From Newsgroup: alt.free.newsservers


probably every page on wikipedia has at least some issues that could use improvement . . . in a perfect world, contributing editors (wikipedians)
are unbiased, unaffiliated, as if dead, living and working off the earth
from their cushy office on a nearby star-planet . . . in a perfect world

wikipedia has many millions of pages and articles in many languages, e.g.
on anonymous remailers (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_remailer) which is overtly biased against anonymous remailers and serves to remind subscribers to a.p.a-s <news:alt.privacy.anon-server> why this newsgroup
exists . . . it's uncensored, thus you'll find everything, pros and cons including wikipedia editors pushing all sorts of anti-anonymous remailer propaganda (troll farm central, promoting pseudonymity around the clock) expressly because, unlike wikipedia, anyone can contribute to this group

so, because wikipedia is obviously controlled by anti-anonymous remailer agents, excerpts from their anonymous_remailer page might be edited here
on apa-sipedia... e.g. this reads like a "confessional booth" transcript:

Remailer abuse and blocking by governments
[icon]
This section needs expansion. You