• Trump's Greenland "Deal" - SOUNDS Like We Own LITTLE PARTS

    From c186282@c186282@nnada.net to talk.politics.misc,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.trump on Wed Jan 21 18:47:16 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.politics.usa

    I'm seeing a bit more about "The Deal" now. It appears
    that the USA doesn't need or want ALL of Greenland. The
    security (maybe mineral) aspects CAN be done by buying
    small PARTS of the island and making them a 'dispersed
    territory' or whatever, not quite sure how that'd work.
    Maybe like owning a group of islands all under your flag ?

    Anyway, the invasion is off, so are the euro tariffs.

    US stock markets rebounded on the news, up about 1.15%

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15485717/Trump-halts-tariffs-Greenland.html

    Was looking at Greenland the other day on Maps.
    Like WOW you wouldn't want to be stationed there !
    Just bare light brown rock with snow in the cracks
    even in summer. Maybe five or so miles of coast in
    some places, then the giant glacier. This is like
    for soldiers caught nekked with the generals daughter ....

    In any case, Greenland is HUGE and we don't NEED, or
    want, the whole damned thing. The locals can STILL
    be Danish-Greenlandic and not be bothered and we
    can have our land/bases in the north and northeast.

    Barely 15 miles from Greenland there's "Alert" in
    Canada, basically a small mil base that's always
    manned. Some kind of mysterious buildings - missile
    silos or radar arrays perhaps ? Landscape is the same.
    Hope the poor Canuk soldiers get like 5X pay and free
    beer for spending 6 months there. It DOES seem to have
    an improvised drive-in theater however :-)

    Hey ... ! The Mil can recall Walz, and station
    him at the worst Greenland base until he confesses
    where our billion+ $$$ went to :-)

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2