From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

Hello all,

OS XPsp3 :

I'm using wsprintfA (user32) with the format-string "%010I64d" to output
a provided 64-bit number. Which works.

The thing is that I would like to see a "+" sign for the positive numbers,
and I can't seem to do it. No matter where I put a "+" symbol in the format string the output breaks.

Question : is there a way to get wsprintfA to include a plus sign when displaying decimal numbers, and if so what is it ?

Remark : I've also tried sprintf (crtdll), but it doesn't seem to understand either "%I64d" or "%lld".

Remark #2 : wsprintfA doesn't understand "%+d" either. :-|

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 09:35:45 +0100, R.Wieser wrote:

Hello all,

OS XPsp3 :

I'm using wsprintfA (user32) with the format-string "%010I64d" to output
a provided 64-bit number. Which works.

The thing is that I would like to see a "+" sign for the positive numbers, and I can't seem to do it. No matter where I put a "+" symbol in the format string the output breaks.

Question : is there a way to get wsprintfA to include a plus sign when displaying decimal numbers, and if so what is it ?

Remark : I've also tried sprintf (crtdll), but it doesn't seem to understand either "%I64d" or "%lld".

Remark #2 : wsprintfA doesn't understand "%+d" either. :-|

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

`+` is never part of format control string in the first place. It'd just be treated as literal text.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

JJ,

`+` is never part of format control string in the first place.
It'd just be treated as literal text.

When using wsprintfA I presume. Yes, it looks like it.

Any idea how to have sprintf (crtdll) print a 64-bit decimal value ?

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

JJ,

[quote=me]

Any idea how to have sprintf (crtdll) print a 64-bit decimal value ?

Scratch that question.

I don't know what I did wrong the first time I tried, but just now sprintf using "%lld" does exactly what it should do. And so does "%+010lld"

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

JJ,

[quote=me]

Scratch that question.

Scratch that. I'd forgotten that I had changed my test value, and caused it to fit into 4 bytes. Changing it back to 5E+10 the displayed result showed again a truncated 32-bit result

Strange that "%lld" was not rejected as unrecognised though ...

So, the question still stands :

Any idea how to have sprintf (crtdll) print a 64-bit decimal value ?

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On Wed, 1/7/2026 3:14 PM, R.Wieser wrote:

JJ,

[quote=me]

Scratch that question.

Scratch that. I'd forgotten that I had changed my test value, and caused it to fit into 4 bytes. Changing it back to 5E+10 the displayed result showed again a truncated 32-bit result

Strange that "%lld" was not rejected as unrecognised though ...

So, the question still stands :

Any idea how to have sprintf (crtdll) print a 64-bit decimal value ?

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

I couldn't get my INT64_T to work, and I suspect I need to install
more packages in my mingw64 thingy. Adding the header files made no difference.

/* #include <stdint.h> */
/* #include <inttypes.h> */
#include <stdio.h>

/* gcc -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c */
/* gcc -m64 -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c */

int main( void )
{
wchar_t buf[100];
/* int64_t i; */
long long int i;

i = 5000000000000 ;

int len = swprintf( buf, 100, L"%s %+lld %s", L"Pack my box with ", i, L" liquor jugs" );
printf( "Generated %d characters\n\n", len );

wprintf(L"%ls\n\n", buf);
}

UCRT64 ~
$ ./wide
Generated 45 characters

Pack my box with +5000000000000 liquor jugs


UCRT64 ~

Paul
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

Paul,

Generated 45 characters

Pack my box with +5000000000000 liquor jugs

Hmmm.... It works for you, but not for me. Did you use XP or some other, later version ?

By the way, quite the box you have there. :-)

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On Thu, 1/8/2026 2:00 AM, R.Wieser wrote:

Paul,

Generated 45 characters

Pack my box with +5000000000000 liquor jugs

Hmmm.... It works for you, but not for me. Did you use XP or some other, later version ?

By the way, quite the box you have there. :-)

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

The routine you were using, was supposed to be a "legacy"
version with no floating point printout capability.
The "w" stands for "wombat" rather than "wide". That's what
a Google was telling me. So I switched to another print
variant that a couple of posts suggested would be
a successor to it.

I did my compiling in a mingw64 variant, because I wasn't sure whether
the original mingw had "c99".

If I could have copy/pasted any text examples using hex strings,
to flesh out the wide characters, I would have. But nothing
presented itself that I could copy.

The leading "+" as a sign indicator [ %+lld ], seems to work. Running
the program with a negative number, prints out a sign too.

$ ./wide
Generated 45 characters

Pack my box with -5000000000000 liquor jugs

*******

Using "history" in the terminal, it looks like the first sub-package
I populated was this one.

pacman -S mingw-w64-ucrt-x86_64-gcc

pacman -Ss gcc

So I added a couple more. These are in a way, cross compilers by
naming convention, but doing x86-to-x86 or something.

pacman -S mingw64/mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc
pacman -S mingw32/mingw-w64-i686-gcc

MINGW32 ~
$ gcc -m64 -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c
cc1.exe: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in

MINGW32 ~
$ gcc -m32 -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c

$ ./wide
Generated 18 characters

P -5000000000000

And then it doesn't work right.

