleep advance v's TEMAZEPAM 1/2 x 10mg as sleep
aid | dandelion root tea as beneficial liver agent) were conveyed at a consultation with an MEDICAL SPECIALIST and it was concluded that the
ATAXIA episodes were likely trigger events manifested involving small quantities of alcohol consumption rather than any deteriorating health status.
There was no need to consult a neurologist and instead the TEMAZEPAM
should be immediately ceased (ie. the prescription of 21 JULY 2025
remains unused and is only for possible abnormal anxiety states should
they occur and none have heretofore).
On 13 NOVEMBER 2025, within 36 hours after consuming less than 2
standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE, another episode of ATAXIA manifested which had rapidly progressed from the nausea stage to not being able to stand and walk.-a Following waiting (on my back) for a TELEHEALTH APPOINTMENT with my GENERAL PRACTITIONER, it was decided to immediately cease usage of NATURE'S OWN SLEEP ADVANCED AID to mediate that recurrent life circumstance.
A short term regime (until consultation in FEBRUARY 2026) of melatonin
2mg nightly was commenced.
Further controlled observations involving 3 instances of consuming less
than 2 standard drinks of PINOT NOIR WINE were undertaken (specifically
the events of 12 DEC / 16 DEC) with no occurrence as symptoms of nausea onset within 36 hours or spiralling towards ATAXIA occurred.
The provisional conclusion is that the PROLONGED USAGE (sometimes
periodic overlapped by 12 HRS but never simultaneous) of NATURES OWN
SLEEP ADVANCED / TEMAZEPAM has manifested ATAXIA as trigger events which
are invoked by only small quantities of responsible alcohol consumption.
NOTIFICATION OF PROLOGUED USEAGE CONTRADICTION ADVICE GIVEN TO SANOFI @
0726 HRS ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 and GENERAL PRACTITIONER ADVISED @ 1100 HRS
ON 18 DECEMBER 2025 OF RESOLUTION TO ATAXIA TRIGGER EVENTS and no
further trigger events or other adverse dispositions have manifested
during the festive end of year period.
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 - COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
The illegality defense is a legal doctrine that asserts that a plaintiff cannot pursue legal relief if their claim is connected to their own illegal or immoral conduct (ie. there is an attempt by the INSURER to convey the falsely advanced psychiatric opinion of severe mental illness, psychosis, and schizoaffective disorder as a natural consequence of same sex behaviour receiving due recompense for immorality and illegal conduct (ie. MARRIAGE SELF-EVIDENTLY HAS MEANING {@2: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#53 - ch||q (H2706): *ENACTMENT* *OF* *LAW*); Ego: 63 - WATCH: SHIH (#65 - y|oshab (H3427): *TO* *MARRY*)}) to evade legal accountability given the nature of the TERRORIST EVENT of 11 SEPTEMBER 2001 and $8+ trillion cost for 20 years of protracted war as recompense concerning which their obmutescence is a depravity most shocking to any reasonable person's sensibility). The principle is rooted in public policy, which aims to prevent the courts from assisting a party in profiting from their wrongdoing. The Latin maxim "ex turpi causa non oritur actio" translates to "no action arises from a dishonorable cause," emphasizing that the law will not support claims that arise from illegal activities.
CONTRACT LAW: The defense also extends to contract law, where a party cannot enforce a contract that is illegal or against public policy. If a contract is deemed immoral or illegal, the courts will not provide remedies for breach.
CAUSAL LINK: For the illegality defense to apply, there must be a clear connection between the illegal conduct and the claim being made. The courts will assess whether the harm suffered by the claimant is a direct result of their wrongdoing.
PUBLIC POLICY: The overarching rationale for the illegality defense is to uphold public policy and prevent individuals from benefiting from their illegal actions. Courts aim to maintain the integrity of the legal system by refusing to assist those who engage in unlawful conduct.
The illegality defense serves as a crucial legal principle that prevents individuals from seeking compensation for claims arising from their own illegal acts. Its application varies across different areas of law, including tort and contract, and is guided by public policy considerations and relevant case law. Understanding this defense is essential for navigating legal claims that may involve elements of illegality.
