From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

Let's see if I get the Spam nonsense from neodome.

Using QSL/TOR

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 16:39:34 +0100, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202601.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:

Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
Injection-Info: neodome.net;

snip

Message-ID: <063a94b2598d801c690455e05ab6b7a3@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> >Path: news.neodome.net!mail2news
Xref: news.neodome.net alt.privacy:8834 alt.privacy.anon-server:28451

Let's see if I get the Spam nonsense from neodome.
Using QSL/TOR

headers look authentic . . .

this reply posted via mixmaster frell godot@remailer.frell.eu.org
to neodome gateway mail2news@neodome.net (w/ omnimix, tor browser) . . .

1) if subject header is:

Re: [Spam] testing neodome

then no "[spam]" prefix was added by neodome's m2n gateway, or

2) if subject header is:

[Spam] Re: [Spam] testing neodome

then the "[spam]" prefix was added by neodome's m2n gateway, but
if the subject header of any article posted through the neodome
gateway was deliberately modified by the sender, adding "[spam]"
for whatever purpose, that could happen too, e.g. troll tactics

i posted a copy of this reply via frell yamn to neodome gateway (nyam@remailer.frell.eu.org to mail2news@neodome.net) . . .

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On Sun, 11 Jan 2026 16:39:34 +0100, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202601.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:

Newsgroups: alt.privacy,alt.privacy.anon-server
Injection-Info: neodome.net;

snip

Message-ID: <063a94b2598d801c690455e05ab6b7a3@msgid.frell.theremailer.net> >Path: news.neodome.net!mail2news
Xref: news.neodome.net alt.privacy:8834 alt.privacy.anon-server:28451

Let's see if I get the Spam nonsense from neodome.
Using QSL/TOR

headers look authentic . . .

this reply posted via mixmaster frell godot@remailer.frell.eu.org
to neodome gateway mail2news@neodome.net (w/ omnimix, tor browser) . . .

1) if subject header is:

Re: [Spam] testing neodome

then no "[spam]" prefix was added by neodome's m2n gateway, or

2) if subject header is:

[Spam] Re: [Spam] testing neodome

then the "[spam]" prefix was added by neodome's m2n gateway, but
if the subject header of any article posted through the neodome
gateway was deliberately modified by the sender, adding "[spam]"
for whatever purpose, that could happen too, e.g. troll tactics

i posted a copy of this reply via frell yamn to neodome gateway (nyam@remailer.frell.eu.org to mail2news@neodome.net) . . .
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

In article <063a94b2598d801c690455e05ab6b7a3@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202601.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> wrote:

Let's see if I get the Spam nonsense from neodome.

Using QSL/TOR

It seems my simple post also was labeled as Spam by neodome.

What the hell is going on with that gateway? Doesn't the owne read
the complaints about this?

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

I don't know what you trolls don't understand about the simple word spam. If you're an anonymous remailer and post through neodome, the administrator will tag you with spam. That's consistent in my opinion. You trolls are spam and have nothing to do with anonymity.

--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2

From Newsgroup: alt.privacy.anon-server

On 11 Jan 2026, Bael <anonymous@domain.hell> posted some news:44d7933ebcceeaa99791e4e1b.58f0.5ef@6e7cd417.net:

I don't know what you trolls don't understand about the simple word
spam. If you're an anonymous remailer and post through neodome, the administrator will tag you with spam. That's consistent in my opinion.
You trolls are spam and have nothing to do with anonymity.

Thank you for confirming you know nothing of the services or situation.
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2