• Savea rotated image in Gimp

    From pinnerite@pinnerite@gmail.com to alt.os.linux.mint on Mon Dec 15 14:20:48 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    GIMP 2.10.36

    I have been scanning articles from a journal.
    When I opened them in Gimp, reversed the image that was inverted and exported the result, they were still inverted. I cannot remember this being the case in the past.

    I have tried to find a solution via Google but nothing seems to work.

    Alan
    --
    Linux Mint 22.1 kernel version 6.8.0-84-generic Cinnamon 6.4.8
    AMD Ryzen 7 7700, Radeon RX 6600, 32GB DDR5, 2TB SSD, 2TB Barracuda
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Paul@nospam@needed.invalid to alt.os.linux.mint on Mon Dec 15 09:48:53 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    On Mon, 12/15/2025 9:20 AM, pinnerite wrote:
    GIMP 2.10.36

    I have been scanning articles from a journal.
    When I opened them in Gimp, reversed the image that was inverted
    and exported the result, they were still inverted. I cannot remember
    this being the case in the past.

    I have tried to find a solution via Google but nothing seems to work.

    Alan

    Some image formats, have a metadata bit indicating the
    image should be rotated. This applies a rotation
    not captured in the pixmap part.

    The Linux "file" command can tell you something of the image type:

    file mymysterymeat

    JPG file or PNG file or TIFF file and so on.

    Some scanners produce TIF, some produce PDF, and so on.
    There are a few options for what you're looking at right now.

    *******

    Let's make up a strawman for you.

    An image has the pixmap rotated. The metadata says to
    rotate it some more. Alan looks at the image on his
    screen, and due to the "total 360" degrees of rotation,
    Alan attaches it to an email and sends it to a friend.

    The friend comments "why did you send me this upside-down
    image, Alan?". Then, Alan cannot figure out what is amiss,
    as the image looks just dandy on Alans screen.

    The problem in this case, is viewing tools do not
    always honour the metadata rotation bit. Alans viewing tool
    honoured the bit and added the extra rotation, the friend
    of Alan with a less featureful image viewer, the metadata
    bit is ignored.

    I think you can see from my little strawman, that it behooves
    the computer scientist preparing the image, to *remove*
    the metadata rotation, then apply whatever physical rotation
    is really needed. *Then*, when the friend receives the photo,
    it no longer matters whether the friend has an "old" or a "new"
    image viewer, the picture looks the same in all of them and
    it also looks like it did on Alans screen.

    Apple likes to save out images, with metadata rotation asserted.

    Paul
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From pinnerite@pinnerite@gmail.com to alt.os.linux.mint on Mon Dec 15 18:00:23 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    On Mon, 15 Dec 2025 09:48:53 -0500
    Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:

    On Mon, 12/15/2025 9:20 AM, pinnerite wrote:
    GIMP 2.10.36

    I have been scanning articles from a journal.
    When I opened them in Gimp, reversed the image that was inverted
    and exported the result, they were still inverted. I cannot remember
    this being the case in the past.

    I have tried to find a solution via Google but nothing seems to work.

    Alan

    Some image formats, have a metadata bit indicating the
    image should be rotated. This applies a rotation
    not captured in the pixmap part.

    The Linux "file" command can tell you something of the image type:

    file mymysterymeat

    JPG file or PNG file or TIFF file and so on.

    Some scanners produce TIF, some produce PDF, and so on.
    There are a few options for what you're looking at right now.

    *******

    Let's make up a strawman for you.

    An image has the pixmap rotated. The metadata says to
    rotate it some more. Alan looks at the image on his
    screen, and due to the "total 360" degrees of rotation,
    Alan attaches it to an email and sends it to a friend.

    The friend comments "why did you send me this upside-down
    image, Alan?". Then, Alan cannot figure out what is amiss,
    as the image looks just dandy on Alans screen.

    The problem in this case, is viewing tools do not
    always honour the metadata rotation bit. Alans viewing tool
    honoured the bit and added the extra rotation, the friend
    of Alan with a less featureful image viewer, the metadata
    bit is ignored.

    I think you can see from my little strawman, that it behooves
    the computer scientist preparing the image, to *remove*
    the metadata rotation, then apply whatever physical rotation
    is really needed. *Then*, when the friend receives the photo,
    it no longer matters whether the friend has an "old" or a "new"
    image viewer, the picture looks the same in all of them and
    it also looks like it did on Alans screen.

    Apple likes to save out images, with metadata rotation asserted.

    Paul

    Thanks Paul but my problem is simpler.
    Usiung Xsane I scanned 3 pages of a magazine article.
    For the second one I had to rotate the page.

    I loaded them one by one into Gimp to clean them up and re-exported
    them. I rotated the second page before re-exporting it.

    Finally I installed pdfchain and did it using that.

    All the best,
    Alan
    --
    Linux Mint 22.1 kernel version 6.8.0-84-generic Cinnamon 6.4.8
    AMD Ryzen 7 7700, Radeon RX 6600, 32GB DDR5, 2TB SSD, 2TB Barracuda
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2