MINGW64 ~
$ gcc -m64 -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c

MINGW64 ~
$ ./wide
Generated 18 characters

P -5000000000000

Nope. and gcc -m32 does not link there.

So whatever UCRT does, seems to work.

*******

If I take it over to the original MINGW, then only
one flavor would be supported.

gcc -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c

16 | int len = swprintf( buf, 100, L"%s %+lld %s", L"Pack my box with ", i, L" liquor jugs" );
| ^~~~~~~~
| snwprintf

Fixing that, gives

$ ./wide
Generated 45 characters

Pack my box with -5000000000000 liquor jugs

And the final program is:

/* #include <stdint.h> */
/* #include <inttypes.h> */
#include <stdio.h>

/* gcc -std=c99 -o wide.exe wide.c */

int main( void )
{
wchar_t buf[100];
/* int64_t i; */
long long int i;

i = -5000000000000 ;

int len = snwprintf( buf, 100, L"%s %+lld %s", L"Pack my box with ", i, L" liquor jugs" );
printf( "Generated %d characters\n\n", len );

wprintf(L"%ls\n\n", buf);
}

Paul








Paul
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

Paul,

The "w" stands for "wombat" rather than "wide".

I always wondered what that 'w" in "wsprintf" stood for. Not "wide", as
there where "A" and "W" postfix variants.

Its "wombat" you say ? I would have liked to read the story behind that,
but just now googling for it didn't get me any hits. :-|

So I switched to another print variant that a couple of posts suggested
would be a successor to it.

You made me remember something : NTDLL also has a version of sprintf, but I always assumed that the wsprintf one in USER32.DLL would be using it. It looks like it doesn't though.

So, I have two DLL functions with the same name. :-(

With some carefully re-ordering of my includes I got the program so far as
to use the NTDLL version of sprintf, instead of the CRTDLL one, which
accepts the "%+010I64d" format string and displays the value as I needed it
: +50000000000.

iow : thanks for making me remind that NTDLL function again. :-)

I'm currently re-researching how I can, in my sourcefile, call a function outof a specific DLL, but didn't find anything when I first tried some time ago. Oh well. I can always create libary and include files in which all function names are prefixed with the name of the DLL.

... now I think of it, thats not a bad idea at all. :-)

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general


I just did a few tests with CRTDLL sprintf, NTDDL sprintf and USER32
wsprintf, and I must say I did not extpect all three to behave differently - both what format strings they accepted, as well as what they returned when
it wasn't.

... or how much they sometimes ignored of the format string. :-|

Regards,
Rudy Wieser


--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general


+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa
EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA
Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE
Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4







--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On 10.01.2026 01:06, Emoji User wrote:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa
EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA
Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE
Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

LOL

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On 10.01.2026 04:43, Schugo wrote:

On 10.01.2026 01:06, Emoji User wrote:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa >> EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA
Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE
Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

LOL

err..
Content-Type: text/plain;
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On 10.01.2026 04:46, Schugo wrote:

On 10.01.2026 04:43, Schugo wrote:

On 10.01.2026 01:06, Emoji User wrote:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa >>> EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA
Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE
Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

LOL

err..
Content-Type: text/plain;

this should work better:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On 10.01.2026 01:06, Emoji User wrote:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
|o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa |o+orCa
|#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++ |#++-i++
|#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a |#++-i+a
|#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A |#++-i+A
|#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC| |#++-irC|
|#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E |#++-i-E
|#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi |#++-irCi
|#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4
|#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4 |#++-orCy|ore4-i|#++rCY-4

EfiCEfai EfiCEfai EfiCEfai

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

Emoji User schrieb einmal:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +

Da hast du UTF-8 zu setzen vergessen.

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + rLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLarLa EfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiAEfiA EfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfieEfie
EfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfii
EfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfiiEfii
EfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiEEfiE
EficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEficEfic
EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4EfoarCiEfo4

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

Nym Mailer wrote in alt.comp.os.windows-xp,alt.windows7.general,de.test:

Da hast du UTF-8 zu setzen vergessen.

Dass ich zum Erbfeind |+berlaufe, hei|ft ja nicht, dass ich meine
Muttersprache vergesserCa Beruhigt mich doch mal.

Hat sich was an der Grammatik.., der grammatikalischen Leitkultur
oder er Akzeptanzschwelle bei rCa so Duden und Zeuch. Ups. Verb
vergessen: ge|nndert?

Zusammengesetzte Zeiten etc.

Verwirrt,

Michael
f'up de.test
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.windows7.general

On Sat, 10 Jan 2026 04:46:12 +0100, Schugo wrote:

On 10.01.2026 04:43, Schugo wrote:

On 10.01.2026 01:06, Emoji User wrote:

+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa rLa >>> EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA EfiA
Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie Efie
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii Efii
EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE EfiE
Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic Efic
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4
EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4 EfoarCiEfo4

Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

LOL

err..
Content-Type: text/plain;

Bad usenet client?
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2