https://www.foxnews.com/media/corporation-public-broadcasting-board-votes-dissolve-organization-after-congress-defunds-npr-pbs
. . .
Aww ... Trump took away their Free Money for
making endless rad-leftist bullshit !!!
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public >television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public
television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their
donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something
to be laughed at.
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you >>>>> can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public
television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their
donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something
to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats
can't relate to.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News"
and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you >>>>>> can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported >>>>> by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public
television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their
donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something
to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats
can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to
be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News"
and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
You're suggesting that celebrating the closing of the border,
the end of Iranian nuclear development,
the arrest of the Venezuelan tyrant,
and the end of wars in the Middle East
are dumb?
Are you liking the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" promoting government confiscation of people's homes?
Sorry, I think that you are the Dummy.
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their >>>>>>> estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You
wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you >>>>>>> can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported >>>>>> by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public
television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their
donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something >>>> to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats
can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to
be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to "non-public
TV," you raging simpleton?
The "public" includes PBS's hundreds of thousands of small and large >contributors, not just the federal money they received.
The stations in the bigger cities will get by fine on donations alone,
it's the smaller cities where in many locations the only TV signal that
can be received is from a PBS station that are going to be harmed.
But since those smaller cities are likely Republican-voting they're
content to bask in their ignorance like a pig in shit, so who cares.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News"
and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
You're suggesting that celebrating the closing of the border,
You can't "close the border" any more than you can stop drugs from
crossing them.
the end of Iranian nuclear development,
It hasn't ended.
the arrest of the Venezuelan tyrant,
We have a tyrant running the US now.
and the end of wars in the Middle East
LOL, "the end of wars in the Middle East." That's probably your (and >Trump's) stupidest claim.
are dumb?
Are you liking the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" promoting government
confiscation of people's homes?
Is that the current hot wall-to-wall topic on Faux Republican News?
Must be. But New Yorkers are smart and capable of governing themselves.
Sorry, I think that you are the Dummy.
Trot out all those weak right-wing talking points you like, we're in
the middle of a Nazi nightmare
that's going to damage the country for
decades if not permanently.
But I guess you can always point fingers at somebody else when Trump,
Russia and China form an "axis of evil" that the rest of world has to
defend itself against, shades of Germany/Italy/Japan in WWII.
That's obviously where this is heading.
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and
their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their
estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You >>wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 23:22:10 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their >>>>>>>> estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You >>>>>>>> wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you >>>>>>>> can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported >>>>>>> by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public >>>>>> television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their
donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something >>>>> to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats
can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to
be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to "non-public
TV," you raging simpleton?
<CHUCKLE> It doesn't matter what they call themselves, Dummy, they're
not "Public TV" if they're privately funded.
The "public" includes PBS's hundreds of thousands of small and large
contributors, not just the federal money they received.
The stations in the bigger cities will get by fine on donations alone,
it's the smaller cities where in many locations the only TV signal that
can be received is from a PBS station that are going to be harmed.
But since those smaller cities are likely Republican-voting they're
content to bask in their ignorance like a pig in shit, so who cares.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News"
and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
You're suggesting that celebrating the closing of the border,
You can't "close the border" any more than you can stop drugs from
crossing them.
..and yet the drugs and people crossings are drastically reduced.
the end of Iranian nuclear development,
It hasn't ended.
What leads you to believe that?
the arrest of the Venezuelan tyrant,
We have a tyrant running the US now.
Tyrants are oppressive. How have you been oppressed? What rights have
you been denied?
and the end of wars in the Middle East
LOL, "the end of wars in the Middle East." That's probably your (and
Trump's) stupidest claim.
The terrorist groups are on their knees.
are dumb?
Are you liking the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" promoting government
confiscation of people's homes?
Is that the current hot wall-to-wall topic on Faux Republican News?
Must be. But New Yorkers are smart and capable of governing themselves.
Yet the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" said she wants to confiscate
their homes. Are you really OK with that?
Sorry, I think that you are the Dummy.
Trot out all those weak right-wing talking points you like, we're in
the middle of a Nazi nightmare
What current events do you believe relate to what the Nazi's did?
that's going to damage the country for
decades if not permanently.
