Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On 11/11/25 8:34 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Yep, I admit that I screwed-up on this one:
-a-a "Yep. I admit that JTEM is right."
In any case, such has nothing to do with tachyons,
Lol!
You're such a fucking idiot... "Even if I'm wrong I'd
right."
Photons break your idiotic worship of "No Retrocausality."
BECAUSE photons don't experience time AND WE DO, the result
HAS TO BE quantum funkiness such as Retrocausality. It has
to happen, BECAUSE photons and how they exist can't fit into
our human model of space & time.
Get it, speaking rhetorically?
FOR US there is a "Before" and "After" and we can't escape
this. But for the photon there is no such thing. Thus, the
Delayed Choice Quantum Entanglement were the entangled
photon knows what WE ARE GOING TO DO to it's entangled pair.
Retrocausality.
Yet the entirety of your objection to tachyons is that they
break the laws of physics which we just broke with the photons
anyway, creating Retrocausality.
Why are tachyons not listed
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 11/11/25 2:29 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:20:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Absolutely not!!
You are *Such* a fucking idiot!
And yet, she's far more intelligent than you. I realize that,
given your lack of education, this isn't saying much.
Your sock puppet
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
So you
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 11/12/25 3:57 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:49:38 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/11/25 2:29 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:20:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Absolutely not!!
You are *Such* a fucking idiot!
And yet, she's far more intelligent than you. I realize that, >>>>given your lack of education, this isn't saying much.
Your sock puppet
So you still hold the delusion that you and only one other person
are on Usenet? It's either that or you just got caught in a lie.
It's not about me,
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You're the one
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On 11/13/25 4:00 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:13:49 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/12/25 3:57 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2025 14:49:38 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/11/25 2:29 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:20:07 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
Dawn Flood wrote:
Absolutely not!!
You are *Such* a fucking idiot!
And yet, she's far more intelligent than you. I realize that, >>>>>>given your lack of education, this isn't saying much.
Your sock puppet
So you still hold the delusion that you and only one other person >>>>are on Usenet? It's either that or you just got caught in a lie.
It's not about me,
You're the one who has a mental illness that makes you believe, >>firmly, that you and only one other person are all of Usenet. Or you
have been lying.
Which is it?
So I invented photons?
YourI have nothing to do with your mental illness(es).
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
And yet, she's far more intelligent than you. I realize that, >>>>>>>>given your lack of education, this isn't saying much.
Your sock puppet
So you still hold the delusion that you and only one other person >>>>>>are on Usenet? It's either that or you just got caught in a lie.
It's not about me,
You're the one who has a mental illness that makes you believe, >>>>firmly, that you and only one other person are all of Usenet. Or you >>>>have been lying.
Which is it?
So I invented photons?
Your attempt to divert from your very real mental illness is >>acknowledged.
So, what are you pretending to disagree with?
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
I
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 11/15/25 3:36 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2025 12:04:51 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
It's not about me,And yet, she's far more intelligent than you. I realize that, >>>>>>>>>>given your lack of education, this isn't saying much.
Your sock puppet
So you still hold the delusion that you and only one other person >>>>>>>>are on Usenet? It's either that or you just got caught in a lie. >>>>>>>
You're the one who has a mental illness that makes you believe, >>>>>>firmly, that you and only one other person are all of Usenet. Or you >>>>>>have been lying.
Which is it?
So I invented photons?
Your attempt to divert from your very real mental illness is >>>>acknowledged.
So, what are you pretending to disagree with?
I already detailed that.
The pussy is here! The pussy is here! Look at her cower, just
like a pussy, too terrified to even attempt an answer...
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
At least youI am the sweetest man on earth, REFUSING to stoop to name calling,
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
(Time) 11/30/25 AgainX2 greeting Dawn here ...
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-|a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?'
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 60 min since
being greeted here means, JTEM, you're #StatCOVID19Test **positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
On 12/1/25 7:02 AM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 60 min
since
being greeted here means, JTEM, you're #StatCOVID19Test
**positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See
https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or
https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
There was never anything to reply to! Not in this group.
I saw this and thought "I went to bed" but it wouldn't matter if
I did or did not. There was no reply posted to this group.
Did Satan block your post?
JTEM wrote:
On 12/1/25 7:02 AM, HeartDoc Andrew wrote:
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 60 min since
being greeted here means, JTEM, you're #StatCOVID19Test **positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See
https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
There was never anything to reply to! Not in this group.