It is our reasonable view that the GEOGRAPHIC PROXIMITY as localised theatre of action: [#36 - BOER WAR (INFIDELITY) v's #36 - ANZAC DAY HISTORICAL REVISIONISM / #37 - GOVERNANCE / #38 - IRISH REPUBLICANISM (ANZAC JINGOISM) / #39 - HOME STREET ADDRESS (COERCIVE CONTROL / PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE)] meets the criteria of sectarian / political ideology as the IMPOSING OF A RELIGIOUS BELIEF in contra 116 of the CONSTITUTION to the benefit of an IRISH CATHOLIC (#71 - SAINT PATRICK'S DAY) REPUBLICAN CAUSE as ANTI-STATISM (TREASONOUS) CONTEMPT (vis a vis ARCHBISHOP MANNIX arrest by the BRITISH navy in 1920) which is an impetus of relentless action [eg: *PRIVATE* JAKE KOVCO's questionable #27 - EYiaE|i = #201 - sh|Au (o<e): INTEGRITY as self inflicted gunshot gambit on #117 - FEME: #117 / #201 - m|olak (H4427): SOVEREIGN's BIRTHDAY 21 APRIL 2006 --> POPE FRANCIS DEATH EASTER MONDAY 21 APRIL 2025] to the #177 - F|LHRERPRINZIP [#20, #23, #24] architect, continue to pursue the #71 - DOMINION (#308 - STRUGGLE: RECLAIM THE #1827 - EUCHARIST / PENTECOST FROM oiE - SWASTIKA OBSTRUCTION / #491 - PRINCIPLE OF CONTINUITY | #230 - q|| ni|in (oA+o||): *LAST* *YEAR* --> POPE BENEDICT'S DEATH 31 DECEMBER 2022) / #34 - COMMON DIABOLICAL CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459.
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte, #Nauru,
#aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson, #fossil #media,
Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their #expenses ? Or
good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their
#expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
NOTHING HERE UNTIL SUNDAY 4 JANUARY 2026
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/REFUSAL%20RESPONSE%2020260102.pdf>
On 1/2/26 09:49, dolf wrote:
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And in
the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and their
#expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS
warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The
MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
#37 - EYi-tYf = #211 / #373 / #488
COGITO: #248 = [#76, #46, #46, #66, #14] as #37 - PURITY (TS'UI)
RANGE: 02 to noon 06 JUNE
TRANSIT OF VENUS 3 JUNE 1769 [#1728 - d|a (ono): *GRAND* + #40 - t|Ang (t|#): *RULE* + #20 - chu|in (*e|): *SHIP*]
APPRAISAL #2: TAINTED SECRETLY WHILE FEIGNING PURITY, (oaNooUoaAtYf)
He is shamed to the center of his self. (*a|uu+E+!)
FATHOMING #2: A dark mix pretending to be pure (oaNooUoaAtYf)
MEANS: The center buries itself. (E+!*c-uceE|f)
#4 - EYieoua = #178 / #340 / #455
COGITO: #195 = [#49, #23, #7, #56, #60] as #4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)
RANGE: noon 04 to 08 JANUARY
APPRAISAL #8: THE RED STENCH SPREADS TO THE PASSES. (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
If the Great King does not bar its way, (onooEcE+ioua)
Contagion will sweep the kingdom (oaioLi)
And drive his house. (E|yo<|)
FATHOMING #8: The Red Stench reaching the passes (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
MEANS: He fears it may enter the palace. (uUEoaNo<nE|f)
#300 = [#4, #8, #17, #52, #64, #74, #81]
ch|4 (*|n): 1. red; scarlet, 2. bare; naked, 3. Kangxi radical 155, 4.