How exactly is the USA being damaged? The GPD is up. The stock market
is up. Taxes are down. Drug deaths are down. Gas prices are down.
Inflation is down. Fraudulent government giveaways are being
discovered and stopped. The people of Iran are revolting against their dictator. Several terrorist groups are being weakened. The people of Venezuela have now got a chance to get back to the Democracy that was
taken away from them. The Socialist takeover of that country put the
people into poverty and lead to a tyrant stealing elections.
Fact is that you're damned lucky that Cackling Cammy and Tampon Tim
didn't win the election.
But I guess you can always point fingers at somebody else when Trump,
Russia and China form an "axis of evil" that the rest of world has to
defend itself against, shades of Germany/Italy/Japan in WWII.
That's obviously where this is heading.
<LOL> what makes that obvious?
You poor little fool...
On 2026-01-07 07:30:11 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 23:22:10 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>>>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their >>>>>>>>> estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You >>>>>>>>> wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you >>>>>>>>> can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported >>>>>>>> by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public >>>>>>> television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their >>>>>> donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something >>>>>> to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats >>>>> can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to
be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to "non-public
TV," you raging simpleton?
<CHUCKLE> It doesn't matter what they call themselves, Dummy, they're
not "Public TV" if they're privately funded.
The public is still funding them, goofball. As in public donations.
And you're right -- it doesn't matter what they call themselves because
you hard right dickweeds will still get your panties in a wad over them >regardless.
The "public" includes PBS's hundreds of thousands of small and large
contributors, not just the federal money they received.
The stations in the bigger cities will get by fine on donations alone,
it's the smaller cities where in many locations the only TV signal that
can be received is from a PBS station that are going to be harmed.
But since those smaller cities are likely Republican-voting they're
content to bask in their ignorance like a pig in shit, so who cares.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News" >>>>> and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
You're suggesting that celebrating the closing of the border,
You can't "close the border" any more than you can stop drugs from
crossing them.
..and yet the drugs and people crossings are drastically reduced.
...and yet prices are soaring at the store because of the Trumplican >xenophobia and labor shortages.
Then there's this: "For the first time in more than a year, street drug >deaths appear to be rising across the U.S. according to a new report
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
- https://www.npr.org/2025/06/18/nx-s1-5436711/overdose-drugs-cdc
the end of Iranian nuclear development,
It hasn't ended.
What leads you to believe that?
"CSIS Satellite Imagery Analysis Reveals Possible Signs of Renewed
Nuclear Activity in Iran"
https://www.csis.org/analysis/csis-satellite-imagery-analysis-reveals-possible-signs-renewed-nuclear-activity-iran
the arrest of the Venezuelan tyrant,
We have a tyrant running the US now.
Tyrants are oppressive. How have you been oppressed? What rights have
you been denied?
"100 Human Rights Harms in 100 Days - The Trump AdministrationAs
Assault on Rights in the United States and Abroad"
- >https://www.hrw.org/feature/2025/04/24/100-human-rights-harms-100-days/trump-administrations-assault-rights-united
and the end of wars in the Middle East
LOL, "the end of wars in the Middle East." That's probably your (and
Trump's) stupidest claim.
The terrorist groups are on their knees.
And yet ISIS killed three Americans as late as last month.
are dumb?
Are you liking the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" promoting government
confiscation of people's homes?
Is that the current hot wall-to-wall topic on Faux Republican News?
Must be. But New Yorkers are smart and capable of governing themselves.
Yet the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" said she wants to confiscate
their homes. Are you really OK with that?
I don't know enough about New York politics and governance to comment
but it sounds like some kind of cherry-picked red meat by Fox News and
the far right silo to get their disciples like you salivating.
Sorry, I think that you are the Dummy.
Trot out all those weak right-wing talking points you like, we're in
the middle of a Nazi nightmare
What current events do you believe relate to what the Nazi's did?
