No one "runs" a newsgroup. Usually people who spam go
after groups with a lot of people. This place is dead. I
bet that deflated that ego of yours.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:26:34 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >>news:MPG.43d1cb21340856a498aafb@usnews.blocknews.net...
How is this leader stopping Spam?
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place.
That has nothing to do with you.
Another lie. When was the last time you posted about fast food? LOL
Becouse of weeding out of many troll's done by me personally.
How did you do that?
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless
if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH
QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the
issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
At the end of the day you still lead nothing.
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:23:50 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:7ivfmkdj43e778v1jruimism55i7q909ne@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:m7h8lk1q2rhseb3q5kqjqaf40s0leia5ba@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:20:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:gdtgjk1otqu7qegh32v2jsu9hbsa9eiv5j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>message
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>keeping
this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved >>>>>>>>>>>>into
spam.
You lead nobody.
Then why hasn't this newsgroup been overrun with spam?
Non sequitur
Answer the question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Non sequitur
that's not an answer.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Look up " Non sequitur"
The deifination of "non sequitur" doesn't matter.
The definition certainly does.
What MATTERS IS, your
dodging the issue at hand by refusing to answer the question.
You're dodging the issue by offering a Non sequitur
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >>QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the issue >>at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
Look up " Non sequitur"
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is, THERE >>>> IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already answered >>that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43f424d91360435d98af3d@usnews.blocknews.net...
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>> if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >>> QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the
issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
At the end of the day you still lead nothing.
That's your opinion. In teh meantime, this newsgroup is alive and thriving >while 99.99999 of newsgroup's have died.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is, THERE >>>>> IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already answered >>>that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1lrkokdntg1v67740qt8ih10c9c084pju2@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:26:34 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >>>news:MPG.43d1cb21340856a498aafb@usnews.blocknews.net...
How is this leader stopping Spam?
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place.
That has nothing to do with you.
Yes it does. I am largely responsible for keeping the discussion flowing >here.
Another lie. When was the last time you posted about fast food? LOL
I post about fast-food alsmost every day. You know that.
Becouse of weeding out of many troll's done by me personally.
How did you do that?
Becouse of my personalized killfiling program, which currently has over 50
name's in it.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
Look up " Non sequitur"I did look it up.
Waiting for you to back up your claim with facts.
Yes it does. I am largely responsible for keeping the discussion flowing here.
IF you knew anything about usenet--
which you do not--
At the end of the day you still lead nothing.That's your opinion.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.A lie. It isn't "run" by anyone.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message news:MPG.43f4253a6c52ecaf98af3e@usnews.blocknews.net...
No one "runs" a newsgroup. Usually people who spam go
after groups with a lot of people. This place is dead. I
bet that deflated that ego of yours.
Excuse me sir, but alt.fast-food is NOT dead.
Your welcome for that, BTW.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:07okokhts4lkegc3fp92gckprq071jb21j@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:23:50 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:7ivfmkdj43e778v1jruimism55i7q909ne@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:m7h8lk1q2rhseb3q5kqjqaf40s0leia5ba@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:20:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:gdtgjk1otqu7qegh32v2jsu9hbsa9eiv5j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>message
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>keeping
this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved >>>>>>>>>>>>into
spam.
You lead nobody.
Then why hasn't this newsgroup been overrun with spam?
Non sequitur
Answer the question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Non sequitur
that's not an answer.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Look up " Non sequitur"
The deifination of "non sequitur" doesn't matter.
The definition certainly does.
What MATTERS IS, your
dodging the issue at hand by refusing to answer the question.
You're dodging the issue by offering a Non sequitur
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >>QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the issue >>at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
Look up " Non sequitur"
I did look it up. The defination of non sequiter is irrelevent. The POINT is, you still haven't answered the question.
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS newsgroup different from the other's?
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is, THERE >>>> IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already answered >>that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1lrkokdntg1v67740qt8ih10c9c084pju2@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:26:34 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >>news:MPG.43d1cb21340856a498aafb@usnews.blocknews.net...
How is this leader stopping Spam?
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place.
That has nothing to do with you.
Yes it does. I am largely responsible for keeping the discussion flowing here.
