"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:61jfnkpbuslfvmicrog1bll2m7mm9btku9@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:00:21 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:qi20mk5v5u3fs8jv18lqftctlspcn7gjlo@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:54:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mr36kk159imnh1j9o40ja9a5lkdim2j0ri@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:57:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:lWn%Q.111155$VIz6.73460@fx12.iad...
At Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:17:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> message
the qourter pounde is not mythincal. I just tasted one today >>>>>>>>> >> for
lunch.
You are, of course, lying. Nobody sells a "qouter pounder." >>>>>>>>>
Klous, I'm sure you think your real cute when you point out there >>>>>>>>> is
no "qourter pounder" but really your just makes you look like a >>>>>>>>> idiot
becouse everyone reading this knows what I mean.
Why are you replying to an article from over a month ago?
You do realize that these message's have no official expiration date? >>>>>>>AS
long as the server still carries, it ANYONE is allowed to to reply to >>>>>>>ANY
message.
Yet you claimed to have "Locked" the "J. Balvin thread."
Were you lying THEN, or NOW?
Locking threads has NOTHING to do with expiring threads, moron. So no I >>>>>wasn't lying at all.
The J. Balvin thread is "open" "unlocked" and "un-expired," moron.
Yes. You were lying.
Incorrect, people have stopped discussing J balvin, effective immediately >>>after I locked teh thread.
Therefore, the thread has been succesfully CLOSED AND LOCKED. As for >>>expiration, I wasn't the one that said it was expired. Usenet has no >>>expiration, as long as the server still carries the message.
Incorrect. WE are STILL discussing it.
That's funny, I'm not seeing anyone discussing it.
I see that you are
discussing that you are discussing it, but I'm not seeing any ACUTAL >DISCUSSION about it.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43e2b453cdc01eaa98ae72@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article
<vPGcna7ObfgcIer0nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message
news:br80mkp8tt54t0cmvcv1dkqikcu7s53elq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:54:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:mr36kk159imnh1j9o40ja9a5lkdim2j0ri@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>> >>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:57:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote in message
news:lWn%Q.111155$VIz6.73460@fx12.iad...
At Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:17:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>>>> in
message
the qourter pounde is not mythincal. I just tasted one today >>> >>>>>> >> for
lunch.
You are, of course, lying. Nobody sells a "qouter pounder."
Klous, I'm sure you think your real cute when you point out there >>> >>>>>> is
no "qourter pounder" but really your just makes you look like a
idiot
becouse everyone reading this knows what I mean.
Why are you replying to an article from over a month ago?
You do realize that these message's have no official expiration date? >>> >>>>AS
long as the server still carries, it ANYONE is allowed to to reply to >>> >>>>ANY
message.
Yet you claimed to have "Locked" the "J. Balvin thread."
Were you lying THEN, or NOW?
Locking threads has NOTHING to do with expiring threads, moron. So no >>> >>I
wasn't lying at all.
You were lying both times. Just as you LIED in the post I'm
replying to.
There is no way to lock a thread.
And yet I have locked the J balvin thread succesfully. people have
stopped
discussing it.
What people? There are what 6 people posting here?
What people? What people you ask? thank you for admitting that nobody is >discussion the J Balvin thread any longer. By asking "what people" are >discussing it.
What people?
That's funny, I'm not seeing anyone discussing it.
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in message >news:61jfnkpbuslfvmicrog1bll2m7mm9btku9@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 13:00:21 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>message >>>news:qi20mk5v5u3fs8jv18lqftctlspcn7gjlo@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com...
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:54:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>message >>>>>news:mr36kk159imnh1j9o40ja9a5lkdim2j0ri@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>>>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:57:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote in message >>>>>>>news:lWn%Q.111155$VIz6.73460@fx12.iad...
At Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:17:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in >>>>>>>>> message
Klous, I'm sure you think your real cute when you point out there >>>>>>>>> isthe qourter pounde is not mythincal. I just tasted one today >>>>>>>>> >> for
lunch.
You are, of course, lying. Nobody sells a "qouter pounder." >>>>>>>>>
no "qourter pounder" but really your just makes you look like a >>>>>>>>> idiot
becouse everyone reading this knows what I mean.
Why are you replying to an article from over a month ago?