Trump has supported political violence against opponents; many
academics cited Trump's involvement in the January 6 United States
Capitol attack as an example of fascism. Trump has been accused of
racism and xenophobia with respect to his rhetoric about illegal
immigrants and his policies of mass deportation and family separation. >Trump's base, referred to as the MAGA movement, is sometimes analyzed
as a cult of personality. Especially during his second term, several
experts of fascism have characterized Trump and his allies' rhetoric
and style of governance as authoritarian, and have compared them to
previous fascist leaders'. In contrast, some scholars have described
Trump variously as an authoritarian populist, a far-right populist, a >nationalist, or of a different ideology.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_and_fascism
that's going to damage the country for
decades if not permanently.
How exactly is the USA being damaged? The GPD is up. The stock market
is up. Taxes are down. Drug deaths are down. Gas prices are down.
Inflation is down. Fraudulent government giveaways are being
discovered and stopped. The people of Iran are revolting against their
dictator. Several terrorist groups are being weakened. The people of
Venezuela have now got a chance to get back to the Democracy that was
taken away from them. The Socialist takeover of that country put the
people into poverty and lead to a tyrant stealing elections.
Trump has weakened America, economically and politically. His policies
are creating serious problems for the US economy. For example, both
tariffs and mass deportations of irregular migrants who take the jobs
that Americans will not do are stoking inflation. The frequent chopping
and changing of policy creates uncertainty, harms investment and has a >negative impact on market sentiment. The defunding of large areas of >scientific research risks undermining the innovation that has given the
US a consistently higher growth rate than Europe; America is ceding the >leadership of many green technologies to China. Furthermore, a country
that expels visitors, confiscates their electronic devices for
criticising the president and detains international students engaging
in protest will be less attractive for international business and
academic exchanges.
The world can also see how Trump is eroding the checks and balances of
the US political system, through his attacks on the federal government,
his criticism of the courts (and his non-compliance with some of their >decisions), his hounding of political opponents and his sidelining of >Congress. The decisions to virtually abolish institutions like USAID
and Voice of America have done a lot to undermine US soft power - and >American global influence. A nationalist and unpredictable America is
less attractive as an ally and as a trading partner. The damage Trump
is doing will be hard to repair.
- https://www.cer.eu/insights/donald-trumps-return-office-ten-consequences
Fact is that you're damned lucky that Cackling Cammy and Tampon Tim
didn't win the election.
Fact is the Trumpenfuhrer and his far right Project 2025 agenda are
damaging the US permanently.
But I guess you can always point fingers at somebody else when Trump,
Russia and China form an "axis of evil" that the rest of world has to
defend itself against, shades of Germany/Italy/Japan in WWII.
That's obviously where this is heading.
<LOL> what makes that obvious?
You don't read a lot of news do you, especially of late.
--You poor little fool...
"neener-neener" :p
On 2026-01-07 07:30:11 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 23:22:10 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys
accomplish? The local stations will be around supported solely >>>>>>>>> by donations and their donors (many who are very wealthy
philanthropists or their estates) will demand a solid
progressive programming bent. You wingerdingers can kick and >>>>>>>>> scream but there won't be a damn thing you can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not
supported by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about
public television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and
their donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and
thus, something to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing
asshats can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them
to be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to
"non-public TV," you raging simpleton?
<CHUCKLE> It doesn't matter what they call themselves, Dummy, they're
not "Public TV" if they're privately funded.
The public is still funding them, goofball. As in public donations.
And you're right -- it doesn't matter what they call themselves
because you hard right dickweeds will still get your panties in a wad
over them regardless.
On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:27:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-07 07:30:11 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 23:22:10 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish? >>>>>>>>>> The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their >>>>>>>>>> estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You >>>>>>>>>> wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported >>>>>>>>> by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public >>>>>>>> television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their >>>>>>> donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something >>>>>>> to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats >>>>>> can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to >>>>> be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to "non-public >>>> TV," you raging simpleton?
<CHUCKLE> It doesn't matter what they call themselves, Dummy, they're
not "Public TV" if they're privately funded.
The public is still funding them, goofball. As in public donations.
<LOL> Donations from private people are not public donations, Dummy.
And you're right -- it doesn't matter what they call themselves because
you hard right dickweeds will still get your panties in a wad over them
regardless.
