• Can language be Abused ?

    From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Sun Mar 1 13:12:17 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    I was contemplating the name of this newsgroup - (Alt) Use of English -
    and it occurred to me that 'AUE' could equally stand for AbUse of English.

    Language is a tool, just like a knife. Am I abusing a knife if I use it
    to pry open a tin of paint. Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom of
    speech?

    It all seems ot come down to the eye of the beholder.


    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Plusnet@not@home.com to alt.usage.english on Sun Mar 1 21:15:46 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 01/03/2026 12:12, occam wrote:
    I was contemplating the name of this newsgroup - (Alt) Use of English -
    and it occurred to me that 'AUE' could equally stand for AbUse of English.

    Language is a tool, just like a knife. Am I abusing a knife if I use it
    to pry open a tin of paint. Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom of speech?

    It all seems ot come down to the eye of the beholder.

    But it isn't easy to define abuse.
    An old knife, or screwdriver, or chisel, or saw can be a very useful
    tool in ways and situations where you would never use a new
    knife/screwdriver etc.
    I don't think of that as abuse.

    Much the same with language. You can adapt a word to meet a new use -
    but you may end up skunking it so that it can no longer serve its
    original purpose.
    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Moylan@peter@pmoylan.org to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 10:59:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 01/03/26 23:12, occam wrote:

    I was contemplating the name of this newsgroup - (Alt) Use of English
    - and it occurred to me that 'AUE' could equally stand for AbUse of
    English.

    Language is a tool, just like a knife. Am I abusing a knife if I use
    it to pry open a tin of paint. Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom
    of speech?

    It all seems ot come down to the eye of the beholder.

    As I recall it, one of the motivations for the creation of the AUE
    newsgroup was to serve as a dump for spelling flames.

    It didn't take long, though, for the regular contributors to put their
    own stamp on the flavour of the group.
    --
    Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
    Newcastle, NSW
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hibou@vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 06:49:07 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Le 01/03/2026 |a 12:12, occam a |-crit :

    I was contemplating the name of this newsgroup - (Alt) Use of English -
    and it occurred to me that 'AUE' could equally stand for AbUse of English.

    Language is a tool, just like a knife. Am I abusing a knife if I use it
    to pry open a tin of paint.


    I think the answer is yes. You risk blunting it and breaking the blade.
    By misusing the knife, by abusing it, you risk damaging it.

    Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom of speech?


    That is a correct use of 'pillock'. It's not abuse.

    It all seems ot come down to the eye of the beholder.


    I think language can be abused. Using a word wrongly is abuse because it weakens its meaning ('refute' for 'deny'...). Using a tense wrongly,
    similarly ('I ate already' for 'I've eaten', 'if I would have' for 'if I had'...). Linguistic inflation is abuse ('incredibly' for 'very',
    'impact' for 'effect', 'luxury' bog roll...) because it eliminates
    nuance and blurs meaning.

    'I could care less', on the other hand, is not an abuse of language; it
    is simply nonsensical. "Twas bryllyg, and the slythy toves / Did gyre
    and gymble in the wabe" is not abuse either.

    Your 'pry' (1806 - OED) for 'prise' (1574) may once have been abuse
    (since it may risk confusion with 'pry', meaning being nosey), but must
    now be reluctantly accepted as a regional variation.

    In short, IMHO abuse is misuse that risks damaging the language and
    reducing its power. The parallel with a knife is a good one.
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hibou@vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 07:41:18 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Le 02/03/2026 |a 06:49, Hibou a |-crit :
    Le 01/03/2026 |a 12:12, occam a |-crit :

    Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom of
    speech?

    That is a correct use of 'pillock'. It's not abuse.


    I mean it's not abuse of language. If it's not a pondered, accurate assessment, then it may be abuse in another sense.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 09:17:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 02.03.2026 kl. 07.49 skrev Hibou:

    I think language can be abused. Using a word wrongly is abuse because it weakens its meaning ('refute' for 'deny'...). Using a tense wrongly, similarly ('I ate already' for 'I've eaten', 'if I would have' for 'if I had'...). Linguistic inflation is abuse ('incredibly' for 'very',
    'impact' for 'effect', 'luxury' bog roll...) because it eliminates
    nuance and blurs meaning.

    The worst phenomenon that we see in Danish is not the inflow of English
    words. We've had similar influences before, and Danish is still alive
    and kicking.