You do realize that these message's have no official expiration date? >>>>>>>AS
long as the server still carries, it ANYONE is allowed to to reply to >>>>>>>ANY
message.
Yet you claimed to have "Locked" the "J. Balvin thread."
Were you lying THEN, or NOW?
Locking threads has NOTHING to do with expiring threads, moron. So no I >>>>>wasn't lying at all.
The J. Balvin thread is "open" "unlocked" and "un-expired," moron.
Yes. You were lying.
Incorrect, people have stopped discussing J balvin, effective immediately >>>after I locked teh thread.
Therefore, the thread has been succesfully CLOSED AND LOCKED. As for >>>expiration, I wasn't the one that said it was expired. Usenet has no >>>expiration, as long as the server still carries the message.
Incorrect. WE are STILL discussing it.
That's funny, I'm not seeing anyone discussing it. I see that you are >discussing that you are discussing it, but I'm not seeing any ACUTAL >DISCUSSION about it.
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >news:MPG.43e2b453cdc01eaa98ae72@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article
<vPGcna7ObfgcIer0nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message
news:br80mkp8tt54t0cmvcv1dkqikcu7s53elq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:54:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:mr36kk159imnh1j9o40ja9a5lkdim2j0ri@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>> >>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:57:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote in message
news:lWn%Q.111155$VIz6.73460@fx12.iad...
At Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:17:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>> >>>>>> in
message
the qourter pounde is not mythincal. I just tasted one today >>> >>>>>> >> for
lunch.
You are, of course, lying. Nobody sells a "qouter pounder."
Klous, I'm sure you think your real cute when you point out there >>> >>>>>> is
no "qourter pounder" but really your just makes you look like a
idiot
becouse everyone reading this knows what I mean.
Why are you replying to an article from over a month ago?
You do realize that these message's have no official expiration date? >>> >>>>AS
long as the server still carries, it ANYONE is allowed to to reply to >>> >>>>ANY
message.
Yet you claimed to have "Locked" the "J. Balvin thread."
Were you lying THEN, or NOW?
Locking threads has NOTHING to do with expiring threads, moron. So no >>> >>I
wasn't lying at all.
You were lying both times. Just as you LIED in the post I'm
replying to.
There is no way to lock a thread.
And yet I have locked the J balvin thread succesfully. people have
stopped
discussing it.
What people? There are what 6 people posting here?
What people? What people you ask? thank you for admitting that nobody is >discussion the J Balvin thread any longer. By asking "what people" are >discussing it.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2026 13:24:43 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Skeeter" <invalid@none.com> wrote in message >>news:MPG.43e2b453cdc01eaa98ae72@usnews.blocknews.net...
In article
<vPGcna7ObfgcIer0nZ2dnZfqn_cAAAAA@supernews.com>,
jerrysauk@hotmail.com says...
"Kenito Benito" <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote in message
news:br80mkp8tt54t0cmvcv1dkqikcu7s53elq@4ax.com...
On Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:54:12 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote in
message
news:mr36kk159imnh1j9o40ja9a5lkdim2j0ri@Is.Rudy.Canoza.dead.yet.com... >>>> >>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:57:49 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote in message
news:lWn%Q.111155$VIz6.73460@fx12.iad...
At Sat, 13 Dec 2025 13:17:39 -0600, "Jerry Sauk"
<jerrysauk@hotmail.com> wrote:
"KlausSchadenfreude" <klaus.schadenfreudeREMOVE@gmail.com> wrote >>>> >>>>>> in
message
the qourter pounde is not mythincal. I just tasted one today >>>> >>>>>> >> for
lunch.
You are, of course, lying. Nobody sells a "qouter pounder."
Klous, I'm sure you think your real cute when you point out there >>>> >>>>>> is
no "qourter pounder" but really your just makes you look like a >>>> >>>>>> idiot
becouse everyone reading this knows what I mean.
Why are you replying to an article from over a month ago?
You do realize that these message's have no official expiration date? >>>> >>>>AS
long as the server still carries, it ANYONE is allowed to to reply to >>>> >>>>ANY
message.
Yet you claimed to have "Locked" the "J. Balvin thread."
Were you lying THEN, or NOW?
Locking threads has NOTHING to do with expiring threads, moron. So no >>>> >>I
wasn't lying at all.