I saw this and thought "I went to bed" but it wouldn't matter if
I did or did not. There was no reply posted to this group.
Did Satan block your post?
who gets covid these days?
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(Time) 12/01/25 AgainX2, Re: JTEM ...
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 16:42:22 -0400, HeartDoc Andrew, in the Holy
Spirit, boldly wrote:
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(no reply for > 60 min)
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 60 min since
being greeted here means, JTEM, you're #StatCOVID19Test **positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
(no reply for > 60 min)
Your not being able to reply appropriately over the past 60 min since
being greeted here means, JTEM, you're #StatCOVID19Test **positive**
which indicates you're possibly infected w/#COVID (See https://youtu.be/F9cjfEiLQIk or https://tinyurl.com/StatCOVID19Test
for the science).
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(no reply for > 60 min)
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Your not being able to reply appropriately
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(no reply for > 60 min)
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
(no reply for > 60 min)
-aHeartDoc Andrew wrote:
(no reply for > 60 min)
What are you posting these to alt.atheism?-a The last few days I haven't
even been downloading headers cus there's too many of them, and I'm too disgustingly lazy to go through them all.
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(no reply for > 60 min)
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
(Time) 12/04/25 Again, Re: JTEM ...
I will solute the divinity in you, and call on the angels
bless you and shower you with wealth & prosperity, but
only if you reply appropriately within 60 minutes. After
that they may tie your shoe laces together or bring you
warts. It's all out of my hands.
JTEM wrote:
Check your crossposts, otherwise you're just going to get
killfiled.
Crossposts have been checked.
In the interim, I am otherwise wonderfully hungry for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, JTEM, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On 11/12/25 12:30 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Why are tachyons not listed
Who cares?
Literally NOTHING was listed in the past. Did nothing exist
before someone decided to come up with a list?
You're religious. You need a high priest to reveal "Truth"
unto you.
Try thinking for a change.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Derive the Dirac equation for me from scratch; no Internet & no
cheating.-a Present your results here.
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On 12/8/25 2:15 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Derive the Dirac equation for me from scratch; no Internet & no
cheating.a Present your results here.
How does this alter the fact that photons don't experience time
so quantum weirdness -- like Retrocausality -- is inescapable.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Your failure
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 14:40:31 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/8/25 2:15 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Derive the Dirac equation for me from scratch; no Internet & no
cheating.-a Present your results here.
How does this alter the fact that photons don't experience time
so quantum weirdness -- like Retrocausality -- is inescapable.
Your failure is acknowledged.
It's OK. You're in what, fourth grade? You haven't had the
education necessary to even understand the Dirac equation. Odds are,
you didn't know of its existence until Dawn's post. Because of this,
you can't know how it applies to the discussion.
Now try to divert from the truth. You will because I command it.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Yeppers!-a I can't derive the
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 12/9/2025 3:28 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Mon, 8 Dec 2025 14:40:31 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/8/25 2:15 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Derive the Dirac equation for me from scratch; no Internet & no
cheating.a Present your results here.
How does this alter the fact that photons don't experience time
so quantum weirdness -- like Retrocausality -- is inescapable.
Your failure is acknowledged.
It's OK. You're in what, fourth grade? You haven't had the
education necessary to even understand the Dirac equation. Odds are,
you didn't know of its existence until Dawn's post. Because of this,
you can't know how it applies to the discussion.
Now try to divert from the truth. You will because I command it.
Yeppers! I can't derive the Dirac equation on my own, but I have seen >others do so, and it makes sense!!
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
-aDawn Flood wrote:
Yeppers!-a I can't derive the
So you're pretending to address... what?
I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
going to.
YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience
time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're
pretending to refute what I say... idiot.
We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present
and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This
is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."
This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes
but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described
it.
"He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"
Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh
at you over it later.
NOTE:-a Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening" thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed
Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective
both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH
PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid people can't wrap your head around.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
No, no, and no!!-a The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only
relates to events that are acausal.-a If one event causes another event
On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:
aDawn Flood wrote:
Yeppers!a I can't derive the
So you're pretending to address... what?
I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
going to.
YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience
time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're
pretending to refute what I say... idiot.
We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present
and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This
is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of
Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."
This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes
but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described
it.
"He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"
Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh
at you over it later.
NOTE:a Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening"
thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed
Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective
both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another
perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH
PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid
people can't wrap your head around.
No, no, and no!! The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only
relates to events that are acausal. If one event causes another event,
then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event
A' came *before* 'Event B'.