The "public" includes PBS's hundreds of thousands of small and large
contributors, not just the federal money they received.
The stations in the bigger cities will get by fine on donations alone, >>>> it's the smaller cities where in many locations the only TV signal that >>>> can be received is from a PBS station that are going to be harmed.
But since those smaller cities are likely Republican-voting they're
content to bask in their ignorance like a pig in shit, so who cares.
And the laughing going on is at Faux Republican Entertainment "News" >>>>>> and their imitators, largely responsible for the dumbing down of
America for the past 20 years (yourself being a prime example).
You're suggesting that celebrating the closing of the border,
You can't "close the border" any more than you can stop drugs from
crossing them.
..and yet the drugs and people crossings are drastically reduced.
...and yet prices are soaring at the store because of the Trumplican
xenophobia and labor shortages.
Then there's this: "For the first time in more than a year, street drug
deaths appear to be rising across the U.S. according to a new report
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
- https://www.npr.org/2025/06/18/nx-s1-5436711/overdose-drugs-cdc
the end of Iranian nuclear development,
It hasn't ended.
What leads you to believe that?
"CSIS Satellite Imagery Analysis Reveals Possible Signs of Renewed
Nuclear Activity in Iran"
<LOL> And you think "Satellite Imagery Analysis Reveals Possible Signs
of Renewed Nuclear Activity in Iran" means it absolutely hasn't ended?
Even if that's true, it can be destroyed again just as easily as it
was done last year.
https://www.csis.org/analysis/csis-satellite-imagery-analysis-reveals-possible-signs-renewed-nuclear-activity-iran
the arrest of the Venezuelan tyrant,
We have a tyrant running the US now.
Tyrants are oppressive. How have you been oppressed? What rights have
you been denied?
"100 Human Rights Harms in 100 Days - The Trump AdministrationAs
Assault on Rights in the United States and Abroad"
-
https://www.hrw.org/feature/2025/04/24/100-human-rights-harms-100-days/trump-administrations-assault-rights-united
<LOL> Leftist misinformation site full of nothing but undocumented
opinions? Really?
and the end of wars in the Middle East
LOL, "the end of wars in the Middle East." That's probably your (and
Trump's) stupidest claim.
The terrorist groups are on their knees.
And yet ISIS killed three Americans as late as last month.
Bad, but they're still onn their knees.
Yet the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" said she wants to confiscateare dumb?
Are you liking the official NYC "Tenant Adviser" promoting government >>>>> confiscation of people's homes?
Is that the current hot wall-to-wall topic on Faux Republican News?
Must be. But New Yorkers are smart and capable of governing themselves. >>>
their homes. Are you really OK with that?
I don't know enough about New York politics and governance to comment
but it sounds like some kind of cherry-picked red meat by Fox News and
the far right silo to get their disciples like you salivating.
In the resurfaced clip, which is undated, she said: "It will mean that families, especially white families, are going to have a different relationship to property than the one we currently have."
In another post resurfaced on X, Weaver said on June 13, 2018: "Seize
private property!" https://www.newsweek.com/zohran-mamdani-tenant-advisor-home-ownership-white-supremacy-11307264
Sorry, I think that you are the Dummy.
Trot out all those weak right-wing talking points you like, we're in
the middle of a Nazi nightmare
What current events do you believe relate to what the Nazi's did?
Trump has supported political violence against opponents; many
academics cited Trump's involvement in the January 6 United States
Capitol attack as an example of fascism. Trump has been accused of
racism and xenophobia with respect to his rhetoric about illegal
immigrants and his policies of mass deportation and family separation.
Trump's base, referred to as the MAGA movement, is sometimes analyzed
as a cult of personality. Especially during his second term, several
experts of fascism have characterized Trump and his allies' rhetoric
and style of governance as authoritarian, and have compared them to
previous fascist leaders'. In contrast, some scholars have described
Trump variously as an authoritarian populist, a far-right populist, a
nationalist, or of a different ideology.
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_and_fascism
Undocumented opinion on wikipedia? ReallY
that's going to damage the country for
decades if not permanently.