Another lie. When was the last time you posted about fast food? LOL
I post about fast-food alsmost every day. You know that.
Becouse of weeding out of many troll's done by me personally.
How did you do that?
Becouse of my personalized killfiling program, which currently has over 50 name's in it.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message news:MPG.43f424d91360435d98af3d@usnews.blocknews.net...
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >> if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >> QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the
issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
At the end of the day you still lead nothing.
That's your opinion. In teh meantime, this newsgroup is alive and thriving while 99.99999 of newsgroup's have died.
This one stinks more.
So how does it stay alive when you're not here?
So? Only you can't see them. The group still can.
Wrong. There are many groups still alive.
On 2/24/2026 6:59 PM, Skeeter wrote:
Wrong. There are many groups still alive.
Alt.checkmate is very busy and has /NO/ spam.
marston shores wrote:
On 2/24/2026 6:59 PM, Skeeter wrote:
Wrong. There are many groups still alive.
Alt.checkmate is very busy and has /NO/ spam.
It's not busy.
It's not busy.
It's not busy.
its like a watering hole.. or whatever its called. the animals are not always there.
On 2/26/2026 10:53 AM, jojo wrote:
It's not busy.
its like a watering hole.. or whatever its called. the animals are not
always there.
It;s still busy.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is, THERE >>>>> IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already answered >>>that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:1lrkokdntg1v67740qt8ih10c9c084pju2@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:26:34 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >>>news:MPG.43d1cb21340856a498aafb@usnews.blocknews.net...
How is this leader stopping Spam?
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place.
That has nothing to do with you.
Yes it does. I am largely responsible for keeping the discussion flowing >here.
Another lie. When was the last time you posted about fast food? LOL
I post about fast-food alsmost
every day. You know that.
Becouse of weeding out of many troll's done by me personally.
How did you do that?
Becouse
of my personalized
killfiling
program, which currently has over 50
name's
in it.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43f424d91360435d98af3d@usnews.blocknews.net...
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>> if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >>> QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the
issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
At the end of the day you still lead nothing.
That's your opinion. In teh
meantime, this newsgroup is alive and thriving
while 99.99999 of newsgroup's
have died.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43f4253a6c52ecaf98af3e@usnews.blocknews.net...
No one "runs" a newsgroup. Usually people who spam go
after groups with a lot of people. This place is dead. I
bet that deflated that ego of yours.
Excuse me sir, but alt.fast-food is NOT dead.
Your welcome for that, BTW.
Ask Rev. Larson to rid you of your demon of lying.
Since hells has openly and freely admitted the conviction isn't
mine
Only JESUS can offer salvation.
In article
<XpOdnTqpJrRlZAD0nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.43f4253a6c52ecaf98af3e@usnews.blocknews.net...
No one "runs" a newsgroup. Usually people who spam go
after groups with a lot of people. This place is dead. I
bet that deflated that ego of yours.
Excuse me sir, but alt.fast-food is NOT dead.
Compared to other groups it is.
Your welcome for that, BTW.
Huh? You drinking again?
On 2/26/2026 10:53 AM, jojo wrote:
It's not busy.
its like a watering hole.. or whatever its called. the animals are not
always there.
It;s still busy.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:07okokhts4lkegc3fp92gckprq071jb21j@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:23:50 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:7ivfmkdj43e778v1jruimism55i7q909ne@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:m7h8lk1q2rhseb3q5kqjqaf40s0leia5ba@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:20:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>message >>>>>>>news:gdtgjk1otqu7qegh32v2jsu9hbsa9eiv5j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>>message
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>keeping
this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved >>>>>>>>>>>>>into
spam.
You lead nobody.
Then why hasn't this newsgroup been overrun with spam?
Non sequitur
Answer the question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Non sequitur
that's not an answer.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Look up " Non sequitur"
The deifination of "non sequitur" doesn't matter.
The definition certainly does.
What MATTERS IS, your
dodging the issue at hand by refusing to answer the question.
You're dodging the issue by offering a Non sequitur
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>>if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING TEH >>>QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the issue >>>at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
Look up " Non sequitur"
I did look it up. The defination of non sequiter is irrelevent.
The POINT
is, you still haven't answered the question.
