From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism
eye <
user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid> posted:
A saying may be said about being. Beings
can be said to exist naturally. Most are
what could be called, time beings.
Being as a thing, its own self, is said
to emerge from or be produced by nonbeing.
Wu, in other words using a form of Romanization.
Yet, given: Zhuangzi, the book known by his name,
as he articulates various modes and nodes of a
type of a kind of a paradigm which could
pertain to Daojia, he talks about
Being and Nonbeing, Yu and Wu.
A curious word occurs, groot.
Groot said he was groot, except he
always used the word, is and that
is an odd feature of words, imo.
Never was said, I am not groot.
I am groot.
I am Groot.
Explanations point.
Questions mark.
Periods are.
Meanings vary.
- thanks! Cheers!
========================================
The Daoist concept of "wu" (non-being) is close to what Buddhism refutes as the "view of non-existence" or "annihilationism."
If one clings to "wu" as truly existent or as an ultimate, fundamental source, this becomes a form ofdharma-grasping (attachment to concepts as real).
As the Buddha stated in theMah-Uparinirv-Ub|ca S+2tra:
rCLBetter to entertain a view of existence as massive as Mount Sumeru than to hold a view of non-existence as tiny as a mustard seed,rCY
for those who cling to "non-existence" easily fall into nihilism, severing their virtuous roots and destroying the principle of cause and effect (karma).
Buddhism employs "emptiness" (+c+2nyat-U) to transcend the dualistic extremes of "existence" and "non-existence."
Emptiness is not "nihilism" or "nothingness"; rather, it signifies that all phenomena arise dependentlyrColacking inherent, independent, or unchanging essence.
As stated in N-Ug-UrjunarCOsM+2lamadhyamakak-Urik-U (Fundamental Verses on the Middle Way):
rCLWhatever arises dependently,
I declare that to be emptiness.
It is also a provisional designation,
And indeed, the meaning of the Middle Way.rCY
--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2