Do you understand this??
Being right has NEVER been his goal.
So you're NOT pretending to be a narcissist.
I tried in the past
On 12/11/25 4:24 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
No, no, and no!!-a The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only
relates to events that are acausal.-a If one event causes another event
It's actually all about reference frame.
From our reference frame, the effect precedes the cause but only inside
of our reference frame. If we assume the reference frame of the photon
they happen simultaneously.
In the experiment referenced above (See subject line), The information
isn't even known until after the fact. That alone will satisfy whatever nonsense you Googled and are now misunderstanding.
But this is inescapable and it's not the only example of the photon
breaking our rules of nature. I've only pointed this out numerous times
which means I can look forward to continue pointing it out without you
once ever getting it:
"Spooky Action at a Distance."
It's nothing more than another illustration of the photon and the consequences of it not experiencing time. That's all. And as before,
it breaks our rules but only because the rules of the photon do not
fit into our idea of reality.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 12/11/25 4:22 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
-a-a-a-a-a I tried in the past
Expectations were not high.
Photons don't experience time. They violate our rules of
existence. It's impossible for them not to, as they don't
experience time (or even distance) and we do.
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
"Spooky Action at a Distance."
It's nothing more than another illustration of the photon and the
consequences of it not experiencing time. That's all. And as before,
it breaks our rules but only because the rules of the photon do not
fit into our idea of reality.
No!-a What you are describing
Did you know that you can have a radio without any external electricity (battery, A/C outlet, hand crank, solar, etc.) to power it?!
On 12/12/25 10:11 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
"Spooky Action at a Distance."
It's nothing more than another illustration of the photon and the
consequences of it not experiencing time. That's all. And as before,
it breaks our rules but only because the rules of the photon do not
fit into our idea of reality.
No!a What you are describing
I'm describing the fact that photons don't experience time. This is
why we have "Spooky Action at a Distance."
According to our rules, the speed of light, C, is a universal speed
limit and nothing can travel faster. Yet if you measure one photon
it's entangled pair INSTANTLY reacts regardless of distance -- breaking
our universal speed limit. This is because time does not exist for the >photon, and hence neither does space.
This isn't a "Paradox." This is an inescapable consequence of not >experiencing time.--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
I honestly have no way to account for your difficulty with such a simple >concept, except to conclude that you are either mentally retarded or
perhaps brain damaged.
...chemically inhibited?
Drugs? Lots of drugs? Lots & lots of drugs?
The concept is valid for massive particles as well as photons.
It is instantaneous, but it can't be used to send messages or other
forms of information
On 12/12/25 5:53 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
The concept is valid for massive particles as well as photons.
*Sigh*
No matter the sock puppet, never any reading comprehension...
Speed of light. Photons do not experience the speed of light and
as an inescapable consequence entangled photons are always in the
same place, and it's always the same time for both.
It is instantaneous, but it can't be used to send messages or other
forms of information
There goes quantum computing!
How does that relate to quantum entanglement in, say, electrons with different spins?
On 12/12/25 11:14 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
How does that relate to quantum entanglement in, say, electrons with
different spins?
Why? What answer changes anything I've said?
Photons don't have time or space. We do. So for us there's all this
strange quantum funkiness that just plain never exists for the photon.
And it's how we get Retrocausality.
On 12/12/25 2:17 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Did you know that you can have a radio without any external
electricity (battery, A/C outlet, hand crank, solar, etc.) to power it?!
Yes.
Photons still don't experience time. As an inescapable consequence,
they violate our rules of existence.
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
On 12/12/25 10:11 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
"Spooky Action at a Distance."
It's nothing more than another illustration of the photon and the
consequences of it not experiencing time. That's all. And as before,
it breaks our rules but only because the rules of the photon do not
fit into our idea of reality.
No!-a What you are describing
I'm describing the fact that photons don't experience time. This is
why we have "Spooky Action at a Distance."
According to our rules, the speed of light, C, is a universal speed
limit and nothing can travel faster. Yet if you measure one photon
it's entangled pair INSTANTLY reacts regardless of distance -- breaking
our universal speed limit. This is because time does not exist for the photon, and hence neither does space.
This isn't a "Paradox." This is an inescapable consequence of not experiencing time.
I honestly have no way to account for your difficulty with such a simple concept, except to conclude that you are either mentally retarded or
perhaps brain damaged.
-a-a-a-a-a ...chemically inhibited?
