Sysop: | Amessyroom |
---|---|
Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
Users: | 23 |
Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
Uptime: | 55:24:31 |
Calls: | 584 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 1,139 |
D/L today: |
179 files (27,921K bytes) |
Messages: | 111,829 |
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
. . .--- Synchronet 3.21a-Linux NewsLink 1.2
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as
hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with
Tony if you're not a crook.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as
hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with
Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as >>hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with
Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was
a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a business.
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as >>>>hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with >>>>Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was
a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a >>business.
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a
business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as >>>>hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with >>>>Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was >>a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a >>business.
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a
business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
You received your MBA from Mafia U Graduate School of Corruption, did you?
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as
hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with
Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was >> >>a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a
business.
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a
business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com>:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as >>>>>>>hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with >>>>>>>Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was >>>>>a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a >>>>>business.
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a >>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the >dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled
by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no
match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
https://www.joblo.com/jerry-adler-dies/
Jerry Adler, best known for playing businessman and family
associate Herman "Hesh" Rabkin on The Sopranos, has passed
away. He was 96.
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as
hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with
Tony if you're not a crook.
That Adler spent 4 decades off stage and behind the scenes and was an important production manager is quite interesting.
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com>:
Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com> wrote:
Hesh was a businessman? On his good days, perhaps. He was corrupt as >>>>>>>>hell. Except for the restaurant owner, you don't become friends with >>>>>>>>Tony if you're not a crook.
Usury is a business, no?
It's been made a crime in some states, but Hesh, among other things, was >>>>>>a loanshark. It's the threat of violence or death that makes it not a >>>>>>business.
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a >>>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the >>dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled
by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no
match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
Ooo, another LLM hallucination by the formerly legitimate poster known
as David Carson. Let's note that neither the dictionaries nor linguists exist.
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com>:
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a >>>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the >>dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled
by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no
match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
Ooo, another LLM hallucination by the formerly legitimate poster known
as David Carson. Let's note that neither the dictionaries nor linguists >exist.
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:24:29 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com>:
I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a >>>>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the >>>dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled
by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no >>>match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
Ooo, another LLM hallucination by the formerly legitimate poster known
as David Carson. Let's note that neither the dictionaries nor linguists >>exist.
I note that I became illegitimate at about the same time as I stopped
taking Adam H. Kerman serioiusly. What a coincidence.
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:24:29 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
<ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
Mon, 25 Aug 2025 18:10:24 -0000 (UTC), Mark Shaw <mshaw@panix.com>: >>>>>>>I don't see how illegality and violence makes a business not a >>>>>>>business. But then again IANAL, so who knows?
It was an honest mistake that anyone could have made. There are the >>>>dictionaries that are published for everyone to use, that are compiled >>>>by professional linguists, and those agree with you. But they are no >>>>match for the dictionary that floats around in Adam H. Kerman's head.
Ooo, another LLM hallucination by the formerly legitimate poster known
as David Carson. Let's note that neither the dictionaries nor linguists >>>exist.
I note that I became illegitimate at about the same time as I stopped >>taking Adam H. Kerman serioiusly. What a coincidence.
Well, no. It was when you posterd that specific bit of nonsense. It was >action you took that had nothing to do with me.
Yeah, in the past, I would have responded without making a personal
dig at you from the get-go. And then we would have exchanged three to
five non-personal replies until you told me to go fuck myself. But
I've found this new way of dealing with your errors to be way more
effective. Get used to it.
You boys really, really need to either:
1) Get a room and don't post pix online of what happens there.
or:
2) Killfile each other and be done with it.
Wed, 27 Aug 2025 01:55:35 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote: >>David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
. . .
I note that I became illegitimate at about the same time as I stopped >>>taking Adam H. Kerman serioiusly. What a coincidence.
Well, no. It was when you posterd that specific bit of nonsense. It was >>action you took that had nothing to do with me.
Oh, it was all about you, baby. . . .
You appear to be expecting some kind of rational action(s) from a
pair that got bent out of shape when "Nazi" was used to refer to a
regime that disappears its citizens off the streets without trial.
Thu, 28 Aug 2025 15:00:19 -0000 (UTC), Invalid <invalid@invalid.invalid>:
You appear to be expecting some kind of rational action(s) from a
pair that got bent out of shape when "Nazi" was used to refer to a
regime that disappears its citizens off the streets without trial.
Are you referring to when _you_ used the word Nazi and I asked you,
with all sincerity, to keep it up, and Adam essentially called you a
troll because of your screenname, and I replied to him that I meant
what I said, and then that was the end of it? And you actually
recorded that as both of us getting "bent out of shape" because you
said Nazi?
Are you referring to when _you_ used the word Nazi and I asked you,
with all sincerity, to keep it up, and Adam essentially called you a
troll because of your screenname, and I replied to him that I meant
what I said, and then that was the end of it? And you actually
recorded that as both of us getting "bent out of shape" because you
said Nazi?
invalid@invalid.invalid got it wrong. The word was in the obituary of
the Holocaust survivor; he quoted it but didn't say it in followup to
make an off-topic political point. I then made the obvious point to you
that you had been trolled and were troll feeding someone who couldn't be bothered to comment on the deceased.
Another big win for David Carson! Let us all fete you and place upon
your head this laurel wreath.
In the previous article, Adam H. Kerman <ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
Another big win for David Carson! Let us all fete you and place upon
your head this laurel wreath.
... and hearty handshake!
David Carson <davidc@wa-wd.com> wrote:
Are you referring to when _you_ used the word Nazi and I asked you,
with all sincerity, to keep it up, and Adam essentially called you a
troll because of your screenname, and I replied to him that I meant
what I said, and then that was the end of it? And you actually
recorded that as both of us getting "bent out of shape" because you
said Nazi?
I recorded it as A) You denying that what's currently going on
in the USA is in any way Nazi-adjacent, making you either blind,
lying or a Nazi and B) Kerman having what the kids used to call
"a spazz" because that's pretty much what he does all the time.
Perhaps "bent out of shape" is less applicable to you than "Nazi >[apologist]" while Kerman can have "bent out of shape" all to himself.