    People use English expressions with Danish words. Tghis results in
    meaning less constructions that you only understand if you master
    English on a more than basic level. Imagine that you never saw these expressions before and had to guess their meaning:

    He has my back.

    Try not to sleep through your alarm clock.

    They are meaningless - if it weren't that they have become standard.

    Here's a Danish expression (and Danish syntax) written with English words:

    He has a stick in the ear.

    It means

    Ur vf irel qehax.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 08:40:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging
    their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised
    by other wordsmiths.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 08:40:00 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 01/03/2026 12:12, occam wrote:
    I was contemplating the name of this newsgroup - (Alt) Use of English -
    and it occurred to me that 'AUE' could equally stand for AbUse of English.

    Language is a tool, just like a knife. Am I abusing a knife if I use it
    to pry open a tin of paint. Am I abusing English when I call a
    politician a 'pillock', or am I just using it to exercise by freedom of speech?

    It all seems ot come down to the eye of the beholder.

    But it isn't easy to define abuse.
    An old knife, or screwdriver, or chisel, or saw can be a very useful
    tool in ways and situations where you would never use a new knife/screwdriver etc.
    I don't think of that as abuse.

    Much the same with language. You can adapt a word to meet a new use -
    but you may end up skunking it so that it can no longer serve its
    original purpose.

    Another type of abuse is adopting a word for something it doesn't mean
    and for which an accurate word already exists.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 09:54:40 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 02/03/2026 09:40, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised
    by other wordsmiths.


    Excellent example in case this morning: Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri. <smile>
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hibou@vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 09:36:24 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Le 02/03/2026 |a 08:54, occam a |-crit :

    Excellent example in case this morning: Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri. <smile>


    Quite. We used to have a War Office; now we have a Ministry of Defence.
    (We used to have a Prime Minister; now we have a drone?)

    Those selling ideas tend to abuse language - politicians,
    advertisers.... 'Issue' for 'problem' or 'failure', and 'challenge' for 'difficulty' seem to me like PR-speak. The sad thing is that those whose interest lies the other way, who have a problem they want solved, will
    weaken their case by calling it an 'issue'.

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Sam Plusnet@not@home.com to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 20:04:53 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 02/03/2026 09:36, Hibou wrote:
    Le 02/03/2026 |a 08:54, occam a |-crit :

    Excellent example in case this morning:-a Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the
    Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri.-a <smile>


    Quite. We used to have a War Office; now we have a Ministry of Defence.
    (We used to have a Prime Minister; now we have a drone?)

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace,
    love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.
    --
    Sam Plusnet
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mike Spencer@mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 16:52:02 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> writes:

    In short, IMHO abuse is misuse that risks damaging the language and
    reducing its power. The parallel with a knife is a good one.
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    I would say that abuse of language occurs when one calculatedly (or intuitively, out of habit) contrives to write/say something that
    literally, under scrupulously critical parsing, means one thing yet
    conveys to the the less critical reader/listener something very
    different or even contradictory.

    This would obviously condemn almost all of what politicians (not to
    overlook polemicists) say as language abuse: Words that cannot be
    proven in court to mean anything culpable but which work widely as misdirection, distraction or falsehood accepted as truth.
    --
    Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Mike Spencer@mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 16:57:33 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) writes:

    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised
    by other wordsmiths.

    Indeed. Befor you hire someone as a write -- journalist, speech
    write, whatever -- you want to have a look at what they've previously
    written.

    I once worked in a shop where a job applicant was required to appear
    with his big, often very heavy tool chest. The boss scrutinzed his
    tools more closely that he did the applicant himself.
    --
    Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Kerr-Mudd, John@admin@127.0.0.1 to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 21:16:03 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 20:04:53 +0000
    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:
    On 02/03/2026 09:36, Hibou wrote:
    Le 02/03/2026 a 08:54, occam a ocrit :

    Excellent example in case this morning:a Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the
    Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri.a <smile>


    Quite. We used to have a War Office; now we have a Ministry of Defence. (We used to have a Prime Minister; now we have a drone?)

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace, love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    May be (only may be) if he'd got the Peace Prize, he wouldn't be being
    so nasty now?
    --
    Bah, and indeed Humbug.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Peter Moylan@peter@pmoylan.org to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 08:50:09 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 03/03/26 07:04, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace, love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I am impressed that the incurable liar told the truth for once.