Drugs? Lots of drugs? Lots & lots of drugs?
No, Honey, that is
No matter the sock puppet, never any reading comprehension...
On 12/12/25 4:36 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:24:31 -0600, Dawn Flood
<Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:
aDawn Flood wrote:
Yeppers!a I can't derive the
So you're pretending to address... what?
I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
going to.
YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience
time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're
pretending to refute what I say... idiot.
We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present
and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This
is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of
Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."
This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes
but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described >>>> it.
"He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"
Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh
at you over it later.
NOTE:a Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening" >>>> thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed
Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective
both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another
perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH
PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid >>>> people can't wrap your head around.
No, no, and no!! The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only >>>relates to events that are acausal. If one event causes another event, >>>then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event >>>A' came *before* 'Event B'.
Do you understand this??
John probably doesn't understand. He has claimed he's not yet 10
years of age, so he isn't too likely to have been taught. But he
doesn't care.
Being right has NEVER been his goal. Simply using 'argumentum ad >>hominem' seems to be his only motive and goal.
It's a discussion group, you demented twat.
Then youAlways about me yet I have never acquiesced to your desire
Thank you
You seem to believe that quantum entanglement is restricted to
photons.
On 12/13/25 10:21 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
No, Honey, that is
Me:-a "Oh, look, here's an experiment that demonstrates Retrocausality."
Spasm:-a "No I watched a Youtube video and misunderstood a webpage!"
Me:-a "Oops, the experiment is still there."
Spasm:-a "No you made it up plus you lie & stuff cus I misunderstood something.
Me: "Okay, the experiment is still there."
Spasm:-a "No impossible & stuff!"
Me:-a "Great. The experiment is still there."
On 12/13/25 12:41 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
You seem to believe that quantum entanglement is restricted to
photons.
Look. You're a raging narcissist
cowering behind a bevy of sock
puppets so you don't know what I said. And I'll remind you now
but it won't do any good because exposing your repeated errors
simply triggers A STRONGER narcissistic reaction/defense...
Photons are one of the only two things I mentioned, the other
being the proposed Tachyons.
And look up at the subject line. Copy & paste it into Google.
It's correct that final word but it will get you there: Your
"Cite" that was never missing.
You goddamn Tim Walz...
The link that I posted was from a PhD physicist.
Weren't you just recently accusing someone of wanting to drink your
saliva?
On 12/13/25 4:57 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
Weren't you just recently accusing someone of wanting to drink your
saliva?
You do want to.
And given your, um, your "State" of existence, I
don't blame you one bit.
So, again, I raised the example of an experiment that demonstrates >Retrocausality. And you went mental.
Again, don't blame you, mostly blame your parents but, there it is.
On 12/13/25 1:11 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 20:51:42 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
No matter the sock puppet, never any reading comprehension...
Then you should cease using them.
Always about me
On 12/13/25 1:11 PM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2025 08:12:36 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/12/25 4:36 AM, Kenito Benito wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:24:31 -0600, Dawn Flood >>>><Dawn.Belle.Flood@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/10/2025 3:22 PM, JTEM wrote:
aDawn Flood wrote:
Yeppers!a I can't derive the
So you're pretending to address... what?
I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
going to.
YOU are pretending to address the fact that photons don't experience >>>>>> time. And it is a fact, and you even acknowledged it. Yet you're
pretending to refute what I say... idiot.
We do experience time. For us, there is a past, there is a present >>>>>> and there is a future. Photons don't experience time and we do. This >>>>>> is why photons break all our rules of nature, as in the case of
Retrocausality or "Quantum Strangeness at a Distance."
This actually translates to The Multiverse, which Einstein describes >>>>>> but doesn't name so idiots can't comprehend that he said it, described >>>>>> it.
"He didn't use that word so he never talked about it!"
Google & misunderstand Simultaneity. Take your time. We can laugh
at you over it later.
NOTE:a Einstein's Simultaneity and the famous "Train hit by lightening" >>>>>> thought experiment is illustrating Retrocausality in the Delayed
Choice Quantum Entanglement experiment in that from one perspective >>>>>> both lightening bolts happen at the exact same time, and from another >>>>>> perspective one of them happens FIRST and then the other. BOTH
PERSPECTIVES ARE RIGHT! BOTH ARE REAL! That is the part that you stupid >>>>>> people can't wrap your head around.
No, no, and no!! The thought experiment by Professor Einstein only >>>>>relates to events that are acausal. If one event causes another event, >>>>>then ***ALL*** observers in our entire Universe will agree that 'Event >>>>>A' came *before* 'Event B'.