red; scarlet
#78 = [#4, #74]
ch|#u (*c!): 1. to smell; to stink; to emit a foul odor
#113 = [#4, #31, #78]
b|# (uA!): 1. to broadcast; to announce, 2. to sow; to spread, 3. to
ramble; to drift, 4. to shake; to winnow, 5. to divide, 6. to cast away;
to reject
#148 = [#4, #71, #73]
gu-Un (ouL): 1. to close, 2. a frontier; a border, 3. relation, 4. to detain; to lock up, 5. to stop; to turn off, 6. to involve; to connect,
7. to receive; to get, 8. a doorbolt, 9. a strategic moment, 10. a
switch, 11. Guan
#639 = #300 + #78 + #113 + #148 as [#80, #100, #70, #5, #9, #5, #300,
#70] = prot|!themai (G4388): {UMBRA: #625 % #41 = #10} 1) to place
before, to set forth; 1a) to set forth to be looked at, expose to view;
1b) *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *PUBLIC* *VIEW*; 1b1) of the bodies of the dead;
1b2) to let lie in state; 1c) *TO* *SET* *BEFORE* *ONE'S* *SELF*,
propose to one's self; 1c1) to purpose, determine;
MELBOURNE ARCHBISHOP PETER COMENSOLI said on FRIDAY 2 JANUARY 2026 {@3:
Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#166 - ch|-ng (E|y): *TO* *MAKE* *USE* *OF*;
*TO* *TAKE* *ADVANTAGE* *OF*; *TO* *COMPLY* *WITH*, *TO* *PREVAIL*, *TO* *PURSUE* / [#4, #31, #38, #42, #51]); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#162 - su|4 (tYf): *CLEAR*-*EYED* / [#37, #47, #78])} the bishops did not want to suggest what form an inquiry takes, but said Australia needed to examine how the rCLUTTER DARKNESSrCY [#194 ... #239 ... #459] of antisemitism had become ingrained in some parts of society.
PENTECOST (on-tAat|o) NOUS #33 - 24 MAY 33 AD / 2015 / 2026
MALE #115: - |!dios (G2398): *BELONGING* *TO* *ONESELF* / FEME #202 - q|odash (H6942): *HOLY*; *SANCTIFIED*
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.5.24>
N++
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
rCLMany voices now are calling for some serious inquiry, and I think that the GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE ABLE TO HEAR THAT AND RESPOND IN A POSITIVE WAY.
I think [that] would be a significant move,rCY Comensoli said." [Brittany Busch and Natassia Chrysanthos, Sydney Morning Herald @ 1701 / 1714 HRS
ON 2 JANUARY 2025]
On 1/2/26 16:43, dolf wrote:
NOTHING HERE UNTIL SUNDAY 4 JANUARY 2026
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/REFUSAL%20RESPONSE%2020260102.pdf>
On 1/2/26 09:49, dolf wrote:
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf> >>>>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And
in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and
their #expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS >>>>> warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The >>>>> MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
#37 - EYi-tYf = #211 / #373 / #488
COGITO: #248 = [#76, #46, #46, #66, #14] as #37 - PURITY (TS'UI)
RANGE: 02 to noon 06 JUNE
TRANSIT OF VENUS 3 JUNE 1769 [#1728 - d|a (ono): *GRAND* + #40 - t|Ang (t|#): *RULE* + #20 - chu|in (*e|): *SHIP*]
APPRAISAL #2: TAINTED SECRETLY WHILE FEIGNING PURITY, (oaNooUoaAtYf)
He is shamed to the center of his self. (*a|uu+E+!)
FATHOMING #2: A dark mix pretending to be pure (oaNooUoaAtYf)
MEANS: The center buries itself. (E+!*c-uceE|f)
#4 - EYieoua = #178 / #340 / #455
COGITO: #195 = [#49, #23, #7, #56, #60] as #4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)
RANGE: noon 04 to 08 JANUARY
APPRAISAL #8: THE RED STENCH SPREADS TO THE PASSES. (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
If the Great King does not bar its way, (onooEcE+ioua)
Contagion will sweep the kingdom (oaioLi)
And drive his house. (E|yo<|)
FATHOMING #8: The Red Stench reaching the passes (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
MEANS: He fears it may enter the palace. (uUEoaNo<nE|f)
#300 = [#4, #8, #17, #52, #64, #74, #81]
ch|4 (*|n): 1. red; scarlet, 2. bare; naked, 3. Kangxi radical 155, 4.
