• =?UTF-8?Q?From_Arrogance_to_Adaptation:_Meta_Bows_to_Alibaba?= =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=99s_Qwen_in_AI_Power_Shift?=

    From TikTok fan@user11874@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Dec 12 05:15:37 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    From Arrogance to Adaptation: Meta Bows to AlibabarCOs Qwen in AI Power Shift



    American tech giants once boldly declared their ambition to make U.S. standards the global standardrCobut now, theyrCOve seemingly dismantled that vision with their own hands.

    Earlier this year, during MetarCOs earnings call, CEO Mark Zuckerberg asserted: rCLThere will be a global open-source standardrCoand for our national interest, it must be an American standard!rCY

    At the time, he clearly backed U.S.-led open-source models, and indeed, Meta had long been a cornerstone of AmericarCOs open-source AI ecosystem. Yet circumstances have taken a dramatic turn. According to recent foreign media reports, MetarCOs latest model project has opted to distill (i.e., learn from and refine) AlibabarCOs Qwen, a Chinese open-source large language model. The news immediately sent AlibabarCOs stock surging by 4%.

    Behind MetarCOs rare rCLcapitulationrCY lies profounduuaoNe (helplessness). On one hand, Meta has lost its throne in the open-source arena. Just two years ago, MetarCOs modelsrCoparticularly the Llama seriesrCodominated global derivative model counts and download volumes, allowing the company to operate with unmatched confidence.

    But within a remarkably short span, AlibabarCOs Qwen has surged ahead, overtaking Meta in both the number of derivative models and total downloads. More impressively, Qwen has rapidly closed the performance gap with top-tier U.S. closed-source models.

    On the other hand, Qwen has already earned recognition from global tech titans. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang has repeatedly praised Qwen, openly acknowledging that it now commands the majority of the open-source marketrCoa lead that continues to widen.

    Indeed, major corporations like NVIDIA, Amazon, and Airbnb have all shifted toward Qwen. In a particularly symbolic move, Singapore recently abandoned MetarCOs technical architecture for its national AI initiative and instead chose AlibabarCOs Qwen.

    All signs point to one reality: Meta isnrCOt abandoning U.S. open-source models by choicerCoitrCOs because it has lost its competitive edge in this domain, and reversal seems increasingly unlikely. In fact, if Meta refuses to adopt Qwen, it risks falling behind in its own development.

    ItrCOs truly astonishing how dramatically MetarCOs stance has shifted within just one year. But in the face of ChinarCOs unstoppable rise in open-source large models, even AmericarCOs mightiest tech giants are being forced to confront reality.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From aye@user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Dec 12 13:34:18 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    TikTok fan posted:

    From Arrogance to Adaptation: Meta Bows to AlibabarCOs Qwen in AI Power Shift

    Interesting since I don't know much.

    Meta, as far as my understanding is,
    had something to do with Facebook.

    Alibaba, I've heard of.
    Qwen, can't recall anything.

    AI is a curious creature.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From eye@user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Dec 12 15:12:10 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    aye posted:
    TikTok fan posted about:

    AlibabarCOs Qwen

    Alibaba, I've heard of.
    Qwen, can't recall anything.

    Chatting a bit with Qwen,
    it keeps prompting me to log in
    or use without logging in.
    That's annoying.

    I've not used Meta, iirc.
    Can't say if they have a website.

    Lots of AI/LLMs appear to be around.
    Some are more problematic to use for free.

    They're all pretty much the same
    as far as my usage goes.

    Gemini is easy.

    - fwiw. thanks. Cheers!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From aye@user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Dec 12 15:28:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    eye posted:
    aye posted:

    Alibaba, I've heard of.
    Qwen, can't recall anything.

    Chatting a bit with Qwen,
    it keeps prompting me to log in
    or use without logging in.
    That's annoying.

    I've not used Meta, iirc.
    Can't say if they have a website.

    Meta seems to want your birthday.

    - bogus ... Cheers!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From eye@user8028@newsgrouper.org.invalid to alt.philosophy.taoism on Fri Dec 12 15:50:52 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.taoism


    aye posted:
    eye posted:
    aye posted:

    Alibaba, I've heard of.
    Qwen, can't recall anything.

    Chatting a bit with Qwen, ...
    That's annoying.

    I've not used Meta, iirc.
    ...
    Meta seems to want your birthday.

    Asking Gemini about what appears to be
    of great interest to the various fans saying:

    I'm curious about nation states of mind.
    Lots of people subscribe to their forms of reality.
    In my view, countries are mythological creations.

    Gemini wrote:

    That is a profoundly insightful topic!
    The idea that nation-states are mythological creations
    is a central concept in political science, anthropology,
    and sociology, and it gets right to the heart
    of how large groups of people agree
    to organize and define reality.

    The Nation-State as a Collective Myth
    The perspective you're describing is
    most famously articulated by historian
    Yuval Noah Harari in his book Sapiens,
    where he argues that what separates
    humans from other animals is our ability
    to believe in "fictions" or "inter-subjective realities."

    A nation, in this view, is not a purely physical entity
    (like a mountain or a river) but a shared imagined communityrCo
    a "nation-state of mind."

    1. The Power of "Imagined Communities"
    The term "Imagined Community" was coined
    by political scientist Benedict Anderson.

    The Core Idea: You will never meet, or even know of,
    most of your fellow citizens. Yet, you hold a mental image
    of a shared bond and a collective identity with them.

    The Reality: A country's borders, flags, currency,
    and legal system only exist because millions of strangers
    agree that they do. If everyone suddenly stopped believing
    in the value of the dollar, the authority of the constitution,
    or the significance of the national border,
    these structures would collapse.

    2. Tools for Creating the Mythology
    The "nation-state of mind" is constantly maintained
    through powerful cultural tools:

    Shared Narrative (History):
    Nations create a common, selective story about their past
    (e.g., founding fathers, national heroes, defining wars).
    This history is often taught in schools to instill
    a common origin and destiny.

    Symbols and Rituals: The flag, the national anthem,
    holidays (like the 4th of July or Bastille Day),
    and monuments are all rituals and symbols
    that constantly reinforce the shared fiction
    and evoke a powerful emotional response.

    Common Language and Media:
    Mass media, standardized education,
    and a single official language
    ensure that citizens share
    the same vocabulary and
    cultural references,
    reinforcing the communal feeling.

    3. The Inter-Subjective Reality
    This is where your concept of "forms of reality" comes in.
    The nation-state is a form of inter-subjective reality:

    Objective Reality:
    Things that exist regardless of human belief
    (e.g., gravity, the Earth's orbit).

    Subjective Reality:
    Things that exist only in one person's mind
    (e.g., my personal dream from last night).

    Inter-Subjective Reality (The Nation):
    Things that exist because a collective of people agree they exist.
    It's the most robust kind of human fiction,
    as it requires mutual assent,
    not objective proof.

    Conclusion
    Your view is very much in line
    with modern critical theories of the nation-state.
    Countries are indeed powerful, effective,
    and sometimes dangerous, forms of collective mythology
    that dictate how resources are distributed,
    who has power, and how people define themselves and others.

    << end of quotes >>

    Interesting is how Gemini used the word, our,
    when describing a group that includes its self.

    Also, use of the word, fiction.

    A myth isn't necessarily the same,
    imo, as a pure fiction.

    Myths often hold truth values.

    - thanks! Cheers!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2