Do you understand this??
John probably doesn't understand. He has claimed he's not yet 10 >>>>years of age, so he isn't too likely to have been taught. But he >>>>doesn't care.
Being right has NEVER been his goal. Simply using 'argumentum ad >>>>hominem' seems to be his only motive and goal.
It's a discussion group, you demented twat.
Thank you for proving me 100% correct. You are dismissed.
It's not about me,
On 12/13/25 3:57 PM, Dawn Flood wrote:
The link that I posted was from a PhD physicist.
So you're pretending that he's the only one and everyone agrees
with him, or at least nobody out ranks him -- being the only
person EVER to hold a Phd -- and that's your final answer?
Honestly, WHY aren't you asking your nurse to look over these
things before you post them? Would sabe you a lot of
embarrassment...
I'll give you a hint, and you go put on your Einstein Cap and
try & figure out what it means:
The people who came up with the experiment I referenced hold
WHAT degree? Is it a Phd or a Sponge Bob Squarepants certificate
of Crabby Patties?
Go on, sparky, take a wild stab at it...
But you see, speaking rhetorically:-a You have no clue even how
to BEGIN to question any topic. "Guy has Phd!" Yeah, as if they're
the only one... Sheesh!
Think more, act out with your various mental disorders less.
Have a nice day.
Please CITE a SINGLE physicist who agrees with you!
Again, you
You'veIt's not about me. That's your mental illness(es) at work, as
Sounds like some homosexual fantasy.
And given your, um, your "State" of existence, I
don't blame you one bit.
That's really nauseating.
More from the article I posted that
On 12/14/25 10:56 AM, Dawn Flood wrote:
Please CITE a SINGLE physicist who agrees with you!
How about the ones who came up with the test, or the one whose
work they based it on?
Moron.
Seriously. Even after humiliating you for this exact type of
insane tunnel vision, you do it again!
You don't have to disgrace yourself like this, not every time.
You can run this incredibly stupid remarks of yours by others
first, get some feedback before committing to your insanity.
But that's your narcissism, isn't it?-a You can't admit your
stupidity. You can't deal with the fact that you're stupid.
Some scientific papers
On 12/14/25 12:12 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
Sounds like some homosexual fantasy.
An audio rorschach test!
And given your, um, your "State" of existence, I
don't blame you one bit.
That's really nauseating.
Your state of existence is nauseating.
More from the article I posted that
You're a moron so you forgot the most important part:
How does this article you never read and don't understand make
the Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment go away?
How does it change the results?
You can't remember, your disorder is blocking you, but you're
pretending to address the things I've said. So, how are YOU
are doing that?
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:40:06 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/14/25 12:12 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
Sounds like some homosexual fantasy.
An audio rorschach test!
What a strange activity
"The delayed-choice quantum eraser does not communicate information in
a retro-causal manner because
On 12/14/25 5:29 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:40:06 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/14/25 12:12 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
Sounds like some homosexual fantasy.
An audio rorschach test!
What a strange activity
Your disassociating! Not a surprise...
"The delayed-choice quantum eraser does not communicate information in
a retro-causal manner because
You're a raging jackass, as you constantly prove, but you merely
cherry picked an opposing opinion.
Clearly it's not the only point
of view. If you're having difficulty figuring out what I mean, why
don't you ask yourself "Who came up with the idea for the
experiment in the first place??
HINT: It was designed to demonstrate Retrocausality!
It's the standard interpretation.
On 12/14/25 10:06 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
[--Troll--]
It's the standard interpretation.
So the experiment designed to demonstrate Retrocausality isn't
allowed to contract some interpretation, cus you think it's
standard.
Well. Totally scientific there...
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 21:49:49 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
So the experiment designed to demonstrate Retrocausality isn't
allowed to contract some interpretation, cus you think it's
standard.
What do you mean by that?
On 12/16/25 12:02 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 21:49:49 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
So the experiment designed to demonstrate Retrocausality isn't
allowed to contract some interpretation, cus you think it's
standard.
What do you mean by that?
It's a mystery.
And you express typical narcissistic behavior with
every post, every sock puppet.
A mystery even to you
On 12/17/25 12:16 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
A mystery even to you
No. I have reading comprehension & retention. And even if I
didn't
I know how to look at older posts. This is all well
above your pay grade, obviously.
So Retrocausality is demonstrated in the cited experiment.