red; scarlet
#78 = [#4, #74]
ch|#u (*c!): 1. to smell; to stink; to emit a foul odor
#113 = [#4, #31, #78]
b|# (uA!): 1. to broadcast; to announce, 2. to sow; to spread, 3. to
ramble; to drift, 4. to shake; to winnow, 5. to divide, 6. to cast away;
to reject
#148 = [#4, #71, #73]
gu-Un (ouL): 1. to close, 2. a frontier; a border, 3. relation, 4. to detain; to lock up, 5. to stop; to turn off, 6. to involve; to connect,
7. to receive; to get, 8. a doorbolt, 9. a strategic moment, 10. a
switch, 11. Guan
#639 = #300 + #78 + #113 + #148 as [#80, #100, #70, #5, #9, #5, #300,
#70] = prot|!themai (G4388): {UMBRA: #625 % #41 = #10} 1) to place
before, to set forth; 1a) to set forth to be looked at, expose to view;
1b) *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *PUBLIC* *VIEW*; 1b1) of the bodies of the dead;
1b2) to let lie in state; 1c) *TO* *SET* *BEFORE* *ONE'S* *SELF*,
propose to one's self; 1c1) to purpose, determine;
MELBOURNE ARCHBISHOP PETER COMENSOLI said on FRIDAY 2 JANUARY 2026 {@3:
Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#166 - ch|-ng (E|y): *TO* *MAKE* *USE* *OF*;
*TO* *TAKE* *ADVANTAGE* *OF*; *TO* *COMPLY* *WITH*, *TO* *PREVAIL*, *TO* *PURSUE* / [#4, #31, #38, #42, #51]); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#162 - su|4 (tYf): *CLEAR*-*EYED* / [#37, #47, #78])} the bishops did not want to suggest what form an inquiry takes, but said Australia needed to examine how the rCLUTTER DARKNESSrCY [#194 ... #239 ... #459] of antisemitism had become ingrained in some parts of society.
PENTECOST (on-tAat|o) NOUS #33 - 24 MAY 33 AD / 2015 / 2026
MALE #115: - |!dios (G2398): *BELONGING* *TO* *ONESELF* / FEME #202 - q|odash (H6942): *HOLY*; *SANCTIFIED*
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.5.24>
N++
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
rCLMany voices now are calling for some serious inquiry, and I think that the GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE ABLE TO HEAR THAT AND RESPOND IN A POSITIVE WAY.
I think [that] would be a significant move,rCY Comensoli said." [Brittany Busch and Natassia Chrysanthos, Sydney Morning Herald @ 1701 / 1714 HRS
ON 2 JANUARY 2025]
On 1/2/26 16:43, dolf wrote:
NOTHING HERE UNTIL SUNDAY 4 JANUARY 2026
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/REFUSAL%20RESPONSE%2020260102.pdf>
On 1/2/26 09:49, dolf wrote:
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf> >>>>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And
in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and
their #expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS >>>>> warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The >>>>> MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
#37 - EYi-tYf = #211 / #373 / #488
COGITO: #248 = [#76, #46, #46, #66, #14] as #37 - PURITY (TS'UI)
RANGE: 02 to noon 06 JUNE
TRANSIT OF VENUS 3 JUNE 1769 [#1728 - d|a (ono): *GRAND* + #40 - t|Ang (t|#): *RULE* + #20 - chu|in (*e|): *SHIP*]
APPRAISAL #2: TAINTED SECRETLY WHILE FEIGNING PURITY, (oaNooUoaAtYf)
He is shamed to the center of his self. (*a|uu+E+!)
FATHOMING #2: A dark mix pretending to be pure (oaNooUoaAtYf)
MEANS: The center buries itself. (E+!*c-uceE|f)
#4 - EYieoua = #178 / #340 / #455
COGITO: #195 = [#49, #23, #7, #56, #60] as #4 - BARRIER (HSIEN)
RANGE: noon 04 to 08 JANUARY
APPRAISAL #8: THE RED STENCH SPREADS TO THE PASSES. (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
If the Great King does not bar its way, (onooEcE+ioua)
Contagion will sweep the kingdom (oaioLi)
And drive his house. (E|yo<|)
FATHOMING #8: The Red Stench reaching the passes (*|n*c!uA!ouL)
MEANS: He fears it may enter the palace. (uUEoaNo<nE|f)
#300 = [#4, #8, #17, #52, #64, #74, #81]
ch|4 (*|n): 1. red; scarlet, 2. bare; naked, 3. Kangxi radical 155, 4.