You were lying both times. Just as you LIED in the post I'm
replying to.
There is no way to lock a thread.
And yet I have locked the J balvin thread succesfully. people have
stopped
discussing it.
What people? There are what 6 people posting here?
What people? What people you ask? thank you for admitting that nobody is >>discussion the J Balvin thread any longer. By asking "what people" are >>discussing it.
This is the SECOND TIME TODAY you brought it up.
LOL
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY J. BALVIN RESPONSE =========
====== BEGIN STANDARD JENNY J. BALVIN RESPONSE =========
Invincible ignorance fallacy
Jenny knows that J. Balvin's RACE is not Colombian. It is his
NATIONALITY. Saying his RACE is Colombian is as stupid as saying
Jenny's race is American.
====== END STANDARD JENNY J. BALVIN RESPONSE =========
====== END STANDARD JENNY J. BALVIN RESPONSE =========
Why, then, are you discussing it?
Whereas YOU made the claim (LIE)
Jerry's LIE
On 2/18/2026 2:47 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Why, then, are you discussing it?
Why, then, are you running away from your lies about Rev. Larson?
Since hells has openly and freely admitted the conviction isn't
mine
Only JESUS can offer salvation.
On 2/18/2026 2:48 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Jerry's LIE
What of your /LIES/, Kentucci? Still going on the Sea Doo Jet Boat?
Since hells has openly and freely admitted the conviction isn't
mine
Only JESUS can offer salvation.
Whereas I've not lied about Lar$on
On 2/19/2026 2:31 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Whereas I've not lied about Lar$on
You call him an adulterer. Prove it!
Since hells has openly and freely admitted the conviction isn't
mine
Only JESUS can offer salvation.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:17:05 -0700, marston shores <kp@of.fire> wrote:
On 2/19/2026 2:31 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Whereas I've not lied about Lar$on
You call him an adulterer. Prove it!
Matthew 19:9
Luke 16:18
How long have you held the firm belief that Jesus lied?
How long have you held the firm belief that Jesus lied?
Jesus wasn't always on his game.
How long have you held the firm belief that Jesus lied?
You are /NOT/ allowed to quote the Bible.
Since hells has openly and freely admitted the conviction isn't
mine
Only JESUS can offer salvation.
At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 01:23:40 -0800, KenitoBenito <Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:17:05 -0700, marston shores <kp@of.fire> wrote:
On 2/19/2026 2:31 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Whereas I've not lied about Lar$on
You call him an adulterer. Prove it!
Matthew 19:9
Luke 16:18
How long have you held the firm belief that Jesus lied?
1) Did Lar$on just get a divorce, or did he divorce and marry someone
else? It's only the latter that is "adultery" according to Jesus'
teaching.
2) Jesus wasn't always on his game. Witness the Samaritan
woman who he basically calls a dog. (Friggin' bigot.)
He divorced his first wife, and NOT for adultery, then married
another.
Matthew
On Fri, 20 Feb 2026 11:56:55 +0000, "Doc Hammerslack" <dochammerslack@creon.earth> wrote:
At Fri, 20 Feb 2026 01:23:40 -0800, KenitoBenito
<Kenito@Benito.Het> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 19:17:05 -0700, marston shores <kp@of.fire>
wrote:
On 2/19/2026 2:31 AM, KenitoBenito wrote:
Whereas I've not lied about Lar$on
You call him an adulterer. Prove it!
Matthew 19:9
Luke 16:18
How long have you held the firm belief that Jesus lied?
1) Did Lar$on just get a divorce, or did he divorce and marry
someone else? It's only the latter that is "adultery" according to
Jesus' teaching.
He divorced his first wife, and NOT for adultery, then married
another.
2) Jesus wasn't always on his game. Witness the Samaritan
woman who he basically calls a dog. (Friggin' bigot.)
He didn't call the Samaritan woman by the well a dog. He didn't
call her anything derogatory.
That's what Jesus called adultery -- divorcing and remarrying. Do you
think he was right?
| Sysop: | Amessyroom |
|---|---|
| Location: | Fayetteville, NC |
| Users: | 59 |
| Nodes: | 6 (0 / 6) |
| Uptime: | 00:04:31 |
| Calls: | 810 |
| Files: | 1,287 |
| Messages: | 196,198 |