And this sent you spiraling into a tizzy, and I think that's
funny.
In other words
On 12/17/25 11:39 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
In other words
I could spell it out for you 10 different ways
and your massive
personality disorder would still prevent you from comprehending...
Okay, so the referenced experiment was designed to demonstrate >retrocausality, and this triggered you, sent you into a tizzy.
Why?
You're constantly move backwards & forwards in time, maybe by
centuries, from other reference points in the universe. Same
universe, vastly different reference points...
Why did this one experiment cause you to lose bladder control?
And yet it was you
On 12/21/25 6:13 PM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
And yet it was you
Not about me, honey.
Your mental illness is all about you.
So I tried rephrasing this, breaking through your mental..
mental.. your.. shall we say "Issues?"
Anyway, I asked you to accept what you already accepted,
that photons don't experience time, and I asked you to
think of some ways how that would mess us up in our
observations. And you... you... what?
You switched handles and acted out emotionally again.
But try it: WE experience. WE do. But not the photon.
So what are some of the ways that this difference in
perspective would have manifest, from our point of view?
I'll spell out one thing, to help you get going, but it
won't work. You're too far gone to think.
Anyhow:
"Spooky action at a distance."
To us, entangled particles share "Information" faster than
the speed of light. Because we exist in time and photons
don't. To the photon, it takes exactly the same amount of
time for it to reach Mars as it does to reach all the
other galaxies we can see, which is no time at all.
Instantly!
So "Spooky action at a distance" is one way that the differing
perspectives would manifest.
What are some other ways?
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
On 12/22/25 2:30 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
Lol! The mask is gone! We see the malicious, dirty little
malcontent!
Look. You're a classic narcissist and this fact shine through
all your alters. You've been exposed as a fool
and you can't
accept this, so you're trying to distract.
It's not working.
Photons don't experience time so they don't follow our rules.
One rule is faster-than-light communication and another is
Retrocausality.
Take your meds, accept the fact that you're a sniveling little
runt of an "Intellect"
and go play with your poo.
Good luck with that!
On 12/22/25 2:30 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
Lol! The mask is gone!
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:41:00 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/22/25 2:30 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
So youSwitching handles, avoiding the topic... revealing your
Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:41:00 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:
On 12/22/25 2:30 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
This is proof that you're a mentally ill sock puppet. You're far too
much of a pussy to risk public exposure for this like homophobia!
No, you're just a twisted little freak
triggered over the fact that
photons don't experience time, so they do things that don't seem
right to us -- even impossible -- because we do experience time.
One thing they do is appear to break the rules of faster-than-light >communication, with their "Spooky Action at a Distance."
They aren't
doing ANYTHING "Faster" because "Faster" is a product of duration, and >without time there is no duration.
You can't grasp this at all, can you? No. Of course not. This is why
you're spazzing out...
Anyway, talk to your shrink. Get your lithium upped.
Good luck with that!
Kenito Benito wrote:
On Tue, 23 Dec 2025 23:41:00 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Switching handles,
On 12/22/25 2:30 AM, Vincent Maycock wrote:
On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:33:05 -0500, JTEM <jtem01@gmail.com> wrote:Vincent Maycock wrote:
Not interested, faggot.
Lol! The mask is gone!
So you are gay? OK.
I presumed Vincent was mocking your calling him by a pet name, >>"honey." Turns out, he was spot on.
I don't play your over-the-top narcissism game and I'm never
going to.
Dawn Flood wrote:
You cannot point to a single scientific experiment and/or observation
that supports retrocausality vis-a-vis some sort of "time travel".
"And Isaiah had replied, 'This will be a sign to you from the LORD
that He will do what He has promised: Shall the shadow go forward ten
steps, or go back ten steps?' 'It is easy for the shadow to lengthen
ten steps (i.e. forwards time travel),' answered Hezekiah, 'but not
for it to go back ten steps (i.e. backwards time travel).' So the
prophet Isaiah called out to the LORD, Who brought the shadow back the
ten steps it had descended on the stairway of Ahaz (i.e. backwards
time travel).o (2 Kings 20:9-11 w/ parenthetical clarification)
In the interim, as discussed earlier, I am simply https://WonderfullyHungry.org (Philippians 4:12) for food right now
(Luke 6:21a) and hope you, Dawn, and others reading this, also have a
healthy appetite for food right now too.
So how are you ?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 74 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 52:04:11 |
| Calls: | 1,101 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,339 |
| Messages: | 276,090 |