red; scarlet
#78 = [#4, #74]
ch|#u (*c!): 1. to smell; to stink; to emit a foul odor
#113 = [#4, #31, #78]
b|# (uA!): 1. to broadcast; to announce, 2. to sow; to spread, 3. to
ramble; to drift, 4. to shake; to winnow, 5. to divide, 6. to cast away;
to reject
#148 = [#4, #71, #73]
gu-Un (ouL): 1. to close, 2. a frontier; a border, 3. relation, 4. to detain; to lock up, 5. to stop; to turn off, 6. to involve; to connect,
7. to receive; to get, 8. a doorbolt, 9. a strategic moment, 10. a
switch, 11. Guan
#639 = #300 + #78 + #113 + #148 as [#80, #100, #70, #5, #9, #5, #300,
#70] = prot|!themai (G4388): {UMBRA: #625 % #41 = #10} 1) to place
before, to set forth; 1a) to set forth to be looked at, expose to view;
1b) *TO* *EXPOSE* *TO* *PUBLIC* *VIEW*; 1b1) of the bodies of the dead;
1b2) to let lie in state; 1c) *TO* *SET* *BEFORE* *ONE'S* *SELF*,
propose to one's self; 1c1) to purpose, determine;
MELBOURNE ARCHBISHOP PETER COMENSOLI said on FRIDAY 2 JANUARY 2026 {@3:
Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#166 - ch|-ng (E|y): *TO* *MAKE* *USE* *OF*;
*TO* *TAKE* *ADVANTAGE* *OF*; *TO* *COMPLY* *WITH*, *TO* *PREVAIL*, *TO* *PURSUE* / [#4, #31, #38, #42, #51]); Ego: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN
(#162 - su|4 (tYf): *CLEAR*-*EYED* / [#37, #47, #78])} the bishops did not want to suggest what form an inquiry takes, but said Australia needed to examine how the rCLUTTER DARKNESSrCY [#194 ... #239 ... #459] of antisemitism had become ingrained in some parts of society.
PENTECOST (on-tAat|o) NOUS #33 - 24 MAY 33 AD / 2015 / 2026
MALE #115: - |!dios (G2398): *BELONGING* *TO* *ONESELF* / FEME #202 - q|odash (H6942): *HOLY*; *SANCTIFIED*
<https://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?run:Daily&date:2026.5.24>
N++
#33, #49, #41
#33, #01, #57
#33, #17, #25
#33, #65, #09
rCLMany voices now are calling for some serious inquiry, and I think that the GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE ABLE TO HEAR THAT AND RESPOND IN A POSITIVE WAY.
I think [that] would be a significant move,rCY Comensoli said." [Brittany Busch and Natassia Chrysanthos, Sydney Morning Herald @ 1701 / 1714 HRS
ON 2 JANUARY 2025]
On 1/2/26 16:43, dolf wrote:
NOTHING HERE UNTIL SUNDAY 4 JANUARY 2026
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/REFUSAL%20RESPONSE%2020260102.pdf>
On 1/2/26 09:49, dolf wrote:
AN ILLEGALITY DEFENCE AGAINST IMMORAL CONDUCT #71 - DOMINION / #34 -
COMMON MARRIAGE PIOUS CAUSE: #194 ... #239 ... #459
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/AFCA%20RESPONSE%2020251120.pdf> >>>>
On 12/31/25 10:36, |urd||g, the Newsgroup Devil wrote:
*What are the biggest Scams of 2025? | Scam of the Year*
/The West Report, 112k subscribers, 30 Dec 2025/
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=INFANTILE-PORN>
"Welcome to the prestigious Scam of the Year Award for the highest
achievements in scammery in Australian business and politics. And
in the Business of Australian politics!
Who will take out the gong? #scomo for Robodebt, AI #deloitte,
#Nauru, #aukus, the #antisemitism racketeers, Pauline #Hanson,
#fossil #media, Australia's #property ponzi or politicians and
their #expenses ? Or good old #NACC
~~~~-a-a ~~~~~
Who could be the ultimate winner???
LNP or ON luminaries? Corporate billionaire crooks?-a Real estate
fraudsters? Far-right political lobby groups and think tanks? AUKUS >>>>> warmongers? Assorted foreign shit stirrers? Genocidal regimes?-a The >>>>> MAGAt Emperor? Murdoch's media ghouls?
The race for this amazing supreme title is quite tight!
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 17:58:40 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
4 files (8,203K bytes) |
| Messages: | 184,414 |
| Posted today: | 1 |