• =?UTF-8?B?IOKAnOeEoeS6puS4jeWPr+eri+KAnSAtIHfDuiB5w6wgYsO5IGs=?= =?UTF-8?B?xJsgbMOsIOKAlCDigJxldmVuIG5vbi1iZWluZyBjYW5ub3QgYmUg?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXN0YWJsaXNoZWTigJ0=?=

    From eye@user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Jan 23 17:55:55 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    A saying may be said about being. Beings
    can be said to exist naturally. Most are
    what could be called, time beings.

    Being as a thing, its own self, is said
    to emerge from or be produced by nonbeing.

    Wu, in other words using a form of Romanization.

    Yet, given: Zhuangzi, the book known by his name,
    as he articulates various modes and nodes of a
    type of a kind of a paradigm which could
    pertain to Daojia, he talks about
    Being and Nonbeing, Yu and Wu.

    A curious word occurs, groot.

    Groot said he was groot, except he
    always used the word, is and that
    is an odd feature of words, imo.

    Never was said, I am not groot.

    I am groot.
    I am Groot.

    Explanations point.
    Questions mark.
    Periods are.

    Meanings vary.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gree fan@user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Sat Jan 24 14:46:39 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    eye <user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:


    A saying may be said about being. Beings
    can be said to exist naturally. Most are
    what could be called, time beings.

    Being as a thing, its own self, is said
    to emerge from or be produced by nonbeing.

    Wu, in other words using a form of Romanization.

    Yet, given: Zhuangzi, the book known by his name,
    as he articulates various modes and nodes of a
    type of a kind of a paradigm which could
    pertain to Daojia, he talks about
    Being and Nonbeing, Yu and Wu.

    A curious word occurs, groot.

    Groot said he was groot, except he
    always used the word, is and that
    is an odd feature of words, imo.

    Never was said, I am not groot.

    I am groot.
    I am Groot.

    Explanations point.
    Questions mark.
    Periods are.

    Meanings vary.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    ========================================
    The Daoist concept of "wu" (non-being) is close to what Buddhism refutes as the "view of non-existence" or "annihilationism."
    If one clings to "wu" as truly existent or as an ultimate, fundamental source, this becomes a form ofdharma-grasping (attachment to concepts as real).

    As the Buddha stated in theMah-Uparinirv-Ub|ca S+2tra:
    rCLBetter to entertain a view of existence as massive as Mount Sumeru than to hold a view of non-existence as tiny as a mustard seed,rCY
    for those who cling to "non-existence" easily fall into nihilism, severing their virtuous roots and destroying the principle of cause and effect (karma).



    Buddhism employs "emptiness" (+c+2nyat-U) to transcend the dualistic extremes of "existence" and "non-existence."
    Emptiness is not "nihilism" or "nothingness"; rather, it signifies that all phenomena arise dependentlyrColacking inherent, independent, or unchanging essence.

    As stated in N-Ug-UrjunarCOsM+2lamadhyamakak-Urik-U (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way):
    rCLWhatever arises dependently,
    I declare that to be emptiness.
    It is also a provisional designation,
    And indeed, the meaning of the Middle Way.rCY
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gree fan@user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Sat Jan 24 14:56:08 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    eye <user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:


    A saying may be said about being. Beings
    can be said to exist naturally. Most are
    what could be called, time beings.

    Being as a thing, its own self, is said
    to emerge from or be produced by nonbeing.

    Wu, in other words using a form of Romanization.

    Yet, given: Zhuangzi, the book known by his name,
    as he articulates various modes and nodes of a
    type of a kind of a paradigm which could
    pertain to Daojia, he talks about
    Being and Nonbeing, Yu and Wu.

    A curious word occurs, groot.

    Groot said he was groot, except he
    always used the word, is and that
    is an odd feature of words, imo.

    Never was said, I am not groot.

    I am groot.
    I am Groot.

    Explanations point.
    Questions mark.
    Periods are.

    Meanings vary.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    =========================================
    To break through "non-being" is to enter the "Middle Way".

    "When you meet the Buddha, kill the Buddha; when you meet the patriarch, kill the patriarch... only then do you attain liberation."

    "All dharmas are unobtainable, and all conceptual elaborations are extinguished."

    The mind abides nowhere, like a lotus flower unsullied by water.

    "How can one seek fruit from a sky-flower? How can one search for fish in a mirage?"

    "Grasping the meaning and forgetting the words" and "verbal expressions are merely provisional names; transcend words to realize truth."

    The Vimalakirti Sutra: "The Dharma is beyond all contemplation and practice; it is only inconceivable!"

    The Diamond Sutra: "One should give rise to the mind that abides nowhere."

    The Diamond Sutra: "The Dharma spoken by the TathagataN+ebuddhaN+e cannot be grasped, cannot be spoken, is neither Dharma nor non-Dharma."

    Since all dharmas are empty, how can there be extremes or non-extremes, both extremes and non-extremes, neither extremes nor non-extremes?
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Gree fan@user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Sat Jan 24 15:11:11 2026
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    eye <user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:


    A saying may be said about being. Beings
    can be said to exist naturally. Most are
    what could be called, time beings.

    Being as a thing, its own self, is said
    to emerge from or be produced by nonbeing.

    Wu, in other words using a form of Romanization.

    Yet, given: Zhuangzi, the book known by his name,
    as he articulates various modes and nodes of a
    type of a kind of a paradigm which could
    pertain to Daojia, he talks about
    Being and Nonbeing, Yu and Wu.

    A curious word occurs, groot.

    Groot said he was groot, except he
    always used the word, is and that
    is an odd feature of words, imo.

    Never was said, I am not groot.

    I am groot.
    I am Groot.

    Explanations point.
    Questions mark.
    Periods are.

    Meanings vary.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    =========================================
    True existence needs no explanationrCoit simply is.

    Philosophy seeks to explain (yet remains merely a finger pointing);
    Doubt keeps openness (yet is still a symbol);
    Only the periodrColike ZhuangzirCOs rCLsitting in forgetfulnessrCY zuowang) or Chan BuddhismrCOs rCLsilent illuminationrCY mozhao)rCo
    establishes no words, and is enlightenment here and now.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2