How exactly is the USA being damaged? The GPD is up. The stock market
is up. Taxes are down. Drug deaths are down. Gas prices are down.
Inflation is down. Fraudulent government giveaways are being
discovered and stopped. The people of Iran are revolting against their
dictator. Several terrorist groups are being weakened. The people of
Venezuela have now got a chance to get back to the Democracy that was
taken away from them. The Socialist takeover of that country put the
people into poverty and lead to a tyrant stealing elections.
Trump has weakened America, economically and politically. His policies
are creating serious problems for the US economy. For example, both
tariffs and mass deportations of irregular migrants who take the jobs
that Americans will not do are stoking inflation. The frequent chopping
and changing of policy creates uncertainty, harms investment and has a
negative impact on market sentiment. The defunding of large areas of
scientific research risks undermining the innovation that has given the
US a consistently higher growth rate than Europe; America is ceding the
leadership of many green technologies to China. Furthermore, a country
that expels visitors, confiscates their electronic devices for
criticising the president and detains international students engaging
in protest will be less attractive for international business and
academic exchanges.
Undocumented opinion is all you have.
The world can also see how Trump is eroding the checks and balances of
the US political system, through his attacks on the federal government,
his criticism of the courts (and his non-compliance with some of their
decisions), his hounding of political opponents and his sidelining of
Congress. The decisions to virtually abolish institutions like USAID
and Voice of America have done a lot to undermine US soft power - and
American global influence. A nationalist and unpredictable America is
less attractive as an ally and as a trading partner. The damage Trump
is doing will be hard to repair.
- https://www.cer.eu/insights/donald-trumps-return-office-ten-consequences
More Undocumented opinion..
Fact is that you're damned lucky that Cackling Cammy and Tampon Tim
didn't win the election.
Fact is the Trumpenfuhrer and his far right Project 2025 agenda are
damaging the US permanently.
Undocumented opinion is not a fact, Jackass.
But I guess you can always point fingers at somebody else when Trump,
Russia and China form an "axis of evil" that the rest of world has to
defend itself against, shades of Germany/Italy/Japan in WWII.
That's obviously where this is heading.
<LOL> what makes that obvious?
You don't read a lot of news do you, especially of late.
Leftist can't back his claim...
You poor little fool...
"neener-neener" :p
On 2026-01-07 14:46:31 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:27:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-07 07:30:11 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 23:22:10 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 22:49:00 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 16:29:50 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 21:25:41 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:35:08 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
On 2026-01-06 15:46:50 +0000, Socialism is for losers said:
On Tue, 6 Jan 2026 09:41:46 -0600, super70s
<super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
What did Trumpenfuhrer and his flying Republican monkeys accomplish?
The local stations will be around supported solely by donations and >>>>>>>>>>> their donors (many who are very wealthy philanthropists or their >>>>>>>>>>> estates) will demand a solid progressive programming bent. You >>>>>>>>>>> wingerdingers can kick and scream but there won't be a damn thing you
can do about it.
There's no problem with that, Dummy, as long as they're not supported
by taxpayer revenue.
Are you really too stupid to understand that?
You ignorant far right asswipes will still be whining about public >>>>>>>>> television no matter how it's funded, it's in your DNA.
It's not public TV if it's "supported solely by donations and their >>>>>>>> donors," Dummy. It'll be like CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, and thus, something >>>>>>>> to be laughed at.
Their programming won't change nevertheless -- it'll still be
educational and informative which is something you rightwing asshats >>>>>>> can't relate to.
I can't relate to CNNLOL and MS-NEVER, too, but I don't want them to >>>>>> be cancelled because they're damned good entertainment.
You think those stations are going to change their name to "non-public >>>>> TV," you raging simpleton?
<CHUCKLE> It doesn't matter what they call themselves, Dummy, they're
not "Public TV" if they're privately funded.
The public is still funding them, goofball. As in public donations.
<LOL> Donations from private people are not public donations, Dummy.
Semantics. Any donor is part of the public.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 54 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 14:30:10 |
| Calls: | 742 |
| Files: | 1,218 |
| D/L today: |
3 files (2,681K bytes) |
| Messages: | 183,842 |
| Posted today: | 1 |