• Re: Best Backup tool for Home Directory

    From Handsome Jack@jack@handsome.com to alt.os.linux.mint on Sun Nov 30 09:53:01 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:20:39 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 09:07:29 -0000 (UTC), Handsome Jack wrote:

    On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 04:49:49 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence DrCOOliveiro wrote:

    There is another way, and that is to use options like --link-dest to
    create separate point-in-time snapshots with deduping to save space.

    I don't understand the instructions for link-dest either in the "rsync
    --help" command line, or in man.

    First backup:

    rsync -2various-options-+ -2src-dir-+ -2backup-dir-1-+

    Second backup:

    rsync -2various-options-+ --link-dest=-2backup-dir-1-+ -2src-dir-+
    -2backup-dir-2-+

    Now you have backups from two points in time. For restore purposes, each
    one looks like a full backup, even though the second one was created as
    an incremental backup. The --link-dest option means that files that were unchanged share a single copy that is hard-linked into both places,
    saving both storage space and network traffic (if the backup is being
    done over a network).

    You can continue this sequence to save backups from as many points in
    time as you like. To get rid of old backups, just do

    rm -rf -2backup-dir-1-+

    etc.

    Interesting, and now at least I know what "hard link" means. But I don't actually see how it helps. Both this method and the ordinary method still
    have to make a full backup copy of every new file in the live system, and neither have to make copies of files in the live system that are *not*
    new.

    Moreover, both methods retain copies of files that have been moved or
    deleted in the live system since the last backup, so the backup archive
    gets cluttered up with these orphan files. You either have to delete them
    with "--delete", or accept this clutter will continue to grow until you
    decide to make a brand new backup from scratch.

    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From RobH@rob@despammer.com to alt.os.linux.mint on Sun Nov 30 10:48:58 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    On 16/11/2025 08:28, yossarian wrote:
    On 16 Nov 2025 02:45:30 GMT
    Gordon <Gordon@leaf.net.nz> wrote:

    It cost $45 for a lifetime liesence with upgrades included.

    It costs re424,38 :)
    https://store.teejeetech.com/product/baqpaq/#reviews


    -u20.48 now!
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
  • From Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOliveiro?=@ldo@nz.invalid to alt.os.linux.mint on Sun Nov 30 16:22:57 2025
    From Newsgroup: alt.os.linux.mint

    On Sun, 30 Nov 2025 09:53:01 -0000 (UTC), Handsome Jack wrote:

    But I don't actually see how it helps. Both this method and the
    ordinary method still have to make a full backup copy of every new
    file in the live system ...

    This method does an incremental backup, saving both drive space and
    network traffic. The hard links make it look like a full backup for
    restoration purposes.
    --- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2