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, >when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS newsgroup >different from the other's?
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place. becouse of teh
the
active participation which is started and and driven by me. Becouse of
weeding out of many troll's done by me personally. The list goes on and
on.
That list is in your mind so it can't go to far. You don't
start threads,
How have "you" personally weeded out these
trolls?
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:16:03 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:07okokhts4lkegc3fp92gckprq071jb21j@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:23:50 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:7ivfmkdj43e778v1jruimism55i7q909ne@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:m7h8lk1q2rhseb3q5kqjqaf40s0leia5ba@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:20:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>news:gdtgjk1otqu7qegh32v2jsu9hbsa9eiv5j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>in
message
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>keeping
this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>into
spam.
You lead nobody.
Then why hasn't this newsgroup been overrun with spam?
Non sequitur
Answer the question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Non sequitur
that's not an answer.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Look up " Non sequitur"
The deifination of "non sequitur" doesn't matter.
The definition certainly does.
What MATTERS IS, your
dodging the issue at hand by refusing to answer the question.
You're dodging the issue by offering a Non sequitur
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>>>if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING >>>>TEH
QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the >>>>issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
Look up " Non sequitur"
I did look it up. The defination of non sequiter is irrelevent.
No, it's not. You did NOT look it up and you have no idea what it
means.
The POINT
is, you still haven't answered the question.
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, >>when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS >>newsgroup
different from the other's?
Waiting for you to back up your claim with facts.
<CRICKETS>
In article
<XpOdnTmpJrRqZAD0nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is,
THERE
IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already
answered
that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
So how does it stay alive when you're not here?
The fact's are obvious. FACT: This newsgroup is not overun with spam and >troll's.
FACT, this is a vibrant, active discussion discussing the topic at
hand.
FACT: other newsgroups, such as alt.checkmate and rec, food cooking,
and many more REGULRALY look to this newsgroup to see how leadership happens >here and to inspire them to do the same in thier newsgroups.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43f425ce9a4aa32398af3f@usnews.blocknews.net...
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place. becouse of teh
the
active participation which is started and and driven by me. Becouse of
weeding out of many troll's done by me personally. The list goes on and >>> on.
That list is in your mind so it can't go to far. You don't
start threads,
Incorrrect.
I satart
threads all the time, probably more then anyone else.
How have "you" personally weeded out these
trolls?
Through my personalized killfiling program, of course.
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, >>>when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS >>>newsgroup
different from the other's?
Waiting for you to back up your claim with facts.
<CRICKETS>
The fact's
are obvious. FACT: This newsgroup is not overun
with spam and
troll's.
FACT, this is a vibrant, active discussion discussing the topic at
hand.
FACT: other newsgroups,
such as alt.checkmate and rec, food cooking,
and many more REGULRALY
look to this newsgroup to see how leadership happens
here and to inspire them to do the same in thier newsgroups.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.440804848dc752c298b0aa@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article
<XpOdnTmpJrRqZAD0nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is,
THERE
IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already
answered
that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
So how does it stay alive when you're not here?
This has already been studied. While it has been awhile since I took a >lenghty
break from the newsgroup, participation GREATLY dipped when I
wasn't here.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message news:MPG.43f425ce9a4aa32398af3f@usnews.blocknews.net...
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place. becouse of teh
the
active participation which is started and and driven by me. Becouse of
weeding out of many troll's done by me personally. The list goes on and >> on.
That list is in your mind so it can't go to far. You don't
start threads,
Incorrrect. I satart threads all the time, probably more then anyone else.
How have "you" personally weeded out these
trolls?
Through my personalized killfiling program, of course.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message news:isurpk1tojfa04l8ha9hruro80nqguqo3e@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Tue, 24 Feb 2026 13:16:03 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>message >>news:07okokhts4lkegc3fp92gckprq071jb21j@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:23:50 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>message >>>>news:7ivfmkdj43e778v1jruimism55i7q909ne@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>> On Wed, 14 Jan 2026 13:07:22 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>message >>>>>>news:m7h8lk1q2rhseb3q5kqjqaf40s0leia5ba@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:20:36 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>message >>>>>>>>news:gdtgjk1otqu7qegh32v2jsu9hbsa9eiv5j@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksucking.dwarf.com...