    How many countries use their military for defence? Very few.
    --
    Peter Moylan peter@pmoylan.org http://www.pmoylan.org
    Newcastle, NSW
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Cryptoengineer@petertrei@gmail.com to alt.usage.english on Mon Mar 2 22:18:51 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 3/2/2026 3:54 AM, occam wrote:
    On 02/03/2026 09:40, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging
    their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised
    by other wordsmiths.


    Excellent example in case this morning: Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri. <smile>

    That didn't age well.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/british-air-base-cyprus-hit-by-suspected-drone-strike-sky-news-reports-2026-03-02/

    pt
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Steve Hayes@hayesstw@telkomsa.net to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 06:55:42 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 21:16:03 +0000, "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>
    wrote:

    May be (only may be) if he'd got the Peace Prize, he wouldn't be being
    so nasty now?

    He has said so himself.
    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hibou@vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 06:28:15 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Le 03/03/2026 |a 03:18, Cryptoengineer a |-crit :

    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/british-air-base-cyprus-hit-by- suspected-drone-strike-sky-news-reports-2026-03-02/


    "Cyprus currently holds the EU's rCirotating presidency."

    I like it. I immediately pictured the wifey on a motorised podium. (Is
    that wrong? Have I not received the circular?)

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Rich Ulrich@rich.ulrich@comcast.net to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 01:53:54 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 02 Mar 2026 16:57:33 -0400, Mike Spencer
    <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:


    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) writes:

    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging
    their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised
    by other wordsmiths.

    Indeed. Befor you hire someone as a write -- journalist, speech
    write, whatever -- you want to have a look at what they've previously >written.

    I once worked in a shop where a job applicant was required to appear
    with his big, often very heavy tool chest. The boss scrutinzed his
    tools more closely that he did the applicant himself.

    One of my uncles was a 'master mechanic' (IIRC? Is that it?)

    He told me that a prospective hire would have his tools examined
    mainly to look at the tools that he had designed and built for
    himself. Apparently that is standard at one level of the profession.

    The function of the tools would reveal the problems he had solved,
    and how well they were made would show someting else.
    --
    Rich Ulrich
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From athel.cb@gmail.com@user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 09:08:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> posted:

    On Mon, 2 Mar 2026 21:16:03 +0000, "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1>
    wrote:

    May be (only may be) if he'd got the Peace Prize, he wouldn't be being
    so nasty now?

    He has said so himself.

    And, of course, he always says the truth.
    --
    athel

    Living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly in England before that
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From athel.cb@gmail.com@user12588@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 09:12:58 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english


    Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> posted:

    On 03/03/26 07:04, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace, love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I am impressed that the incurable liar told the truth for once.

    How many countries use their military for defence? Very few.

    Larger countries, you're right. But smaller countries probably most do. Ask occam, but I doubt whether Luxemburg has any immediate plans to conquer Germany.
    --
    athel

    Living in Marseilles for 38 years; mainly in England before that
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Hibou@vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 09:20:52 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Le 02/03/2026 |a 21:50, Peter Moylan a |-crit :
    On 03/03/26 07:04, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace,
    love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I am impressed that the incurable liar told the truth for once.

    How many countries use their military for defence? Very few.


    At the time of WW1 and WW2, the USA was slow to go to war. It seems to
    have become much readier to do so since.

    Perhaps Mr Trump is trying to become a one-man apocalypse. It seems he
    loves "the smell of napalm in the morning." ("Beautiful!")

    Now, I think Iran is pretty frightful, a problem for its own citizens
    and its neighbours - but what's the plan? Is it just to duff them up?
    What comes afterwards? How are we going to decide whether Mr Trump is a success or an Epic Loser?

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 10:26:13 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 03.03.2026 kl. 10.12 skrev athel.cb@gmail.com:

    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I am impressed that the incurable liar told the truth for once.

    How many countries use their military for defence? Very few.

    Larger countries, you're right. But smaller countries probably most do. Ask occam, but I doubt whether Luxemburg has any immediate plans to conquer Germany.

    Until Anders Fogh Rasmussen became prime minister in Denmark we had a defensive military. He changed that when he sided with Dubbya. Since
    then we have been involved in several wars - none of them for the
    defence of Denmark.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Bertel Lund Hansen@rundtosset@lundhansen.dk to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 10:27:22 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Den 03.03.2026 kl. 10.20 skrev Hibou:

    Now, I think Iran is pretty frightful, a problem for its own citizens
    and its neighbours - but what's the plan? Is it just to duff them up?
    What comes afterwards?

