• dox everyone

    From Keith@user13263@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.privacy on Sat Dec 27 18:42:16 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy


    im kind of a psychotic evil nigger but any time someone involved in politics or technology proposes something that would curtail civil liberties in the name of "child safety" or some other horse shit lets just dox them and their family, so that they understand why what they're proposing is a terrible idea. im sure there are people on hacking forums already working on this but I just wanted to provide some additional encouragement.

    if they "go dark" and begin taking measures to anonymize the identities of those involved then we can penetrate their organization, people who do not understand technology yet choose to make policy proposals regarding it anyway tend not to have very good OPSEC.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From J@J@M to alt.privacy on Sat Dec 27 21:45:51 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy

    On Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:42:16 GMT, Keith <user13263@newsgrouper.org.invalid> wrote:
    Path: news..!usenet.network!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org
    !nntp.eternal-september.org!newsgrouper.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
    Message-ID: <1766860936-13263@newsgrouper.org>
    Injection-Info: newsgrouper.org;
    User-Agent: Newsgrouper/0.8.3

    headers look correct (not eelbash, not x-posted) . . .

    im kind of a psychotic evil nigger but any time someone involved in politics or
    technology proposes something that would curtail civil liberties in the name of
    "child safety" or some other horse shit lets just dox them and their family, so
    that they understand why what they're proposing is a terrible idea. im sure there
    are people on hacking forums already working on this but I just wanted to provide
    some additional encouragement.
    if they "go dark" and begin taking measures to anonymize the identities of those
    involved then we can penetrate their organization, people who do not understand
    technology yet choose to make policy proposals regarding it anyway tend not to >have very good OPSEC.

    (using Tor Browser 15.0.3) https://duckduckgo.com/?q=opsec+acronym&ia=web&assist=true
    OPSEC stands for "Operations Security." It is a process used to protect sensitive
    information from being accessed by adversaries. Proofpoint Wikipedia
    Meaning of OPSEC
    OPSEC stands for "Operations Security."
    Purpose of OPSEC
    The primary goal of OPSEC is to protect sensitive information from adversaries.
    It involves identifying critical information, analyzing potential threats, and >implementing measures to prevent unauthorized access.
    Key Components of OPSEC
    Five-Step Process
    Identify Critical Information: Determine what information needs protection.
    Analyze Threats: Assess who might want to exploit this information.
    Analyze Vulnerabilities: Identify weaknesses that could be exploited.
    Assess Risks: Evaluate the potential impact of threats on operations.
    Apply Countermeasures: Implement strategies to mitigate risks.
    Applications
    Military: Originally developed during the Vietnam War to protect military
    operations.
    Private Sector: Used to safeguard against competitive intelligence and cyber
    threats.
    OPSEC is essential for maintaining security in both military and civilian >contexts, ensuring that sensitive information remains protected from potential >exploitation.
    U.S. Army Proofpoint
    [end quoted "search assist"]

    so that explains it . . . "operations security" did not exist until
    after rock and roll music was invented . . . a communist conspiracy




























    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Keith@user13263@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.privacy on Sat Dec 27 20:58:46 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.privacy


    holy shit I had no idea
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2