On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 13:02:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>>>>>>>>in
message
The people of this newsgroup, obiousvly, for the purpose of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>keeping
this
newsgroup relevant.
Unlike the majority of other newsgroup's that have de-volved >>>>>>>>>>>>>>into
spam.
You lead nobody.
Then why hasn't this newsgroup been overrun with spam? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Non sequitur
Answer the question!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Non sequitur
that's not an answer.
ANSWER THE QUESTION.
Look up " Non sequitur"
The deifination of "non sequitur" doesn't matter.
The definition certainly does.
What MATTERS IS, your
dodging the issue at hand by refusing to answer the question.
You're dodging the issue by offering a Non sequitur
Your dodging the issue by refusing to answer the question. Irregardless >>>>if
it's a non-sequitor, you could PROVE it's a non-sequitor by ANSWERING >>>>TEH
QUESTION which you AREN'T doing, meaning YOU are the one dodging the >>>>issue
at hand meanwhile I am attacking it straight on.
Look up " Non sequitur"
I did look it up. The defination of non sequiter is irrelevent.
No, it's not. You did NOT look it up and you have no idea what it
means.
The POINT
is, you still haven't answered the question.
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, >>when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS >>newsgroup
different from the other's?
Waiting for you to back up your claim with facts.
<CRICKETS>
The fact's are obvious. FACT: This newsgroup is not overun with spam and troll's. FACT, this is a vibrant, active discussion discussing the topic at hand. FACT: other newsgroups, such as alt.checkmate and rec, food cooking, and many more REGULRALY look to this newsgroup to see how leadership happens here and to inspire them to do the same in thier newsgroups.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message news:MPG.440804848dc752c298b0aa@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article
<XpOdnTmpJrRqZAD0nZ2dnZfqnPQAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:3orkokph4469b0alpu8imq3a3pc05jrq75@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 9 Feb 2026 15:25:20 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
The FACT is, this newsgroup is NOT overrun by spam. The fact is,
THERE
IS A
REASON FOR THAT.
Your obligation is to answer, WHY????!!!!!
You made the claim that it isn't. So tell us why.
Why isn't the newsgroup overrun with spam? I believe I already
answered
that... becouse it is verywell run newsgroup.
The newsgroup isn't "run" by anyone.
Incorrect. It is run by ME.
So how does it stay alive when you're not here?
This has already been studied. While it has been awhile since I took a lenghty break from the newsgroup, participation GREATLY dipped when I wasn't here.
In article <_dqcnSwI_
7kmqTr0nZ2dnZfqn_EAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.43f425ce9a4aa32398af3f@usnews.blocknews.net...
Becouse of the multiple on-topic threads taking place. becouse of teh >> >> the
active participation which is started and and driven by me. Becouse of >> >> weeding out of many troll's done by me personally. The list goes on and >> >> on.
That list is in your mind so it can't go to far. You don't
start threads,
Incorrrect. I satart threads all the time, probably more then anyone else.
I looked and you are lying.
How have "you" personally weeded out these
trolls?
Through my personalized killfiling program, of course.
How come we can still see them?
The QUESTION IS, why hasn't THIS newsgroup died out and overrun with spam, >> >>when 99.999999% of the other newsgroups HAS BEEN. What makes THIS
newsgroup
different from the other's?
Waiting for you to back up your claim with facts.
<CRICKETS>
The fact's are obvious. FACT: This newsgroup is not overun with spam and >> troll's. FACT, this is a vibrant, active discussion discussing the topic at
hand. FACT: other newsgroups, such as alt.checkmate and rec, food cooking, >> and many more REGULRALY look to this newsgroup to see how leadership happens
here and to inspire them to do the same in thier newsgroups.
Now I know you are drunk.
alt.checkmate would bury you.
Stop lying.
So how does it stay alive when you're not here?
This has already been studied. While it has been awhile since I took a
lenghty break from the newsgroup, participation GREATLY dipped when I
wasn't here.
Because we couldn't slap you around.
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 60 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 04:41:24 |
| Calls: | 813 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 1,289 |
| D/L today: |
8 files (5,275K bytes) |
| Messages: | 213,839 |