    Let me guess: Chaos? We've seen it before.
    --
    Bertel, Kolt, Danmark

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 09:42:43 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> wrote:

    On 02 Mar 2026 16:57:33 -0400, Mike Spencer
    <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> wrote:


    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) writes:

    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging >> their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised >> by other wordsmiths.

    Indeed. Befor you hire someone as a write -- journalist, speech
    write, whatever -- you want to have a look at what they've previously >written.

    I once worked in a shop where a job applicant was required to appear
    with his big, often very heavy tool chest. The boss scrutinzed his
    tools more closely that he did the applicant himself.

    One of my uncles was a 'master mechanic' (IIRC? Is that it?)

    He told me that a prospective hire would have his tools examined
    mainly to look at the tools that he had designed and built for
    himself. Apparently that is standard at one level of the profession.

    Anyone who buys a secondhand lathe spends the first year using it to
    make all the extra bits and pieces that it needs.


    The function of the tools would reveal the problems he had solved,
    and how well they were made would show someting else.

    I was brought up to make my own electronics tools and have quite a
    collection of gadgets that were designed to do a particular job. Some
    of them hang around for years and never get used again, others suddenly
    turn out to have more uses.

    Last weekend I re-used a device that I made decades ago. It was
    originally built for tracing lost wires, pipes and cables but it turned
    out to be ideal for tracking down a speed-variation problem in a 1920's gramophone by monitoring the magnetic field of the motor.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 10:50:21 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 03/03/2026 10:12, athel.cb@gmail.com wrote:

    Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org> posted:

    On 03/03/26 07:04, Sam Plusnet wrote:

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace, >>> love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I am impressed that the incurable liar told the truth for once.

    How many countries use their military for defence? Very few.

    Larger countries, you're right. But smaller countries probably most do. Ask occam, but I doubt whether Luxemburg has any immediate plans to conquer Germany.


    <smile> Our policy has not changed since WW II. Our military -
    comprising 25% musicians - will dispatch the army to the border and play
    really discordant music at the enemy, be they German, French or Belgian.
    There are rumours that the government has been stockpiling Music of Mass Discordance for a number of years.
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Anders D. Nygaard@news2012adn@google.com to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 11:14:26 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 3/3/2026 10:20 AM, Hibou wrote:
    How are we going to decide whether Mr Trump is a success or an Epic Loser?

    I should have thought that that was abundantly clear by now.

    /Anders, Denmark
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From liz@liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 10:41:01 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    Sam Plusnet <not@home.com> wrote:

    On 02/03/2026 09:36, Hibou wrote:
    Le 02/03/2026 |a 08:54, occam a |-crit :

    Excellent example in case this morning:-a Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the
    Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri.-a <smile>


    Quite. We used to have a War Office; now we have a Ministry of Defence.
    (We used to have a Prime Minister; now we have a drone?)

    The Trump administration has recently reversed that trend towards peace, love, and putting flowers down the barrels of rifles.
    They now have a "Department of War", not Defense.

    I noticed that Trump said "We are coming to help you", which sounds a
    lot better as a rallying cry than "We may eventually avenge your
    deaths", which was nearer the truth.
    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk
    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From occam@occam@nowhere.nix to alt.usage.english on Tue Mar 3 11:41:12 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.usage.english

    On 03/03/2026 04:18, Cryptoengineer wrote:
    On 3/2/2026 3:54 AM, occam wrote:
    On 02/03/2026 09:40, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Hibou <vpaereru-unmonitored@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:

    [...].
    Blacksmiths, silversmiths, and locksmiths keep their tools in good
    order. Only wordsmiths abuse them.

    That is because the physical workers spoil their reputations by damaging >>> their tools whereas wordsmiths enhance their reputations and are praised >>> by other wordsmiths.


    Excellent example in case this morning:-a Keir Starmer has allowed the
    use of the British RAF base in Cyprus for 'defensive' use only by the
    Americans.

    Yes, we are all hoping that the orange moron will set up defensive
    measures against Iranian drones in Akrotiri.-a <smile>

    That didn't age well.

    It wasn't meant to age well. I posted it after the attacks.

    My flight to Cyprus was cancelled. Today, the re-booking has also been cancelled.



    https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/british-air-base-cyprus-hit-by- suspected-drone-strike-sky-news-reports-2026-03-02/

    pt

    --- Synchronet 3.21d-Linux NewsLink 1.2